Drought Resistance of Various Jutes(Corchorus L.)in Seedling Under PEG Stress

YAO Yun-fa; HONG Jian-ji; CENG Ri-qiu; YANG Yan-xing

doi:10.19303/j.issn.1008-0384.2013.05.010

Volume 28 Issue 5

May 2013

Turn off MathJax

Article Contents

Article Navigation > Fujian Journal of Agricultural Sciences > 2013 > 28(5): 457-462

YAO Yun-fa, HONG Jian-ji, CENG Ri-qiu, YANG Yan-xing. Drought Resistance of Various Jutes(Corchorus L.)in Seedling Under PEG Stress[J]. Fujian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2013, 28(5): 457-462. doi: 10.19303/j.issn.1008-0384.2013.05.010

Citation:

YAO Yun-fa, HONG Jian-ji, CENG Ri-qiu, YANG Yan-xing. Drought Resistance of Various Jutes(Corchorus L.)in Seedling Under PEG Stress[J]. Fujian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2013, 28(5): 457-462. doi: 10.19303/j.issn.1008-0384.2013.05.010

Citation:

PDF( 912 KB)

Drought Resistance of Various Jutes(Corchorus L.)in Seedling Under PEG Stress

doi: 10.19303/j.issn.1008-0384.2013.05.010

Sugarcane Research Institute,Fujian Academy of Agricultural Sciences,Zhangzhou,Fujian 363005,China

Received Date: 2012-10-17
Publish Date: 2013-05-18

Abstract

Abstract

In our experiment,15% and 25% polyethylene glycol(PEG 6000)were used to simulate the natural drought conditions.Under the artificial stress,the responses of 60 different varieties of jute(Corchorus L)in seed germination stage were studied.The results showed that the drought-resistance coefficients of the root length,shoot length and germination drought tolerance were reduced significantly as PEG concentration increased.By a cluster analysis,the jutes were,then,categorized into A,B,C,D and E groups each consisting of 18,8,7,3 and 24 varieties,respectively.The jutes in the C and D groups were highly drought tolerant,while those in the E group poorly.Those in the A and the B groups were markedly different in their resistances to drought.In all,16.7% of the varieties tested showed a strong,40% medium and 43.3% weak drought resistance.It appeared that the PEG stress test could be used to evaluate the drought tolerance potential of jute in seed germination stage.
- Jute,
- seedling stage,
- drought resistance,
- PEG stress

FullText(HTML)

References(17)

References

[1]	刘东盛,俞建勇,夏兆鹏.黄麻纤维产业状况及其应用进展[J].纺织科技进展,2007,(3):81-82.
[2]	熊和平.抓住天然纤维复苏契机,推动我国麻类产业发展[J].中国棉麻流通经济,2010,(5):21-25.
[3]	武斌,李新海,肖木辑,等.53份玉米自交系的苗期耐旱性分析[J].中国农业科学,2007,40(4):665-676.
[4]	廖江林,贺喜全,盛良学,等.南方耐旱玉米种质资源筛选和鉴定指标研究[J].中国生态农业学报,2008,16(5):1154-1157.
[5]	白向历.玉米抗旱机制及鉴定指标筛选的研究[D].沈阳:沈阳农业大学,2006.
[6]	陈京.抗旱性不同的甘薯品种对渗透胁迫的生理相应[J].作物学报,1999,25(2):232-236.
[7]	胡标林,余守武,万勇,等.东乡普通野生稻全生育期抗旱性鉴定[J].作物学报,2007,33(3):425-432.
[8]	毛新国,王爱萍,景蕊莲,等.小麦抗旱相关基因TaGSTF6的多态性[J].中国农业科学,2007,40(2):225-233.
[9]	严美玲,李向东,林英杰,等.苗期干旱胁迫对不同抗旱花生品种生理特性、产量和品质的影响[J].作物学报,2007,33(1):113-119.
[10]	杨柳,周瑞阳,金声扬.PEG模拟干旱胁迫对11份黄麻种子萌发的效应[J].南方农业学报,2011,42(7):715-718.
[11]	HEYSER J W,NABORS M W.Osmotic Adjustment ofCultured Tobacco Cells(Nicotiana tabacum var.Samsum)Grown on Sodium Chloride[J].Plant Physiol,1981,67(4):720-727.
[12]	郭雪松,唐章林.PEG胁迫下42个油菜品种(系)耐旱性的评价[J].西南大学学报:自然科学版,2009,10(31):1-7.
[13]	唐启义.DPS数据处理系统(Data Processing System)V6.55[M].北京:科技出版社,2003.
[14]	麦苗苗,石大兴,王米力,等.PEG处理对连香树种子萌发与芽期生长的影响[J].林业学报,2009,45(10):94-99.
[15]	张辰妮,周青平,颜红波,等.PEG6000对老芒麦种质材料萌发期抗旱性影响的研究[J].草业科学,2010,27(1):119-123.
[16]	胡晓艳,呼天明,李红星.草坪草马蹄金与结缕草种子萌发期抗旱性比较[J].草业科学,2006,23(1):89-92.
[17]	彭去回,钱晓刚.14个荞麦种质材料萌发期的抗旱性能初步研究[J].山地农业生物学报,2011,30(6):483-486.