• 中文核心期刊
  • CSCD来源期刊
  • 中国科技核心期刊
  • CA、CABI、ZR收录期刊

林间花绒寄甲种群快速提升的影响因素研究

陈元生, 黄建林, 罗致迪, 范海元

陈元生,黄建林,罗致迪,等. 林间花绒寄甲种群快速提升的影响因素研究[J]. 福建农业学报,2025,X(3) :1−9.
引用本文: 陈元生,黄建林,罗致迪,等. 林间花绒寄甲种群快速提升的影响因素研究[J]. 福建农业学报,2025,X(3) :1−9.
CHEN Y S,HUANG J L,LUO Z D,et al. Conditions to Rapidly Increase Dastarcus helophoroides Population in Pine Forest[J]. Fujian Journal of Agricultural Sciences,2025,X(3) :1−9.
Citation: CHEN Y S,HUANG J L,LUO Z D,et al. Conditions to Rapidly Increase Dastarcus helophoroides Population in Pine Forest[J]. Fujian Journal of Agricultural Sciences,2025,X(3) :1−9.

林间花绒寄甲种群快速提升的影响因素研究

基金项目: 

江西省重点研发计划项目(20192BBF60017);江西省林业科技创新项目(创新专项〔2023〕22号、〔2018〕17号)

详细信息
    作者简介:

    陈元生(1967 — ),男,教授,博士,主要从事昆虫生物学和森林病虫害防治研究,E-mail:cys0061@163.com

  • 中图分类号: Q968.2; S763

Conditions to Rapidly Increase Dastarcus helophoroides Population in Pine Forest

  • 摘要:
    目的 

    林间释放花绒寄甲控制松褐天牛防治松材线虫病具有持效、长效控制作用,为探寻找影响林间花绒寄甲种群数量积累、快速提升的关键因素,于2020~2023 年在江西部分疫区开展“疫木不砍伐或不清除仅释放花绒寄甲”试验。

    方法 

    通过花绒寄甲亲本来源、体型大小、室内繁育世代数(活性)、释放比率、释放次数等对比试验,调查分析这些因子对林间花绒寄甲种群密度提升的影响。

    结果 

    疫木不清理有利于林间花绒寄甲种群数量的迅速积累,而采用现砍现烧的疫木处理方式,则不利于花绒寄甲种群数量积累;在疫木不清理的条件下,释放当地花绒寄甲种源、释放室内繁育世代数低(即活性强的F3代)的亲本、释放体型更大的个体于林间,释放比率1∶1(松褐天牛侵入孔数∶花绒寄甲成虫数)、释放3次(即连续3年,每年3月释放1次),这些措施的综合应用,即能显著、快速提升林间花绒寄甲种群密度,4年间可提升426.16%~706.23%,是释放前的5.26~8.06倍。这些因素综合分析表明,疫木处理方式是影响林间花绒寄甲快速提升的最重要因素。

    结论 

    释放的花绒寄甲本身特性[包括其亲本来源、体型大小、室内繁育世代数(活性)]、人工释放技术(包括释放时间、释放比率、释放次数)及疫木处理方式等,是影响林间花绒寄甲种群数量积累、快速提升的关键因素,可为林业生产上应用花绒寄甲防治松褐天牛控制松材线虫病提供科学依据。

    Abstract:
    Objective 

    Factors conducive to rapid rise and maintain the Dastarcus helophoroides population for a sustainable, long-term control of pine wood nematode disease in a forest were analyzed.

    Method 

    Experiments were conducted in nematode-infected areas in Jiangxi Province by releasing D. helophoroides without cutting down or clearing diseased trees were conducted from 2020 to 2023. Impacts of the body size and indoor breeding generations (activity) of D. helophoroides as well as the rate and frequency of the release on the insect density and disease control at the sites were monitored.

    Result 

    Both the increase rate and accumulation of D. helophoroides populations were significantly encouraged by not clearing the infected woods or cutting and burning the diseased trees at the sites. Thus, under the conditions, various D. helophoroides release measures were implemented. It was found that the release of the local species from parents with low indoor breeding generations (i.e., the highly active F3 generation) and large body at a rate of 1∶1 (i.e., number of nematode invasion holes on trees by Monochamus alternatus : number of D. helophoroides adults) once in March for 3 consecutive years significantly rose the insect density by 426.16-706.23% in 4 years. The increase was 5.26 to 8.06 times higher than without the release.

    Conclusion 

    The experimented method significantly increased D. helophoroides population at the sites. The application conditions included, in addition to not clearing, cutting, or burning the diseased trees at the sites, releasing the local D. helophoroides of specific parental source, body size, and indoor breeding generations (activity) at the specified time, rate, and frequency. The implementation significantly accelerated the increase of the insect population and effectively helped control the pine wilt disease spread by M. alternatus infestation in the forest.

  • 图  1   各试验处理对花绒寄甲密度提升率影响的比较

    图中不同大写字母表示差异显著(P<0.01)。

    Figure  1.   Effect of experimental method on insect density at test sites

    Data with different capital letters indicate significant difference at P<0.01.

    表  1   试验地点、时间及试验处理基本情况

    Table  1   Experimentation sites, time, and basic information

    地点
    Location code
    处理组数
    Number of
    processing groups
    试验区面积
    Test area/hm2
    树高
    Tree height/m
    胸径
    DBH/cm
    试验前的疫木处理方式
    Treatment of Phytophthora
    before the test
    试验项目
    Experimental project
    NK 3 16.31 7.06 9.13 CB 释放比率试验
    Release ratio test
    WA 4 39.08 9.43 11.24 NT 繁育世代数试验
    Breeding generations test
    XJ 2 11.07 7.95 12.72 CB 疫木处理试验
    Epidemic wood treatment test
    YF 5 35.13 8.07 11.92 CB 释放次数、种源试验
    Release frequency and natural enemy source test
    XF 4 31.44 9.87 11.69 CB 体型试验
    Individual size test
    ①地点代码为试验地所在县的县名拼音首字母。 ②疫木处理方式“CB”代表“现砍现烧”,“NT”代表“不处理”。
    ① Location codes are expressed with first letter of pinyin name of county of test site. ② CB: cutting and burning diseased trees; NT: no treatment.
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  2   试验方法

    Table  2   Experimental methods

    地点
    Location code
    试验项目
    Experimental project
    种源
    D. helophoroides
    source
    繁育代数
    Breeding enerations
    体型
    Body individuals
    释放比率
    Release ratio
    释放次数
    Release frequency
    疫木处理
    Epidemic wood
    treatment
    YF1 种源试验
    D. helophoroides source test
    GN、GB F3 B 1∶1 3 NT
    WA 繁育世代数试验
    Breeding generations test
    GN F3、F11 B 1∶1 3 NT
    XF 体型试验
    Body size test
    GN F3 A、B 1∶1 3 NT
    NK 释放比率试验
    Release ratio test
    GN F3 B 2∶1、1∶1、1∶2 3 NT
    YF2 释放次数试验
    Release frequency test
    GN F3 B 1∶1 1、2、3 NT
    XJ 疫木处理试验
    Epidemic wood treatment test
    GN F3 B 1∶1 3 NT、CB
    体型“A”代表“大型个体”,“B”代表“混合型个体”;其他同表1
    Large body individual; B: individuals of mixed body types; others: same aslisted in Table 1.
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  3   花绒寄甲种源对其林间种群密度的影响

    Table  3   Effect of D. helophoroides source on population density at test sites

    年份 Year 寄甲密度 D. helophoroides density/(头·hm−2 种群密度提升率 Population density improvement rate/%
    种源GN Source GN 种源GB Source GB 种源GN Source GN 种源GB Source GB
    2019 927.86 915.85
    2020 1931.62 1615.85 108.18 76.43
    2021 2796.56 1961.57 201.40 114.18
    2022 3969.27 2853.29 327.79 211.55
    2023 5531.37 4067.12 496.15±11.94 A 344.08±16.10 B
    同行均值(平均值±标准差)后不同大写字母表示差异极显著(P<0.01)。下同。
    Data with different capital letters after mean (mean±SD) on same row indicate significant difference at P<0.01. Same for following tables.
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  4   花绒寄甲繁育代数对其林间种群密度提升的影响

    Table  4   Effect of breeding generation of D. helophoroides on population density at test sites

    年份Year寄甲密度 D. helophoroides density/(头·hm−2种群密度提升率 Population density improvement rate/%
    F3F11F3F11
    20191211.581176.27
    20202927.862241.69141.6690.58
    20213809.963114.76214.46164.80
    20224857.273953.29300.90236.09
    20236374.834759.09426.16±20.28 A304.59±13.92 B
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  5   花绒寄甲体型大小对其林间种群密度提升的影响

    Table  5   Effect of body size of D. helophoroides on population density at test sites

    年份
    Year
    寄甲密度 D. helophoroides density/(头·hm−2种群密度提升率 Population density improvement rate/%
    大型个体
    Large body individuals
    混合型
    Mixed individuals
    大型个体
    Large body individuals
    混合型
    Mixed individuals
    2019786.06741.45
    20202076.771625.85164.20119.28
    20213186.512435.29305.38228.45
    20224379.563264.80457.15340.32
    20235917.284525.69652.77±29.84 A510.38±45.28 B
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  6   花绒寄甲释放比率对其林间种群密度提升的影响

    Table  6   Effect of release rate of D. helophoroides on population density at test sites

    年份Year寄甲密度 D. helophoroides density/(头·hm−2种群密度提升率 Population density improvement rate/%
    2∶11∶11∶22∶11∶11∶2
    2019761.32759.87747.58
    20201467.491875.652497.5692.76±9.29 A146.84±15.36 B234.09±19.55 C
    20212148.702554.663177.63182.23±17.81 A236.20±22.50 B325.06±24.11 C
    20222747.56 a3469.80 b3941.04 b260.89±21.34 A356.63±20.48 B427.17±18.73 C
    20233552.18 a4519.27 b4753.89 b366.58±17.55 A494.74±20.81 B535.90±19.20 C
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  7   花绒寄甲释放次数对其林间种群密度提升的影响

    Table  7   Effect of number of D. helophoroides release on insect density at test sites

    年份 Year寄甲密度 D. helophoroides density/(头·hm−2种群密度提升率 Population density improvement rate/%
    释放1次
    Release once
    释放2次
    Release twice
    释放3次
    Release 3 times
    释放1次
    Release once
    释放2次
    Release twice
    释放3次
    Release 3 times
    2019834.61860.71849.48
    20201587.521702.651657.0990.2197.8295.07
    20211997.242265.452673.16139.30163.21214.68
    20222430.062911.383534.44191.16±18.37 A238.25±21.46 B316.07±22.85 C
    20232947.574172.195269.27253.17±12.76 A384.74±11.41 B520.29±18.07 C
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  8   疫木处理方式对花绒寄甲林间种群密度提升的影响

    Table  8   Effect of diseased tree treatments on nsect density at test sites

    年份 Year寄甲密度 D. helophoroides density/(头·hm−2种群密度提升率 Population density improvement rate/%
    疫木不处理
    No treatment for epidemic wood
    现砍现烧
    Felled and immediate burning
    疫木不处理
    No treatment for epidemic wood
    现砍现烧
    Felled and immediate burning
    2019517.91343.65
    20201479.14427.91185.6024.52
    20212086.11552.37302.8060.74
    20222991.56778.26477.62126.47
    20234175.52960.84706.23179.60
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1] 杨忠岐. 利用天敌昆虫控制我国重大林木害虫研究进展[J]. 中国生物防治,2004,20(4) :221−227.

    YANG Z Q. Advance in bio-control researches of the important Forest Insect pests with natural enemies in China[J]. Chinese Journal of Biological Control,2004,20(4) :221−227. (in Chinese)

    [2] 陈元生,简迎龙,罗致迪,等. 疫木隔离结合释放花绒寄甲防治松材线虫病[J]. 江苏农业科学,2018,46(24) :101−104.

    CHEN Y S,JIAN Y L,LUO Z D,et al. Control effect of plague wood isolation combined with release of Dastarcus helophoroides on pine wood nematode[J]. Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences,2018,46(24) :101−104. (in Chinese)

    [3] 陈元生,黄名广,罗致迪,等. 花绒寄甲与松褐天牛及松材线虫病三者间长效关系研究[J]. 西部林业科学,2023,52(3) :63−69.

    CHEN Y S,HUANG M G,LUO Z D,et al. The long term relationship among Dastarcus helophoroides,Monochamus alternatus and brsaphelenchus Xylophilus[J]. Journal of West China Forestry Science,2023,52(3) :63−69. (in Chinese)

    [4] 罗致迪,陈元生,于海萍,等. 赣南花绒寄甲松树林间自然寄生率调查研究[J]. 环境昆虫学报,2015,37(5) :1070−1074.

    LUO Z D,CHEN Y S,YU H P,et al. Investigation on natural parasitic rates of Dastarcus helophoroides in Gannan pine forest[J]. Journal of Environmental Entomology,2015,37(5) :1070−1074. (in Chinese)

    [5] 陈元生,邓晓峰,周峰,等. 花斑花绒寄甲生活史与其栖息地纬度的关系[J]. 中国植保导刊,2018,38(12) :20−24,32. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-6820.2018.12.004

    CHEN Y S,DENG X F,ZHOU F,et al. Relationship between life history and habitat latitude of Dastarcus helophoroides[J]. China Plant Protection,2018,38(12) :20−24,32. (in Chinese) DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-6820.2018.12.004

    [6] 温小遂,廖三腊,孙计拓,等. 林间释放花绒寄甲对松褐天牛防效的研究[J]. 江西农业大学学报,2016,38(3) :505−510.

    WEN X S,LIAO S L,SUN J T,et al. Experiment on the efficacy of releasing Dastarcus helophoroides adults against Monochamus alternatus in pine forests[J]. Acta Agriculturae Universitatis Jiangxiensis,2016,38(3) :505−510. (in Chinese)

    [7] 唐艳龙,高尚坤,张彦龙,等. 花绒寄甲寄生松褐天牛的关键环境因子研究[J]. 中国生物防治学报,2015,31(6) :830−835.

    TANG Y L,GAO S K,ZHANG Y L,et al. Key environmental factors affecting parasitism of Monochamus alternatus hope by Dastarcus helophoroides fairmaire[J]. Chinese Journal of Biological Control,2015,31(6) :830−835. (in Chinese)

    [8] 郭舟,王钦召,彭观地,等. 成虫体型大小对花绒寄甲生殖及后代发育的影响[J]. 中国生物防治学报,2024,40(1) :33−43.

    GUO Z,WANG Q Z,PENG G D,et al. Effects of adult body size on reproductive fitness and offspring development in Dastarcus helophoroides (Fairmaire) e[J]. Chinese Journal of Biological Control,2024,40(1) :33−43.

    [9] 卢桦,陈元生,罗致迪,等. 松褐天牛在松材线虫病病死树上的垂直分布规律[J]. 福建农业学报,2019,34(2) :229−234.

    LU H,CHEN Y S,LUO Z D,et al. Vertical distribution of Monochamus monochamus in infected Bursaphelenchus xylophilus tree trunks[J]. Fujian Journal of Agricultural Sciences,2019,34(2) :229−234. (in Chinese)

    [10] 杨忠岐,唐艳龙,姜静,等. 栗山天牛天敌花绒寄甲在栎林中的种群保持机制[J]. 生态学报,2012,32(24) :7764−7773. DOI: 10.5846/stxb201203120327

    YANG Z Q,TANG Y L,JIANG J,et al. Population-keeping mechanism of the parasitoid Dastarcus helophoroides (Coleoptera:Bothrideridae) of Massicus raddei (Coleoptera:Cerambycidae) in oak forest[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica,2012,32(24) :7764−7773. DOI: 10.5846/stxb201203120327

    [11] 展茂魁. 马尾松蛀干害虫种群动态与松材线虫病的关系及松褐天牛天敌研究[D]. 北京:中国林业科学研究院,2014.

    ZHAN M K. Studies on population dynamics of woodborers and the relationship with pine wilt disease on Pinus massioniana,and natural enemies of Monochamus alternatus [D]. Beijing:Chinese Academy of Forestry,2014. (in Chinese)

    [12] 高尚坤,张彦龙,唐艳龙,等. 花绒寄甲松褐天牛生物型的越冬特性及耐寒性[J]. 林业科学,2016,52(3) :68−74.

    GAO S K,ZHANG Y L,TANG Y L,et al. Overwintering characteristics and cold-Hardiness of biotype of Dastarcus helophoroides ( Coleoptera:Bothrideridae) on Monochamus alternatus ( Coleoptera:Cerambycidae) [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae,2016,52(3) :68−74.

    [13] 王欽召. 外源因子对花绒寄甲行为与适合度的影响[D]. 南昌:江西农业大学,2023.

    WANG Q Z. Influence of exogenous factors on the behavior and fitness of Dastarcus helophoroides(Fairmaire) (Coleoptera:Bothrideridae) [D]. Nanchang:Jiangxi Agricultural University,2023. (in Chinese)

    [14]

    WEI J R,YANG Z Q,POLAND T M,et al. Parasitism and olfactory responses of Dastarcus helophoroides (Coleoptera:Bothrideridae) to different cerambycid hosts[J]. BioControl,2009,54(6) :733−742.

    [15] 郭婉琳. 花绒寄甲的退化规律及复壮技术研究[D]. 合肥:安徽农业大学,2016.

    GUO W L. Study on the degradation law and revitalization technology of Dastarcus helophoroides(Fairmaire) [D]. Hefei:Anhui Agricultural University,2016. (in Chinese)

    [16] 李子坤. 人工繁育的花绒寄甲对松墨天牛适应性的研究[D]. 泰安:山东农业大学,2020.

    LI Z K. Study on the adaptability of Dastarcus helophoroides Artificially bred to Monochamus alternatus [D]. Taian:Shandong Agricultural University,2020. (in Chinese)

    [17] 黄韵姗,张静宇,蒋明星. 昆虫个体大小对其种群生物学的影响[J]. 生态学报,2017,37(7) :2158−2168.

    HUANG Y S,ZHANG J Y,JIANG M X. Effect of body size on the population biology of insects[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica,2017,37(7) :2158−2168.

    [18]

    BEUKEBOOM L W. Size matters in insects–an introduction[J]. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata,2018,166(1) :2−3.

    [19]

    ZHANG Y,ZHAO C C,MA W H,et al. Larger males facilitate population expansion in Ophraella communa[J]. Journal of Animal Ecology,2021,90(12) :2782−2792.

    [20] 仇兰芬,仲丽,邵金丽,等. 环境温度和体型大小对花绒寄甲成虫死亡率及产卵量的影响[J]. 应用昆虫学报,2021,58(4) :959−965.

    QIU L F,ZHONG L,SHAO J L,et al. Influence of environmental temperature and adult body size on the mortality and fecundity of Dastarcus helophoroides[J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Entomology,2021,58(4) :959−965.

    [21] 王建敏,邹军民,洪承昊,等. 花绒寄甲防治松褐天牛田间试验研究:以湖北崇阳为例[J]. 湖北林业科技,2021,50(5) :28−31. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-3020.2021.05.008

    WANG J M,ZOU J M,HONG C H,et al. Dastarcus helophoroides’s control of Monochamus alternatus in case of Chongyang County in Hubei[J]. Hubei Forestry Science and Technology,2021,50(5) :28−31. (in Chinese) DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-3020.2021.05.008

    [22] 张志刚,杨衡,蔡东章,等. 应用花绒寄甲防治松墨天牛试验[J]. 现代园艺,2017(17) :11−12.

    ZHANG Z G,YANG H,CAI D Z,et al. Application of Dastarcus helophoroides and Control Monochamus alternatus[J]. Xiandai Horticulture,2017(17) :11−12. (in Chinese)

    [23] 温小遂,宋墩福,杨忠岐,等. 天敌花绒寄甲与寄主松褐天牛成虫出现期的关系[J]. 林业科学,2020,56(9) :193−200. DOI: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.20200921

    WEN X S,SONG D F,YANG Z Q,et al. Relationships between the emergence of Dastarcus helophoroides(Coleoptera:Bothrideridae) and the emergence of the host Monochamus alternatus(Coleoptera:Cerambycidae) in Pinus massoniana forests[J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae,2020,56(9) :193−200. (in Chinese) DOI: 10.11707/j.1001-7488.20200921

图(1)  /  表(8)
计量
  • 文章访问数:  2
  • HTML全文浏览量:  1
  • PDF下载量:  0
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2024-06-18
  • 修回日期:  2024-10-09
  • 网络出版日期:  2025-04-06

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回