• 中文核心期刊
  • CSCD来源期刊
  • 中国科技核心期刊
  • CA、CABI、ZR收录期刊

稻米抗性淀粉含量测定方法的比较分析

罗曦, 黄锦峰, 朱永生, 谢鸿光, 张建福, 谢华安

罗曦, 黄锦峰, 朱永生, 谢鸿光, 张建福, 谢华安. 稻米抗性淀粉含量测定方法的比较分析[J]. 福建农业学报, 2011, 26(5): 822-826.
引用本文: 罗曦, 黄锦峰, 朱永生, 谢鸿光, 张建福, 谢华安. 稻米抗性淀粉含量测定方法的比较分析[J]. 福建农业学报, 2011, 26(5): 822-826.
LUO Xi, HUANG Jin-feng, ZHU Yong-sheng, XIE Hong-guang, ZHANG Jian-fu, XIE Hua-an. Determination and Properties of Starch in Rice[J]. Fujian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2011, 26(5): 822-826.
Citation: LUO Xi, HUANG Jin-feng, ZHU Yong-sheng, XIE Hong-guang, ZHANG Jian-fu, XIE Hua-an. Determination and Properties of Starch in Rice[J]. Fujian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2011, 26(5): 822-826.

稻米抗性淀粉含量测定方法的比较分析

基金项目: 

国家863计划项目(2006AA1001101、2010AA101801、2010AA101804);福建省科技厅国家科技项目配套经费项目(F2006AA100101);福建省自然科学基金项目(2011J0901109);福建省农业科学院创新团队项目(STIF-Y04)

详细信息
    作者简介:

    罗曦(1982-),男,硕士,研究实习员, 主要从事水稻高抗性淀粉遗传育种研究

    通讯作者:

    张建福(1971-),男,博士,副研究员,主要从事水稻分子生物学与分子育种研究(E-mail: jianfzhang@163.com); 谢华安(1941-),男,研究员,中国科学院院士,主要从事水稻遗传育种研究(E-mail:huaanxie@yahoo.com.cn)

    张建福(1971-),男,博士,副研究员,主要从事水稻分子生物学与分子育种研究(E-mail: jianfzhang@163.com); 谢华安(1941-),男,研究员,中国科学院院士,主要从事水稻遗传育种研究(E-mail:huaanxie@yahoo.com.cn)

  • 中图分类号: S 511

Determination and Properties of Starch in Rice

  • 摘要: 以高抗性淀粉水稻品种功米3号、粳稻日本晴、中籼品种9311为材料,比较其蒸煮前后抗性淀粉含量的变化,以及在不同pH值下水解后的抗性淀粉含量的差异。研究结果表明,蒸煮前后各材料的抗性淀粉含量依次为:未蒸煮处理>蒸煮隔夜处理>蒸煮处理,未蒸煮处理与其他两种处理相比较差异显著,蒸煮隔夜处理与蒸煮处理相比较差异不显著;不同pH值处理各材料的抗性淀粉含量依次为pH5.2>pH6.0>pH6.9,其中pH5.2的RS含量与pH6.9、pH6.0比较呈极显著差异,pH6.9与pH6.0差异不显著;3份材料抗性淀粉含量大小依次为功米3号>9311>日本晴,功米3号抗性淀粉含量明显高于9311和日本晴,而9311略高于日本晴。总之,消化可溶性淀粉缓冲液的pH值为6.0时以及蒸煮处理后所得抗性淀粉含量的变异系数最低,重现性好,重复间差异小。
    Abstract: The high resistant starch rice, Gongmi 3, a typical Japonica rice, Nipponbare, and Indica rice 9311 were selected to study the cooking and pH effect on their starches. The results showed that the resistant starch content decreased in the order of no cookingcooking and overnight-holdingcooking. A significant difference existed between no cooking and the other two. The pH effect on the resistant starch content was pH 5.2 pH 6.0 pH 6.9. A significant difference was shown between pH 5.2 and the others, but no difference was found between pH 6.0 and pH 6.9. Among the three rice varieties, the resistant starch content decreased in the order of Gongmi 39311Nipponbare. When the pH of the starch hydrolysis buffer was 6.0, cooking seemed to induce the minimal change in the resistant starch content of the rice. The results were also reproducible with minor differences between the replicates.
  • HIGGINS J A.Resistant starch:metabolic effects and potential health benefits[J].Journal of AOAC International,2004,87(3):761-768.

    BROUNS F,KETTLITZ B,ARRIGONI E.Resistant starch and the butyrate revolution[J].Trends in Food Science Technology,2002,13:25l-261.

    BJORCK I,NYMAN M,PEdERSEN B,et al.On the digestibility of starch in wheat bread studies in vitro and in vivo[J].Journal of Cereal Science,1986,(4):1-11.

    AKERbERG AKE,LILJEBERG HGM,GRANFELDT,et al.An invitro method, based on chewing.to Predict resistant starch content in foods allows parallel determination of potentially available starch and dietary fiber[J].Journal of Nutrition,1998,128:651-660.

计量
  • 文章访问数:  3844
  • HTML全文浏览量:  149
  • PDF下载量:  1976
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2011-06-20
  • 修回日期:  2011-08-02
  • 刊出日期:  2011-10-14

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回