Remediation Effect of Biological Agents on Rhizosphere Soil on Land of Continuously Cropped <i>Panax notoginseng</i>

ZHAO Han-yu; WEI Xiao-ya; LIN Yu; CHEN Ting; TAO Zi-xi; LIN Wen-xiong; LIN Sheng

doi:10.19303/j.issn.1008-0384.2018.11.011

Volume 33 Issue 11

Mar. 2019

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Article Navigation > Fujian Journal of Agricultural Sciences > 2018 > 33(11): 1181-1189

ZHAO Han-yu, WEI Xiao-ya, LIN Yu, CHEN Ting, TAO Zi-xi, LIN Wen-xiong, LIN Sheng. Remediation Effect of Biological Agents on Rhizosphere Soil on Land of Continuously Cropped Panax notoginseng[J]. Fujian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2018, 33(11): 1181-1189. doi: 10.19303/j.issn.1008-0384.2018.11.011

Citation:

ZHAO Han-yu, WEI Xiao-ya, LIN Yu, CHEN Ting, TAO Zi-xi, LIN Wen-xiong, LIN Sheng. Remediation Effect of Biological Agents on Rhizosphere Soil on Land of Continuously Cropped Panax notoginseng[J]. Fujian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2018, 33(11): 1181-1189. doi: 10.19303/j.issn.1008-0384.2018.11.011

Citation:

PDF( 2466 KB)

Remediation Effect of Biological Agents on Rhizosphere Soil on Land of Continuously Cropped Panax notoginseng

doi: 10.19303/j.issn.1008-0384.2018.11.011

ZHAO Han-yu^1
,,
WEI Xiao-ya¹,
LIN Yu²,
CHEN Ting¹,
TAO Zi-xi¹,
LIN Wen-xiong^{1, 2, 3},
LIN Sheng^{1, 2, 3
,
,}

1.
College of Life Science, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, Fujian 350002, China
2.
Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Agroecological Processing and Safety Monitoring, Fuzhou, Fujian 350002, China
3.
Fujian-Taiwan Joint Innovative Center for Germplasm Resources and Cultivation of Crop, Fuzhou, Fujian 350002, China

Received Date: 2018-09-12
Rev Recd Date: 2018-10-22
Publish Date: 2018-11-28

Abstract

Abstract

Two biological agents, EM and TRI, were applied in soil on a continuous cropping field of Panax notoginseng to study the remediating effect on the soil and the mechanism associated with the application. Treatments with the agents were found significantly increased the seedling emergence rate and survival rate as well as the root yield. All nutrients in the soil treated with EM were increased, while the available potassium in the soil treated with TRI significantly improved. The HPLC analysis showed no accumulation of phenolic acids in the rhizosphere soil by these treatments indicating that allelochemicals were not directly, but might indirectly, involved in the detrimental effect on P. notoginseng caused by continuous cropping. The DGGE and qRT-PCR test results showed that both EM and TRI, especially TRI, could increase the population of beneficial, while depressed the harmful, bacteria in the soil. Thereby, the rhizosphere soil was effectively repaired by alleviating the deficiency brought about by the continuous cropping practice, and consequently, the growth and yield of P. notoginseng was significantly recovered or improved.
- Panax notoginseng,
- harmful effect of continuous cropping,
- microbial agents,
- biological agents rhizosphere soil,
- soil remediation

FullText(HTML)

References(38)

References

[1]	杨志刚, 陈阿琴, 俞颂东.三七药理研究新进展[J].上海中医药杂志, 2005, 39(4):59-62. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-1334.2005.04.025
[2]	王莹, 禇扬, 李伟, 等.三七中皂苷成分及其药理作用的研究进展[J].中草药, 2015, 46(9):1381-1392. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/zcy201509023
[3]	孟祥霄, 黄林芳, 董林林, 等.三七全球产地生态适宜性及品质生态学研究[J].药学学报, 2016, 51(9):1483-1493. http://mall.cnki.net/magazine/Article/YXXB201609021.htm
[4]	张子龙, 李凯明, 杨建忠, 等.轮作对三七连作障碍的消减效应研究[J].西南大学学报(自然科学版), 2015, 37(8):39-46. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/xnnydxxb201508007
[5]	张子龙, 王文全, 缪作清, 等.主成分分析在三七连作土壤质量综合评价中的应用[J].生态学杂志, 2013, 32(6):1636-1644. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Conference/7964304
[6]	孙雪婷, 李磊, 龙光强, 等.三七连作障碍研究进展[J].生态学杂志, 2015, 34(3):885-893. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/sdnyswxb201101016
[7]	刘莉, 刘大会, 金航, 等.三七连作障碍的研究进展[J].山地农业生物学报, 2011, 30(1):70-75. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-0457.2011.01.016
[8]	张学炜, 黄学森.西瓜连作障碍及其防治方法[J].中国瓜菜, 1993(2):21-23. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=QK000004993433
[9]	高微微, 张西梅, 田给林, 等.探索中前行——中药材病害研究概况与思考[J].植物保护, 2016, 42(5):15-23. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0529-1542.2016.05.003
[10]	吴林坤, 吴红淼, 朱铨, 等.不同改良措施对太子参根际土壤酚酸含量及特异菌群的影响[J].应用生态学报, 2016, 27(1):3623-3630. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/yystxb201611027
[11]	张丽娟, 曲继松, 郭文忠, 等.微生物菌肥对黄河上游地区设施土壤微生物及酶活性的影响[J].中国土壤与肥料, 2014(5):32-36. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/trfl201405007
[12]	王涛, 乔卫花, 李玉奇, 等.轮作和微生物菌肥对黄瓜连作土壤理化性状及生物活性的影响[J].土壤通报, 2011, 42(3):578-583. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/trtb201103013
[13]	逄焕成, 李玉义, 严慧峻, 等.微生物菌剂对盐碱土理化和生物性状影响的研究[J].农业环境科学学报, 2009, 28(5):951-955. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1672-2043.2009.05.016
[14]	鲍士旦.土壤农化分析[M].第3版.北京:中国农业出版社, 1999:25-109.
[15]	李贺勤, 刘奇志, 张林林, 等.草莓连作土壤酚酸类物质积累对土壤线虫的影响[J].生态学杂志, 2014, 33(1):169-175. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/stxzz201401025
[16]	吴宗伟, 王明道, 刘新育, 等.重茬地黄土壤酚酸的动态积累及其对地黄生长的影响[J].生态学杂志, 2009, 28(4):660-664. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/stxzz200904014
[17]	胡元森, 李翠香, 杜国营, 等.黄瓜根分泌物中化感物质的鉴定及其化感效应[J].生态环境, 2007, 16(3):954-957. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-5906.2007.03.050
[18]	夏围围, 贾仲君.高通量测序和DGGE分析土壤微生物群落的技术评价[J].微生物学报, 2014, 54(12):1489-1499. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/wswxb201412012
[19]	龙良鲲, 羊宋贞, 姚青, 等. AM真菌DNA的提取与PCR-DGGE分析[J].菌物学报, 2005(4):94-99. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/jwxt200504015
[20]	位小丫, 林煜, 陈婷, 等.田间条件下植物促生细菌缓解太子参连作障碍的效果评价[J].生态学杂志, 2018, 37(2):399-408. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/stxzz201802014
[21]	朱扬玲.采用PCR-DGGE方法研究浙江玫瑰醋酿造过程中的微生物多样性[D].杭州: 浙江工商大学, 2009.
[22]	刘鹏飞, 赵丹, 宋刚, 等.变性梯度凝胶电泳技术在微生物多样性研究中的应用[J].微生物学杂志, 2013, 33(6):88-92. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-7021.2013.06.017
[23]	刘绍雄, 王明月, 王娟, 等.基于PCR-DGGE技术的剑湖湿地湖滨带土壤微生物群落结构多样性分析[J].农业环境科学学报, 2013(7):1405-1412. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-NHBH201307020.htm
[24]	梁小刚, 蔡国林, 张中华, 等.利用nested PCR-DGGE技术分析江苏啤酒大麦真菌群落结构[J].食品与发酵工业, 2012, 38(8):1-6. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=QK201205542302
[25]	牛芳胜, 马志强, 毕秋艳, 等.哈茨木霉菌与5种杀菌剂对番茄灰霉病菌的协同作用[J].农药学学报, 2013, 15(2):165-170. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-7303.2013.02.07
[26]	王幼珊, 刘润进.球囊菌门丛枝菌根真菌最新分类系统菌种名录[J].菌物学报, 2017, 36(7):820-850. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/jwxt201707004
[27]	LI S, MIAO Z, ZHANG Y, et al. Monacrosporium janus sp. nov. a new nematode-trapping hyphomycete parasitizing sclerotia and hyphae of Sclerotinia sclerotiorum[J]. Mycological Research, 2003, 107(7):888-894. doi: 10.1017/S0953756203008165
[28]	NGUYEN H D, NICKERSON N L, SEIFERT K A. Basidioascus and Geminibasidium:a new lineage of heat-resistant and xerotolerant basidiomycetes[J]. Mycologia, 2013, 105(5):1231-1250. doi: 10.3852/12-351
[29]	SMILEY R W, PATTERSON L M. Pathogenic fungi associated with Fusarium foot rot of winter wheat in the semiarid Pacific Northwest[J]. Plant Disease, 1996, 80(8):944-949. doi: 10.1094/PD-80-0944
[30]	祝英, 彭轶楠, 巩晓芳, 等.不同微生物菌剂对当归苗生长及根际土微生物和养分的影响[J].应用与环境生物学报, 2017(3):511-519. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=QKC20172017080200314373
[31]	董占梅, 杜立财, 程林, 等. 4种微生物菌剂对老参地人参产量和质量的影响[J].特产研究, 2016, 38(4):9-13. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TCYA201604004.htm
[32]	罗玉兰, 田龚, 张冬梅, 等.微生物菌剂对连栋大棚土壤养分及硝态氮累积的影响[J].中国农学通报, 2015, 31(13):224-228. doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb14120113
[33]	尹淑丽, 张丽萍, 张根伟, 等.复合微生态菌剂对黄瓜根际土壤微生物数量及酶活的影响[J].微生物学杂志, 2012, 32(1):23-27. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-7021.2012.01.005
[34]	韩忠明, 杨颂, 韩梅, 等.不同菌剂对人参连作土壤酶活性的影响[J].东北农业科学, 2016(1):50-53. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JLNK201601013.htm
[35]	王强, 阮晓, 李兆慧, 等.植物自毒作用及针叶林自毒研究进展[J].林业科学, 2007, 43(6):134-142. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/lykx200706024
[36]	张亚琴, 陈雨, 雷飞益, 等.药用植物化感自毒作用研究进展[J].中草药, 2018, 49(8):1946-1956. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/zcy201808032
[37]	KAUR H, KAUR R, KAUR S, et al. Taking ecological function seriously:soil microbial communities can obviate allelopathic effects of released metabolites[J]. Plos One, 2009, 4(3):1-6.
[38]	吴凤芝, 王伟.大棚番茄土壤微生物区系研究[J].北方园艺, 1999(3):1-2. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=QK199900214015