Changes on Composition of Volatile Organic Compounds in Mango Leaves Induced by <i>Procontarinai robusta</i> Infestation

CAI Hong-jiao; CHEN Feng

doi:10.19303/j.issn.1008-0384.2019.02.013

Volume 34 Issue 2

Apr. 2019

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Article Navigation > Fujian Journal of Agricultural Sciences > 2019 > 34(2): 223-228

CAI Hong-jiao, CHEN Feng. Changes on Composition of Volatile Organic Compounds in Mango Leaves Induced by Procontarinai robusta Infestation[J]. Fujian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2019, 34(2): 223-228. doi: 10.19303/j.issn.1008-0384.2019.02.013

Citation:

CAI Hong-jiao, CHEN Feng. Changes on Composition of Volatile Organic Compounds in Mango Leaves Induced by Procontarinai robusta Infestation[J]. Fujian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2019, 34(2): 223-228. doi: 10.19303/j.issn.1008-0384.2019.02.013

Citation:

PDF( 1132 KB)

Changes on Composition of Volatile Organic Compounds in Mango Leaves Induced by Procontarinai robusta Infestation

doi: 10.19303/j.issn.1008-0384.2019.02.013

CAI Hong-jiao^1
,,
CHEN Feng^{2
,
,}

1.
Fishery college, Jimei University, Xiamen, Fujian 361021, China
2.
Institute of Plant Protection, Fujian Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Fuzhou, Fujian 350013, China

Received Date: 2019-01-02
Rev Recd Date: 2019-02-06
Publish Date: 2019-02-28

Abstract

Abstract

Objective To identify the variations on volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in mango leaves due to infestation by Procontarinai robusta for future study to mitigate or control the disease caused by the midge. Method The VOCs in healthy leaves from a mango tree were compared with those in the midge-infested leaves by using headspace solid-phase microextraction (SPME) combined with gas chromatography mass spectrometry (GC–MS). Result The healthy leaves were found to contain 65 VOCs, while the diseased ones 66 VOCs. Between them, 45 were identical which included caryophyllene, α-cyanene, octadecene, decene, hydrocelene, β-Myrcene, and terpenes. In the diseased leaves, 31 terpenes contributed 51.41%, while 13 aromatic compounds made up 41.10%, of the total. Besides naphthalene and azulene compounds, methyl-4-(1-methylethylidene)-cyclohexene comprised 24.32%, α-cubebene 8.92%, 3-carene 2.23%, acetate 3-hexen-1-ol 2.23%, 4-carene 1.06%, limonene 1.04%, and α-caryophyllene 1.46%. The content of esters was much higher in the midge-infested leaves than that of the healthy counterparts, and the composition also differed from each other. Minute amounts of substances, such as octanol, lanthanol, spartanol, epichlorohydrin, long citronellol and coumarins, were detected in the healthy leaves but not in the infested samples. Whereas, aristoloene, farnesene and some special naphthalene and azulene aromatic compounds were found only in the midge-infested leaves. Conclusion The VOCs in mango leaves mainly consist of aromatic components and terpenes, the composition and content of which were obviously changed after Procontarinairobusta damage.
- Procontarinai robusta,
- HS-SPME,
- GC-MS,
- volatile organic compounds,
- midge-infested mango leaves

FullText(HTML)

References(19)

References

[1]	李军, 卜文俊, 张清源.危害芒果叶片的瘿蚊科-中国新纪录和物种[J].动物分类学报, 2006, 28(1):148-151. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-0739.2006.01.024 LI J, PU W J, ZHANG Q Y. A new species of gall midge (Diptera, Cecidomyiidae) attacking mango leaves from China[J]. Acta Zootaxonomica Sinica, 2006, 28(1):148-151.(in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-0739.2006.01.024
[2]	NENTWIG W. Handbook of Alien Species in Europe. In chapter 11, list of species alien in Europe and to Europe[M]. Dordrecht: Springer Dordrecht, 2009: 247.
[3]	陈永森, 黄国弟, 李日旺, 等.入侵有害生物壮铗普瘿蚊在我国的风险分析[J].南方农业学报, 2017, 48(3): 454-458. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/gxnykx201703012 CHEN Y S, HUANG G D, LI R W, et al. Risk analysis of Procontarinia robusta Li, Bu and Zhang in China: An invasive pest[J]. Journal of Southern Agriculture, 2017, 48(3): 454-458.(in Chinese) http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/gxnykx201703012
[4]	CAI H J, Kolesik P, Wang HY, et al. Description of the immature stages and gall morpholgy, and molecular characterisation of Procontarinia robusta, a gall midge (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae) damaging leaves of mango Mangifera indica L. (Anarcadiaceae) in southern Asia[J]. Australian Journal of Entomology, 2013, 52: 206-211. doi: 10.1111/aen.2013.52.issue-3
[5]	王伟新, 王宏毅.芒果壮铗普瘿蚊生物学特性初报[J].福建农业学报, 2005, 20(2):74-76. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-0384.2005.02.003 WANG W X, WANG H Y. A preliminary report on biological characters of Procontarinia robusta in mango[J]. Fujian Journal of Agricultral Science, 2005, 20(2):74-76.(in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-0384.2005.02.003
[6]	DEMORAES C M, LEWIS W J, PAR P W. Herbivore-infested plants selectively attract parasitoids[J]. Nature, 1998, 393(6685): 570-573. doi: 10.1038/31219
[7]	杜家纬.植物-昆虫间的化学通讯及其行为控制[J].植物生理学报, 2005, 27(3):193-200. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/zwslxb200103001 DU J W. Plant-insect Chemical Communication and Its Behavior Control[J]. Acta Phytophysiologica Sinica, 2005, 27(3):193-200.(in Chinese) http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/zwslxb200103001
[8]	WINTERHALTER P. Volatile compounds in foods and beverages[M].New York: Marcel Dekker, 1991:389-409.
[9]	CANUTO K M, de Souza M A, GARRUTID D. Volatile chemical composition of mango fruit 'Tommy Atkins', cultivated in San Francisco valley, at different stages of maturity[J]. Quimica Nova, 2009, 32(9): 2377-2381.
[10]	PANDITS S, KULKARNIR S, CDLEY H G, et al. Changes in volatile composition during fruit development and ripening of Alphonso mango[J]. Journal Science Food Agricultury, 2009, 89(12): 2071-2081. doi: 10.1002/jsfa.v89:12
[11]	田厚军, 陈艺欣, 魏辉, 等, 芒果不同部位挥发物及横线尾夜蛾对其触角电位反应[J].生物安全学报, 2012, 21(2): 142-147. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-1787.2012.02.012 TIAN H J, CHEN Y X, WEI H, et al. Volatiles emitted by mango (Mangifera indica) plants and electrophysiological responses of Chlumetia transverse to such volatiles[J]. Journal of Biosafety, 21(2): 142-147.(in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-1787.2012.02.012
[12]	肖春芬, 黄秋妹, 李永冲, 等. 3-芳基香豆素类化合物抗肿瘤活性研究进展[J].广州化学, 2018, 43(06), 72-78. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/gzhx201806014 XIAO C F, HUANG Q M, LI Y C, et al. Progress in the Anti-tumor Activity of 3-Aryl Coumarins[J]. Guangzhou Chemistry, 2018, 43(6), 72-78.(in Chinese) http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/gzhx201806014
[13]	BERENBAUM M R, ZANGERL A R. Furanocoumarin metabolism in Papiliopolyxenes: biochemistry, genetic variability, and ecological significance[J].Oecologia, 1993, 95:370-375. doi: 10.1007/BF00320991
[14]	WITTSTOCK U, BUROW M. Glucosinolate breakdown in Arabidopsis:mechanism, regulation and biological significance[J]. The Arabidopsis Book, 2010(8): e0134. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/OAPaper/oai_pubmedcentral.nih.gov_3244901
[15]	AUGUSTYNA W A, BOTHAA B M, COMBRINCKA S, et al. Correlation of volatile profiles of twenty mango cultivars with their susceptibilities to mango gall fly infestation[J]. South African Journal of Botany, 2012, 76(4):710-716. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=48fc1417dc13acb379c21c1be8cf24d1
[16]	张季林, 魏惠珍, 张洁. β-石竹烯生物学功能的研究进展[J].山东医药, 2018, 58(3):110-112. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-266X.2018.03.035 ZHANG J L, WEI H Z, ZHANG J. Advances in biological functions of beta-caryophyllene[J]. Shandong Medical Journal, 2018, 58(3):110-112.(in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-266X.2018.03.035
[17]	PICHERSKY E, GERSHENZON J. The formation and function of plant volatiles: perfumes for pollinator attraction and defense[J]. Current Opinion of Plant Biology, 2002, 5(3): 237-243. doi: 10.1016/S1369-5266(02)00251-0
[18]	王红伟, 杨伟, 杨桦, 等.横坑切梢小蠹对植物挥发物的电生理和行为反应[J].生态学杂志, 2014, 33 (5):1260-266. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/stxzz201405020 WANG H W, YANG W, YANG H, et al, Electroan-tennogram and behavioral responses of Tomicus minor(Hartig)(Coleoptera:Scolytidae) to plant volatiles[J]. Chinese Joural of Ecology, 2014, 33 (5):1260-1266.(in Chinese) http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/stxzz201405020
[19]	BRUCE T J A and PICKETT J A. Perception of plant volatile blends by herbivorous insects Finding the right mix[J]. Phytochemistry, 2011, 72(13): 1605-1611. doi: 10.1016/j.phytochem.2011.04.011