Screening, Identification, and Functional Study on Drought-tolerant Endophytes in Sugarcane
-
摘要:
目的 筛选耐旱性较强的甘蔗内生菌,并对其功能进行测定,以丰富甘蔗耐旱性内生菌资源,并用于提高甘蔗的抗旱性。 方法 以云南农业大学甘蔗研究所分离的329株甘蔗内生菌为供试菌株,采用PEG6000模拟干旱的方法进行耐旱菌株的筛选;通过0~45% PEG6000的胁迫处理,对筛选得到的目标菌株进行耐旱性分析;结合形态观察、生理生化测定、16sDNA等方法对其进行鉴定;并研究了不同培养条件对菌株生长特性的影响,以及菌株固氮和分泌IAA的能力。 结果 筛选得到两株耐旱性较强的菌株,其中K5菌株鉴定为考克氏菌(Kocuria sp.),登录号为OP737815;ZM菌株为芽孢杆菌(Bacillus sp.),登录号为OP740361。K5菌株和ZM菌株都能耐受40%PEG6000的胁迫,其最适初始pH分别为5.0和6.0,而且两株菌株均能在50 ℃的条件下稳定生长,具有较广的初始pH和温度适应范围,能耐受100 g·L−1的氯化钠胁迫。此外,两株菌株均具有固氮和分泌生长素的能力;其中ZM菌株的固氮能力强于K5菌株,在一定的时间范围内,两株菌株分泌IAA的能力随着培养时间的增加而增强。 结论 K5、ZM菌株耐旱能力较强,且具有固氮和分泌IAA的能力,间接推测其对于提高甘蔗抗旱性具有较大的应用潜力。 Abstract:Objective Endophytes in sugarcane were screened for drought resistance to serve as microbial and germplasm resources. Methods Drought-tolerant microbes were isolated from a collection of 329 sugarcane endophytes at the Sugarcane Research Institute, Yunnan Agricultural University. In a simulated experiment, target strains were screened under the artificial draught condition created by using 0-45% PEG6000. Potential candidates were identified based on the morphological, physiological, and biochemical characteristics as well as 16sDNA sequences of the microbes. Optimal culture conditions for the growth, nitrogen fixation ability, and IAA secretion of the identified isolates were determined. Results Two strains that exhibited significant drought-tolerance were identified. K5 was a Kocuria sp. with an accession number of OP737815, and ZM a Bacillus sp. with an accession number of OP740361. Withstood the stress exerted by 40% PEG6000 or 100 g·L−1 sodium chloride, they could grow stably at 50 ℃ in wide ranges of pHs and temperatures but optimally under an initial pH at 5.0 for K5 and 6.0 for ZM. ZM was stronger than K5 in fixing nitrogen. Within a limited timeframe, the IAA secretion of the two strains increased with prolonged culture. Conclusion Both K5 and ZM displayed significant drought-resistance with the abilities of nitrogen fixation and IAA secretion. They could be potential candidates as a microbial agent, and their carrier sugarcane a valuable germplasm. -
Key words:
- Sugarcane /
- endophyte /
- drought tolerance /
- screening /
- identification
-
表 1 20%PEG6000胁迫条件下菌株的耐旱情况分析
Table 1. Drought-tolerance of strains under 20% PEG6000 stress
OD600 菌株数 Strain number 0<OD600≤0.5 33 0.5<OD600≤1.0 91 1.0<OD600≤1.5 120 1.5<OD600≤2.0 65 >2.0 20 表 2 30%PEG6000胁迫条件下菌株耐旱情况分析
Table 2. Drought-tolerance of strains under 30% PEG6000 stress
菌株 Strains OD600 菌株 strains OD600 YC89-j-10 0.222±0.014 g ZM-g-1 1.029±0.023 a YC89-j-2 0.470±0.016 d YC89-g-2 1.032±0.014 a YC89-g-12 0.077±0.060 i D01-58-g-3 0.921±0.036 b D01-47-g-5 0.163±0.010 h YZ-g-2 0.069±0.004 ij D01-47-g-14 0.067±0.003 ij YC89-g-18 0.029±0.007 l D01-47-g-6 0.437±0.012 d D01-47-g-7 0.470±0.022 d YT93-g-10 0.772±0.028 c D01-47-g-17 0.164±0.025 h YT86-g-1 0.035±0.006 jk D04-14-8 0.068±0.013 ij GT-g-8 0.130±0.013 h YT86-g-4 0.271±0.076 f 河-g-6 0.044±0.010 ijk GT-j-9 0.390±0.008 e 不同小写字母表示差异显著(P<0.05),下同。
Datas with different lowercase letters indicate significant difference (P<0.05). Same for below.表 3 菌株的部分生理结果
Table 3. Partial physiological and biochemical properties of isolated strains
生理生化指标
Physiological and biochemical indexesK5菌株
K5 strainZM菌株
ZM strain酪素水解试验 Casein hydrolysis test − + 硝酸还原酶试验 Nitrate reduction test − + 接触酶试验 Contactase test + − 淀粉水解试验 Starch hydrolysis test + + 甲基红试验 Methyl red test − + V-P试验 V-P test − + “+”阳性,“−”阴性。
“+” Positive reaction,“−” The negative reaction.表 4 菌株固氮能力分析
Table 4. Nitrogen fixation abilities of isolated strains
菌株
Strains透明圈直径D
Transparent ring
diameter D /cm菌落直径d
Colony diameter
d /cm可溶性指数(D/d)
Solubility index
(D/d)K5 0.695±0.397 b 0.6 1.158±0.072 b ZM 1.575±0.299 a 0.6 2.625±0.498 a -
[1] SCUDELETTI D, CRUSCIOL C A C, BOSSOLANI J W, et al. Trichoderma asperellum inoculation as a tool for attenuating drought stress in sugarcane [J]. Frontiers in Plant Science, 2021, 12: 645542. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2021.645542 [2] 孙萌, 尚忠海, 沈植国, 等. 植物对干旱胁迫响应的研究进展 [J]. 河南林业科技, 2019, 39(4):1−3,44. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-2630.2019.04.001SUN M, SHANG Z H, SHEN Z G, et al. Research progress in plant response mechanism to drought stress [J]. Journal of Henan Forestry Science and Technology, 2019, 39(4): 1−3,44.(in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-2630.2019.04.001 [3] 刘硕, 樊仙, 全怡吉, 等. 干旱胁迫对甘蔗光合生理特性的影响 [J]. 西南农业学报, 2022, 35(8):1776−1785.LIU S, FAN X, QUAN Y J, et al. Effects of drought stress on photosynthetic and physiological characteristics of sugarcane [J]. Southwest China Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2022, 35(8): 1776−1785.(in Chinese) [4] 狄义宁, 刘鲁峰, 胡一凡, 等. 甘蔗内生菌B9的鉴定及其促生长机制和定殖能力的研究 [J]. 中国土壤与肥料, 2019(3):186−193. doi: 10.11838/sfsc.1673-6257.18298DI Y N, LIU L F, HU Y F, et al. Identification of endophytic B9 from sugarcane and its growth-promoting mechanism and colonization ability [J]. Soil and Fertilizer Sciences in China, 2019(3): 186−193.(in Chinese) doi: 10.11838/sfsc.1673-6257.18298 [5] JAYAKUMAR A, PADMAKUMAR P, NAIR I C, et al. Drought tolerant bacterial endophytes with potential plant probiotic effects from Ananas comosus [J]. Biologia, 2020, 75(10): 1769−1778. doi: 10.2478/s11756-020-00483-1 [6] 谢林艳, 狄义宁, 何丽莲, 等. 甘蔗赤腐病内生拮抗菌YC89的筛选及鉴定 [J]. 微生物学报, 2020, 60(4):739−748. doi: 10.13343/j.cnki.wsxb.20190292XIE L Y, DI Y N, HE L L, et al. Screening and identification of endophytic antagonistic Bacteria YC89 in sugarcane red rot [J]. Acta Microbiologica Sinica, 2020, 60(4): 739−748.(in Chinese) doi: 10.13343/j.cnki.wsxb.20190292 [7] RODRIGUEZ R, REDMAN R. More than 400 million years of evolution and some plants still can't make it on their own: Plant stress tolerance via fungal symbiosis [J]. Journal of Experimental Botany, 2008, 59(5): 1109−1114. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erm342 [8] 张彦涛, 生吉萍, 葛佳, 等. 旱生植物内生细菌的分离及耐旱菌株的筛选鉴定 [J]. 食品科学, 2012, 33(5):124−128.ZHANG Y T, SHENG J P, GE J, et al. Isolation and identification of drought-tolerant bacteria from xerophtes [J]. Food Science, 2012, 33(5): 124−128.(in Chinese) [9] 徐春燕, 王涛, 徐婷, 等. 一株耐旱细菌的分离、筛选与鉴定 [J]. 干旱区资源与环境, 2019, 33(4):117−123. doi: 10.13448/j.cnki.jalre.2019.115XU C Y, WANG T, XU T, et al. Isolation, screening and identification of a strain of drought resistant bacteria [J]. Journal of Arid Land Resources and Environment, 2019, 33(4): 117−123.(in Chinese) doi: 10.13448/j.cnki.jalre.2019.115 [10] CHANDRASEKARAN M, PARAMASIVAN M. Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and antioxidant enzymes in ameliorating drought stress: A meta-analysis [J]. Plant and Soil, 2022, 480(1/2): 295−303. [11] WANG Z, SOLANKI M K, YU Z X, et al. Draft genome analysis offers insights into the mechanism by which Streptomyces chartreusis WZS021 increases drought tolerance in sugarcane [J]. Frontiers in Microbiology, 2018, 9: 3262. [12] 高阳, 朱双丽, 吴庆珊, 等. 金钗石斛IAA内生细菌筛选及对干旱胁迫下玉米种子萌发的影响 [J]. 种子, 2017, 36(4):36−41.GAO Y, ZHU S L, WU Q S, et al. Screening of IAA producing endophytic bacteria in Dendrobium nobile lindl and effect on Zea mays seed germination under drought stress [J]. Seed, 2017, 36(4): 36−41.(in Chinese) [13] 曹凯, 李远婷, 安登第, 等. 内生菌对植物抗干旱胁迫能力的影响研究进展 [J]. 生物技术通报, 2015, 31(9):23−29.CAO K, LI Y T, AN D D, et al. Research progress on effects of endophytes on plant drought resistance [J]. Biotechnology Bulletin, 2015, 31(9): 23−29.(in Chinese) [14] 辛凯芸. 西北荒漠骆驼刺促生抗旱内生细菌分离筛选及功能研究[D]. 杨凌: 西北农林科技大学, 2017XIN K Y. Isolation, screening and functional analysis of endophytic bacteria with ability to improve plant growth and drought tolerance from Alhagi sparsifolia[D]. Yangling: Northwest A & F University, 2017. (in Chinese) [15] 刘鲁峰, 寸海春, 何鹏飞, 等. 甘蔗内生菌分离鉴定及功能多样性研究 [J]. 热带作物学报, 2019, 40(6):1144−1152.LIU L F, CUN H C, HE P F, et al. Isolation, identification and multiple function analyses of sugarcane endophytes [J]. Chinese Journal of Tropical Crops, 2019, 40(6): 1144−1152.(in Chinese) [16] 冶子耕. 枣叶5种内生细菌鉴定与生防作用研究[D]. 阿拉尔市: 塔里木大学, 2022.YE Z G. Identification and biocontrol of five endophytic bacteria in jujube leaves[D]. Alaer : Tarim University, 2022. (in Chinese) [17] 刘娟. 鲜食玉米内生菌的分离、鉴定及功能分析[D]. 广州: 仲恺农业工程学院, 2018.LIU J. Screening, identification and functional analysis of endophytes in fresh maize[D]. Guangzhou: Zhongkai University of Agriculture and Engineering, 2018. (in Chinese) [18] VARDHARAJULA S, ZULFIKAR ALI S, GROVER M, et al. Drought-tolerant plant growth promoting Bacillus spp. : Effect on growth, osmolytes, and antioxidant status of maize under drought stress [J]. Journal of Plant Interactions, 2011, 6(1): 1−14. doi: 10.1080/17429145.2010.535178 [19] SANDHYA V, SK Z A, GROVER M, et al. Alleviation of drought stress effects in sunflower seedlings by the exopolysaccharides producing Pseudomonas putida strain GAP-P45 [J]. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 2009, 46(1): 17−26. doi: 10.1007/s00374-009-0401-z [20] 张国霞, 茅庆, 何忠义, 等. 陵水普通野生稻(Oryza rufipogon)内生菌的固氮及溶磷特性 [J]. 应用与环境生物学报, 2006, 12(4):457−460.ZHANG G X, MAO Q, HE Z Y, et al. Detection of nitrogenase activity and phosphorus dissolving ability of endophytic isolates from Oryza rufipogon in Lingshui [J]. Chinese Journal of Applied & Environmental Biology, 2006, 12(4): 457−460.(in Chinese) [21] 狄义宁, 谢林艳, 谷书杰, 等. 甘蔗及甘蔗近缘属内生菌的筛选、鉴定与功能研究 [J]. 中国农业大学学报, 2021, 26(11):70−83.DI Y N, XIE L Y, GU S J, et al. Screening, identification and biological function study of endophytic bacteria isolated fromsugarcane and its related Genera [J]. Journal of China Agricultural University, 2021, 26(11): 70−83.(in Chinese) [22] 张东艳, 刘晔, 吴越, 等. 花生根际产IAA菌的筛选鉴定及其效应研究 [J]. 中国油料作物学报, 2016, 38(1):104−110.ZHANG D Y, LIU Y, WU Y, et al. Isolation and identification of IAA-producing strains from peanut rhizosphere and its promoting effects on peanut growth [J]. Chinese Journal of Oil Crop Sciences, 2016, 38(1): 104−110.(in Chinese) [23] 鹿春燕. 银沙槐内生菌共生抗干旱促种子萌发代谢分析[D]. 乌鲁木齐: 新疆师范大学, 2017LU C Y. Symbiotic enhancing of seed germination metabolism analysis on drought-stress by endophytic bacteria of Ammodendron bifolium[D]. Urumqi: Xinjiang Normal University, 2017. (in Chinese) [24] LIU Y, WEI X L. Dark septate endophyte improves the drought-stress resistance of Ormosia hosiei seedlings by altering leaf morphology and photosynthetic characteristics [J]. Plant Ecology, 2021, 222(7): 761−771. doi: 10.1007/s11258-021-01135-3 [25] XU F J, SONG S L, MA C Y, et al. Endophytic fungus improves peanut drought resistance by reassembling the root-dwelling community of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi [J]. Fungal Ecology, 2020, 48: 100993. doi: 10.1016/j.funeco.2020.100993 [26] 黄逸轩. 考克氏菌属菌株KD4基因组学研究[D]. 兰州: 兰州交通大学, 2020.HUANG Y X. The study of genomics of strain Kocuria sp. KD4[D]. Lanzhou: Lanzhou Jiatong University, 2020. (in Chinese) [27] 唐然, 袁梦龙, 吴菁, 等. 一株耐辐射考克氏菌的分离与鉴定 [J]. 核农学报, 2010, 24(2):276−280.TANG R, YUAN M L, WU J, et al. Isolation and identification of an irradiation-resistant bacterium strain of Kocuria [J]. Journal of Nuclear Agricultural Sciences, 2010, 24(2): 276−280.(in Chinese) [28] 屈香香, 刘畅, 相微微, 等. 玫瑰色考克氏菌SDB9对玉米农艺性状的影响研究 [J]. 榆林学院学报, 2022, 32(2):40−44.QU X X, LIU C, XIANG W W, et al. Effects of Kocuria rosea SDB9 on agronomic characters of maize [J]. Journal of Yulin University, 2022, 32(2): 40−44.(in Chinese) [29] 吕娇娇. 甘肃省13种药用植物根际和内生菌的分离及5株功能菌株鉴定和抑菌促生功能测定[D]. 兰州: 甘肃中医药大学, 2022.LV J J. Isolation of endophytic and rhizosphere bacteria from 13 medicinal plants in Gansu Province, identification of 5 functional and strains and study on their antibacterial and growth-promoting functions[D]. Lanzhou: Gansu University of Chinese Medicine, 2022. (in Chinese)