Respected readers, authors and reviewers, you can add comments to this page on any questions about the contribution, review, editing and publication of this journal. We will give you an answer as soon as possible. Thank you for your support!
ZHENG Xiang-li, YE Hua-lan, WANG Zheng-rong, XU Guo-zhong, WENG Bo-qi. Agronomic, yield and quality characteristics of a new dual-purpose peanut variety[J]. Fujian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2010, 25(5): 568-571.
Citation:
ZHENG Xiang-li, YE Hua-lan, WANG Zheng-rong, XU Guo-zhong, WENG Bo-qi. Agronomic, yield and quality characteristics of a new dual-purpose peanut variety[J]. Fujian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2010, 25(5): 568-571.
ZHENG Xiang-li, YE Hua-lan, WANG Zheng-rong, XU Guo-zhong, WENG Bo-qi. Agronomic, yield and quality characteristics of a new dual-purpose peanut variety[J]. Fujian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2010, 25(5): 568-571.
Citation:
ZHENG Xiang-li, YE Hua-lan, WANG Zheng-rong, XU Guo-zhong, WENG Bo-qi. Agronomic, yield and quality characteristics of a new dual-purpose peanut variety[J]. Fujian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2010, 25(5): 568-571.
Fujian Engineering and Technology Research Center for Hilly Prataculture, Institute of Agricultural Ecology, Fujian Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Fuzhou, Fujian 350013, China;
2.
Fuzhou Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Fuzhou, Fujian 350018, China
To select a new dual-purpose strain,six strains of peanut were evaluated according to their agronomic characteristics,yield performances of both above-and under-ground materials,and nutritional value.The results showed that the plant height of TJ was greater than Quanhua No.7 at P0.05 level,the peanut yields of Shang G and TJ were 35.81% and 35.11%,respectively,higher than that of Quanhua No.10,and 26.12% and 25.47%,respectively,higher than that of Quanhua No.7 at P0.01 level.The peanut vine yield of TJ was 29.08% and 30.42% greater than that of Quanhua No.10 and Quanhua No.7,respectively,at P0.01 level.The peanut vine yield of Shang G was 14.29% and 15.46% greater than that of Quanhua No.10 and Quanhua No.7,respectively,at P 0.05 level.