• 中文核心期刊
  • CSCD来源期刊
  • 中国科技核心期刊
  • CA、CABI、ZR收录期刊

Message Board

Respected readers, authors and reviewers, you can add comments to this page on any questions about the contribution, review,        editing and publication of this journal. We will give you an answer as soon as possible. Thank you for your support!

Name
E-mail
Phone
Title
Content
Verification Code
Volume 33 Issue 10
Mar.  2019
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
LAI Pu-fu, LI Yi-bin, WU Li, WENG Min-jie, TANG Bao-sha, CHEN Jun-chen. Effects of Different Drying Methods on the Nutritional and Bioactive Components of Radix Puerariae Residue[J]. Fujian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2018, 33(10): 1108-1112. doi: 10.19303/j.issn.1008-0384.2018.10.017
Citation: LAI Pu-fu, LI Yi-bin, WU Li, WENG Min-jie, TANG Bao-sha, CHEN Jun-chen. Effects of Different Drying Methods on the Nutritional and Bioactive Components of Radix Puerariae Residue[J]. Fujian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2018, 33(10): 1108-1112. doi: 10.19303/j.issn.1008-0384.2018.10.017

Effects of Different Drying Methods on the Nutritional and Bioactive Components of Radix Puerariae Residue

doi: 10.19303/j.issn.1008-0384.2018.10.017
  • Received Date: 2018-06-28
  • Rev Recd Date: 2018-10-19
  • Publish Date: 2018-10-01
  • In this study, the major nutritional component, bioactive component and amino acid composition of Radix puerariae residue were monitored after hot air drying and vacuum freeze drying to unravel the effects of different drying methods on the nutritional and bioactive component. The results were as followed:the starch content of Radix puerariae residue in vacuum freeze drying (53.6%) was significantly higher than that in hot air drying (47.0%), but the protein, reducing sugar and ash content were significantly lower than those in hot air drying, no significant difference of the fat, sucrose, total flavonoids, puerarin and polysaccharides content was found between hot air drying and vacuum freeze drying. And the dietary fiber, crude fiber, lignin, total amino acids, essential amino acids, non-essential amino acids contents of Radix puerariae residue in hot air drying were significantly higher than those in vacuum freeze drying. In comprehensive consideration of determination results of various nutritional and bioactive composition of Radix puerariae residue, hot air drying is suitable for processing Radix puerariae residue in order to keep its quality with the cost of production considered.
  • loading
  • [1]
    尹乐斌, 夏秋良, 张臣飞, 等.葛根全原粉沸腾造粒工艺优化[J].农业工程学报, 2016, 32(19):296-301. doi: 10.11975/j.issn.1002-6819.2016.19.040
    [2]
    BERSKI W, PTASZEK A, PTASZEK P, et al. Pasting and rheological properties of oat starch and its derivatives[J]. Carbohydrate Polymers, 2011, 83(2):665-671. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2010.08.036
    [3]
    LIANG X L, ZHANG J, LIAO Z G, et al. Quantitative evaluation of the mechanism underlying the biotransportation of the active ingredients in Pueraria lobata Radix and Chuanxiong rhizoma[J].Phytotherapy Research, 2015, 29(9):1396-1403. doi: 10.1002/ptr.v29.9
    [4]
    吴琼, 刘奕, 吴庆园, 等.不同干燥方式对葛根全粉抗氧化性能和香气成分的影响[J].食品科学, 2017, 38(6):202-208. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/spkx201706032
    [5]
    ADAM R, YOUSEF G G, ROGERS R B, et al. Isolation of radiolabeled isoflavones from kudzu (Pueraria lobata) root cultures[J]. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 2008, 56(17):7860-7865. doi: 10.1021/jf801413z
    [6]
    张帆, 屈紫薇.干热改性葛根淀粉成膜工艺的研究[J].安徽农业科学, 2017, 45(9):86-89. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0517-6611.2017.09.028
    [7]
    赖谱富, 陈君琛, 李怡彬, 等.葛根加工副产物资源化利用研究进展[J].福建农业科技, 2016(8):44-46. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/fjnykj201608016
    [8]
    中华人民共和国国家卫生和计划生育委员会.食品安全国家标准食品中水分的测定: GB5009.3-2016[S].北京: 中国标准出版社, 2016.
    [9]
    中华人民共和国国家卫生和计划生育委员会国家食品药品监督管理总局.食品安全国家标准食品中蛋白质的测定: GB 5009.5-2016[S].北京: 中国标准出版社, 2016.
    [10]
    中华人民共和国国家卫生和计划生育委员会国家食品药品监督管理总局.食品安全国家标准食品中脂肪的测定: GB 5009.6-2016[S].北京: 中国标准出版社, 2016.
    [11]
    中华人民共和国国家卫生和计划生育委员会.食品安全国家标准食品中灰分的测定: GB 5009.4-2016[S].北京: 中国标准出版社, 2016.
    [12]
    中华人民共和国国家卫生和计划生育委员会国家食品药品监督管理总局.食品安全国家标准食品中淀粉的测定: GB 5009.9-2016[S].北京: 中国标准出版社, 2016.
    [13]
    中华人民共和国国家卫生和计划生育委员会.食品安全国家标准食品中还原糖的测定: GB 5009.7-2016[S].北京: 中国标准出版社, 2016.
    [14]
    中华人民共和国卫生部中国国家标准化管理委员会.保健食品中葛根素的测定: GB/T 22251-2008[S].北京: 中国标准出版社, 2008.
    [15]
    中华人民共和国国家卫生和计划生育委员会.食品安全国家标准食品中膳食纤维的测定: GB 5009.88-2014[S].北京: 中国标准出版社, 2014.
    [16]
    中华人民共和国卫生部中国国家标准化管理委员会.植物类食品中粗纤维的测定: GB/T 5009.10-2003[S].北京: 中国标准出版社, 2003.
    [17]
    中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局中国国家标准化管理委员会.饲料中酸性洗涤木质素(ADL)的测定: GB/T 20805-2006[S].北京: 中国标准出版社, 2006.
    [18]
    赖谱富, 赖锋连, 陈君琛, 等.多年生藤本豆总黄酮纯化及抑菌活性研究[J].核农学报, 2015, 29(8):1539-1546. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/hnxb201508014
    [19]
    楚纪明, 马树运, 李海峰, 等.葛根有效成分及其药理作用研究进展[J].食品与药品, 2015, 17(2):142-146. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-979X.2015.02.020
    [20]
    黄彤, 李丽华, 刘蕾, 等.利用响应面分析法优化葛渣异黄酮提取工艺[J].食品研究与开发, 2013, 34(10):32-37. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/spyjykf201310009
    [21]
    李秀娟, 李慧, 黄贤刚.天然葛及葛根淀粉的成分分析研究[J].食品科技, 2006(11):102-104. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-9989.2006.11.028
    [22]
    江连洲, 张巧智, 关嘉琦, 等.羧甲基化大豆水酶法膳食纤维的制备及其性能研究[J].农业机械学报, 2017, 48(10):330-337. doi: 10.6041/j.issn.1000-1298.2017.10.042
    [23]
    谢欢, 涂宗财, 张露, 等.黑曲霉发酵制备高可溶性膳食纤维豆渣工艺优化及其水合性质研究[J].中国粮油学报, 2017, 32(4):116-121, 132. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-0174.2017.04.020
    [24]
    王岩岩.药用真菌发酵葛渣生产活性膳食纤维研究[D].武汉: 华中科技大学, 2005. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=degree&id=D010515
    [25]
    FAO. Amino acid content of foods and biological data on proteins[J]. Food policy and food Sci Serv Nutr Div, 1970, 24:5-6. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=707fce0c594237dff3d25d5dfea61e6b
    [26]
    彭智华, 龚敏方.蛋白质的营养评价及其在食用菌评价上的应用[J].食用菌学报, 1996, 3(3):56-64. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=QK199600512886
    [27]
    WATSON S A, Hirata Y. Some wet-milling properties of Artificially dried Corn[J]. Cereal Chem, 1962, (39):35-47. http://www.aaccnet.org/publications/cc/backissues/1962/Documents/CC1962a04.html
    [28]
    NAKASAKO M. Water-protein interactions from high-resolution protein crystallography[J]. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, 2004, 359(1448):1191-1206. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2004.1498
    [29]
    唐秋实, 刘学铭, 池建伟, 等.不同干燥工艺对杏鲍菇品质和挥发性风味成分的影响[J].食品科学, 2016, 37(4):25-30. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/spkx201604005
    [30]
    徐康, 杜金华.干燥方法对黄秋葵抗氧化能力的影响[J].食品与发酵工业, 2016, 42(5):120-125. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/spyfx201605021
    [31]
    鲍士宝, 李顺欲, 杭华.干燥方式对甘薯渣干燥特性及品质的影响[J].食品工业科技, 2014, 35(10):168-171. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/spgykj201410040
    [32]
    黄纪念, 王长虹, 孙强, 等.麦麸膳食纤维研究概况[J].农产品加工·创新版, 2010(3):20-23. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/zgyy200715045
    [33]
    李建文, 杨月欣.膳食纤维定义及分析方法研究进展[J].食品科学, 2007, 28(2):350-355. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1002-6630.2007.02.090
    [34]
    吕佳宁, 李影, 韩立杰, 等.不同干燥方法对生食香菇品质的影响[J].食品科学技术学报, 2014, 32(2):46-50. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/bjqgyxyxb201402009
    [35]
    ERKAN N, ÖZDEN Ö. The changes of fatty acid and amino acid compositions in sea bream (Sparus aurata) during irradiationprocesss[J]. Radiation Physics and Chemistry, 2007, 76(10):1636-1641. doi: 10.1016/j.radphyschem.2007.01.005
    [36]
    YANG J H, LIN H C, MAU J L. Non-volatile taste components of several commercial mushrooms[J]. Food Chemistry, 2001, 72(4):465-471. doi: 10.1016/S0308-8146(00)00262-4
    [37]
    郭刚军, 胡小静, 徐荣, 等.干燥方式对辣木叶营养、功能成分及氨基酸组成的影响[J].食品科学, 2018, 39(11):39-45. doi: 10.7506/spkx1002-6630-201811007
    [38]
    石芳, 李瑶, 杨雅轩, 等.不同干燥方式对松茸品质的影响[J].食品科学, 2018, 39(5):141-147. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/spkx201805022
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Tables(4)

    Article Metrics

    Article views (925) PDF downloads(13) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return