• 中文核心期刊
  • CSCD来源期刊
  • 中国科技核心期刊
  • CA、CABI、ZR收录期刊

Message Board

Respected readers, authors and reviewers, you can add comments to this page on any questions about the contribution, review,        editing and publication of this journal. We will give you an answer as soon as possible. Thank you for your support!

Name
E-mail
Phone
Title
Content
Verification Code
Volume 28 Issue 6
Jun.  2013
Turn off MathJax
Article Contents
DU Yi-xin, CHEN Ren, SHI Niu-niu, RUAN Hong-chun, GAN Lin, CHEN Fu-ru. Toxicity and Field Control Efficiency of Several Fungicides Against Botrytis cinerea[J]. Fujian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2013, 28(6): 575-579. doi: 10.19303/j.issn.1008-0384.2013.06.014
Citation: DU Yi-xin, CHEN Ren, SHI Niu-niu, RUAN Hong-chun, GAN Lin, CHEN Fu-ru. Toxicity and Field Control Efficiency of Several Fungicides Against Botrytis cinerea[J]. Fujian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2013, 28(6): 575-579. doi: 10.19303/j.issn.1008-0384.2013.06.014

Toxicity and Field Control Efficiency of Several Fungicides Against Botrytis cinerea

doi: 10.19303/j.issn.1008-0384.2013.06.014
  • Received Date: 2013-04-12
  • Publish Date: 2013-06-18
  • Toxicity of 6fungicides and co-toxicities between procymidone and thiram on Botrytis cinerea were determined by measuring the growth rate of mycelia,and the control efficiency of 7fungicides against grey mould of tomato in the field were also studied.The results showed that chlorothalonil,iprodione and procymidone have higher toxicity to the fungus,and chlorothalonil has the best toxicity(EC50=0.516 6mg.L-1).The synergism between procymidone and thiram with different mixing ratios(5∶1,1∶3and 1∶5)were 121.44,124.22and 128.46indicated by CTCs respectively.Furthermore,the field control efficacy of pocymidone 50% WP(562.5 g.hm-2),picoxystrobin 25%SC(112.5g.hm-2),boscalid 50%WG(300g.hm-2)were all above 75%.
  • loading
  • [1]
    张从宇,高智谋,岳永德.番茄灰霉病研究进展,有害生物治理策略与展望[M].北京:中国农业科技出版社,2002:80-82.
    [2]
    刘长令.世界农药大全[M].北京:化学工业出版社,2005:114-116.
    [3]
    赵晓军,任璐,周建波,等.山西省蔬菜灰霉病菌对嘧霉胺的抗药性检测[J].植物保护,2012,38(5):120-123.
    [4]
    纪明山,祁之秋,王英姿,等.番茄灰霉病菌对嘧霉胺的抗药性[J].植物保护学报,2003,30(4):396-400.
    [5]
    张传清,张雅,魏方休,等.设施蔬菜灰霉病菌对不同类型杀菌剂的抗性检测[J].农药学学报,2006,8(3):245-249.
    [6]
    丁中,刘峰,慕立义.不同抗性型灰葡萄孢Botrytis cinerea对不同作用机制杀菌剂的敏感性研究[J].农药学学报,2001,3(4):59-63.
    [7]
    奉代力,王强,郑纪慈,等.几种杀菌剂对番茄灰霉病菌的抑菌效果对比研究[J].浙江农业学报,2013,25(1):119-123.
    [8]
    慕立义.植物化学保护研究方法[M].北京:中国农业出版社,1994:76-81.
    [9]
    裴旭,赵永新,周洪友,等.8种杀菌剂对向日葵黄萎病菌的室内毒力测定[J].内蒙古农业大学学报,2011,32(1):72-75.
    [10]
    韩熹莱.农药概论[M].北京:北京农业大学出版社,1995:6-38.
    [11]
    农业部农药检定所生测室.GB/T17980.28-2000农药田间药效试验准则(一):杀菌剂防治蔬菜灰霉病[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2000:115-119.
    [12]
    陈治芳,王文桥,韩秀英,等.新杀菌剂对番茄灰霉病菌的室内毒力及田间防效[J].植物保护,2011,37(5):193-195.
    [13]
    纪明山,祁之秋,赵平,等.番茄灰霉病菌对嘧霉胺抗药性试验[J].沈阳农业大学学报,2002,33(5):345-347.
    [14]
    CHAPELAND F,FRITZ R,LANEN C,et al.Inheritanceand Mechanisms of Resistance to Anilinopyrimidine Fungicidesin Botrytis Cinerea[J].Pestic Biochem Physiol,1999,64:85-100.
    [15]
    LATORR B A,SPADARO I,RIOJA M E.Occurrence ofresistant strains of Botrytis cinerea to anilinopyrimidinefungicides in table grapes in Chile[J].Crop Protection,2002,21(10):957-961.
    [16]
    赵琳,纪明山,祁之秋,等.辽宁省蔬菜灰霉病菌对嘧霉胺的抗药性[J].植物保护,2008,34(3):85-88.
    [17]
    印利梅,礼茜,李红叶.浙江省茄科蔬菜灰霉病对嘧霉胺的抗性[J].浙江农业学报,2007,19(2):123-126.
    [18]
    ZHANG C Q,YUAN S K,SUN H Y,et al.Sensitivity ofBotrytis cinerea from vegetable greenhouses to boscalid[J].Plant pathology,2007,56:646-653.
    [19]
    余玲,刘慧平,韩巨才,等.山西省灰霉菌对啶酰菌胺的敏感性测定[J].山西农业大学学报:自然科学版,2012,32(3):232-234.
    [20]
    周明国.浅谈杀菌剂抗性治理策略[J].南京农业大学学报,1996,19(S):155-159.
  • 加载中

Catalog

    通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
    • 1. 

      沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

    1. 本站搜索
    2. 百度学术搜索
    3. 万方数据库搜索
    4. CNKI搜索

    Article Metrics

    Article views (250) PDF downloads(9) Cited by()
    Proportional views
    Related

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return