• 中文核心期刊
  • CSCD来源期刊
  • 中国科技核心期刊
  • CA、CABI、ZR收录期刊

Message Board

Respected readers, authors and reviewers, you can add comments to this page on any questions about the contribution, review,        editing and publication of this journal. We will give you an answer as soon as possible. Thank you for your support!

Name
E-mail
Phone
Title
Content
Verification Code
Volume 32 Issue 7
Oct.  2017
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
LU Shao-wei, DING Jie, LI Shao-ning, YANG Chao, CHEN Bo, LU Sen. Water Consumption by Transpiration of Landscape Trees in Beijing[J]. Fujian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2017, 32(7): 739-745. doi: 10.19303/j.issn.1008-0384.2017.07.010
Citation: LU Shao-wei, DING Jie, LI Shao-ning, YANG Chao, CHEN Bo, LU Sen. Water Consumption by Transpiration of Landscape Trees in Beijing[J]. Fujian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2017, 32(7): 739-745. doi: 10.19303/j.issn.1008-0384.2017.07.010

Water Consumption by Transpiration of Landscape Trees in Beijing

doi: 10.19303/j.issn.1008-0384.2017.07.010
  • Received Date: 2017-03-18
  • Rev Recd Date: 2017-05-04
  • Publish Date: 2017-07-01
  • A pot experiment was conducted to study the photosynthesis and the transpiration of 5 landscape trees commonly found in Beijing, Pinus bungeana, Fraxinus chinensis, Ginkgo biloba, Prunus davidiana, and Lycium chincnse. The results showed that, with ample supply of water, the rates of photosynthesis (Pn), transpiration (Tr), and stomatal conductance (Gs) on leaves of the nursery stocks in a day consistently changed in an M-shape curve with a "lunch break" at noon time. The changes on vapor pressure deficit (VPD) exhibited a single peak curve. Tr linearly correlated with Gs as well as VPD. The correlation coefficient (R2) between Tr and Gs of P. bungeana was 0.9795; and, that between Tr and VPD, 0.9884. Tr of the 5 species ranked L. chincnse (3.33 mmol·m-2·s-1) > F. chinensis (3.22 mmol·m-2·s-1) > P. davidiana (3.22 mmol·m-2·s-1)=G. biloba (3.21 mmol·m-2·s-1) > P. bungeana (2.21 mmol·m-2·s-1). The water consumptions for the trees were L. chincnse (0.090 g·cm-2·d-1) > F.chinensis (0.080 g·cm-2·d-1) > Prunus davidiana (0.076 g·cm-2·d-1)=G. biloba (0.076 g·cm-2·d-1)>P. bungeana (0.032 g·cm-2·d-1). The monthly water consumptions of F. chinensis and G. biloba exhibited in a V-shape curve; while, P. bungeana, P. davidiana and L. chincnse, an M-shape curve with twin peaks. Seasonally, the water consumptions of the trees decrease in the order of July (0.083 g·cm-2·d-1) > September (0.078 g·cm-2·d-1) > August (0.075 g·cm-2·d-1) > June (0.071 g·cm-2·d-1) > October (0.060 g·cm-2·d-1) > May (0.057 g·cm-2·d-1). And, P. bungeana consumed the greatest amount of water in autumn, while others in summer. On draught resistance, P. davidiana and G. biloba were more tolerant to the stress than L. chincnse, F. chinensis or P. bungeana.
  • loading
  • [1]
    陆贵巧, 谢宝元, 谷建才, 等.大连市常见绿化树种蒸腾降温的效应分析[J].河北农业大学学报, 2006, 29(2):65-66. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CULT200602016.htm
    [2]
    樊敏. 北京常用3种观赏乔木耗水特性研究[D]. 北京: 北京林业大学, 2007. http://cdmd.cnki.com.cn/Article/CDMD-10022-2007077176.htm
    [3]
    王瑞辉, 马履一.北京15种园林树木耗水性的比较研究[J].中南林业科技大学学报, 2009, 29(4):17-20. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZNLB200904004.htm
    [4]
    马达, 李吉跃, 林平.北京山区造林树种耗水规律初探[J].山西农业大学学报:自然科学版, 2006, 26(1):48-49. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SXNY200601017.htm
    [5]
    REMORINI D, MASSAI R. Comparison of water status indicators for young peach trees[J]. Irrigation Science, 2003, 22(1):39-46. https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=1164823
    [6]
    李薛飞, 孟庆涛, 黄建国, 等.植物生理学原理测算树木蒸腾耗水速率方法综述[J].防护林科技, 2014, (3):93-95. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-FHLK201403042.htm
    [7]
    毛振华. 不同灌溉量条件下六种地被植物的耗水特性[D]. 呼和浩特: 内蒙古农业大学, 2011.
    [8]
    薛雪, 李娟娟, 郑云峰, 等. 5个常绿园林树种的夏季光合蒸腾特性[J].林业科学, 2015, 51(9):150-156. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-LYKE201509019.htm
    [9]
    ZIMMERMANN U, SCHNEIDER H, WEGNER L H, et al. Water ascent in tall trees:does evolution of land plants rely on a highly metastable state[J].New Phytologist, 2004, 162:575-615. doi: 10.1111/nph.2004.162.issue-3
    [10]
    王瑞辉. 北京主要园林树种耗水性及节水灌溉制度研究[D]. 北京: 北京林业大学, 2006.
    [11]
    刘崟艳, 周以飞, 李清, 等.三叶青的蒸腾作用与气孔结构研究[J].中草药, 2015, 46(17):2614-2615. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZCYO201517021.htm
    [12]
    邱权, 潘昕, 何茜, 等.华南地区3种苗木生长旺盛时期光合特性及蒸腾耗水日变化规律的比较[J].华南农业大学学报, 2012, 33(4):526-528. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HNNB201204020.htm
    [13]
    ELENA P, CRISTINA N, GIACOMO L. Early Responses to Acute Ozone Exposure in Two Fagus Sylvatica Clones Differing in Xeromorphic Adaptations:Photosynthetic and Stomatal Processes, Membrane and Epicuticular Characteristics[J].Environ Monit Assess, 2007, 128:93-108. doi: 10.1007/s10661-006-9418-z
    [14]
    张静. R: FR值对温室菊花气孔特性及蒸腾的影响及模拟研究[D]. 南京: 南京信息工程大学, 2013.
    [15]
    JORGENSEN S T, NTUNDU W H, OUEDRAOGO M, et al. Effect of a short and severe intermittent drought on transpiration, seed yield, yield components, and harvest index in four landraces of bambara groundnut[J].International Journal Plant Pro-duction, 2011, 5(1):25-36. http://ijpp.gau.ac.ir/article_717_5.html
    [16]
    朱妍, 李吉跃, 史剑波.北京六个绿化树种盆栽蒸腾耗水量的比较研究[J].北京林业大学学报, 2006, 20(1):65-70. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-BJLY200601013.htm
    [17]
    孙鹏森, 马履一.水源保护树种耗水特性研究与应用[M].北京:中国环境科学出版社, 2002:4-16; 68-93.
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(7)

    Article Metrics

    Article views (1112) PDF downloads(254) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return