Dissipation and Risk Evaluation of Nitenpyram and Tolfenpxrad Residues in Tea and Soil

CHEN Feng; HU Jin-feng; WANG Jun; WU Wei; WANG Chang-fang

doi:10.19303/j.issn.1008-0384.2020.03.011

Volume 35 Issue 3

Mar. 2020

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Article Navigation > Fujian Journal of Agricultural Sciences > 2020 > 35(3): 317-322

CHEN F, HU J F, WANG J, et al. Dissipation and Risk Evaluation of Nitenpyram and Tolfenpxrad Residues in Tea and Soil [J]. Fujian Journal of Agricultural Sciences，2020，35（3）：317−322 doi: 10.19303/j.issn.1008-0384.2020.03.011

Citation:

CHEN F, HU J F, WANG J, et al. Dissipation and Risk Evaluation of Nitenpyram and Tolfenpxrad Residues in Tea and Soil [J]. Fujian Journal of Agricultural Sciences，2020，35（3）：317−322 doi: 10.19303/j.issn.1008-0384.2020.03.011

Citation:

PDF( 632 KB)

Dissipation and Risk Evaluation of Nitenpyram and Tolfenpxrad Residues in Tea and Soil

doi: 10.19303/j.issn.1008-0384.2020.03.011

Fujian Key Laboratory for Monitoring and Integrated Management of Crop Pests/Institute of Plant Protection, Fujian Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Fuzhou, Fujian　350013, China

Received Date: 2019-11-01
Rev Recd Date: 2020-02-25
Publish Date: 2020-03-01

Abstract

Abstract

Objective Dissipation of two new insecticides and risk of the residues in tea and soil were studied. Method A gas chromatographic method was applied for analyzing nitenpyram and tolfenpxrad residues in tea and soil specimens to determine the dissipation and transfer of the insecticides after application. Result The insecticide residues in tea and soil decreased exponentially with time after application in a first-order kinetic function. The half-lives of nitenpyram at the recommended dosage were 6.08–6.54 d in tea and 1.52–1.68 d in soil. It took 0.91–3.33 d for the residue to degrade below the maximum allowable residue limit (MRL) in tea. For tolfenpxrad at the recommended usage level, the residue half-lives were 4.47–4.74 d in tea and 1.87–1.89 d in soil. It took 5.10–8.18 d for the pesticide residue to dissipate below MRL in tea. Conclusion Both nitenpyram and tolfenpxrad were found to degrade to below the MRLs in tea for safe consumption as well as in soil for environmental protection.
- nitenpyram,
- tolfenpxrad,
- tea,
- residue degradation,
- risk assessment

FullText(HTML)

References(23)

References

[1]	ZHANG J, LIU J, QIN X W, et al. Analysis of time-and concentration-mortality relationship of nitenpyram against different larval stages of Nilaparvata lugens (Hemiptera: Delphacidae) [J]. Journal of Economic Entomology, 2010, 103(5): 1665−1669. doi: 10.1603/EC10138
[2]	TSUMURA Y, NAKAMURA Y, TONOGAI Y, et al. Determination of neonicotinoid pesticide nitenpyram and its metabolites in agricultural products [J]. Food Hygiene and Safety Science (Shokuhin Eiseigaku Zasshi), 1998, 39(2): 127−134_1. doi: 10.3358/shokueishi.39.127
[3]	BAJPAI N K, JEENGAR K L. Efficacy of tolfenpyrad 15% EC against whitefly, Bemisia tabaci Gennadius. infesting okr [J]. Progressive Horticulture, 2014: 76−79.
[4]	HIKIJI W, YAMAGUCHI K, SAKA K J, et al. Acute fatal poisoning with Tolfenpyrad [J]. Journal of Forensic and Legal Medicine, 2013, 20(8): 962−964. doi: 10.1016/j.jflm.2013.08.012
[5]	The Japan Food Chemical Research Foundation.Maximum residue limits (MRLs) list of agricultural chemicals in foods[DB/OL]. [2019-08-15]. http://www.m5.ws001.squarestart.ne.jp/foundation/agrdtl.php?a_inq=64900.
[6]	姚华源. 不同药剂防治茶树茶小绿叶蝉药效试验 [J]. 安徽农学通报(上半月刊), 2011, 17(7):135−136. YAO H Y. Efficacy of different insecticides against tea leafhopper in tea [J]. Anhui Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2011, 17(7): 135−136.(in Chinese)
[7]	王国鑫. 30%唑虫酰胺SC对茶小绿叶蝉的田间药效试验 [J]. 福建热作科技, 2019, 44(3):15−17. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-2327.2019.03.006 WANG G X. Field efficacy test of 30% tolfenpyrad suspension concentrate on Empoasca pirisuga [J]. Fujian Science & Technology of Tropical Crops, 2019, 44(3): 15−17.(in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-2327.2019.03.006
[8]	曾明森, 刘丰静, 黄伙水, 等. 茶园唑虫酰胺残留动态与使用安全性 [J]. 福建农业学报, 2014, 29(8):774−778. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-0384.2014.08.013 ZENG M S, LIU F J, HUANG H S, et al. Residue and safety of tolfenpyrad used in tea plantations [J]. Fujian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2014, 29(8): 774−778.(in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-0384.2014.08.013
[9]	毕富春, 韩冰, 王文涛, 等. 唑虫酰胺15%乳油气相色谱定量分析 [J]. 农药科学与管理, 2012, 33(5):41−43. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-5480.2012.05.015 BI F C, HAN B, WANG W T, et al. Quantitative analysis of tolfenpxrad 15% EC by gas chromatography [J]. Pesticide Science and Administration, 2012, 33(5): 41−43.(in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-5480.2012.05.015
[10]	NY/T 788-2018. 中华人民共和国农业行业标准的中国: 农药残留标准测试 [S]. 北京: 中华人民共和国农业部标准出版社, 2018.
[11]	GB/T 31270.1-2014. 中华人民共和国国家标准: 测试化学农药的环境安全性评价标准 [S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2014.
[12]	DOBSON P, TINEMBART O, FISCH R D, et al. Efficacy of nitenpyram as a systemic flea adulticide in dogs and cats [J]. Veterinary Record, 2000, 147(25): 709.
[13]	ABROL D P, SHANKAR U. Pesticides, food safety and integrated pest management [M]. Integrated Pest Management. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 2014: 167－199.
[14]	胡贝贞, 宋伟华, 董文洪, 等. 茶叶中联苯菊酯等4种农药残留测定结果的不确定度评定 [J]. 现代测量与实验室管理, 2012, 20(1):29−32. HU B Z, SONG W H, DONG W H, et al. Evaluation of uncertainty of determination results of four pesticide residues in tea [J]. Advanced Measurement and Laboratory Management, 2012, 20(1): 29−32.(in Chinese)
[15]	成婧, 王美玲, 朱绍华, 等. 固相萃取-高效液相色谱-串联质谱法测定茶叶中啶虫脒、吡虫啉和氟虫腈残留量 [J]. 食品安全质量检测学报, 2016, 7(1):131−137. CHENG J, WANG M L, ZHU S H, et al. Determination of imidacloprid, acetamiprid and fipronil residues in tea by high performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry coupled with solid-phase extraction [J]. Journal of Food Safety & Quality, 2016, 7(1): 131−137.(in Chinese)
[16]	王立一, 杨春亮, 王晓芳. 茶叶中阿维菌素和吡虫啉残留量的测定 [J]. 分析仪器, 2013(4):23−26. WANG L Y, YANG C L, WANG X F. Determination of abamectin and imidacloprid residues in tea [J]. Analytical Instrumentation, 2013(4): 23−26.(in Chinese)
[17]	魏鹏, 曹梦超, 王全胜, 等. QuEChERS-PSA-气相色谱法分析联苯菊酯·啶虫脒微乳剂在茶园中的残留特征 [J]. 农业环境科学学报, 2015, 34(10):2032−2038. WEI P, CAO M C, WANG Q S, et al. Analysis of residual profiles of bifenthrin and acetamiprid in tea garden by QuEChERS-PSA-GC [J]. Journal of Agro-Environment Science, 2015, 34(10): 2032−2038.(in Chinese)
[18]	Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Programme. Codex Alimentarius Commission: Procedural manual 21 [M]. FAO/WHO, 2009.
[19]	YUE N, KUANG H, SUN L, et al. An empirical analysis of the impact of EU's new food safety standards on China's tea export [J]. International Journal of Food Science & Technology, 2010, 45(4): 745−750.
[20]	CHEN Z M, WAN H B. Factors affecting residues of pesticides in tea [J]. Pesticide Science, 1988, 23(2): 109−118. doi: 10.1002/ps.2780230204
[21]	PRAMANIK S K, SAHA P, BHATTACHARYYA A, et al. Studies on the fate of ready-mix formulation of endosulfan and cypermethrin in tea [J]. Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, 2012, 89(5): 1016−1020. doi: 10.1007/s00128-012-0808-3
[22]	TEWARY D K, KUMAR V, RAVINDRANATH S D, et al. Dissipation behavior of bifenthrin residues in tea and its brew [J]. Food Control, 2005, 16(3): 231−237. doi: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2004.02.004
[23]	PARAMASIVAM M, CHANDRASEKARAN S. Persistence behaviour of deltamethrin on tea and its transfer from processed tea to infusion [J]. Chemosphere, 2014, 111: 291−295. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2014.03.111