Fitness and Glucosinolate Catabolism-related Gene Expression Upon Feeding on Natural Host Plant of <i>Plutella xylostella</i> Raised from Artificial Diet

DONG Yu-hong; CHEN Wei; ZHENG Ling; JING Xiao-dong; ZHOU Li; ZHANG Ling-ling; LI Xiao-tong; HE Wei-yi

doi:10.19303/j.issn.1008-0384.2018.01.011

Volume 33 Issue 1

Mar. 2019

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Article Navigation > Fujian Journal of Agricultural Sciences > 2018 > 33(1): 54-60

DONG Yu-hong, CHEN Wei, ZHENG Ling, JING Xiao-dong, ZHOU Li, ZHANG Ling-ling, LI Xiao-tong, HE Wei-yi. Fitness and Glucosinolate Catabolism-related Gene Expression Upon Feeding on Natural Host Plant of Plutella xylostella Raised from Artificial Diet[J]. Fujian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2018, 33(1): 54-60. doi: 10.19303/j.issn.1008-0384.2018.01.011

Citation:

DONG Yu-hong, CHEN Wei, ZHENG Ling, JING Xiao-dong, ZHOU Li, ZHANG Ling-ling, LI Xiao-tong, HE Wei-yi. Fitness and Glucosinolate Catabolism-related Gene Expression Upon Feeding on Natural Host Plant of Plutella xylostella Raised from Artificial Diet[J]. Fujian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2018, 33(1): 54-60. doi: 10.19303/j.issn.1008-0384.2018.01.011

Citation:

DONG Yu-hong, CHEN Wei, ZHENG Ling, JING Xiao-dong, ZHOU Li, ZHANG Ling-ling, LI Xiao-tong, HE Wei-yi. Fitness and Glucosinolate Catabolism-related Gene Expression Upon Feeding on Natural Host Plant of Plutella xylostella Raised from Artificial Diet[J]. Fujian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2018, 33(1): 54-60. doi: 10.19303/j.issn.1008-0384.2018.01.011

PDF( 2130 KB)

Fitness and Glucosinolate Catabolism-related Gene Expression Upon Feeding on Natural Host Plant of Plutella xylostella Raised from Artificial Diet

doi: 10.19303/j.issn.1008-0384.2018.01.011

DONG Yu-hong^{1, 2, 3
,},
CHEN Wei^{1, 2, 3},
ZHENG Ling^{1, 2, 3},
JING Xiao-dong^{1, 2, 3},
ZHOU Li^{1, 2, 3},
ZHANG Ling-ling^{1, 2, 3},
LI Xiao-tong^{1, 2, 3},
HE Wei-yi^{1, 2, 3
,
,}

1.
State Key Laboratory of Ecological Pest Control for Fujian and Taiwan Crops, Institute of Applied Ecology/Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, Fujian 350002, China
2.
Key Laboratory of Integrated Pest Management for Fujian-Taiwan Crops, Ministry of Agriculture, Fuzhou, Fujian 350002, China
3.
Fujian-Taiwan Joint Centre for Ecological Control of Crop Pests/Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, Fujian 350002, China

Received Date: 2017-11-01
Rev Recd Date: 2017-12-12
Publish Date: 2018-01-01

Abstract

Abstract

Glucosinolate sulfatase (GSS) and sulfatase modifying factor 1 (SUMF1) are crucial for the catabolism of Plutella xylostella on the defensive glucosinolates in the cruciferous host plants. However, little information is available on their roles in the adaptation of the strain of P. xylostella raised from an artificial diet when changed to be fed on its natural host plant. The expression patterns of GSSs and SUMF1s at different developmental stages of two artificial diet strains of P. xylostella (i.e., AD and G88) were determined. It was found that the expressions of GSSs were similar between the two strains, with abundant GSS1 and GSS2 expressions at the 3^rd and 4^th-instar stages, but no apparent patterns observed for SUMF1s. After the newly hatched larvae of AD and G88 were transferred onto the cotyledons of radish plants, the larval survival rates became lower, with longer larval developmental time and lower pupal weight, than their counterparts fed on the original artificial diet. The expression levels of GSS1 and GSS2 in the larval midguts grown on the radish cotyledons decreased significantly; but, that of SUMF1a, only in the midguts of AD strain. It suggested that the expressions of glucosinolate catabolism-related genes in P. xylostella were possibly regulated by the factor(s) in the host plant and closely associated with the adaptability of the insects upon a shifted feeding from a formulated diet to a natural host plant.
- Plutella xylostella,
- glucosinolate sulfatase,
- sulfatase modifying factor 1,
- artificial diet strain,
- host shift

FullText(HTML)

References(26)

References

[1]	AGRAWAL A A. Induced responses to herbivory and increased plant performance[J]. Science, 1998, 279(5354):1201-1202. doi: 10.1126/science.279.5354.1201
[2]	HEIL M. Indirect defence via tritrophic interactions[J]. New Phytologist, 2008, 178(1):41-61. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2007.02330.x
[3]	EYLES A, BONELLO P, GANLEY R, et al. Induced resistance to pests and pathogens in trees[J]. New Phytologist, 2010, 185(4):893-908. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2009.03127.x
[4]	MULLER C. Interactions between glucosinolate-and myrosinase-containing plants and the sawfly Athalia rosae[J]. Phytochemistry Reviews, 2009, 8(1):121-134. doi: 10.1007/s11101-008-9115-3
[5]	WINDE I, WITTSTOCK U. Insect herbivore counterada-ptations to the plant glucosinolate-myrosinase system[J]. Phytochemistry, 2011, 72(13):1566-1575. doi: 10.1016/j.phytochem.2011.01.016
[6]	KLIEBENSTEIN D J, KROYMANN J, MITCHELL O T. The glucosinolate-myrosinase system in an ecological and evolutionary context[J]. Current Opinion in Plant Biology, 2005, 8(3):264-271. doi: 10.1016/j.pbi.2005.03.002
[7]	RAUT J S, BANSODE B S, JADHAV A K, et al. Activity of allyl isothiocyanate and its synergy with fluconazole against Candida albicans biofilms[J]. Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology, 2017, 27(4):685-693. doi: 10.4014/jmb.1607.07072
[8]	BORGEN B, AHUJA I, THANGSTAD O P, et al. 'Myrosin cells' are not a prerequisite for aphid feeding on oilseed rape (Brassica napus) but affect host plant preferences[J]. Plant Biology, 2012, 14(6):894-904. doi: 10.1111/plb.2012.14.issue-6
[9]	WITTSTOCK U, AGERBIRK N, STAUBER E J, et al. Successful herbivore attack due to metabolic diversion of a plant chemical defense[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the U S A, 2004, 101(14):4859-4864. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0308007101
[10]	KAZANA E, POPE T W, TIBBLES L, et al. The cabbage aphid:a walking mustard oil bomb[J]. Proceedings of the Royal Society B-Biological Sciences, 2007, 274(1623):2271-2277. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2007.0237
[11]	BERAN F, PAUCHET Y, KUNERT G, et al. Phyllotreta striolata flea beetles use host plant defense compounds to create their own glucosinolate-myrosinase system[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the U S A, 2014, 111(20):7349-7354. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1321781111
[12]	RATZKA A, VOGEL H, KLIEBENSTEIN D J, et al. Disarming the mustard oil bomb[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the U S A, 2002, 99(17):11223-11228. doi: 10.1073/pnas.172112899
[13]	YOU M S, YUE Z, HE W Y, et al. A heterozygous moth genome provides insights into herbivory and detoxification[J]. Nature Genetics, 2013, 45(2):220-225. doi: 10.1038/ng.2524
[14]	COSMA M P, PEPE S, ANNUNZIATA I, et al. The multiple sulfatase deficiency gene encodes an essential and limiting factor for the activity of sulfatases[J]. Cell, 2003, 113(4):445-456. doi: 10.1016/S0092-8674(03)00348-9
[15]	SARDIELLO M, ANNUNZIATA I, ROMA G, et al. Sulfatases and sulfatase modifying factors:an exclusive and promiscuous relationship[J]. Human Molecular Genetics, 2005, 14(21):3203-3217. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddi351
[16]	ZITO E, FRALDI A, PEPE S, et al. Sulphatase activities are regulated by the interaction of sulphatase-modifying factor 1 with SUMF2[J]. EMBO Reports, 2005, 6(7):655-660. doi: 10.1038/sj.embor.7400454
[17]	MA X L, HE W Y, CHEN W, et al. Structure and expression of sulfatase and sulfatase modifying factor genes in the diamondback moth, Plutella xylostella[J]. Insect Science, 2017, DOI: 10.1111/1744-7917.12487.
[18]	SARFRAZ R M, DOSDALL L M, KEDDIE A B, et al. Larval survival, host plant preferences and developmental responses of the diamondback moth Plutella xylostella (Lepidoptera:Plutellidae) on wild brassicaceous species[J]. Entomological Science, 2011, 14(1):20-30. doi: 10.1111/ens.2011.14.issue-1
[19]	HOPKINS R J, van DAM N M, van LOON J J A. Role of glucosinolates in insect-plant relationships and multitrophic interactions[J]. Annual Review of Entomology, 2009, 54(1):57-83. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ento.54.110807.090623
[20]	AGERBIRK N, OLSEN C E. Glucosinolate structures in evolution[J]. Phytochemistry, 2012, 77(1):16-45. http://cn.bing.com/academic/profile?id=c5a92134385fe420468395331a5cce8f&encoded=0&v=paper_preview&mkt=zh-cn
[21]	BADENES-PEREZ F R, NAULT B A, SHELTON A M. Manipulating the attractiveness and suitability of hosts for diamondback moth (Lepidoptera:Plutellidae)[J]. Journal of Economic Entomology, 2005, 98(3):836-844. doi: 10.1603/0022-0493-98.3.836
[22]	TALEKAR N S, SHELTON A M. Biology, ecology, and management of the diamondback moth[J]. Annual Review of Entomology, 1993, 38(1):275-301. doi: 10.1146/annurev.en.38.010193.001423
[23]	FURLONG M J, WRIGHT D J, DOSDALL L M. Diamondback moth ecology and management:problems, progress and prospects[J]. Annual Review of Entomology, 2013, 58(1):517-541. doi: 10.1146/annurev-ento-120811-153605
[24]	YANG G, WANG D F, DONG Z Q, et al. Characterization of a myrosinase cDNA from Brassica parachinensis and its defense role against Plutella xylostella after suppression[J]. Insect Science, 2012, 19(4):461-471. doi: 10.1111/ins.2012.19.issue-4
[25]	HUANG Y P, CHEN Y, ZENG B, et al. CRISPR/Cas9 mediated knockout of the abdominal-A homeotic gene in the global pest, diamondback moth (Plutella xylostella)[J]. Insect Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, 2016, 75:98-106. doi: 10.1016/j.ibmb.2016.06.004
[26]	HUANG Y P, WANG Y, ZENG B, et al. Functional characterization of Pol Ⅲ U6 promoters for gene knockdown and knockout in Plutella xylostella[J]. Insect Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, 2017, 89:71-78. doi: 10.1016/j.ibmb.2017.08.009