Fuzzy Synthetic Evaluation on <i>Monascus</i> for Rice Wine Brewery

SU Hao; LIANG Zhang-cheng; HE Zhi-gang; LIN Xiao-zi; LI Wei-xin

doi:10.19303/j.issn.1008-0384.2018.08.015

Volume 33 Issue 8

Mar. 2019

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Article Navigation > Fujian Journal of Agricultural Sciences > 2018 > 33(8): 859-864

SU Hao, LIANG Zhang-cheng, HE Zhi-gang, LIN Xiao-zi, LI Wei-xin. Fuzzy Synthetic Evaluation on Monascus for Rice Wine Brewery[J]. Fujian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2018, 33(8): 859-864. doi: 10.19303/j.issn.1008-0384.2018.08.015

Citation:

SU Hao, LIANG Zhang-cheng, HE Zhi-gang, LIN Xiao-zi, LI Wei-xin. Fuzzy Synthetic Evaluation on Monascus for Rice Wine Brewery[J]. Fujian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2018, 33(8): 859-864. doi: 10.19303/j.issn.1008-0384.2018.08.015

Citation:

PDF( 853 KB)

Fuzzy Synthetic Evaluation on Monascus for Rice Wine Brewery

doi: 10.19303/j.issn.1008-0384.2018.08.015

SU Hao^{1, 2
,},
LIANG Zhang-cheng^{1, 2},
HE Zhi-gang^{1, 2},
LIN Xiao-zi^{1, 2
,
,},
LI Wei-xin^{1, 2}

1.
Institute of Agricultural Engineering Technology, Fujian Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Fuzhou, Fujian 350003, China
2.
Fujian Key Laboratory of Agricultural Products(Food) Processing, Fuzhou, Fujian 350003, China

Received Date: 2018-05-27
Rev Recd Date: 2018-07-22
Publish Date: 2018-08-01

Abstract

Abstract

The fuzzy synthetic evaluation method was applied to determine the sensory quality of the Hongqu rice wine brewed with Monascus sp. The appearance, aroma, taste, and characteristics of the wines were the criteria used in classifying them into 5 grades, i.e., superior, fine, qualified, unqualified, and inferior. The M (·, +) operator was selected to establish the fuzzy synthetic evaluation index and model. According to the degree of association based on the weighted ranks, 12 Hongqu rice wines were judged to be in the fine grade, 18 in the qualified grade, and 2 as unqualified. Total acid content in the wine was found to be a critical element affecting the sensory quality. The applied evaluation method was considered a scientific and reliable tool in producing quality Hongqu rice wine.
- fuzzy synthesis evaluation,
- Hongqu rice wine,
- sensory evaluation

FullText(HTML)

References(16)

References

[1]	王培璇, 毛健, 李晓钟, 等.不同地区黄酒挥发性物质差异性分析[J].食品科学, 2014, 35(6):83-89. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/spkx201406017
[2]	曾金红, 江涛, 焦新萍, 等.黄酒品质评价方法的研究进展[J].酿酒科技, 2012(5):17-20. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/niangjkj201205001
[3]	顾艳君, 王芳, 张佳汇.基于模糊数学综合评判的鸡精调味料感官评价方法[J].食品工业, 2018(1):298-302. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SPGY201801082.htm
[4]	刘加友, 陈兵兵, 王振斌, 等.模糊数学和响应面在葛根乳酸菌饮料感官评定中的应用[J].中国食品学报, 2017, 17(1):224-229. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/zgspxb201701029
[5]	魏健, 陈铮, 徐泽权, 等.基于模糊数学法评价不同煮制温度下新疆熏马肉的品质[J].食品工业科技, 2016, 37(15):134-139. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/spgykj201615030
[6]	陈希, 李汴生, 梅灿辉, 等.模糊综合评判在催陈黄酒感官分析的应用[J].现代食品科技, 2009, 25(4):394-397. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/gzspgykj200904015
[7]	中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫局, 中华国家标准化管理委员会.黄酒: GB13662-2008[S].北京: 中国标准出版社, 2008.
[8]	马美范.王新明.福林法测定啤酒多酚含量的研究[J].食品研究与开发, 2013, 34(5):93-96. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-6521.2013.05.025
[9]	福建省卫生和计划生育委员会.DBS35/003-2017食品安全地方标准红曲黄酒[S].北京: 中国标准出版社, 2017.
[10]	刘月.中国传统黄酒健康价值的评价研究[D].济南: 济南大学, 2016: 31-35. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=degree&id=D01049149
[11]	YU H, ZHANG Y, XU C, et al. Discrimination of wine age of Chinese rice wine by electronic tongue based on amino acid profiles[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering, 2017, 33(2):297-301. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=nygcxb201702041
[12]	YU H Y, ZHAO J, LI F, et al. Characterization of Chinese rice wine taste attributes using liquid chromatographic analysis, sensory evaluation, and an electronic tongue[J]. Journal of Chromatography B, 2015, 997:129-135. doi: 10.1016/j.jchromb.2015.05.037
[13]	BAI W, SUN S, ZHAO W, et al. Determination of ethyl carbamate (EC) by GC-MS and characterization of aroma compounds by HS-SPME-GC-MS during wine frying status in Hakka yellow rice wine[J]. Food Analytical Methods, 2017, 10(6):2068-2077. doi: 10.1007/s12161-016-0754-5
[14]	LEE G, BANG D, LIM J, et al. Simultaneous determination of ethyl carbamate and urea in Korean rice wine by ultra-performance liquid chromatography coupled with mass spectrometric detection[J]. Journal of Chromatography B, 2017, 1065:44-49. http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/28946124
[15]	VEMIREDDY L R, SATYAVATHI V V, SIDDIQ E A, et al. Review of methods for the detection and quantification of adulteration of rice:Basmati as a case study[J]. Journal of food science and technology, 2015, 52(6):3187-3202. http://cn.bing.com/academic/profile?id=7216f742487fd63125c90945e90cf491&encoded=0&v=paper_preview&mkt=zh-cn
[16]	KANG B S, LEE J E, PARK H J. Electronic tongue-based discrimination of Korean rice wines (makgeolli) including prediction of sensory evaluation and instrumental measurements[J]. Food chemistry, 2014, 151:317-323. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2013.11.084