Effect of Nitrogen Stress on Physiological and Biochemical Properties of Different Types of Rice

LÜ Xiao-hong; DU Meng; FU Li-dong; SONG Yu-ting; CHEN Wen-fu

doi:10.19303/j.issn.1008-0384.2017.012.002

Volume 32 Issue 12

Feb. 2018

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Article Navigation > Fujian Journal of Agricultural Sciences > 2017 > 32(12): 1281-1286

LÜ Xiao-hong, DU Meng, FU Li-dong, SONG Yu-ting, CHEN Wen-fu. Effect of Nitrogen Stress on Physiological and Biochemical Properties of Different Types of Rice[J]. Fujian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2017, 32(12): 1281-1286. doi: 10.19303/j.issn.1008-0384.2017.012.002

Citation:

LÜ Xiao-hong, DU Meng, FU Li-dong, SONG Yu-ting, CHEN Wen-fu. Effect of Nitrogen Stress on Physiological and Biochemical Properties of Different Types of Rice[J]. Fujian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2017, 32(12): 1281-1286. doi: 10.19303/j.issn.1008-0384.2017.012.002

Citation:

PDF( 960 KB)

Effect of Nitrogen Stress on Physiological and Biochemical Properties of Different Types of Rice

doi: 10.19303/j.issn.1008-0384.2017.012.002

1.
Liaoning Saline-alkali Land Utilization and Research Institute, Panjin, Liaoning 124010, China
2.
Shenyang Agricultural University Rice Research Institute, Shenyang, Liaoning 110161, China

Received Date: 2016-09-21
Rev Recd Date: 2017-05-25
Publish Date: 2017-12-28

Abstract

Abstract

The compact rice with erect panicles, Shennong 07425, and the loose rice with curved panicles, Akihikari, were used to study the effect of nitrogen applications on thephysiological and biochemical properties of the different types of rice plants.Activities of antioxidant enzymes and damages occurred to thecell membranes of the plants were the criteria used for the evaluation.It was found that MDA inthe leaves of both varieties elevated as the plants aged, and it was more apparent on Akihikari.In addition, either low or high nitrogenlevel resulted in a higher MDA content than those in between.Both varieties, especially Shennong 07425, exhibited a downward trend on CAT and SOD activities with increasingnitrogenapplications.The leaf POD activityrose slightly as theplant grew, reached a peak 15 days after grouting, andended with a gradual decline.The enzymatic activities were more significantly affected by high than low nitrogenlevels.Consequently, it was concluded that a nitrogen fertilization in the range of N 0.1-0.2 g·kg^-1 would enhancethe activities of the protective enzymesin scavenging free radicals delaying senescence of leaves on the plants.Furthermore, theMDA content and POD activity of a rice variety could be used as an indicator in selecting and/or breeding a high-yieldcultivar with an efficient nitrogen utilization capability.
- nitrogen application,
- plant type,
- rice,
- physiological and biochemicalproperties

FullText(HTML)

References(27)

References

[1]	张亚丽, 沈其荣, 段英华.不同氮素营养对水稻的生理效应[J].南京农业大学学报, 2004, 27(2):130-135. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/njnydxxb200402030
[2]	SMIROFF N.Plant resistance to environmental stress[J].Curr Opin Biotechnol, 1998, (2):214-219. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/13620943_Plant_resistance_to_environmental_stress
[3]	高士杰.直立穗型水稻的研究Ⅳ直立穗型水稻生育后期物质生产与转运[J].吉林农业科学, 2001, 26(6):16-19. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/jlnykx200106003
[4]	李雪梅, 樊金娟, 徐正进.不同穗型水稻品种灌浆期生理特性的差异[J].沈阳农业大学学报, 2003, 34(5):347-350. http://www.docin.com/p-509936768.html
[5]	金峰, 陈书强, 李培培, 等.直立与弯曲穗型水稻穗上不同部位粒形分布特征[J].沈阳农业大学学报, 2008, 39(3):279-284. http://www.ricesci.cn/CN/abstract/abstract1898.shtml
[6]	刘柏林, 陈书强, 董丹, 等.水稻株型性状与稻曲病发病程度关系的研究[J].湖北农业科学, 2009, 48(1):42-46. http://www.wenkuxiazai.com/doc/a730fc57a32d7375a4178077.html
[7]	蔡瑞国, 张敏, 尹燕秤, 等.小麦灌浆过程中旗叶光合及抗氧化代谢与氮素营养关系研究[J].中国农业科学, 2008, 41(1):53-62. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/zgnykx200801007
[8]	曹赐生, 吴岳轩.不同抗性水稻品种叶片中活性氧代谢的比较[J].湘潭师范学院学报, 1997, 18(6):67-69.
[9]	李宪利, 高东升, 顾曼如, 等.铵态氮和硝态氮对苹果植株SOD活性的影响[J].植物生理学通讯, 1997, 33(4):254-255. http://www.doc88.com/p-5896860786537.html
[10]	刘瑞显, 郭文琦, 陈兵林, 等.氮素对花铃期干旱及复水后棉花叶片保护酶活性和内源激素含量的影响[J].作物学报, 2008, 34(9):1598-1607. https://www.wenkuxiazai.com/doc/08392651f7ec4afe05a1df1e.html
[11]	赵国臣, 武志海, 徐克章.新老水稻品种抽穗后叶片保护酶活性的变化及其与光合速率的关系[J].安徽农业科学, 2010, 38(28):15481-15483, 15486. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0517-6611.2010.28.013
[12]	余泽高, 王红闪.小麦抗衰性与丙二醛含量相关性的初步探讨[J].湖北农业科学, 2003, (2):28-29, 36. http://www.docin.com/p-508678632.html
[13]	WANG F Z, WANG Q B, KWON S Y, et al.Enhanced drought tolerance of transgenic rice plants expressing a pea manganese superoxide dismutase[J].Journal of Plant Physiology, 2005, 162:465-472. doi: 10.1016/j.jplph.2004.09.009
[14]	刘少华. 水分胁迫对高产杂交稻功能叶光合及抗氧化系统特性的影响[D]. 重庆: 西南大学, 2003.
[15]	鲍士旦.土壤农化分析[M].北京:中国农业大学出版社, 2002, 159-163.
[16]	毛达如.植物营养研究法[M].北京:中国农业大学出版社, 2002, 8-10.
[17]	陈温福.北方水稻生产技术问答[M].北京:中国农业出版社, 2007, 78-80.
[18]	郝建军, 刘延吉.植物生理学试验技术[M].沈阳:辽宁科学技术出版社, 2001, 64-181.
[19]	TAKESHITA T.Current development and usage situation of plant grow the regulation in Japan[J].Japan Pesticide Information, 1990, 57:15. http://agris.fao.org/agris-search/export!exportTopEndNoteXML.action?agrovocString=Biological+competition&onlyFullText=false
[20]	王启明, 徐心诚, 马原松, 等.干旱胁迫下大豆开花期的生理生化变化与抗旱性的关系[J].干旱地区农业研究, 2005, 23(4):98-100. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/ghdqnyyj200504020
[21]	李奕松, 黄仲青.两系釉型杂交水稻齐穗后光合作用和衰老特性的研究[J].中国水稻科学, 2002, 16(2):141-145.
[22]	邬非波, 成灿土, 许馥华.氮素营养对短季棉生理代谢和产量的影响[J].浙江农业大学学报, 1998, 24(3):241-247.
[23]	关欣, 陈温福, 殷红, 等.不同年代水稻品种齐穗后叶片保护酶活性及膜脂过氧化作用比较分析[J].沈阳农业大学学报, 2003, 34(5):351-354. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/synydxxb200305009
[24]	任红旭, 陈雄, 王亚馥.抗旱性不同的小麦幼苗在水分和盐胁迫下抗氧化酶和多胺的变化[J].植物生态学报, 2001, 25(6):709-715. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/zwstxb200106011
[25]	胡文河, 王兴录, 刘振库.不同密度水稻抽穗后生理特性的研究[J].吉林农业大学学报, 2006, 28(6):594-596. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/jlnydxxb200606002
[26]	姜东, 于振文, 苏波, 等.不同施氮时期对冬小麦根系衰老的影响[J].作物学报, 1997, 23(2):181-190.
[27]	王贺正, 马均, 李旭毅, 等.水分胁迫对水稻结实期活性氧产生和保护系统的影响[J].中国农业科学, 2007, 40(7):1379-1387. https://www.wenkuxiazai.com/doc/a4f8488e7f1922791788e83e.html