Genetic Diversity and Grading by Stone Cell Content of Pyrus pyrifolia
-
摘要:
目的 研究砂梨种质资源石细胞含量特征及其多样性，进一步优化砂梨石细胞含量分级指标。 方法 采用冷冻法检测480份砂梨种质资源石细胞含量，分析其遗传多样性。 结果 480份砂梨资源的石细胞含量呈正偏态分布，为0.043%～2.748%，平均石细胞含量0.706%，变异系数为61.11%，遗传多样性指数为1.95。地方品种、国外引进品种和国内选育品种（品系）不同种质类型的平均石细胞含量分别为0.886%、0.440%和0.400%，变异系数分别为48.82%、48.79%和47.02%，多样性指数分别为1.98、2.00和2.01。地方品种不同省份遗传多样性分析表明，云南地方品种的平均石细胞含量最多（1.239%），变异系数最高（51.07%）；四川地方品种的多样性指数最大（1.90）；浙江地方品种的平均石细胞含量最少（0.595%）；广东地方品种的变异系数最低（14.02%），多样性指数最小（0.95）。国内选育品种（品系）不同区域的遗传多样性分析表明，华东地区选育品种平均石细胞含量最少（0.372%），华中地区选育品种变异系数最低（43.41%），但多样性指数最大（2.04）。 结论 砂梨种质资源石细胞含量性状遗传多样性丰富，地方品种石细胞含量最高（0.886%），国内选育品种（品系）遗传多样性指数最大（2.01）。优化的7级梯度差分级指标更适用于评价砂梨种质的石细胞含量性状，7级标准分级为SC＜0.1%、0.1%≤SC＜0.2%、0.2%≤SC＜0.4%、0.4%≤SC＜0.7%、0.7%≤SC＜1.1%、1.1%≤SC＜1.6%和SC≥1.6%。 Abstract:Objective Diversity and characteristics of Pyrus pyrifolia Nakai were studied according to the stone cell (SC) contents of the germplasms to establish a grading system to facilitate analyzing and classifying the resource. Methods SC content of the sand pear varieties was determined after freezing. A grading system was established based on the genetic diversity of the germplasms on SC content. Results The 480 germplasms under study showed a positive skewness statistic distribution on their SC contents, which ranged from 0.043% to 2.748% with an average of 0.706%, a variation coefficient (VC) of 61.11%, and a genetic diversity index (GDI) of 1.95. The average SC content of the local varieties was 0.886% with a VC of 48.82% and a GDI of 1.98, that of the foreign cultivars 0.440% with a VC of 48.79% and a GDI of 2.00, and that of the selected cultivars (lines) for breeding 0.400% with a VC of 47.02% and a GDI of 2.01. On genetic diversity, among the local cultivars the germplasms from Yunnan Province had the highest SC content of 1.239% and VC of 51.07%; those from Sichuan, the largest GDI of 1.90; those from Zhejiang, the lowest SC of 0.595%; and those from Guangdong, the smallest VC of 14.02% and GDI of 0.95. Of the selected cultivars for breeding, those from eastern China showed the lowest SC of 0.372%, while those from the central region the lowest VC of 43.41% and the highest GDI of 2.04. Conclusion The sand pear varieties investigated under this study exhibited a rich genetic diversity on their SC contents. Of all 480 germplasms, the local varieties had the highest SC content of 0.886% and the selected cultivars for breeding the greatest GDI of 2.01. To streamline the resource classification, 7 grades based on the SC content in the germplasms were established as SC＜0.1%, 0.1%≤SC＜0.2%, 0.2%≤SC＜0.4%, 0.4%≤SC＜0.7%, 0.7%≤SC＜1.1%, 1.1%≤SC＜1.6%, and SC≥1.6%. Their respective descriptive terms were scarce, low, medium low, moderate, moderately high, high, and extremely high on SC content. -
Key words:
- Pyrus pyrifolia /
- stone cell content /
- genetic diversity
-
图 1 480份砂梨种质资源石细胞含量分布频次
Figure 1. Frequency distribution of SC contents of 480 sand pear germplasms
表 1 不同种质类型砂梨石细胞的多样性评价
Table 1. Diversity of sand pear germplasms based on SC content
种质类型
Germplasm type数量
Amount/份平均石细胞含量
Average stone
cell content/%范围
Range/%变异系数
Variation
coefficient/%多样性指数
H'地方品种 Landraces 299 0.886 0.133～2.748 48.82 1.98 国外引进品种 Foreign cultivars 68 0.440 0.052～0.903 48.79 2.00 国内选育品种（品系）China breeding cultivars（lines） 113 0.400 0.043～0.972 47.02 2.01 
下载: 导出CSV
表 2 地方品种不同省份的石细胞含量多样性评价
Table 2. SC content-based diversity of sand pear germplasms from different provinces in China
来源
Origin份数
Amount/份范围
Range/%平均石细胞含量
Average stone cell content/%变异系数
Variation coefficient/%多样性指数
H'福建 Fujian 17 0.203～1.133 0.620 26.80 1.56 广东 Guangdong 15 0.540～1.098 0.820 14.02 0.95 广西 Guangxi 40 0.320～1.848 0.812 27.31 1.49 贵州 Guizhou 18 0.414～1.697 0.966 39.03 1.88 湖北 Hubei 61 0.133～2.748 0.865 49.92 1.82 湖南 Hunan 12 0.483～1.622 0.905 30.85 1.63 江西 Jiangxi 18 0.323～1.157 0.612 21.81 1.25 四川 Sichuan 55 0.242～2.279 1.091 46.46 1.90 云南 Yunnan 22 0.643～2.424 1.239 51.07 1.64 浙江 Zhejiang 17 0.289～0.976 0.595 21.35 1.25 其他 others 24 − − − − 注：其他省24份种质来源于安徽省（4）、河北省（1）、河南省（1）、江苏省（5）、陕西省（1）、山西省（1）、台湾地区（3）和重庆市（8）。其他省份样品因单个省份样品数均小于10份，未评价。
Note: 24 germplasms including 4 from Anhui, one from Hebei, one from Henan, 5 from Jiangsu, one from Shaanxi, one from Shanxi, 3 from Taiwan, and 8 from Chongqing were less than 10 from each locality and not evaluated under this study.
下载: 导出CSV
表 3 国外引进品种不同国家和国内选育品种不同区域的石细胞含量多样性评价
Table 3. SC content-based diversity of cultivars from foreign countries and those selected for breeding from regions in China
种质类型
Germplasm type来源地
Origin份数
Amount/份范围
Range/%平均石细胞含量
Average stone
cell content/%变异系数
Variation
coefficien%多样性指数
H'国外引进品种 Foreign cultivars 日本 Japan 53 0.052-0.903 0.440 50.67 1.97 韩国 Korea 12 0.059-0.757 0.398 54.27 1.79 其他国家 Other countries 3 − − − − 国内选育品种（品系）
China breeding cultivars（lines）华中地区 Central China 56 0.058-0.757 0.393 43.41 2.04 华东地区 Eastern China 35 0.043-0.827 0.372 49.34 1.94 西南地区 Southwest China 13 0.093-0.972 0.483 57.67 1.78 其他地区 Other regions 9 − − − − 注：其他国家3份国外引进品种来源于美国，其他地区9份国内选育品种（品系）来源于东北和华北地区，样品量都少于10份，未评价。
Note: 3 foreign cultivars from the U.S. and 9 selected breeding cultivars from northeast and north China were less than 10 in sample size and not evaluated under this study.
下载: 导出CSV
表 4 砂梨石细胞含量分级指标比较
Table 4. Grading standards for sand pear germplasms based on SC content
分级描述
Descriptors梨石细胞含量分级指标[16]
Grading standards of
pear stone cell content砂梨石细胞含量等差分级
Arithmetic grading of sand
pear stone cell content砂梨石细胞含量梯度差分级
Gradient grading of sand
pear stone cell content分级范围
Range/%资源份数
Amount/份分级范围
Range/%资源份数
Amount/份分级范围
Range/%资源份数
Amount/份极少 Scarce SC＜0.05 1 SC＜0.2 34 SC＜0.1 15 少 Light 0.05≤SC＜0.2 33 0.2≤SC＜0.4 84 0.1≤SC＜0.2 22 较少 Medium light − − 0.4≤SC＜0.6 106 0.2≤SC＜0.4 81 中 Medium 0.2≤SC＜0.5 138 0.6≤SC＜0.8 98 0.4≤SC＜0.7 153 较多 Medium heavy − − 0.8≤SC＜1.0 65 0.7≤SC＜1.1 141 多 Heavy 0.5≤SC＜0.8 150 1.0≤SC＜1.2 37 1.1≤SC＜1.6 47 极多 Extremely heavy SC≥0.8 158 SC≥1.2 56 SC≥1.6 21
下载: 导出CSV
-
[1] 张绍铃, 谢智华. 我国梨产业发展现状、趋势、存在问题与对策建议 [J]. 果树学报, 2019, 36(8):1067−1072.ZHANG S L, XIE Z H. Current status, trends, main problems and the suggestions on development of pear industry in China [J]. Journal of Fruit Science, 2019, 36(8): 1067−1072.(in Chinese) [2] 陈学森, 王楠, 张宗营, 等. 仁果类果树资源育种研究进展Ⅰ: 我国梨种质资源、品质发育及遗传育种研究进展 [J]. 植物遗传资源学报, 2019, 20(4):791−800.CHEN X S, WANG N, ZHANG Z Y, et al. Progress on the resource and breeding of kernel fruits Ⅰ: Progress on the germplasm resources, quality development and genetics and breeding of pear in China [J]. Journal of Plant Genetic Resources, 2019, 20(4): 791−800.(in Chinese) [3] YAN C C, YIN M, ZHANG N, et al. Stone cell distribution and lignin structure in various pear varieties [J]. Scientia Horticulturae, 2014, 174: 142−150. doi: 10.1016/j.scienta.2014.05.018 [4] 艾沙江·买买提, 张校立, 梅闯, 等. ‘库尔勒香梨’果实发育过程中石细胞形成与细胞凋亡的关系研究 [J]. 果树学报, 2020, 37(1):59−67.AISAJIANG M, ZHANG X L, MEI C, et al. Study on the relationship between the stone cell formation and apoptosis during the fruit development of ‘Kuerlexiangli’ pear [J]. Journal of Fruit Science, 2020, 37(1): 59−67.(in Chinese) [5] 乔勇进, 张绍铃, 陶书田, 等. 梨果实石细胞发育机理的研究进展 [J]. 果树学报, 2005(4):367−371.QIAO Y J, ZHANG S L, TAO S T, et al. Advances in research on developing mechanism of stone cells in pear fruit [J]. Journal of Fruit Science, 2005(4): 367−371.(in Chinese) [6] CHOI J H, CHOI J J, HONG K H, et al. Cultivar differences of stone cells in pear flesh and their effects on fruit quality [J]. Hortic Environ Biotechnol, 2007, 48: 17−31. [7] TAO S T, KHANIZADEH S, ZHANG H, et al. Anatomy, ultrastructure and lignin distribution of stone cells in two Pyrus species [J]. Plant Science, 2009, 176(3): 413−419. doi: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2008.12.011 [8] 聂敬全, 蔡永萍, 张士鸿, 等. 砀山酥梨果实石细胞与薄壁细胞发育关系的解剖学研究 [J]. 园艺学报, 2009, 36(8):1209−1214. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0513-353X.2009.08.018NIE J Q, CAI Y P, ZHANG S H, et al. The anatomic study on relationship of stone cells and parenchyma cells during fruit development of Pyrus bretschneideri [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2009, 36(8): 1209−1214.(in Chinese) doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0513-353X.2009.08.018 [9] 曹玉芬, 田路明, 李六林, 等. 梨品种果肉石细胞含量比较研究 [J]. 园艺学报, 2010, 37(8):1220−1226.CAO Y F, TIAN L M, LI L L, et al. Comparison studies on the stone cell content in flesh of pear cultivars [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2010, 37(8): 1220−1226.(in Chinese) [10] 田路明, 董星光, 曹玉芬, 等. 梨属植物果肉和石细胞团木质素相关性分析 [J]. 西南农业学报, 2017, 30(9):2091−2096.TIAN L M, DONG X G, CAO Y F, et al. Correlation of flesh in Pyrus fruit with its stone cells lignin [J]. Southwest China Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2017, 30(9): 2091−2096.(in Chinese) [11] CHENG X, LI M L, LI D H, et al. Characterization and analysis of CCR and CAD gene families at the whole-genome level for lignin synthesis of stone cells in pear (Pyrus bretschneideri) fruit [J]. Biology Open, 2017, 6(11): 1602−1613. doi: 10.1242/bio.026997 [12] CHENG X, ZHANG J Y, WANG H, et al. Effects of metaxenia on stone cell formation in pear (Pyrus bretschneideri) based on transcriptomic analysis and functional characterization of the lignin-related gene PbC4H2 [J]. Forests, 2020, 11(1): 53. doi: 10.3390/f11010053 [13] GONG X, XIE Z H, QI K J, et al. PbMC1a/1b regulates lignification during stone cell development in pear (Pyrus bretschneideri) fruit [J]. Horticulture Research, 2020, 7: 59. doi: 10.1038/s41438-020-0280-x [14] ZHAO S G, ZHANG J G, ZHAO Y P, et al. New discoveries of stone cell differentiation in fruitlets of ‘Yali’ pears (Pyrus bretschneideri Rehd.) [J]. J. Food Agric. Enviro, 2013, 11: 937−942. [15] 聂继云, 李静, 杨振锋, 等. 冷冻法测定梨的石细胞含量 [J]. 果树学报, 2006(1):133−135.NIE J Y, LI J, YANG Z F, et al. Study on the conditions for measuring stone cell content in pear flesh by freezing method [J]. Journal of Fruit Science, 2006(1): 133−135.(in Chinese) [16] 曹玉芬, 刘凤之, 胡红菊, 等. 梨种质资源描述规范和数据标准[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2006: 79. [17] LI X L, LIU L, MING M L, et al. Comparative transcriptomic analysis provides insight into the domestication and improvement of pear (P. pyrifolia) fruit [J]. Plant Physiology, 2019, 180(1): 435−452. doi: 10.1104/pp.18.01322 [18] 滕元文. 梨属植物系统发育及东方梨品种起源研究进展 [J]. 果树学报, 2017, 34(3):370−378.TENG Y W. Advances in the research on phylogeny of the genus Pyrus and the origin of pear cultivars native to East Asia [J]. Journal of Fruit Science, 2017, 34(3): 370−378.(in Chinese) [19] 张绍铃, 钱铭, 殷豪, 等. 中国育成的梨品种(系)系谱分析 [J]. 园艺学报, 2018, 45(12):2291−2307.ZHANG S L, QIAN M, YIN H, et al. Pedigree analysis of pear varieties(lines)bred in China [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2018, 45(12): 2291−2307.(in Chinese) [20] 崔艳波, 陈慧, 乐文全, 等. ‘京白梨’与‘鸭梨’正反交后代果实性状遗传倾向研究 [J]. 园艺学报, 2011, 38(2):215−224.CUI Y B, CHEN H, LE W Q, et al. Studies on genetic tendency of truit characters in reciprocal crosses generation between ‘Jingbaili’ and ‘Yali’ pear cultivars [J]. Horticulturae Sinica, 2011, 38(2): 215−224.(in Chinese) [21] XUE Y S, XU S Z, XUE C, et al. Pearprocess: A new phenotypic tool for stone cell trait evaluation in pear fruit [J]. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2020, 19(6): 1625−1634. doi: 10.1016/S2095-3119(20)63193-8 [22] XUE C, YAO J L, QIN M F, et al. PbrmiR397a regulates lignification during stone cell development in pear fruit [J]. Plant Biotechnology Journal, 2019, 17(1): 103−117. doi: 10.1111/pbi.12950 [23] WANG X Q, LIU S Q, LIU C, et al. Biochemical characterization and expression analysis of lignification in two pear (Pyrus ussuriensis Maxim.) varieties with contrasting stone cell content [J]. Protoplasma, 2020, 257(1): 261−274. doi: 10.1007/s00709-019-01434-7 -
点击查看大图
图(1) / 表(4)
计量
- 文章访问数: 863
- HTML全文浏览量: 216
- PDF下载量: 13
- 被引次数: 0
