Male Sterilization of <i>Brassica napus</i> Induced by Sulfonylurea Herbicides

LI Jian-chang; LI Yong-hong; ZHANG Zhen-lan; GUO Xu-peng; ZHANG Yao-wen; ZHAO Peng-tao; ZHAO Xiao-guang

doi:10.19303/j.issn.1008-0384.2018.11.002

Volume 33 Issue 11

Mar. 2019

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Article Navigation > Fujian Journal of Agricultural Sciences > 2018 > 33(11): 1130-1135

LI Jian-chang, LI Yong-hong, ZHANG Zhen-lan, GUO Xu-peng, ZHANG Yao-wen, ZHAO Peng-tao, ZHAO Xiao-guang. Male Sterilization of Brassica napus Induced by Sulfonylurea Herbicides[J]. Fujian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2018, 33(11): 1130-1135. doi: 10.19303/j.issn.1008-0384.2018.11.002

Citation:

LI Jian-chang, LI Yong-hong, ZHANG Zhen-lan, GUO Xu-peng, ZHANG Yao-wen, ZHAO Peng-tao, ZHAO Xiao-guang. Male Sterilization of Brassica napus Induced by Sulfonylurea Herbicides[J]. Fujian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2018, 33(11): 1130-1135. doi: 10.19303/j.issn.1008-0384.2018.11.002

Citation:

PDF( 884 KB)

Male Sterilization of Brassica napus Induced by Sulfonylurea Herbicides

doi: 10.19303/j.issn.1008-0384.2018.11.002

Hybrid Rapeseed Research Center of Shaanxi Province, Shaanxi Rapeseed Branch of National Oil Crops Improvement Center, Yangling, Shaanxi 712100, China

Received Date: 2018-09-15
Rev Recd Date: 2018-10-28
Publish Date: 2018-11-01

Abstract

Abstract

To search for a new, efficient chemical hybridizing agent (CHA), 5 sulfonylurea herbicides (i.e., nicosulfuron, bensulfuron, amidosulfuron, tribenuron and ethametsulfuron) were evaluated. The effects of the agents on inducing male sterility as well as agronomic properties and yield traits of Brassica napus were determined for the analysis. The results showed that, aside from ethametsulfuron, these agents indeed turned the fertile rapeseeds sterile. The induction by nicosulfuron or bensulfuron was less effective, with an average complete male sterility rate merely 30.8% for nicosulfuron and 21.0% for bensulfuron. But their incomplete male sterility and the phytotoxicity rates reached 56.4% and 63.4%, respectively, for nicosulfuron, and 18.4% and 20.0%, respectively, for bensulfuron, which exerted a significant negative effect on agronomic traits and seed yield on B. napus. On the other hand, amidosulfuron and tribenuron were most effective with their average male sterility rates that reached 96.55% and 97.9%, respectively, and the average complete male sterility rate 88.55% and 92.51%, respectively, according to the results obtained by the stem-smearing and spraying methods. In addition, the latter two agents did not carry any significant differences from CK1 on the agronomic traits or seed yield. Therefore, amidosulfuron and tribenuron were expected to be applied in the heterosis utilization of chemical hybridizing of B. napus after further optimization on the preparation, additives and application of the agents.
- sulfonylurea,
- herbicides,
- Brassica napus L.,
- male sterility

FullText(HTML)

References(25)

References

[1]	官春云, 王国槐, 赵均田, 等.甘兰型油菜化学杀雄利用杂种优势的初步研究[J].湖南农学院学报, 1979(4):47-52. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=QK000001443350
[2]	尚毅, 李殿荣, 李永红, 等.我国油菜化学杀雄+细胞质雄性不育的应用研究[J].西北农业学报, 2005, 14(1):26-29. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/xbnyxb200501007
[3]	傅廷栋.杂交油菜的育种与利用[M].武汉:湖北科学技术出版社, 1995:124-136.
[4]	刘录祥, 黄铁城.作物化学杂交育种的实践与展望[J].中国农业科学, 1990, 23(2):1-9. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=QK000004034793
[5]	刘忠松, 官春云, 陈社员.植物雄性不育机理的研究和应用[M].北京:中国农业出版社, 2001:244-248.
[6]	张学昆, 李加纳, 唐章林, 等.化学杂交剂对油菜细胞质不育系波里马育性的影响[J].西南农业大学学报, 1999, (12):4-5. http://www.cqvip.com/Main/Detail.aspx?id=5589949
[7]	张耀文, 尚毅, 李永红, 等.新型化学杂交剂SX-1对甘蓝型油菜CMS的作用效果研究[J].西北农业学报, 2003, 12(3):56-61. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/xbnyxb200303016
[8]	官春云, 李栒, 王国槐, 等.化学杂交剂诱导油菜雄性不育机理的研究, KMS-1对甘蓝型油菜育性的影响[J].中国油料作物学报, 1998, 20(3):1-4. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGYW803.000.htm
[9]	刘绚霞, 董军刚, 刘创社, 等.新型化学杀雄剂EN对甘蓝型油菜的杀雄效果及其应用研究[J].西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2007, 35(4):81-85. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1671-9387.2007.04.019
[10]	何振才, 李建厂, 李永红.新杀雄剂在油菜上的应用初报[J].陕西农业科学, 2000(3):12-14. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0488-5368.2000.03.005
[11]	于澄宇, 胡胜武, 张春宏, 等.化学杂交剂EXP对油菜的杀雄效果[J].作物学报, 2005, 31(11):1455-1459. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0496-3490.2005.11.011
[12]	戚永明, 刘建军, 付云龙, 等.新型化学杀雄剂"定军1号"在甘蓝型油菜CMS制种上控制微粉的作用效果[J].种子, 2006, 25(10):93-95. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4705.2006.10.034
[13]	严志斌, 刘创社, 董军刚, 等.化学杀雄剂对甘蓝型油菜的杀雄效果研究[J].西北农业学报, 2006, 15(6):81-84. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1389.2006.06.021
[14]	范宝磊, 岳霞丽, 刘志勇.新型化学杀雄剂WP对油菜体内乙烯释放量和内源激素的影响[J].化学与生物工程, 2006, 23(10):50-51. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-5425.2006.10.018
[15]	井苗, 汪奎, 王斌, 等.BHL诱导油菜雄性不育效果再研究[J].西北农业学报, 2009, 18(5):150-152. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-1389.2009.05.034
[16]	李宏伟, 张恩慧, 许忠民, 等.甘蓝化学杀雄剂GS-1的杀雄效果研究[J].西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2009, 37(7):115-121. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/xbnydxxb200907020
[17]	官春云, 李栒, 王国槐, 等.化学杂交剂诱导油菜雄不育机理的研究Ⅰ:杀雄剂1号对甘蓝型油菜花药毡绒层和花粉粒形成的影响[J].作物学报, 1997, 23(5):513-521. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0496-3490.1997.05.001
[18]	CHALEFF R S, MAUVAIS C J. Herbicide-resistant mutants from tobacco cell cultures[J].Science, 1984, 223:1148-1151. doi: 10.1126/science.223.4641.1148
[19]	DUGGLEBY R G, PANG S S. Acetohydroxyacid Synthase[J]. Journal of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, 2000, 33(1):1-36. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/nyxxb200504004
[20]	于澄宇, 何蓓如.氨基酸合成抑制剂类除草剂诱导油菜雄性不育效果评价[J].作物学报, 2014, 40(2):264-272. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/zuowxb201402009
[21]	于澄宇, 何蓓如.植物乙酰乳酸合成酶抑制剂作用方式及机理研究进展[J].农药学学报, 2011, 13(3):221-227. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-7303.2011.03.02
[22]	张宝娟, 赵惠贤, 胡胜武.苯磺隆对甘蓝型油菜中双9号的杀雄效果[J].中国油料作物学报, 2010, 32(4):467-471. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/zgylzwxb201004003
[23]	黄铁城, 王明理, 张爱民, 等.新型化学杀雄剂——WL84811诱导普通小麦(Triticum aestivum)雄性不育的研究[J].作物学报, 1988, 14(2):155-162. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0496-3490.1988.02.013
[24]	柴守诚, 杨天章, 柴守玺.化学杂交剂在杂种小麦生产中的应用[J].甘肃农业大学学报, 1992, 27(4):288-293. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=QK000000682591
[25]	MUHITCH M J, SHANER D L, STIDHAM M A. Imidazolinone and acetohydroxyacid synthase from higher plants[J].Plant Physiol, 1987(83):451-456. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/NSTLQK/NSTL_QKJJ02499617/