• 中文核心期刊
  • CSCD来源期刊
  • 中国科技核心期刊
  • CA、CABI、ZR收录期刊

Message Board

Respected readers, authors and reviewers, you can add comments to this page on any questions about the contribution, review,        editing and publication of this journal. We will give you an answer as soon as possible. Thank you for your support!

Name
E-mail
Phone
Title
Content
Verification Code
Volume 35 Issue 1
Jan.  2020
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
LUO X H, DU L W, CHEN H, et al. Emergy Analysis on Two Typical Peach Cultivation Modes at Villages in Fujian [J]. Fujian Journal of Agricultural Sciences,2020,35(1):111−116 doi: 10.19303/j.issn.1008-0384.2020.01.015
Citation: LUO X H, DU L W, CHEN H, et al. Emergy Analysis on Two Typical Peach Cultivation Modes at Villages in Fujian [J]. Fujian Journal of Agricultural Sciences,2020,35(1):111−116 doi: 10.19303/j.issn.1008-0384.2020.01.015

Emergy Analysis on Two Typical Peach Cultivation Modes at Villages in Fujian

doi: 10.19303/j.issn.1008-0384.2020.01.015
  • Received Date: 2019-10-31
  • Rev Recd Date: 2019-12-16
  • Publish Date: 2020-01-01
  •   Objective  An analysis on balancing the ecological and economic benefits of peach orchard operations was conducted at the poverty-stricken areas in Ningde, Fujian Province to evaluate the grass-growing vs. ground-clearing practices for sustainable peach cultivation at a village scale.  Method   A method of analyzing emergy consumption was applied to compare the grass-growing(located at Laidun Village, Gutian County) and ground-clearing(located in Hutou Village, Fu’an County) modes practiced at peach orchards, in Fujian Province, by calculating indices of total emergy input (T), emergy self-sufficiency ratio (ESR), emergy investment ration (EIR), emergy yield ratio (EYR), environmental load ratio (ELR), emergy sustainable index (ESI), and emergy feedback rate (FYE) .   Result   The 2017–2018 indicators of the grass-growing and ground-clearing modes, respectively, were T at 1.16×1016 and 2.36×1016 sej·hm−2, ESR at 0.166 and 0.102; EIR at 5.030 and 8.823; EYR at 1.199 and 1.113; ELR at 0.425 and 0.410; ESI at 2.822 and 2.716; and, FYE at 0.072 and 0.026. The ground-clearing peach cultivation at Hutou employed greater inputs on both labor and organic/chemical fertilizers to resulted in a slightly lower ELR than its counterpart. In contrast, at Laidun, where grass-growing and utilization of methane were applied, led to a significantly higher FYE than at Hutou owing to a reduced demand on chemical fertilizer and emergy inputs by 57.2%. In addition, a significant 46.32% saving on emergy consumption per 10 000 RMB output of the crop was realized at Laidun.  Conclusion   Management of the peach orchard through grass-growing, combined with using methane liquid, has merits as an efficient and ecologically sustainable approach in the hilly villages of Ningde City.
  • loading
  • [1]
    罗旭辉, 高承芳, 刘朋虎, 等. 山区畲族村精准脱贫及绿色振兴研究: 以福鼎市磻溪镇赤溪村为例 [J]. 福建农林大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 2019, 22(2):1−8.

    LUO X H, GAO C F, LIU P H, et al. Poverty alleviation and rural green vitalization of She village: Case study on Chixi village, Pangxi town, Fuding City [J]. Journal of Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University(Philosophy and Social Sciences), 2019, 22(2): 1−8.(in Chinese)
    [2]
    CASTELLINI C, BOGGIA A, CORTINA C, et al. A multicriteria approach for measuring the sustainability of different poultry production systems [J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2012, 37: 192−201. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.07.006
    [3]
    WILFART A, PRUDHOMME J, BLANCHETON J P, et al. LCA and emergy accounting of aquaculture systems: Towards ecological intensification [J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2013, 121: 96−109.
    [4]
    黄文德, 牛俊义, 高玉红, 等. 退耕还草区农业生态系统能值动态分析: 以甘肃省镇原县北庄村为例 [J]. 干旱地区农业研究, 2008, 26(1):112−117.

    HUANG W D, NIU J Y, GAO Y H, et al. Dynamic analysis of emergy for agro-ecosystem in the region of cropland to grassland conversion: a case study of Beizhuang Village, Zhenyuan County in Gansu Province [J]. Agricultural Research in the Arid Areas, 2008, 26(1): 112−117.(in Chinese)
    [5]
    段娜, 林聪, 刘晓东, 等. 以沼气为纽带的生态村循环系统能值分析 [J]. 农业工程学报, 2015, 31(S1):261−268.

    DUAN N, LIN C, LIU X D, et al. Energy analysis of biogas-linked eco-village circulating system [J]. Transactions of the CSAE, 2015, 31(S1): 261−268.(in Chinese)
    [6]
    朱丽. 黄土高原沟壑区两个尺度的农果复合型生态系统能值分析[D]. 杨凌: 西北农林科技大学, 2014.

    ZHU L. Energy analysis of crop-fruit ecological system in two scales gully region of loess plateau[D]. Yangling, China: Northwest A & F University, 2014. (in Chinese)
    [7]
    BROWN M T, ULGIATI S. Updated evaluation of exergy and emergy driving the geobiosphere: a review and refinement of the emergy baseline [J]. Ecological Modelling, 2010, 221(20): 2501−2508. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2010.06.027
    [8]
    YANG Z F, JIANG M M, CHEN B, et al. Solar emergy evaluation for Chinese economy [J]. Energy Policy, 2010, 38(2): 875−886. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2009.10.038
    [9]
    蓝盛芳, 钦佩, 陆宏芳. 生态经济系统能值分析[M]. 北京: 化学工业出版社, 2002.
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(1)  / Tables(5)

    Article Metrics

    Article views (1345) PDF downloads(25) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return