• 中文核心期刊
  • CSCD来源期刊
  • 中国科技核心期刊
  • CA、CABI、ZR收录期刊
YU Y H, CHEN Q W, LI X T, et al. Optimized Proteolysis of Chicken Protein for Food Flavoring [J]. Fujian Journal of Agricultural Sciences,2020,35(1):80−89. DOI: 10.19303/j.issn.1008-0384.2020.01.012
Citation: YU Y H, CHEN Q W, LI X T, et al. Optimized Proteolysis of Chicken Protein for Food Flavoring [J]. Fujian Journal of Agricultural Sciences,2020,35(1):80−89. DOI: 10.19303/j.issn.1008-0384.2020.01.012

Optimized Proteolysis of Chicken Protein for Food Flavoring

More Information
  • Received Date: September 21, 2019
  • Revised Date: October 24, 2019
  •   Objective   The stepwise enzymatic hydrolysis was applied to hydrolyze chicken protein for the preparation of a food flavoring ingredient with improved quality.
      Method  An animal and a compound proteolytic enzyme were used to digest the chicken protein. Free amino acid and peptide contents in the hydrolyzed material were employed as the criteria to initially identify the critical process evaluation parameters based on a single factor Plackett-Burman design. A steepest ascent test was conducted to approximate the maximum response area and arrive at the center point in a response surface experiment. Then, according to the selected indicators for the Box-Behnken experiment, optimized process conditions were determined.
      Result   The selected indicators for the Box-Behnken optimization included the free amino acid and polypeptide contents as well as the flavor scores on the thermal reaction products of the hydrolyzed compounds. The optimal processing conditions were found to include the addition of 0.82% enzymes on the chicken protein substrate, a solid-liquid ratio of 1 4.40, and a reaction duration of 7.26 h to achieve an actual composite evaluation score of 88.97 in comparison to the predicted 89.41. The method was deemed reliable.
      Conclusion  The multi-indicator response surface method effectively optimized the enzymatic proteolysis process of chicken protein materials in producing a high quality flavoring ingredient for food applications.
  • [1]
    孙颖, 张莉莉, 张玉玉, 等. 3种酶解液中游离氨基酸的分析 [J]. 精细化工, 2018, 35(6):1004−1008, 1014.

    SUN Y, ZHANG L L, ZHANG Y Y, et al. Analysis of free amino acids in three kinds of enzymatic hydrolysates [J]. Fine Chemicals, 2018, 35(6): 1004−1008, 1014.(in Chinese)
    [2]
    何蓉蓉, 李怡芳, 李维熙, 等. 鸡汤健康功能的研究现状 [J]. 食品与生物技术学报, 2012, 31(1):17−27. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-1689.2012.01.003

    HE R R, LI Y F, LI W X, et al. Review on health functions of chicken broths [J]. Journal of Food Science and Biotechnology, 2012, 31(1): 17−27.(in Chinese) DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-1689.2012.01.003
    [3]
    ZHUANG M Z, LIN L Z, ZHAO M M, et al. Sequence, taste and umami-enhancing effect of the peptides separated from soy sauce [J]. Food Chemistry, 2016, 206: 174−181. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2016.03.058
    [4]
    SONG H L, XIA L J. Aroma extract dilution analysis of a beef flavouring prepared from flavour precursors and enzymatically hydrolysed beef [J]. Flavour and Fragrance Journal, 2008, 23(3): 185−193. DOI: 10.1002/ffj.1873
    [5]
    陈海涛, 徐晓兰, 张宁, 等. 鸡肉酶解工艺对热反应鸡肉香精香气的影响 [J]. 食品科学, 2013, 34(9):150−154. DOI: 10.7506/spkx1002-6630-201309031

    CHEN H T, XU X L, ZHANG N, et al. Optimal chicken enzymatic hydrolysate for the preparation of chicken flavoring [J]. Food Science, 2013, 34(9): 150−154.(in Chinese) DOI: 10.7506/spkx1002-6630-201309031
    [6]
    张永生, 耿伟涛, 江方, 等. 水解度对热反应鸡肉香精呈味的影响 [J]. 食品科技, 2017, 42(12):270−275.

    ZHANG Y S, GENG W T, JIANG F, et al. Effect of degree of hydrolysis on the taste characteristic of chicken flavor [J]. Food Science and Technology, 2017, 42(12): 270−275.(in Chinese)
    [7]
    肖作兵, 吴旻玲, 牛云蔚. 双指标响应面优化鸡肉酶解工艺 [J]. 中国食品学报, 2016, 16(11):121−128.

    XIAO Z B, WU M L, NIU Y W. Optimization of enzymatic hydrolysis process by dual indicators response surface analysis [J]. Journal of Chinese Institute of Food Science and Technology, 2016, 16(11): 121−128.(in Chinese)
    [8]
    邱燕翔, 陆志鸿, 许守庆, 等. 鸡肉蛋白酶解工艺及水解产物成分研究 [J]. 食品科技, 2017, 42(3):284−287.

    QIU Y X, LU Z H, XU S Q, et al. Optimum technical conditions of chicken hydrolysis and composition of hydrolysate [J]. Food Science and Technology, 2017, 42(3): 284−287.(in Chinese)
    [9]
    侯佰慧, 夏杨毅, 周涛, 等. 鸡肉酶解液制备鸡汤热反应过程中呈味物质的变化 [J]. 食品科学, 2017, 38(14):175−180. DOI: 10.7506/spkx1002-6630-201714027

    HOU B H, XIA Y Y, ZHOU T, et al. Change of taste components in thermal reaction model system containing chicken enzymatic hydrolysate with reaction time [J]. Food Science, 2017, 38(14): 175−180.(in Chinese) DOI: 10.7506/spkx1002-6630-201714027
    [10]
    吴晖, 任尧, 李晓凤. 单酶和双酶分步酶解鸭蛋清蛋白的工艺 [J]. 食品与发酵工业, 2010, 36(11):93−97.

    WU H, REN Y, LI X F. Preparation of bioactive peptides via hydrolysis of duck egg-white protein by single/binary enzymes [J]. Food and Fermentation Industries, 2010, 36(11): 93−97.(in Chinese)
    [11]
    CAI M H, ZHOU X S, SUN X Q, et al. Statistical optimization of medium composition for aspergiolide A production by marine-derived fungus Aspergillus glaucus [J]. Journal of Industrial Microbiology & Biotechnology, 2009, 36(3): 381−389.
    [12]
    侯晓慧, 张金泽, 林静, 等. 植物源α-低聚半乳糖制备工艺条件优化 [J]. 食品与发酵工业, 2014, 40(1):119−123.

    HOU X H, ZHANG J Z, LIN J, et al. Response surface methodology for preparation α-galactooligosaccharide from plants by fermentation [J]. Food and Fermentation Industries, 2014, 40(1): 119−123.(in Chinese)
    [13]
    刘雪飞, 郭端煦, 吕淑霞, 等. 莫海威芽孢杆菌J7产抑菌物质培养基发酵优化 [J]. 中国食品学报, 2018, 18(10):109−119.

    LIU X F, GUO D X, LÜ S X, et al. Fermentation optimization of culture medium for antibacterial material production of Bacillus mojavensis J7 [J]. Journal of Chinese Institute of Food Science and Technology, 2018, 18(10): 109−119.(in Chinese)
    [14]
    中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局, 中国国家标准化管理委员会. GB/T 8314-2013, 茶游离氨基酸总量的测定[S]. 2013.
    [15]
    鲁伟, 任国谱, 宋俊梅. 蛋白水解液中多肽含量的测定方法 [J]. 食品科学, 2005, 26(7):169−171. DOI: 10.3321/j.issn:1002-6630.2005.07.039

    LU W, REN G P, SONG J M. Determination of content of peptides in protein hydrolysates [J]. Food Science, 2005, 26(7): 169−171.(in Chinese) DOI: 10.3321/j.issn:1002-6630.2005.07.039
    [16]
    徐向宏, 何明珠. 试验设计与Design-Expert、SPSS应用[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2010.
    [17]
    朱建平, 胡朝霞, 王艺明. 高级计量经济学导论[M]. 北京: 北京大学出版社, 2009: 73-78.
    [18]
    周涛. 热反应鸡汤呈味物质变化研究[D]. 重庆: 西南大学, 2016.

    ZHOU T. Study on the change of taste components in thermal-reaction chicken soup[D]. Chongqing: Southwest University, 2016. (in Chinese)
    [19]
    LIU Y P, ZHENG P, SUN Z H, et al. Economical succinic acid production from cane molasses by Actinobacillus succinogenes [J]. Bioresource Technology, 2008, 99(6): 1736−1742. DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2007.03.044
    [20]
    梁昌聪, 刘磊, 张建华, 等. 响应面法优化绿色木霉H06产孢培养条件 [J]. 广东农业科学, 2014, 41(19):80−85. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-874X.2014.19.019

    LIANG C C, LIU L, ZHANG J H, et al. Optimization of fermentation conditions for sporulation quantity by Trichoderma viride strain H06 using response surface methodology [J]. Guangdong Agricultural Sciences, 2014, 41(19): 80−85.(in Chinese) DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-874X.2014.19.019
    [21]
    安攀宇, 赵珊, 张淼, 等. 响应面法优化鸡胸肉蛋白酶解工艺 [J]. 肉类研究, 2018, 32(11):22−29.

    AN P Y, ZHAO S, ZHANG M, et al. Optimization of enzymatic hydrolysis of chicken breast proteins by response surface methodology [J]. Meat Research, 2018, 32(11): 22−29.(in Chinese)
  • Related Articles

    [1]LIN Mei, SU Hao, LI Weixin, ZHANG Yi, REN Xiangyun, ZHENG Chunfeng, JU Yanlun, ZHANG Huining. Quality Improvement and brewing optimization for Wine Made from Ziqiu Wild Grapes[J]. Fujian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2024, 39(7): 848-856. DOI: 10.19303/j.issn.1008-0384.2024.07.012
    [2]NI Yuxue, ZHAO Mengqiang, ZHOU Xiaoli, HAN Jian, ZHANG Lijuan, YIN Xing. Effects of Nitrification Inhibitors on N2O and CO2 Emissions of Soil and Yield and Quality of Greenhouse Vegetables[J]. Fujian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 37(3): 381-389. DOI: 10.19303/j.issn.1008-0384.2022.003.014
    [3]WANG Cuili, YANG Shimei, CHEN Zhiguo, XIE Zhongqing, ZHANG Ziqiang. Effects of CO2 and Supplemental LED on Photosynthesis and Quality of Chili Peppers[J]. Fujian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 37(1): 67-73. DOI: 10.19303/j.issn.1008-0384.2022.01.009
    [4]HE Pei-yun, HUANG Xiao-yan, WANG Yu, SHI Zheng, HUANG Kai-feng. Effects of Phosphate Fertilization on Soil Fertility and Plant Morphology, Grain Yield and Quality of Fagopyrum esculentum[J]. Fujian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2019, 34(9): 1003-1008. DOI: 10.19303/j.issn.1008-0384.2019.09.002
    [5]LUO Qing-hua, LI Zhen-zhou, LIN Jun-qing, WANG Yan, ZHOU Liang, HUANG Xiao-yan, HUANG Kai-feng, CHEN Qing-fu. Effects of Nitrogen Application Level on Endogenous Hormones, Yield and Quality of Tartary Buckwheat[J]. Fujian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2019, 34(3): 271-277. DOI: 10.19303/j.issn.1008-0384.2019.03.003
    [6]WEI Cui-hua, XIE Yu, QIN Jian-bin, CHEN Qin. Effect of Fertilizations on Yield and Quality of Anoectochilus roxburghii[J]. Fujian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2015, 30(8): 793-796. DOI: 10.19303/j.issn.1008-0384.2015.08.014
    [7]WANG Yong-hui, CHEN Jian-ping, ZHANG Pei-tong, ZHANG E, CAI Li-wang, GAO Jin. Effect of Phosphorus and Nitrogen Fertilization on Growth,Yield and Quality of Okra Grown on Seashore Saline Soil[J]. Fujian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2015, 30(5): 478-482. DOI: 10.19303/j.issn.1008-0384.2015.05.011
    [8]WANG Rang-jian, YANG Jun, KONG Xiang-rui. Extraction of Genomic DNA and PCR Verification for Processed Tea Products[J]. Fujian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2013, 28(10): 999-1003. DOI: 10.19303/j.issn.1008-0384.2013.10.013
    [9]YOU Xiao-mei, CHEN Chang-song, ZHONG Qiu-sheng, CHEN Zhi-hui, LIN Zheng-he, ZHANG Wen-jin. Preliminary Study on Effects of Nitrogen Fertilization on Yield and Quality of Oolong Tea[J]. Fujian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2012, 27(8): 853-856.
    [10]ZHENG Bao-dong, MENG Peng, ZHENG Jin-gui. Processing juice quality characters of different Prunus mume varieties[J]. Fujian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2005, 20(1): 61-64.
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(14)

    1. 陈露,李青女,郑佳桐,王奕晴,翟俊文,吴沙沙. 兰科植物花期调控技术及分子机理研究进展. 植物遗传资源学报. 2025(01): 1-13 .
    2. 刘贝宁,陈发兴. 多效唑和乙烯利对西克刺桐花芽分化及成花基因表达的影响. 福建农业学报. 2024(04): 427-437 . 本站查看
    3. 李腾基,付志恵,陈鑫,黄洁衔,黄紫钦,张建霞. 不同植物生长调节剂对墨兰成花生理和开花性状的影响. 分子植物育种. 2024(17): 5777-5786 .
    4. 黄洁衔,李腾基,黄紫钦,逯有法,张建霞. 墨兰花芽形态分化及生理特性研究. 北方园艺. 2023(03): 56-63 .
    5. 金洲,卢山,江俊浩,李寿仁,张楠,江晓钰,吴凡. 园艺植物花芽分化影响因素及机理研究进展. 园艺学报. 2023(05): 1151-1164 .
    6. 张超,李彤妤,裴珂,段九菊. 乙炔催花对观赏凤梨糖代谢的影响. 核农学报. 2023(12): 2478-2484 .
    7. 周荣,贺琪馨,陆楚桥. 植物生长调节剂对建兰开花的调控作用研究. 广东农业科学. 2023(09): 165-172 .
    8. 温玥,郝志超,孙天雨,苏淑钗,王湘南. 油茶花芽分化过程中营养物质和内源激素的变化规律. 经济林研究. 2023(04): 31-39 .
    9. 张英杰,李奥,吕云飞,孙纪霞,刘民晓,张京伟,刘学庆,刘晓华,郭文姣,郭对田. 蝴蝶兰成花过程内源激素含量的变化和植物生长调节剂的作用. 热带亚热带植物学报. 2022(01): 104-110 .
    10. 孔兰,林榕燕,樊荣辉,林兵,方能炎,钟淮钦. 杂交兰花瓣类黄酮成分分析及其对花色的影响. 西北植物学报. 2022(10): 1711-1719 .
    11. 段秋笛,杨旭,赵焱,卢丽晶,崔秀伟,梁宏伟. 连香树花芽发育过程中的生理生化特性研究. 湖北农业科学. 2022(22): 89-93 .
    12. 吴洁秋,朱根发,王凤兰,杨凤玺. 竹叶兰花器官发育过程及生理特性研究. 热带作物学报. 2021(01): 140-148 .
    13. 李霖,李婷婷,杨坤,张志忠,吴菁华. 低温抑制中国水仙花芽分化的生理生化机制. 福建农业学报. 2021(04): 412-417 . 本站查看
    14. 董晓晓,别沛婷,袁涛. 3个牡丹品种花芽分化过程形态及叶片碳水化合物质量分数变化. 东北林业大学学报. 2020(07): 34-39 .

    Other cited types(4)

Catalog

    Article Metrics

    Article views (1540) PDF downloads (37) Cited by(18)
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return