• 中文核心期刊
  • CSCD来源期刊
  • 中国科技核心期刊
  • CA、CABI、ZR收录期刊

Message Board

Respected readers, authors and reviewers, you can add comments to this page on any questions about the contribution, review,        editing and publication of this journal. We will give you an answer as soon as possible. Thank you for your support!

Name
E-mail
Phone
Title
Content
Verification Code
Volume 32 Issue 4
May  2017
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
CHEN Wen-sheng, CHU Jia-fan, LV Zai-hui, HUANG Xiao-song, XU Bing-ying, QIU Dong-liang. Effect of Simulated Acid Rain on Permeability of Tomato Cell Membrane[J]. Fujian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2017, 32(4): 376-381. doi: 10.19303/j.issn.1008-0384.2017.04.005
Citation: CHEN Wen-sheng, CHU Jia-fan, LV Zai-hui, HUANG Xiao-song, XU Bing-ying, QIU Dong-liang. Effect of Simulated Acid Rain on Permeability of Tomato Cell Membrane[J]. Fujian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2017, 32(4): 376-381. doi: 10.19303/j.issn.1008-0384.2017.04.005

Effect of Simulated Acid Rain on Permeability of Tomato Cell Membrane

doi: 10.19303/j.issn.1008-0384.2017.04.005
  • Received Date: 2016-11-15
  • Rev Recd Date: 2017-02-09
  • Publish Date: 2017-04-28
  • Effects of simulated acid rain(SiAR) at pH 3.0 and 3.5, along with pH 5.6 (CK), on the membrane permeability of cells in leaves of Brothin tomato were investigated. The results showed that the SOD activity, malondialdehyde (MDA) content, and cell membrane permeability of the tomato leaves increased significantly after SiAR treatments. But, the soluble protein decreased significantly due to the treatments. SOD activity in the leaves declined gradually once the stress was stopped.It became significantly lower than that of control, 20ds after the cessation. MDA content in the leaves treated by pH3.5 SiAR fluctuated with a slight upward trend that was not significantly different from that of control. On the other hand, the pH3.0 treatment produced a significant difference between them after 20ds of removal of the stress. The pH 3.5 treatment caused an initial rise on the membrane permeability and follo wed by a decline, while pH3.0 gave a continual downward trend. However, 20ds after stress stopping, there were no significant differences on the permeability between either of them and control.The soluble protein content in the leaves had an up-and-down insignificant increasing tendency by SiAR treatments in 15 days after the treatment. The injuries on the leaves caused by SiAR declined following the treatments, and reached a constant level 10ds after the stress ceased. Judging by the appearance of the tomato plants, the leaf yellowing and withering persisted 20ds after cessation of the pH3.0 treatment, indicating that an irreversible damage had occurred to the plants by SiAR. In contrast, the tomato plants seemed capable of self-rejuvenation after a SiAR stress at pH3.5.
  • loading
  • [1]
    许新辉, 郜洪文.中国南方酸雨的分布特征及其成因分析[J].四川环境, 2011, 30(4):135-139. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SCHJ201104034.htm
    [2]
    王文兴, 丁国安.中国降水酸度和离子浓度的时空分布[J].环境科学研究, 1997, 10(2):1-7. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HJKX702.000.htm
    [3]
    万玉山, 王皖蒙.中国酸雨污染现状成因分析及防治措施[J].安徽农业科学, 2010, 38(34):19420-19421, 19425. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0517-6611.2010.34.072
    [4]
    齐泽民, 王玄德, 宋光煜.酸雨对植物影响的研究进展[J].世界科技研究与发展, 2004, 26(2):36-41. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SJKF200402009.htm
    [5]
    杨学春, 牟树森.酸雨和降尘对植物产量及汞含量的研究[J].西南农业大学学报, 1998, 20(2):165-169. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XNND802.017.htm
    [6]
    刘婷婷. 模拟酸雨胁迫下番茄叶片的基因差异表达研究[D]. 福州: 福建农林大学, 2010.
    [7]
    商桑, 田丽波, 黄绵佳, 等.模拟酸雨对茄科3种蔬菜种子萌发的影响[J].植物研究, 2007, 27(4):494-499. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-MBZW200704024.htm
    [8]
    BISESSAR S, 孔再德.模拟酸雨对番茄细菌病斑的影响[J].农业环境与发展, 1987, (12):50. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-NHFZ198704023.htm
    [9]
    杨志敏, 华筠, 王萍.模拟酸雨对若干种蔬菜生长和生理特性影响的研究[J].农业环境保护, 1994, (5):213-216, 241. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-NHBH405.004.htm
    [10]
    王学奎.植物生理生化实验原理和技术[M].北京:高等教育出版社, 2006:5.
    [11]
    徐利利, 陈焱山, 张士权, 等.ABA对木樨科植物抗冻性影响的研究[J].现代农业科技, 2007, (15):8-9. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-5739.2007.15.003
    [12]
    李迪, 唐璐, 周青.水稻种子萌发时酸雨对可溶性蛋白与脯氨酸含量的影响[J].安全与环境学报, 2008, (5):12-15. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-AQHJ200805003.htm
    [13]
    严重玲, 洪业汤, 杨先科, 等.酸雨胁迫下稀土元素对小麦的生物学效应[J].中国农业科学, 1998, (3):89-91. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZNYK803.015.htm
    [14]
    侯麟. 酸雨胁迫对白兰花生理特性的影响[D]. 成都: 四川农业大学, 2010.
    [15]
    王涛, 张珊珊, 谢寅峰, 等.模拟酸雨胁迫对菲白竹生理特性的影响[J].东北林业大学学报, 2014, (11):17-21. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-5382.2014.11.005
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Figures(3)  / Tables(4)

    Article Metrics

    Article views (1476) PDF downloads(220) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return