Evaluation and Developing Pattern on "Production-Living-Ecological" Functions in Suburban Rural Area: A Case Study of 59 Villages in Jin'an District of Fuzhou City

CAI Yuelin; WANG Haiping; CHEN Zhifeng; YAN Jiajia

doi:10.19303/j.issn.1008-0384.2022.11.014

Volume 38 Issue 11

Nov. 2023

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Article Navigation > Fujian Journal of Agricultural Sciences > 2023 > 38(11): 1376-1386

CAI Y L, WANG H P, CHEN Z F, et al. Evaluation and Developing Pattern on 'Production-Living-Ecological' Functions in Suburban Rural Area: A Case Study of 59 Villages in Jin'an District of Fuzhou City [J]. Fujian Journal of Agricultural Sciences，2023，38（11）：1376−1386 doi: 10.19303/j.issn.1008-0384.2022.11.014

Citation:

CAI Y L, WANG H P, CHEN Z F, et al. Evaluation and Developing Pattern on "Production-Living-Ecological" Functions in Suburban Rural Area: A Case Study of 59 Villages in Jin'an District of Fuzhou City [J]. Fujian Journal of Agricultural Sciences，2023，38（11）：1376−1386 doi: 10.19303/j.issn.1008-0384.2022.11.014

Citation:

PDF( 1188 KB)

Evaluation and Developing Pattern on "Production-Living-Ecological" Functions in Suburban Rural Area: A Case Study of 59 Villages in Jin'an District of Fuzhou City

doi: 10.19303/j.issn.1008-0384.2022.11.014

CAI Yuelin^1
,,
WANG Haiping²,
CHEN Zhifeng^{2
,
,},
YAN Jiajia^{3
,
,}

1.
Faculty of Business, City University of Macau, Macau　999078, China
2.
Institute of Agricultural Economics and Information, Fujian Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Fuzhou, Fujian　350003, China
3.
College of Economics and Management, Fuzhou University, Fuzhou, Fujian　350108, China

Received Date: 2023-09-07
Rev Recd Date: 2023-12-09
Publish Date: 2023-11-28

Abstract

Abstract

Objective To evaluate the "production-living-ecological" function of suburban rural areas, clarify the element differences and spatial characteristics of rural development, and propose the classified development strategy for villages to promote rural revitalization. Method Taking 59 villages in the north of Jin'an District as an example, the rural development elements were divided into three aspects: production, living and ecology. An evaluation system for village-level rural development was constructed from the perspective of "production-living-ecological" function. The TOPSIS method was used to analyze the elements differences, and villages were spatially positioned based on the significance level of elements. A regional development path and revitalization scheme were reconstructed, focusing on a "central village" and combining multiple villages for a resonant development. Result (1) The level of rural development factors in the north of Jin'an District is not high, with significant differences between elements, characterized by lower levels in the north and higher in the south. (2) Limited by terrain and landform, a few villages distributed near regional roads or with relatively flat landform, have significant living conditions and industrial development. Administrative villages with significant living conditions are characterized by convenient transportation, relatively dense population and abundant resources. Those with significant production function are marked by abundant resources and land use, good accessibility, but relatively backward living conditions. Villages with significant ecology function have rich natural resources, but lack transportation accessibility and have poor living environmental conditions. Conclusion Jin'an District could form 12 rural sectors with different functional orientations and the combination of production, living and ecology. The results could provide a scientific basis for categorizing strategies and scientifical guiding on the formation of a prominent characteristic spatial pattern of suburban rural areas with coordinated "production-living-ecology" functions.
- suburban rural areas,
- rural revitalization,
- "production-living-ecological" functions,
- spatial positioning,
- TOPSIS methos,
- village revitalization coordinated villege

FullText(HTML)

References(25)

References

[1]	房艳刚, 刘继生. 基于多功能理论的中国乡村发展多元化探讨—超越“现代化”发展范式 [J]. 地理学报, 2015, 70(2):257−270. FANG Y G, LIU J S. Diversified agriculture and rural development in China based on multifunction theory:Beyond modernization paradigm [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2015, 70(2): 257−270.(in Chinese)
[2]	李小建. 欠发达区乡村聚落空间演变[M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 2019: 12-17. LI X J. Spatial evolution of rural settlements in underdeveloped areas [M]. Beijing: Science Press, 2019: 12-17. (in Chinese)
[3]	刘玉, 唐林楠, 潘瑜春, 等. 京津冀地区县域农产品生产功能的时空格局及耦合特征 [J]. 农业工程学报, 2015, 31(16):305−314. LIU Y, TANG L N, PAN Y C, et al. Spatiotemporal patterns and evolution characteristics of agricultural production function at county level in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Region [J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2015, 31(16): 305−314.(in Chinese)
[4]	王光耀, 赵中秋, 祝培甜. 长江经济带乡村功能区域差异及类型划分 [J]. 地理科学进展, 2019, 38(12):1854−1864. WANG G Y, ZHAO Z Q, ZHU P T, et al. Regional differences and types of rural functions in the Yangtze River Economic Belt [J]. Progress in Geography, 2019, 38(12): 1854−1864.(in Chinese)
[5]	杨忍, 刘彦随, 龙花楼, 等. 中国乡村转型重构研究进展与展望——逻辑主线与内容框架 [J]. 地理科学进展, 2015, 34(8):1019−1030. YANG R, LIU Y S, LONG H L, et al. Research progress and prospect of rural transformation and reconstruction in China: paradigms and main content [J]. Progress in Geography, 2015, 34(8): 1019−1030.(in Chinese)
[6]	李裕瑞, 刘彦随, 龙花楼. 黄淮海地区乡村发展格局与类型 [J]. 地理研究, 2011, 30(9):1637−1647. LI Y R, LIU Y S, LONG H L. Study on the pattern and types of rural development in the Huang-Huai-Hai region [J]. Geographical Research, 2011, 30(9): 1637−1647.(in Chinese)
[7]	崔悦怡. 中国西部地区农村发展的综合评价 [J]. 生产力研究, 2014(2):80−83. CUI Y Y. Comprehensive evaluation of rural development in western China [J]. Productivity Research, 2014(2): 80−83.(in Chinese)
[8]	贾晋, 李雪峰, 申云. 乡村振兴战略的指标体系构建与实证分析 [J]. 财经科学, 2018(11):70−82. JIA J, LI X F, SHEN Y. Indicator system construction and empirical analysis for the strategy of rural vitalization [J]. Finance & Economics, 2018(11): 70−82.(in Chinese)
[9]	闫周府, 吴方卫. 从二元分割走向融合发展: 乡村振兴评价指标体系研究 [J]. 经济学家, 2019(6):90−103. YAN Z F, WU F W. From binary segmentation to convergence development—A study on the evaluation index system of rural revitalization [J]. Economist, 2019(6): 90−103.(in Chinese)
[10]	张挺, 李闽榕, 徐艳梅. 乡村振兴评价指标体系构建与实证研究 [J]. 管理世界, 2018, 34(8):99−105. ZHANG T, LI M R, XU Y M. The construction and empirical study of rural revitalization evaluation index system [J]. Management World, 2018, 34(8): 99−105.(in Chinese)
[11]	韩磊, 王术坤, 刘长全. 中国农村发展进程及地区比较: 基于2011—2017年中国农村发展指数的研究 [J]. 中国农村经济, 2019(7):2−20. HAN L, WANG S K, LIU C Q. China’s rural development progress and regional comparison: a study based on assessment of China’s rural development index from 2011 to 2017 [J]. Chinese Rural Economy, 2019(7): 2−20.(in Chinese)
[12]	刘玉, 刘彦随, 郭丽英. 基于SOFM的环渤海地区乡村地域功能分区 [J]. 人文地理, 2013, 28(3):114−120. LIU Y, LIU Y S, GUO L Y. Sofm-based functional subareas of rural area along the Bohai rim in China [J]. Human Geography, 2013, 28(3): 114−120.(in Chinese)
[13]	洪惠坤, 廖和平, 李涛, 等. 基于熵值法和Dagum基尼系数分解的乡村空间功能时空演变分析 [J]. 农业工程学报, 2016, 32(10):240−248. doi: 10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.2016.10.034 HONG H K, LIAO H P, LI T, et al. Analysis of spatio-temporal patterns of rural space function based on entropy value method and Dagum Gini coefficient [J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2016, 32(10): 240−248.(in Chinese) doi: 10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.2016.10.034
[14]	唐林楠, 刘玉, 潘瑜春, 等. 基于BP模型和Ward法的北京市平谷区乡村地域功能评价与分区[J]. 地理科学, 2016, 36 (10): 1514–1521. TANG L N, LIU Y, PAN Y C, et al. Evaluation and zoning of rural regional multifunction based on bp model and ward method: a case in the Pinggu District of Beijing City[J]. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2016, 36(10): 1514–1521. (in Chinese)
[15]	BAŃSKI J, STOLA W. Transformation of the spatial and functional structure of rural areas in Poland [J]. Rural Studies, 2002, 3: 1−12.
[16]	WILLEMEN L, HEIN L, VAN MENSVOORT M E F, et al. Space for people, plants and livestock? Quantifying interactions among multiple landscape functions in a Dutch rural region [J]. Ecological Indicators, 2010, 10(1): 62−73.
[17]	HOLMES J, ARGENT N. Rural transitions in the Nambucca Valley: Socio-demographic change in a disadvantaged rural locale [J]. Journal of Rural Studies, 2016, 48: 129−142. doi: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2016.06.009
[18]	杨忍, 罗秀丽, 陈燕纯. 中国县域乡村地域多功能格局及影响因素识别 [J]. 地理科学进展, 2019, 38(9):1316−1328. doi: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2019.09.005 YANG R, LUO X L, CHEN Y C. Spatial pattern and influencing factors of rural multifunctionality at county level in China [J]. Progress in Geography, 2019, 38(9): 1316−1328.(in Chinese) doi: 10.18306/dlkxjz.2019.09.005
[19]	刘彦随, 刘玉, 陈玉福. 中国地域多功能性评价及其决策机制 [J]. 地理学报, 2011, 66(10):1379−1389. LIU Y S, LIU Y, CHEN Y F. Territorial multi-functionality evaluation and decision-making mechanism at county scale in china [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 2011, 66(10): 1379−1389.(in Chinese)
[20]	刘自强, 周爱兰, 鲁奇. 乡村地域主导功能的转型与乡村发展阶段的划分 [J]. 干旱区资源与环境, 2012, 26(4):49−54. LIU Z Q, ZHOU A L, LU Q. The transition of rural territorial leading function and the classification of rural development stages [J]. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment, 2012, 26(4): 49−54.(in Chinese)
[21]	李平星, 陈诚, 陈江龙. 乡村地域多功能时空格局演变及影响因素研究: 以江苏省为例 [J]. 地理科学, 2015, 35(2):845−851. FANG Y G, LIU J S. Temporal evolution and spatial differentiation of rural territorial multifunctions and the influencing factors: the case of Jiangsu Province [J]. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 2015, 35(2): 845−851.(in Chinese)
[22]	张小林. 乡村概念辨析 [J]. 地理学报, 1998, 53(4):365−371. ZHANG X L. On discrimination of rural definitions [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 1998, 53(4): 365−371.(in Chinese)
[23]	李红波, 张小林. 乡村性研究综述与展望[J], 人文地理, 2015, 141(1): 16-20, 142. LI H B, ZHANG X L. A review and trend on rurality[J]. Human Geography, 2015, 141(1): 16–20, 142. (in Chinese)
[24]	曾艳, 廖成浩, 刘建生, 等. “三生”功能视角下城市近郊区村庄发展适宜性评价与分类——以江西抚州临川区为例[J/OL]. 农业资源与环境学报,https://doi.org/10.13254/j.jare.2023.0524 ZENG Y, LIAO C H, LIU J S, et al. Evaluation and classification of village development quality in suburban areas from the perspective of ‘production-life-ecological’ function: a case from Linchuan District, Fuzhou, Jiangxi Province, China[J/OL]. Journal of Agricultural Resources and Environment,https://doi.org/10.13254/j.jare.2023.0524. (in Chinese)
[25]	张茜茜, 廖和平, 杨伟, 等. 基于熵权TOPSIS模型的乡村土地利用转型评价研究——以重庆市渝北区为例 [J]. 西南大学学报 (自然科学版), 2018, 40(10):135−144. ZHANG Q Q, LIAO H P, YANG W. evaluation of rural land use transformation based on the entropy weight TOPSIS model—A case study of Yubei District,Chongqing [J]. Journal of South west University (Natural Science Edition), 2018, 40(10): 135−144.(in Chinese)