• 中文核心期刊
  • CSCD来源期刊
  • 中国科技核心期刊
  • CA、CABI、ZR收录期刊

Message Board

Respected readers, authors and reviewers, you can add comments to this page on any questions about the contribution, review,        editing and publication of this journal. We will give you an answer as soon as possible. Thank you for your support!

Name
E-mail
Phone
Title
Content
Verification Code
Volume 31 Issue 6
Aug.  2016
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
LAN Jiang-lin, LI Feng, LIU Bo, SHI Huai, HUANG Su-fang. Analysis on Spatial Distribution of Microbes Population in the Fermentation Bed[J]. Fujian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2016, 31(6): 649-656. doi: 10.19303/j.issn.1008-0384.2016.06.016
Citation: LAN Jiang-lin, LI Feng, LIU Bo, SHI Huai, HUANG Su-fang. Analysis on Spatial Distribution of Microbes Population in the Fermentation Bed[J]. Fujian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2016, 31(6): 649-656. doi: 10.19303/j.issn.1008-0384.2016.06.016

Analysis on Spatial Distribution of Microbes Population in the Fermentation Bed

doi: 10.19303/j.issn.1008-0384.2016.06.016
  • Received Date: 2016-01-29
  • Rev Recd Date: 2016-04-11
  • Publish Date: 2016-06-28
  • Spatial distribution of microbes in the fermentation bed was analyzed by sampling and culturing, the results indicated that the amount of bacterium was highest, the second was actinomycete, the amount of fungi was lowest. In all of the samples,amplitude of variation of bacterial content was the biggest with(33.72~197.23)105cfug-1, fungal content changes are relatively small with(7.87~48.64)103cfug-1, and Actinomyces content was stability with(20.14~33.18)104cfug-1. GroupⅠ(more than 70.00105cfug-1)of bacteria content was averaged 9.2 sample points, accounting for 28.67% of the total sample; group Ⅲ(less than 30.00105cfug-1)was averaged 8.6 points, accounting for 30.67% of the total sample. Group Ⅱ (30.00~70.00)105cfug-1 was averaged 12.2 points, accounted for the largest proportion of 40.67%. Fungal group I(more than 70.00103cfug-1)was averaged only 3.8 points, the lowest proportion for 12.67%, Group Ⅱ(30.00~70.00)103cfug-1 was averaged 6.4 points, the proportion was 21.33%, group Ⅲ (less than 30.00103 cfug-1) was averaged 19.8 points, a whopping 66.00%.The proportion of actinomyces was similar to type of fungi, group I (more than 70.00104cfug-1)was averaged just1.4 sample points, the lowest proportion, only 4.67%.Group Ⅱ(30.00~70.00)104cfug-1 was averaged 8.4 points and percentage 28%, Group Ⅲ(less than 30.00104cfug-1)was averaged 20.2 sample points, a whopping 67.33%.
  • loading
  • [1]
    毕泗伟,吴祖芳,虞耀土.16S rDNA基因文库技术分析发酵床细菌群落的多样性[J].宁波大学学报:理工版,2013,26(1):18-22.
    [2]
    郭艳,张进良,邓昌彦,等.猪粪堆肥升温期细菌分子生态学研究[J].河南农业科学,2010,(9):74-82.
    [3]
    李婧.发酵床不同深度垫料中微生物与温室气体的分布特征[D].南京:南京农业大学,2012.
    [4]
    刘恩科,赵秉强,李秀英,等.不同施肥制度土壤微生物量碳氮变化及细菌群落16S rDNA V3片段PCR产物的DGGE分析[J].生态学报,2007,27(3):1079-1085.
    [5]
    ZELLES L.Fatty acid patterns of phospholipids and lipopolysaccharides in the characterization of micro-bialcommunities in soil:a review[J].Biol Fert Soils,1999,29:111-129.
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (1261) PDF downloads(393) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return