Effects of Application of Acid Soil Conditioner and Fermented Coffee Peels on Growth of Coffee Seedlings and Fertility and Enzyme Activities of Soil

DONG Yunping; ZHAO Qingyun; ZHANG Ang; ZHAO Shaoguan; LONG Yuzhou; SUN Yan; TAN Jun; LIN Xingjun

doi:10.19303/j.issn.1008-0384.2022.011.016

Volume 37 Issue 11

Nov. 2022

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Article Navigation > Fujian Journal of Agricultural Sciences > 2022 > 37(11): 1493-1502

DONG Y P, ZHAO Q Y, ZHANG A, et al. Effects of Application of Acid Soil Conditioner and Fermented Coffee Peels on Growth of Coffee Seedlings and Fertility and Enzyme Activities of Soil [J]. Fujian Journal of Agricultural Sciences，2022，37（11）：1493−1502 doi: 10.19303/j.issn.1008-0384.2022.011.016

Citation:

DONG Y P, ZHAO Q Y, ZHANG A, et al. Effects of Application of Acid Soil Conditioner and Fermented Coffee Peels on Growth of Coffee Seedlings and Fertility and Enzyme Activities of Soil [J]. Fujian Journal of Agricultural Sciences，2022，37（11）：1493−1502 doi: 10.19303/j.issn.1008-0384.2022.011.016

Citation:

DONG Y P, ZHAO Q Y, ZHANG A, et al. Effects of Application of Acid Soil Conditioner and Fermented Coffee Peels on Growth of Coffee Seedlings and Fertility and Enzyme Activities of Soil [J]. Fujian Journal of Agricultural Sciences，2022，37（11）：1493−1502 doi: 10.19303/j.issn.1008-0384.2022.011.016

PDF( 1211 KB)

Effects of Application of Acid Soil Conditioner and Fermented Coffee Peels on Growth of Coffee Seedlings and Fertility and Enzyme Activities of Soil

doi: 10.19303/j.issn.1008-0384.2022.011.016

1.
Spice and Beverage Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Tropical Agricultural Sciences/Key Laboratory of Genetic Resources Utilization of Spice and Beverage Crops, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs/Key Laboratory of Genetic Improvement and Quality Regulation for Tropical Spice and Beverage Crops of Hainan Provincial, Wanning, Hainan　571533, China
2.
College of Resources and Environment, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou, Henan　450003, China

Received Date: 2022-04-07
Rev Recd Date: 2022-08-26

Available Online: 2022-11-29

Publish Date: 2022-11-28

Abstract

Abstract

Objective Means to utilize coffee peel waste and improve quality of ground soil at coffee plantations were investigated. Method The soil at a 56-year-old coffee plantation was used as the base material for the pot experiment. Aside from CK using 100% plantation soil, treatments applied the mass fractions of acid soil conditioner (TL) and fermented coffee peels (CP) including TL1 (2% TL), TL2 (4% TL), TL3 (6% TL), TL4 (8% TL), CP1 (4% CP), and CP2 (8% CP) were added to the potting soil. Leaf photosynthetic properties, and RuBP activity, growth indicators, and dry biomass accumulation of the seedlings, as well as nutrient content, pH, and activities of acid phosphatase (S-ACP), alkaline phosphatase (S-ALP), catalase (S-CAT), and urease (S-UE) in soil were determined. Result The addition of TL raised 0.8-1.6 on the soil pH, while CP increased it at first, then decreased, and became 0.50 lower than CK after 6 months. The available K and exchangeable Ca and Mg in soil were significantly increased with increasing TL or CP. But the available P significantly dropped by the added TL which, at TL4, was 69.34% lower than CK. The total N, alkaline N, and available P were significantly higher with CP than other treatments. TL2 and TL3 showed the greatest effects on RuBP enzyme activity with significantly 101.16% and 135.30%, respectively, and on net photosynthesis (Pn) 81.71% and 80.35%, respectively, higher than CK. And those were followed by the treatments of CP1 and CP2. All enzyme activities in the soils treated by TL and CP were higher than CK, except ACP, which was similar to CK. The S-ALP activities in the treatment soils were 2.05 to 3.71 times higher than CK. The S-CAT activities were higher than CK by 109.62%-18.60% in the order of CP2＞CP1＞TL4＞TL3＞TL2. The S-UE activities were 18.70%-5.37% higher than CK with the highest showing under CP2 and CP1 followed by TL1 and TL4. The TL2, TL3, CP1, and CP2 treatments promoted the growth and dry matter accumulation of coffee seedlings with plant height and stem diameter increases by 25.09%-81.29% and total and dry weights of leaves, roots, and stems by 1.65-5.02 times over CK. Among them, CP1 delivered the greatest rises. Conclusion Application of TL and CP improved the soil microbial environment, increased the availability of soil nutrients, and promoted the coffee seedling growth. However, excessive TL could bring about high exchangeable Ca inducing P fixation, and with CP addition, the mineralization of organic N would lower the pH in soil. Consequently, the appropriate use of TL and CP was expected to achieve the goal of improving acid soil quality, utilizing coffee waste, and enhancing coffee cultivation at the plantations.
- Acid soil conditioner,
- fermented coffee peel,
- coffee seedling growth,
- soil nutrient content,
- soil enzyme activity

FullText(HTML)

References(32)

References

[1]	徐仁扣. 土壤酸化及其调控研究进展 [J]. 土壤, 2015, 47(2):238−244. doi: 10.13758/j.cnki.tr.2015.02.007 XU R K. Research progresses in soil acidification and its control [J]. Soils, 2015, 47(2): 238−244.(in Chinese) doi: 10.13758/j.cnki.tr.2015.02.007
[2]	张华, 张甘霖, 漆智平, 等. 热带地区农场尺度土壤质量现状的系统评价 [J]. 土壤学报, 2003, 40(2):186−193. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0564-3929.2003.02.004 ZHANG H, ZHANG G L, QI Z P, et al. Systematic assessment of soil quality at farm level in tropical area of China [J]. Acta Pedologica Sinica, 2003, 40(2): 186−193.(in Chinese) doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0564-3929.2003.02.004
[3]	ZHAO Q Y, XIONG W, XING Y Z, et al. Long-term coffee monoculture alters soil chemical properties and microbial communities [J]. Scientific Reports, 2018, 8: 6116. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-24537-2
[4]	赵明珠, 萧自位, 李锦红, 等. 云南咖啡主栽区土壤肥力现状初评 [J]. 热带农业科学, 2018, 38(3):8−14. ZHAO M Z, XIAO Z W, LI J H, et al. Evaluation of soil fertility in major coffee planting areas of Yunnan [J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Agriculture, 2018, 38(3): 8−14.(in Chinese)
[5]	黄家雄, 吕玉兰, 李贵平, 等. 2020年我国咖啡生产、贸易及消费形势分析 [J]. 中国热带农业, 2021(5):40−53. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-0658.2021.05.007 HUANG J X, LV Y L, LI G P, et al. Analysis of China's coffee production, trade and consumption in 2020 [J]. China Tropical Agriculture, 2021(5): 40−53.(in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-0658.2021.05.007
[6]	赵青云, 普浩杰, 王秋晶, 等. 咖啡果皮不同堆沤处理养分含量及其对咖啡植株生长的影响 [J]. 热带作物学报, 2020, 41(4):633−639. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2561.2020.04.001 ZHAO Q Y, PU H J, WANG Q J, et al. Nutrient content of coffee peel with different composting treatments and its effects on coffee plant growth [J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2020, 41(4): 633−639.(in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2561.2020.04.001
[7]	赵青云, 邢诒彰, 林兴军, 等. 施用咖啡果皮对咖啡幼苗生长及土壤理化性状的影响 [J]. 热带农业科学, 2017, 37(8):54−59. ZHAO Q Y, XING Y Z, LIN X J, et al. Effects of coffee fruit peel application on coffee seedlings growth and soil physiochemical characteristics [J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Agriculture, 2017, 37(8): 54−59.(in Chinese)
[8]	匡钰, 肖兵, 张洪波, 等. 云南咖啡初加工废弃物利用及排放情况调查 [J]. 中国热带农业, 2018(5):31−36. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-0658.2018.05.009 KUANG Y, XIAO B, ZHANG H B, et al. Utilization and emission investigation of waste material from primary processing of coffee in Yunnan [J]. China Tropical Agriculture, 2018(5): 31−36.(in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-0658.2018.05.009
[9]	CAI Z J, WANG B R, XU M G, et al. Nitrification and acidification from urea application in red soil (Ferralic Cambisol) after different long-term fertilization treatments [J]. Journal of Soils and Sediments, 2014, 14(9): 1526−1536.[LinkOut doi: 10.1007/s11368-014-0906-4
[10]	李新举, 张志国. 秸秆覆盖与秸秆翻压还田效果比较 [J]. 国土与自然资源研究, 1999(1):43−45. doi: 10.16202/j.cnki.tnrs.1999.01.013 LI X J, ZHANG ZG. Influence on soil floods properties of mulching st raws and soil-returning straw [J]. Territory & Natural Resources Stuty, 1999(1): 43−45.(in Chinese) doi: 10.16202/j.cnki.tnrs.1999.01.013
[11]	蔡晓布, 钱成, 张永青, 等. 秸秆还田对西藏中部退化土壤环境的影响 [J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2003, 9(4):411−415. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1008-505X.2003.04.006 CAI X B, QIAN C, ZHANG Y Q, et al. Effect of straw returning on the environment of degenerated soil in centr al Tibet [J]. Plant Nutrition and Fertilizing Science, 2003, 9(4): 411−415.(in Chinese) doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1008-505X.2003.04.006
[12]	孙皓, 王礼焦, 高云, 等. 推广测土配方施肥技术加快耕地质量建设步伐 [J]. 安徽农学通报(上半月刊), 2009, 15(5):72−74. SUN H, WANG L J, GAO Y, et al. Popularize the technique of soil formulation to applying fertilizer, Facilitate the quality of arable land constructions [J]. Anhui Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2009, 15(5): 72−74.(in Chinese)
[13]	申源源, 陈宏. 秸秆还田对土壤改良的研究进展 [J]. 中国农学通报, 2009, 25(19):291−294. SHEN Y Y, CHEN H. The progress of study on soil improvement research with straw stalk [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2009, 25(19): 291−294.(in Chinese)
[14]	杨彩迪, 卢升高. 秸秆直接还田和炭化还田对红壤酸度、养分和交换性能的动态影响 [J]. 环境科学, 2020, 41(9):4246−4252. doi: 10.13227/j.hjkx.202002213 YANG C D, LU S G. Dynamic effects of direct returning of straw and corresponding biochar on acidity, nutrients, and exchangeable properties of red soil [J]. Environmental Science, 2020, 41(9): 4246−4252.(in Chinese) doi: 10.13227/j.hjkx.202002213
[15]	郭春雷, 李娜, 彭靖, 等. 秸秆直接还田及炭化还田对土壤酸度和交换性能的影响 [J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2018, 24(5):1205−1213. doi: 10.11674/zwyf.17482 GUO C L, LI N, PENG J, et al. Direct returning of maize straw or as biochar to the field triggers change in acidity and exchangeable capacity in soil [J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizers, 2018, 24(5): 1205−1213.(in Chinese) doi: 10.11674/zwyf.17482
[16]	郭和蓉, 陈琼贤, 彭志平, 等. 荔枝施用营养型酸性土壤改良剂的增产改土效果 [J]. 长江大学学报(自科版), 2005, 2(8):16−19,2. GUO H R, CHEN Q X, PENG Z P, et al. Yield-increasing effect modifier application on litch and soil improvement [J]. Journal of Yangtze University (Natural Science Edition), 2005, 2(8): 16−19,2.(in Chinese)
[17]	陈琼贤, 郭和蓉, 彭志平, 等. 土壤改良剂对龙眼的增产效应 [J]. 果树学报, 2004, 21(2):185−187. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-9980.2004.02.023 CHEN Q X, GUO H R, PENG Z P, et al. Effect of applying soil amendment on increasing production of longan [J]. Journal of Fruit Science, 2004, 21(2): 185−187.(in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-9980.2004.02.023
[18]	BROWN K R, THOMPSON W A, CAMM E L, et al. Effects of N addition rates on the productivity of Picea Sitchensis Thuja plicata, and Tsuga heterophylla seedlings [J]. Trees, 1996, 10(3): 198−205.
[19]	翟江, 高原, 张晓伟, 等. 硅钙对日光温室黄瓜光合作用及产量和品质的影响 [J]. 园艺学报, 2019, 46(4):701−713. doi: 10.16420/j.issn.0513-353x.2018-0687 ZHAI J, GAO Y, ZHANG X W, et al. Effects of silicon and calcium on photosynthesis, yield and quality of cucumber in solar-greenhouse [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2019, 46(4): 701−713.(in Chinese) doi: 10.16420/j.issn.0513-353x.2018-0687
[20]	黄家雄. 小粒咖啡标准化生产技术[M]. 北京: 金盾出版社, 2009.
[21]	王宁, 李九玉, 徐仁扣. 三种植物物料对两种茶园土壤酸度的改良效果 [J]. 土壤, 2009, 41(5):764−771. WANG N, LI J Y, XU R K. Amelioration effects of three plant materials on acid tea garden soils [J]. Soils, 2009, 41(5): 764−771.(in Chinese)
[22]	张永春. 长期不同施肥对土壤酸化作用的影响研究[D]. 南京: 南京农业大学, 2012. ZHANG Y C. Research of long term fertilization on soil acidification[D]. Nanjing: Nanjing Agricultural University, 2012. (in Chinese)
[23]	张晓蕊. 石灰性潮土中磷形态转化以及交换性钙对磷固定的影响[D]. 武汉: 华中农业大学, 2020 ZHANG X R. Transformation of phosphorus speciation in A calcareous fluvo-aquic soil and effects of exchangeable calcium on phosphate fixation[D]. Wuhan: Huazhong Agricultural University, 2020. (in Chinese)
[24]	SPOHN M, CARMINATI A, KUZYAKOV Y. Soil zymography - A novel in situ method for mapping distribution of enzyme activity in soil [J]. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 2013, 58: 275−280. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2012.12.004
[25]	NANNIPIERI P, GIAGNONI L, LANDI L, et al. Role of Phosphatase Enzymes in Soi. Phosphorus in Action, Soil Biology 26 [M]. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, 2011: 215–243.
[26]	王涵, 王果, 黄颖颖, 等. pH变化对酸性土壤酶活性的影响 [J]. 生态环境, 2008, 17(6):2401−2406. WANG H, WANG G, HUANG Y Y, et al. The effects of pH change on the activities of enzymes in an acid soil [J]. Ecology and Environment, 2008, 17(6): 2401−2406.(in Chinese)
[27]	LI J B, XIE T, ZHU H, et al. Alkaline phosphatase activity mediates soil organic phosphorus mineralization in a subalpine forest ecosystem [J]. Geoderma, 2021, 404: 115376. doi: 10.1016/j.geoderma.2021.115376
[28]	于宁, 关连珠, 娄翼来, 等. 施石灰对北方连作烟田土壤酸度调节及酶活性恢复研究 [J]. 土壤通报, 2008, 39(4):849−851. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0564-3945.2008.04.030 YU N, GUAN L Z, LOU Y L, et al. Lime application regulates soil acidity and restores enzyme activities in the fields cultivated continuously with tobacco, Northern China [J]. Chinese Journal of Soil Science, 2008, 39(4): 849−851.(in Chinese) doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0564-3945.2008.04.030
[29]	韩晓日, 蒋海英, 郭春雷, 等. 施用新型多元素螯合肥对玉米产量、养分吸收与利用的影响 [J]. 沈阳农业大学学报, 2016, 47(2):159−165. HAN X R, JIANG H Y, GUO C L, et al. Effects of new chelate fertilizer on yield, nutrient uptake and nutrient use efficiency of maize [J]. Journal of Shenyang Agricultural University, 2016, 47(2): 159−165.(in Chinese)
[30]	贾若凌, 李丽, 刘香玲, 等. 荔枝果园土壤脲酶活性与土壤肥力的关系研究 [J]. 河南农业科学, 2011, 40(6):79−81. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-3268.2011.06.021 JIA R L, LI L, LIU X L, et al. Studies on the relationship between urease activity and fertility of the soil in Litchi orchard [J]. Journal of Henan Agricultural Sciences, 2011, 40(6): 79−81.(in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-3268.2011.06.021
[31]	丁少男, 薛萐, 刘国彬. 施肥处理对黄土丘陵区农田土壤酶活性和水溶性有机碳、氮的影响 [J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2015, 34(11):2146−2154. doi: 10.11654/jaes.2015.11.016 DING S N, XUE S, LIU G B. Effects of fertilization on soil enzyme activities and water-soluble organic carbon and nitrogen content in farmland on hilly loess plateau [J]. Journal of Agro-Environment Science, 2015, 34(11): 2146−2154.(in Chinese) doi: 10.11654/jaes.2015.11.016
[32]	冯慧芳, 余明, 薛立. 外源性氮磷添加及林分密度对大叶相思林土壤酶活性的影响 [J]. 生态学报, 2020, 40(14):4894−4902. FENG H F, YU M, XUE L. Effects of nitrogen and phosphorus additions on soil enzyme activities in Acacia auriculiformis stands under different planting densities [J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2020, 40(14): 4894−4902.(in Chinese)