Standards for Grading <i>Anoectochilus roxburghii</i> (Wall.) Lindl.Seedings

ZHAO Yun-qing; CHEN Jing-ying; HUANG Rui-ping; HUANG Ying-zhen

doi:10.19303/j.issn.1008-0384.2017.011.014

Volume 32 Issue 11

Jan. 2018

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Article Navigation > Fujian Journal of Agricultural Sciences > 2017 > 32(11): 1239-1243

ZHAO Yun-qing, CHEN Jing-ying, HUANG Rui-ping, HUANG Ying-zhen. Standards for Grading Anoectochilus roxburghii (Wall.) Lindl.Seedings[J]. Fujian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2017, 32(11): 1239-1243. doi: 10.19303/j.issn.1008-0384.2017.011.014

Citation:

ZHAO Yun-qing, CHEN Jing-ying, HUANG Rui-ping, HUANG Ying-zhen. Standards for Grading Anoectochilus roxburghii (Wall.) Lindl.Seedings[J]. Fujian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2017, 32(11): 1239-1243. doi: 10.19303/j.issn.1008-0384.2017.011.014

Citation:

PDF( 848 KB)

Standards for Grading Anoectochilus roxburghii (Wall.) Lindl.Seedings

doi: 10.19303/j.issn.1008-0384.2017.011.014

ZHAO Yun-qing^{1, 2
,},
CHEN Jing-ying^{1, 2
,
,},
HUANG Rui-ping³,
HUANG Ying-zhen^{1, 2}

1.
Institute of Agricultural Bioresource, Fujian Academy of Agricultural Science, Fuzhou, Fujian 350003, China
2.
Research Centerfor Medicinal Plant, Fujian Academy of Agricultural Science, Fuzhou, Fujian 350003, China
3.
Fujian Station for Planting Technology Extension, Fuzhou, Fujian 350003, China

Received Date: 2017-05-12
Rev Recd Date: 2017-07-21
Publish Date: 2017-11-28

Abstract

Abstract

Standards for grading seedlings of Anoectochilus roxburghii (Wall.) Lindl. were studied. Factors includingplant height and weight, average length, width and count of leaves, stem diameter, andinternode countof a seedlingpropagated from tissues were analyzes on their interrelations and chemical compositions to select agrading system.Cluster and statisticalanalyses were performed to weigh those factors against the survival rate of the seedlings. The results indicated that the plant height and weight, as well as the stem diameter were the determining indicators for an effective grading. Three classifications were thus established:the 1^st Grade to show a seedling height of ≥ 130 mm, a stem diameter of ≥ 2.8 mm, and a weight of ≥ 1.3 g; the 2^nd Grade, a seedling height of ≥ 110 mm, a stem diameter of ≥ 2.4 mm, and a weight of ≥ 1.0 g; and, the 3^rd Grade, a seedling height of ≥ 90 mm, a stem diameter of ≥ 2.1 mm, and a weight of ≥ 0.6 g.The proposed standards would allow a clearly definedevaluation on seedings in the breeding practices.
- Anoectochilus roxburghii(Wall.) Lindl.,
- seedling,
- grading,
- standards

FullText(HTML)

References(23)

References

[1]	明鹤, 杨太新, 杜艳华.祁山药零余子种苗质量分级的研究[J].种子检验, 2013, 3(12):117-119. http://d.wanfangdata.com.cn/Thesis/Y2668718
[2]	孙长生, 朱虹, 龙祥.山豆根种苗质量的分级指标探讨[J].贵州农业科学, 2016, 44(1):140-142. https://mall.cnki.net/qikan-GZZP201501024.html
[3]	于福来, 钟可, 王文全, 等.知母种苗质量分级标准研究[J].种子, 2014, 33(4):110-112. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=zhongz201404036
[4]	田汝美, 孟义江, 葛淑俊.祁紫菀种苗质量分级标准的初步研究[J].河北农业大学学报, 2011, 34(4):16-20. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTotal-ZCYO201501007.htm
[5]	李俊仁, 陈秀珍, 梁凌玲, 等.岗梅种苗质量分级标准研究[J].种子检验, 2016, 35(3):115-117. http://industry.wanfangdata.com.cn/dl/Detail/Periodical?id=Periodical_zhongz201603033
[6]	杨斌, 李林玉, 杨丽英, 等.金铁锁种子质量标准研究[J].种子检验, 2009, 18(11):115-117. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4705.2009.11.035
[7]	徐荣, 周峰, 陈君, 等.肉苁蓉种子质量评价技术与分级标准研究[J].中药材, 2009, 32(4):475-478. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=zyc200904001
[8]	郭巧生, 张贤秀, 王艳茹, 等.夏枯草种子品质检验及质量标准初步研究[J].中国中药杂志, 2009, 34(7):812-816. http://www.cqvip.com/QK/95973X/200907/29985069.html
[9]	郭巧生, 赵荣梅, 刘丽.桔梗种子品质检验及质量标准研究[J].中国中药杂志, 2009, 34(7):812-816. http://med.wanfangdata.com.cn/Paper/Detail/PeriodicalPaper_zgzyzz200705004
[10]	赵鑫, 凯撒·苏来曼, 朱国强, 等.新疆阿魏种子质量分级标准研究[J].中药材, 2010, 33(9):1366-1367. http://www.cqvip.com/QK/90095X/201604/668725002.html
[11]	王国强.全国中草药汇编(卷三):第3版[M].北京:人民卫生出版社, 2014:656-657.
[12]	福建省食品药品监督管理局.福建省中药饮片炮制规范:2012年版[M].福州:福建科学技术出版社, 2013:143-144.
[13]	邵清松, 叶申怡, 周爱存等.金线莲种苗繁育及栽培模式研究现状与展望[J].中国中药杂志, 2016, 41(2):160-166. http://www.cqvip.com/QK/84085A/201501/78747489504849534849494951.html
[14]	朱旭伟珍稀药用植物金线莲种苗繁育技术研究[D]. 济南: 山东大学, 2014. http://cdmd.cnki.com.cn/Article/CDMD-10422-1014309469.htm
[15]	马满驰, 张教洪, 单成钢, 等.中药种苗质量标准研究进展[J].山东农业科学, 2015, 47(4):139-142. http://med.wanfangdata.com.cn/Paper/Detail?id=PeriodicalPaper_zcy200008001
[16]	赵月丽. 铁棍山药种苗质量标准的研究[D]. 郑州: 河南师范大学, 2011. http://cdmd.cnki.com.cn/Article/CDMD-10476-1012281826.htm
[17]	景跃波, 陈隽.云南红豆杉苗木分级研究[J].广东林业科技, 2007, 23(6):61-64. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-6993.2014.05.024
[18]	瞿显友, 李隆云, 钟国跃, 等.动态聚类法确定黄连种苗分级标准[J].中国中药杂志, 2012, (6):777-780. http://industry.wanfangdata.com.cn/dl/Magazine?magazineId=zgzyzz&yearIssue=2012_6
[19]	潘超美, 黄崇才, 刘华, 等.药用植物土沉香种苗分级标准的研究[J].广州中医药大学学报, 2012, (2):180-184. https://www.wenkuxiazai.com/doc/5fe2218eec3a87c24028c4fe-2.html
[20]	秦佳梅, 张卫东, 王育民.返魂草种苗标准研究[J].通化师范学院学报, 2008, (8):3-4. http://www.wenkuxiazai.com/doc/dfb7e8d42cc58bd63186bdf5.html
[21]	明鹤, 杨太新, 杜艳华.祁山药芦头种苗质量分级的研究[J].种子, 2013, 32(5):113-115. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTotal-ZHZI201506034.htm
[22]	邵清松, 周爱存, 胡润淮, 等.种苗级别对金线莲生长发育及产量和品质的影响[J].中国中药杂志, 2014, 39(5):785-789. http://med.wanfangdata.com.cn/Paper/Detail/PeriodicalPaper_zgzyzz201405006
[23]	邵清松, 黄瑜秋, 胡润淮, 等.金线莲形态学性状与产量形成关系的多重分析[J].中国中药杂志, 2017, 39(11):2456-2459. http://www.oalib.com/paper/4438137