Pollen Cytology, Stamen Callus Induction, and Seedling Propagation of Paeonia delavayi
-
摘要:
目的 研究滇牡丹花蕾与花粉粒发育间的相关性,建立外观形态与花粉粒主导发育时期间的关系,为后期取材提供参考;筛选出滇牡丹雄蕊愈伤组织、增殖和分化诱导的最适培养基,以期建立滇牡丹雄蕊的再生体系。 方法 以红色滇牡丹硬蕾期和透色期的花蕾为研究材料,通过石蜡切片加光学显微观察的途径确定各阶段花粉粒的主导发育时期;结合MS固体培养基,研究不同植物生长调节剂及其质量浓度对滇牡丹雄蕊愈伤组织诱导、增殖和分化的影响。 结果 (1)红色滇牡丹花蕾直径10~17 mm且尚未透色的Y2−Y4阶段,其花粉粒主导发育时期是单核中期;花蕾直径12~15 mm且透色面积小于30%的T1−T2阶段为单核靠边期,花蕊直径15~19 mm且透色面积大于30%的T3−T4阶段为双核期。(2)滇牡丹雄蕊的最佳消毒方式为花蕾经流水冲洗30 min后,使用1% 次氯酸钠消毒8 min。(3)滇牡丹雄蕊的最佳诱导时期为单核靠边期。(4)雄蕊愈伤组织诱导适宜的培养基为MS+0.2 mg·L−1 NAA+0.5 g·L−1PVP;最适增殖培养基为MS+0.5 mg·L−1NAA+0.25 mg·L−16-BA+0.5 mg·L−1GA3+1 g·L−1PVP。 结论 明确了花蕾大小和外观透色形态与各阶段花粉粒的主导发育时期的关系,筛选出红花滇牡丹雄蕊愈伤组织诱导与增殖适宜的培养基和培养条件,为滇牡丹组织培养技术的深入研究提供基础。 Abstract:Objective Developments of flower buds and pollen grains, optimum medium for stamen callus induction, and proper conditions for seedling propagation and differentiation of Paeonia delavayi were investigated. Method Dominant pollen grain development stages were examined under an optical microscope on the paraffin sections of red P. delavayi hard buds with visible color. On an MS solid medium, various plant growth regulators in different concentrations were added to determine the optimal formulation for the induction, proliferation, and differentiation of stamen callus. Result (1) The prevailing stage of pollen grain development for the redP. delavayi, Y2-Y4, occurred in the mid-mononuclear period when the bud diameter was 10-17 mm but the color had yet to show. At T1-T2, the bud grew to a diameter ranging from 12 mm to 15 mm with less than 30% of the bud showing its color. That was in the single-core sideline period. When the diameter of a stamen reached 15-19 mm with a colored area greater than 30%, the T3-T4 stage was in the binuclear period. (2) The stamens were most effectively disinfected with running water for 30min followed by a rinse with 1% sodium hypochlorite for 8min. (3) The stamen could be optimally induced during the single-core sideline period. (4) The medium for optimal stamen callus induction was formulated with MS + 0.2 mg NAA·L−1 + 0.5 g PVP·L−1, and that for the proliferation MS + 0.5 mg NAA·L−1 + 0.25 mg 6-BA·L−1 + 0.5 mg GA3·L−1 + 1 g PVP·L−1. Conclusion This study clearly revealed the floral bud size, appearance, and dominant pollen grain development stages of the red P. delavayi and determined the optimal medium formulations and culture conditions for inducing, proliferating, and differentiating the stamen callus. -
Key words:
- Paeonia delavayi /
- stamens /
- callus /
- plant propagation
-
图 2 不同生长阶段滇牡丹花蕾
A:不同生长阶段雄蕊; B:不同生长阶段花蕾; Y1:硬蕾期1; Y2:硬蕾期2; Y3:硬蕾期3; Y4:硬蕾期4;T1:透色期1; T2:透色期2;T3:透色期3;T4:透色期4。
Figure 2. P. delavayi buds at different growth stages
A: Stamens at different growth stages; B: buds at different growth stages; Y1: hard bud stage 1; Y2: hard bud stage 2; Y3: hard bud stage 3; Y4: hard bud stage 4; T1: bud with visible color period 1; T2: bud with visible color period 2; T3: bud with visible color period 3; T4: bud with visible color period 4.
表 1 滇牡丹花蕾外观形态与花粉粒发育时期的相关性
Table 1. Correlation between floral bud appearance and pollen grain development of P. delavayi
生长阶段
Growth
stage对应时期
Corresponding
period花蕾形态(直径大小)
Bud shape
(Diameter size,Φ)/mm单核中期花粉粒
Mid-mononuclear period pollen grains单核靠边期花粉粒
Single-core sideline period pollen grains双核期花粉粒
Binuclear period pollen grains数量
Amount/个占比
Proportion/%数量
Amount/个占比
Proportion/%数量
Amount/个占比
Proportion/%Y1 硬蕾期 萼片包裹紧实(Φ6~8) — — — — — — Y2 硬蕾期 萼片包裹紧实(Φ10~12) 96 97.96 2 2.04 0 0.00 Y3 硬蕾期 萼片包裹紧实(Φ13~14) 50 54.35 27 29.35 15 16.30 Y4 硬蕾期 萼片包裹紧实(Φ15~17) 39 41.49 29 30.85 26 27.66 T1 透色期 花瓣透色面积<10%(Φ12~13) 18 19.78 46 50.55 27 29.67 T2 透色期 花瓣透色面积10%~30%(Φ14~15) 11 11.34 52 53.61 34 35.05 T3 透色期 花瓣透色面积30%~60%(Φ15~16.5) 5 5.49 32 35.16 54 59.34 T4 透色期 花瓣开始松散,透色面积>60%(Φ17~19) 4 4.71 23 27.06 58 68.24 表 2 不同生长阶段雄蕊的诱导结果
Table 2. Stamen induction at growth stages
生长阶段
Growth stage花粉粒主导发育时期
Period of dominant pollen grain development外植体褐化率
Browning rate of explants/%诱导率
Induction rate/%愈伤组织生长状态
Callus growth state褐化程度
Browning degreeY3 单核中期 97.80±1.91a 67.78±1.73c 少量白色致密的愈伤 ++ Y4 单核中期 98.90±1.91a 78.89±1.73b 中等白色致密的愈伤 ++ T1 单核靠边期 100.00±0.00a 91.11±7.21a 大量灰白色愈伤,轻微玻璃化 +++ T2 单核靠边期 100.00±0.00a 82.22±5.03ab 中等白色致密的团块状愈伤 +++ 表中数据为均值±标准差。+表示较轻; ++表示一般; +++表示较重。同列数据后不同小写字母表示在0.05水平下差异显著,表3~5同。
Data are mean±standard error; +means lighter; ++means general; +++means heavier. Data with different lowercase letters on same column indicate significant differences at P<0.05. Same for Tables 3-5.表 3 滇牡丹雄蕊诱导培养基的筛选
Table 3. Medium selection for P. delavayi stamen induction
处理
Treatment植物生长调剂
Plant growth regulator/
(mg·L−1)诱导率
Induction rate/%生长状态
Growth stateNAA 6-BA 1(CK) — — 4.44±1.93d 白色少量米点状愈伤 2 0.05 — 36.67±3.33b 黄白色少量点状愈伤 3 0.2 — 80.00±5.77a 黄白色中等团块状致密愈伤 4 — 0.05 27.78±5.09c 白色少量点状愈伤 5 — 0.2 41.11±1.93b 白色中等团块状愈伤 表 4 滇牡丹雄蕊愈伤组织增殖培养基的筛选
Table 4. Medium selection for P. delavayi stamen callus proliferation
培养基
Medium植物生长调节剂
Plant growth regulator/(mg·L−1)生长量
Growing quantity/g绿色愈伤占比率
Percentage of green callus/%绿色愈伤出现时间
Time of green callus愈伤组织状态
Callus stateZ1 0.5 GA3 0.11±0.02b 96.30±6.42a 光培养后第9天 黄绿色与淡绿色致密愈伤 Z2 0.5 TDZ 0.27±0.03a 69.64±6.44b 光培养后第14天 浅黄绿色致密愈伤 Z3 0.5 2,4-D 0.06±0.02c 27.04±1.60c 光培养后第20天 白色与浅黄绿色致密愈伤 表 5 滇牡丹雄蕊愈伤组织分化培养基的筛选
Table 5. Medium selection for P. delavayi stamen callus differentiation
编号
No.植物生长调剂
Plant growth regulator/(mg·L−1)不定芽分化率
Bud differentiation
rate/%绿色愈伤占比率
Percentage of
green callus/%黄绿色愈伤占比率
Percentage of
yellow-green callus/%黄褐色愈伤占比率
Percentage of
yellow-brown callus/%黑褐色愈伤占比率
Percentage of
dark brown callus/%6-BA GA3 PIC CH KT M1 1 0.2 — — — 0a 83.33±5.77b 0d 0d 0c M2 1 0.5 — — — 0a 96.67±2.89a 0d 0d 0c M3 1 1 — — — 0a 88.33±5.77b 0d 0d 0c M2-1 1 0.5 2 — — 0a 26.67±2.89e 35.00±0.00ab 38.33±2.89a 0c M2-2 1 0.5 4 — — 0a 38.33±2.89d 38.33±2.89a 23.33±2.89b 0c M2-3 1 0.5 — 200 — 0a 53.33±2.89c 35.00±5.00ab 11.67±2.89c 0c M2-4 1 0.5 — 400 — 0a 40.00±5.00d 36.67±2.89a 23.33±2.89b 0c M2-5 1 0.5 — — 0.5 0a 23.33±2.89e 25.00±0.00c 16.67±7.64bc 35.00±5.00a M2-6 1 0.5 — — 1 0a 36.67±2.89d 31.67±2.89b 23.33±2.89b 8.33±2.89b -
[1] 洪德元, 潘开玉. 芍药属牡丹组的分类历史和分类处理 [J]. 植物分类学报, 1999, 37(4):351−368.HONG D Y, PAN K Y. Taxonomical history and revision of Paeonia sect. Moutan(Paeoniaceae) [J]. Acta Phytotaxonomica Sinica, 1999, 37(4): 351−368.(in Chinese) [2] 潘温文. 中国西南地区特有野生花卉: 滇牡丹 [J]. 园林, 2015(12):56−58.PAN W W. Paeonia yunnanensis, a unique wild flower in southwest China [J]. Garden, 2015(12): 56−58.(in Chinese) [3] JIA W Q, LIU H C. Micropropagation of dwarf tree peony from lateral buds [J]. Journal of Applied Sciences, 2014, 14(18): 2189−2193. doi: 10.3923/jas.2014.2189.2193 [4] 文书生, 何绒绒, 郑佳康, 等. 牡丹组织培养技术研究进展 [J]. 林业科学, 2018, 54(10):143−155.WEN S S, HE R R, ZHENG J K, et al. Research advances in tissue culture of tree peony [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2018, 54(10): 143−155.(in Chinese) [5] 刘磊, 王志勇. 牡丹组织培养技术研究综述 [J]. 甘肃农业科技, 2014(4):49−52.LIU L, WANG Z Y. Research summary of tissue culture techniques of tree peony [J]. Gansu Agricultural Science and Technology, 2014(4): 49−52.(in Chinese) [6] 牟亚萍. 牡丹再生体系建立的研究进展 [J]. 温带林业研究, 2022, 5(3):7−11,20.MOU Y P. Research progress on establishment of regeneration system of Paeonia suffruticosa [J]. Journal of Temperate Forestry Research, 2022, 5(3): 7−11,20.(in Chinese) [7] 李昱莹, 郭丽丽, 廉小芳, 等. 牡丹组织培养技术研究进展 [J]. 浙江农业科学, 2018, 59(9):1646−1655.LI Y Y, GUO L L, LIAN X F, et al. Research progress of tissue culture techniques for tree peony [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural Sciences, 2018, 59(9): 1646−1655.(in Chinese) [8] 赵鑫. 牡丹优良品种组织培养研究[R]. 辽宁省, 辽宁林业职业技术学院, 2012-03-12.ZHAO X. , Study on tissue culture of excellent Paeonia suffruticosa [R]. Liaoning Province, Liaoning Forestry Vocational and Technical College, 2012-03-12. [9] 朱军胜. 牡丹新品种培育方法及推广 [J]. 现代园艺, 2020, 43(22):19−20.ZHU J S. Cultivation method and popularization of new peony varieties [J]. Xiandai Horticulture, 2020, 43(22): 19−20.(in Chinese) [10] 李艳玲. 牡丹新品种培育技术 [J]. 现代农业科技, 2016(21):124−125.LI Y L. Cultivation techniques of new peony varieties [J]. Modern Agricultural Science and Technology, 2016(21): 124−125.(in Chinese) [11] 刘佳锦, 王抒怡, 李淑娴, 等. 油用牡丹良种‘凤丹NL10’组织培养与快繁初步研究 [J]. 分子植物育种, 2021, 19(16):5447−5457.LIU J J, WANG S Y, LI S X, et al. Primary study on tissue culture and propagation of A variety’Fengdan NL10’ rich in edible oil [J]. Molecular Plant Breeding, 2021, 19(16): 5447−5457.(in Chinese) [12] 王新, 成仿云, 钟原, 等. 凤丹牡丹鳞芽离体培养与快繁技术 [J]. 林业科学, 2016, 52(5):101−110.WANG X, CHENG F Y, ZHONG Y, et al. Establishment of in vitro rapid propagation system for tree peony(Paeonia ostii) [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2016, 52(5): 101−110.(in Chinese) [13] 朱向涛, 王雁, 吴倩, 等. 江南牡丹茎段愈伤组织诱导与植株再生 [J]. 核农学报, 2015, 29(1):56−62.ZHU X T, WANG Y, WU Q, et al. Efficient induction of callus and plant regeneration from Paeonia suffruticosa andr [J]. Journal of Nuclear Agricultural Sciences, 2015, 29(1): 56−62.(in Chinese) [14] 陆俊杏, 龚慧明, 张涛. 牡丹种胚离体再生体系建立 [J]. 分子植物育种, 2019, 17(17):5741−5747.LU J X, GONG H M, ZHANG T. Establishing regeneration in vitro system of tree peony embryos [J]. Molecular Plant Breeding, 2019, 17(17): 5741−5747.(in Chinese) [15] 刘蓉, 慈惠婷, 任秀霞, 等. ‘凤丹’牡丹幼胚愈伤组织诱导的优化和再生体系的建立 [J]. 园艺学报, 2022, 49(1):166−174.LIU R, CI H T, REN X X, et al. Optimization of callus induction from immature embryo and establishment regeneration system of Paeonia ostii’Fengdan’ [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2022, 49(1): 166−174.(in Chinese) [16] 尹秀, 张二豪, 李芳, 等. 濒危植物大花黄牡丹种胚快速成苗技术研究 [J]. 生物学杂志, 2021, 38(2):75−78.YIN X, ZHANG E H, LI F, et al. Study on rapid seedling-raising technology of embryos of the endangered species Paeonia Ludlowii [J]. Journal of Biology, 2021, 38(2): 75−78.(in Chinese) [17] 何桂梅, 成仿云, 李萍. 两种牡丹胚珠与幼胚离体培养的初步研究 [J]. 园艺学报, 2006, 33(1):185.HE G M, CHENG F Y, LI P. Preliminary studies on culture in vitro of ovule and immature embryo of two tree-peony cultivars [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2006, 33(1): 185.(in Chinese) [18] 张健欣. 紫斑牡丹愈伤组织诱导体系建立的研究[D]. 兰州: 甘肃农业大学, 2015.ZHANG J X. The study on callus induction system established of Paeonia rockii[D]. Lanzhou: Gansu Agricultural University, 2015. (in Chinese) [19] 钟原. 紫斑牡丹分生结节的诱导与培养[D]. 北京: 北京林业大学, 2011.ZHONG Y. Induction and culture of meristematic nodules in Paeonia rockii[D]. Beijing: Beijing Forestry University, 2011. (in Chinese) [20] 魏进莉. 荷包牡丹的组培快繁技术研究 [J]. 天津农业科学, 2022, 28(4):10−14.WEI J L. Study on tissue rapid propagation of Lamprocapnos spectabilis’Amore rose’ [J]. Tianjin Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 28(4): 10−14.(in Chinese) [21] 张艳丽, 刘秀贤, 王雁, 等. 滇牡丹愈伤组织继代培养中的褐化防治 [J]. 中南林业科技大学学报, 2011, 31(2):77−81.ZHANG Y L, LIU X X, WANG Y, et al. Study on browning prevention of callus subculture of Paeonia delavayi [J]. Journal of Central South University of Forestry & Technology, 2011, 31(2): 77−81.(in Chinese) [22] 蒲艳, 张鹏远, 王娟, 等. 滇牡丹成熟胚和叶柄愈伤组织的诱导及培养条件优化[J/OL]. 分子植物育种, 2021: 1-18. (2021-12-12). https://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/46.1068.S.20211208.2124.004.html.PU Y, ZHANG P Y, WANG J, et al. Callus induction from mature embryo and petiole of Paeonia delavayi and optimization of culture conditions[J/OL]. Molecular Plant Breeding, 2021: 1-18. (2021-12-12). https://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/46.1068.S.20211208.2124.004.html.(in Chinese) [23] 刘会超, 贾文庆, 李保亮. 牡丹花药诱导愈伤组织的初步研究 [J]. 广东农业科学, 2011, 38(8):45−46.LIU H C, JIA W Q, LI B L. Preliminary study on callus induced by peony flower medicine [J]. Guangdong Agricultural Sciences, 2011, 38(8): 45−46.(in Chinese) [24] 朱向涛, 王雁, 彭镇华, 等. 牡丹花药诱导愈伤组织 [J]. 东北林业大学学报, 2010, 38(1):34−36.ZHU X T, WANG Y, PENG Z H, et al. Callus induction from anther of Paeonia suffruticosa [J]. Journal of Northeast Forestry University, 2010, 38(1): 34−36.(in Chinese) [25] 王雁, 李艳华, 彭镇华. 黄牡丹的大小孢子发生及雌雄配子体发育 [J]. 东北林业大学学报, 2010, 38(5):62−65.WANG Y, LI Y H, PENG Z H. Megasporogenesis, microsporogenesis and development of female and male gametophytes of Paeonia delavayi var. lutea [J]. Journal of Northeast Forestry University, 2010, 38(5): 62−65.(in Chinese) [26] 魏乐, 廉永善, 张怀刚. 三种牡丹雄蕊发育节律的比较研究 [J]. 青海科技, 2007, 14(5):37−39.WEI L, LIAN Y S, ZHANG H G. Comparative study on stamen development rhythm of three peony species [J]. Qinghai Science and Technology, 2007, 14(5): 37−39.(in Chinese) [27] 朱向涛, 王雁, 彭镇华, 等. 牡丹花蕾大小对花药组培诱导率的影响 [J]. 湖南农业科学, 2010(11):102−104.ZHU X T, WANG Y, PENG Z H, et al. Effect of flower buds size of Paeonia suffruticosa on induction rate of anther tissue culture [J]. Hunan Agricultural Sciences, 2010(11): 102−104.(in Chinese) [28] 周静伟, 吴晓梦, 陈海霞. 八仙花花药培养诱导愈伤组织 [J]. 分子植物育种, 2021, 19(22):7540−7546.ZHOU J W, WU X M, CHEN H X. Callus induction via anther culture of Hydrangea macrophylla [J]. Molecular Plant Breeding, 2021, 19(22): 7540−7546.(in Chinese) [29] 杜媚, 冯莎莎, 杜萍萍, 等. 金莲花花蕾大小与花粉发育时期的关系 [J]. 分子植物育种, 2018, 16(15):5055−5058.DU M, FENG S S, DU P P, et al. Relationship between bud size and pollen development stages of Trollius chinensis bunge [J]. Molecular Plant Breeding, 2018, 16(15): 5055−5058.(in Chinese) [30] 刘晓, 张晓曼, 孙晓光, 等. 四季报春花蕾大小及花粉发育时期其愈伤组织诱导率的相关性 [J]. 分子植物育种, 2018, 16(21):7112−7117.LIU X, ZHANG X M, SUN X G, et al. Correlation between bud size and callus formation rate at pollen development stage of Primula obconica [J]. Molecular Plant Breeding, 2018, 16(21): 7112−7117.(in Chinese) [31] 刘海英, 张运峰, 范永山, 等. 培养基及花蕾大小对黄瓜花药愈伤组织诱导的影响 [J]. 北京农学院学报, 2011, 26(1):66−67.LIU H Y, ZHANG Y F, FAN Y S, et al. Effects of medium and flower bud size on callus induction of cucumber anther [J]. Journal of Beijing University of Agriculture, 2011, 26(1): 66−67.(in Chinese) [32] 汪玲敏, 陈光平, 木万福, 等. 番茄游离小孢子培养研究进展 [J]. 中国农学通报, 2019, 35(30):42−48.WANG L M, CHEN G P, MU W F, et al. Research progress on isolating microspores culture of tomato [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2019, 35(30): 42−48.(in Chinese) [33] TANG H R, REN Z L, REUSTLE G, et al. Plant regeneration from leaves of sweet and sour cherry cultivars [J]. Scientia Horticulturae, 2002, 93(3/4): 235−244. [34] 姚希诺. 芍药再生体系的建立[D]. 沈阳: 沈阳农业大学, 2018YAO X N. Establishment of Paeonia lactiflora pall. rejuvenation system[D]. Shenyang: Shenyang Agricultural University, 2018. (in Chinese) [35] 刘雪婷, 孙晓梅, 李妍, 等. 芍药种胚启动培养及丛生芽诱导研究 [J]. 沈阳农业大学学报, 2020, 51(3):312−320.LIU X T, SUN X M, LI Y, et al. Study on initiation culture of Paeonia lactiflora embryo and induction of multiple shoots [J]. Journal of Shenyang Agricultural University, 2020, 51(3): 312−320.(in Chinese) [36] HUETTEMAN C A, PREECE J E. Thidiazuron: A potent cytokinin for woody plant tissue culture [J]. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture, 1993, 33(2): 105−119. doi: 10.1007/BF01983223 [37] 张润龙, 王小斌, 邵灵梅, 等. 芍药和牡丹的组织培养及遗传转化体系构建 [J]. 植物生理学报, 2021, 57(2):235−247.ZHANG R L, WANG X B, SHAO L M, et al. Tissue culture and genetic transformation system construction of Paeonia lactiflora and Paeonia suffruticosa [J]. Plant Physiology Journal, 2021, 57(2): 235−247.(in Chinese) [38] 孟军, 韩杰, 祖恩普. 牡丹组织培养研究进展 [J]. 北方园艺, 2007(1):153−154.MENG J, HAN J, ZU E P. Research progress on tissue culture of Paeonia suffruticosa [J]. Northern Horticulture, 2007(1): 153−154.(in Chinese)