Effect of H<sub>2</sub>S on Morphology and Physiological/Biochemical Properties of Wheat

LIU Hui; YANG Bo; MA Yong-zhou; ZHA Ri-yang; MENG De-long

doi:10.19303/j.issn.1008-0384.2016.10.008

Volume 31 Issue 10

Dec. 2016

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Article Navigation > Fujian Journal of Agricultural Sciences > 2016 > 31(10): 1044-1050

LIU Hui, YANG Bo, MA Yong-zhou, ZHA Ri-yang, MENG De-long. Effect of H2S on Morphology and Physiological/Biochemical Properties of Wheat[J]. Fujian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2016, 31(10): 1044-1050. doi: 10.19303/j.issn.1008-0384.2016.10.008

Citation:

LIU Hui, YANG Bo, MA Yong-zhou, ZHA Ri-yang, MENG De-long. Effect of H₂S on Morphology and Physiological/Biochemical Properties of Wheat[J]. Fujian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2016, 31(10): 1044-1050. doi: 10.19303/j.issn.1008-0384.2016.10.008

Citation:

PDF( 2346 KB)

Effect of H₂S on Morphology and Physiological/Biochemical Properties of Wheat

doi: 10.19303/j.issn.1008-0384.2016.10.008

LIU Hui^{1, 2
,},
YANG Bo¹,
MA Yong-zhou³,
ZHA Ri-yang³,
MENG De-long^{1
,
,}

1.
Lianyungang Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Lianyungang, Jiangsu 222006, China
2.
Agronomy College, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, Jiangsu 225009, China
3.
Huanghuai Crop Breeding Institute, Lianyungang, Jiangsu 222000, China

Received Date: 2016-01-18
Rev Recd Date: 2016-08-07
Publish Date: 2016-10-28

Abstract

Abstract

NaHS was used as an exogenous H₂S for this study to induce changes on the protein expression and morphological/physiological properties of wheat seedlings. Varied concentrations of NaHS (i.e., 0, 0.05, 0.10, 0.20, 0.40, 0.80, 1.60, and 3.20 mmol·L^-1) were incorporated in the medium solution for the experimentation. According to the effect on the seedling growth and based on their concentrations, 3 groups of the solutions were classified as (a) LC at 0.05 and 0.10 mmol·L^-1 that promoted the growth, (b) IC at 0.20, 1.60, and 0.40 mmol·L^-1 that inhibited the growth, and (c) HC at 0.80 and 3.20 mmol·L^-1 that harmed the growth. When LC was applied, the height, root length, and fresh or dry weight of the plants increased significantly, while the application of HC produced the opposite effects. Furthermore, moisture and leaf chlorophyll contents of the plants were significantly affected by the NaHS concentration. There were also significant correlations observed between the biomass and physiological characteristics, according to a principal component analysis.
- hydrogen sulfide,
- wheat,
- morphology,
- physiology and biochemistry,
- correlation

FullText(HTML)

References(10)

References

[1]	BEAUCHAMP R O, BUS J S, POPP J A, et al. A critical review of the literature on hydrogen sulfide toxicity[J]. Crit Rev Toxicol, 1984, 13:25-97. doi: 10.3109/10408448409029321
[2]	张宪政.植物生理学实验技术[M].沈阳:辽宁科学技术出版社, 1989:103-108.
[3]	李合生.植物生理生化实验原理和技术[M].北京:高等教育出版社, 2000:261-263.
[4]	殷瑞飞, 朱建平.关于利用因子分析方法对变量分类的探讨[J].统计与决策, 2005, (2):20-21. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TJJC200503010.htm
[5]	CARLOS G M, LORENZO L. Hydrogen sulphide, a novel gasotransmitter involved in guard cell signalling[J].New Phytol, 2010, 188(4):977-984. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2010.03465.x
[6]	CHEN J, WU F H, WANG W H, et al. Hydrogen sulphide enhances photosynthesis through promoting chloroplast biogenesisphotosynthetic enzyme expression, and thiol redox modification in Spinacia oleracea seedlings[J]. J Exp Bot, 2011, 62(13):4481-4493. doi: 10.1093/jxb/err145
[7]	梁峥, 汤佩松.硫化氢和低温对水稻幼苗生长和呼吸的影响[J].植物生理学通讯, 1980, (6):19-23. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZWSL198006004.htm
[8]	LISJAK M, SRIVASTAVA N, TEKLIC T, et al. A novel hydrogen sulfide donor causes stomatal opening and reduces nitric oxide accumulation[J].Plant Physiol Biochem, 2010, 48(12):931-935. doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2010.09.016
[9]	李东波, 肖朝霞, 刘灵霞, 等.外源硫化氢对豌豆根尖及其边缘细胞的影响[J].植物学报, 2010, 45(3):354-362. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZWXT201003007.htm
[10]	ZHANG H, TANG J, LIU X P, et al. Hydrogen Sulfide Promotes Root Organogenesis in Ipomoea batatas, Salix matsudana and Glycine max[J].Journal of Integrative Plant Biology, 2009, 51(12):1086-1094. doi: 10.1111/jipb.2009.51.issue-12