• 中文核心期刊
  • CSCD来源期刊
  • 中国科技核心期刊
  • CA、CABI、ZR收录期刊

灌浆期涝害对弱筋小麦相对叶绿素含量及产量的影响

Leaf Chlorophyll and Grain Yield of Low-gluten Wheat as Affected by Waterlogging at Grain-filling Stage

  • 摘要:
      目的  长江中下游弱筋小麦产区中后期涝渍害严重,研究涝害对弱筋小麦生长生理与产量的影响,为弱筋小麦生产提供依据。
      方法  以扬麦13、扬麦15、扬麦22和糯小麦4个弱筋小麦品种为试验材料,采用盆钵栽培方法,研究灌浆期人工模拟涝害对小麦株高、顶三叶SPAD值及产量的影响。
      结果  (1)灌浆期涝害对小麦株高无显著影响;(2)涝害后,小麦顶三叶SPAD值较对照下降,涝害时间越长,下降程度越大;不同叶位叶片涝害后下降差值差异显著,下叶位下降值大,涝害后恢复7 d,上叶位SPAD值较对照差值明显增加,涝害后下叶位叶片先受害,而后向上叶位叶片扩展;(3)小麦灌浆期涝害旗叶、倒二叶及倒三叶间较对照差值有显著差异,倒三叶SPAD值涝害指数与产量涝害指数极显著相关,且相关性最大(r=0.989 5),倒三叶叶片SPAD值为灌浆期涝害程度的指示叶位;(4)在涝害7 d胁迫下,4个弱筋小麦品种的产量均显著降低,扬麦22对涝害最敏感,涝害7 d产量较对照减少3.6 g·株-1,降幅最大,达39.4%。扬麦22和扬麦15涝害敏感期在涝害5 d以下,扬麦13和糯小麦涝害敏感期为涝害7 d;(5)不同品种灌浆期涝害对产量因子的影响不同,扬麦13属于千粒重降低型品种,糯小麦是穗粒数降低型品种,扬麦15是穗粒数和千粒重双因子降低型品种,扬麦22是有效穗、穗粒数和千粒重三因子降低型品种。
      结论  灌浆期涝害对小麦株高无显著影响;用SPAD值涝害指数可以衡量灌浆期小麦涝害程度,指示叶位为倒三叶;扬麦22对涝害最敏感,涝害7 d产量降幅最大,扬麦22和扬麦15涝害敏感期在涝害5 d以下,扬麦13和糯小麦涝害敏感期为涝害7 d。

     

    Abstract:
      Objective  Effects of waterlogging, a serious natural disaster commonly occurring in the middle and late stages of growing season in one of the major production areas in China of middle and lower reaches of the Yangtze River, on the growth, physiology and yield of the low-gluten wheat were studied.
      Method  SPADs of top 3 leaves and yield at grain-filling stage of 4 low-gluten wheat cultivars(i.e., Yangmai 13, Yangmai 15, Yangmai 22 and Waxy wheat)were used in a pot experimentation for the study.
      Result  (1) Waterlogging occurred at the wheat grain-filling stage exerted little effect on the height of a plant. (2) The SPADs of the top leaves on a plant decreased after waterlogging and continued to decline with the condition prolonged. The leaves on lower part of a plant were more sensitive to the stress than those on the upper sections. The SPAD difference between control and treatment (DSPAD) further widened in 7 days of a natural recovery. Waterlogging caused damages firstly on the lower leaves, then, spread to the upper leaves. (3) DSPAD of leaves differed significantly according to their location on a plant. The SPAD of the top third leaf and the grain yield significantly correlated, with a correlation coefficient of 0.989 5, suggesting it be used as an indicator to estimate waterlogging damage at grain-filling stage. (4) After 7 d of waterlogging, the yields of all varieties declined significantly. Yangmai 22 was most sensitive to waterlogging with a decrease on yield of 3.6 g/plant or a 39.4% loss over the untreated. The tolerance threshold for Yangmai 22 and Yangmai 15 was 5 d under waterlogging, while Yangmai 13 and waxy wheat 7 d. (5) The effects brought about by waterlogging were variety-specific on yield traits at the grain-filling stage. For Yangmai 13, the reduction was mainly on the 1000-grain weight, while waxy wheat on the number of grains per spike, Yangmai 15 on both 1000-grain weight and grains per spike, and Yangmai 22 on the effective panicle, grain number per panicle as well as the 1000-grain weight.
      Conclusion  Waterlogging at wheat grain-filling stage did not significantly affect the plant height. The SPAD of the top third leaf could be used to estimate the degree of waterlogging damage on the grain yield of a wheat plant. Yangmai 22 was the variety most susceptible to waterlogging, with a significant loss after 7 d under the stress. The tolerance of Yangmai 22 and Yangmai 15 to waterlogging had a threshold of 5 d, whereas Yangmai 13 and waxy wheat 7 d.

     

/

返回文章
返回