福建甘薯氮磷钾推荐施肥与有机肥替代化肥技术模式

李娟; 张立成; 张华; 张世昌; 潘住财; 张民生; 林明贤; 章明清

doi:10.19303/j.issn.1008-0384.2022.008.002

福建甘薯氮磷钾推荐施肥与有机肥替代化肥技术模式

doi: 10.19303/j.issn.1008-0384.2022.008.002

1.
福建省农业科学院土壤肥料研究所，福建　福州　350013
2.
福建省农田建设与土壤肥料技术推广站，福建　福州　350003
3.
福建省南安市农业局，福建　南安　362300
4.
福建省云霄县土肥站，福建　云霄　363300
5.
福建省漳浦县土壤肥料技术推广站，福建　漳浦　363200

基金项目: 福建省科技计划公益类专项（2021R1025005）；福建省农业高质量发展超越“5511” 协同创新工程项目（XTCXGC2021009）

详细信息

作者简介:
李娟（1977−），女，硕士，副研究员，研究方向：作物营养与施肥（E-mail：lj-95@163.com）

通讯作者:
章明清（1963−），男，博士，研究员，研究方向：作物施肥原理和技术（E-mail：zhangmq2001@163.com）

中图分类号: S 147.2
计量
- 文章访问数: 371
- HTML全文浏览量: 195
- PDF下载量: 21
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2022-04-24
- 修回日期: 2022-05-24
- 网络出版日期: 2022-08-29
- 刊出日期: 2022-08-28

Recommended NPK Fertilization and Partial Replacement with Organic Manure for Sweet Potato Cultivation in Fujian

1.
Soil and Fertilizer Institute, Fujian Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Fuzhou, Fujian　350013, China
2.
Fujian Cropland Construction and Soil and Fertilizer Station, Fuzhou, Fujian　350003, China
3.
Nanan Agricultural Bureau, Nanan, Fujian　362300, China
4.
Yunxiao Soil and Fertilize Station, Yunxiao, Fujian　363300, China
5.
Zhangpu Agricultural Technology Popularization Station, Zhangpu, Fujian　363200, China

摘要

摘要: 目的提高甘薯施肥效益，实现化肥减施增效目标，探讨推荐施肥和有机肥替代化肥的技术模式。方法根据甘薯氮磷钾田间肥效试验结果，定量确定福建甘薯最佳施肥类别；然后分别建立各施肥类别的三元非结构肥效模型和推荐施肥量，在此基础上开展有机肥替代化肥潜力的试验研究，并进行田间示范。结果甘薯施肥可划分为高产田、中产田、中低产田和低产田等4个施肥类别，高产田的氮肥增产效应明显高于其他施肥类别，但磷钾肥的增产效应则反之。基于不同施肥类别的三元非结构肥效模型，甘薯平均经济施肥量为N 160 kg∙hm⁻²、P₂O₅ 62 kg∙hm⁻²、K₂O 212 kg∙hm⁻²，三要素适宜比例为1 ∶ 0.4 ∶ 1.3，但不同施肥类别的推荐施肥量有明显差异。在推荐施肥基础上有机肥替代25%化肥具有最佳增产增收效果，平均比推荐施肥增产13.0%，净增收1802元∙hm⁻²。在N、P₂O₅投入比习惯施肥下降16.7%和47.4%以及K₂O投入提高94.0%的条件下，79个化肥推荐施肥田间示范比习惯施肥平均增产7.9%，净增收3 394元∙hm⁻²；基于推荐施肥量的16个有机肥替代25%化肥的田间示范则平均增产11.3%，净增收4 192元∙hm⁻²。结论化肥推荐施肥和在此基础上有机肥替代25%化肥是可供推广应用的甘薯化肥减施增效技术模式，后者效果更佳。
- 甘薯 /
- 施肥类别 /
- 化肥 /
- 有机肥 /
- 推荐施肥 /
- 施肥模式
Abstract: Objective NPK fertilization and utilization of manure for partial replacement in sweet potato farming were optimized for the agriculture in Fujian. Method Based on field experiments, sweet potato growing fields in the province were classified. A ternary non-structural fertilization response model was constructed for each class to optimize the fertilization. Field tests and demonstrations were conducted to scrutinize and promote the recommended program. Result The 4 classes of sweet potato fields in the province included (1) high yield paddy, (2) medium yield paddy, (3) medium-to-low yield field, and (4) low yield field. The sweet potato plants were highly responsive to N fertilizer application on the fields of higher yield, but P or K tended to benefit more the plants grown on lands of lower yields. According to the fertilization response models, the economic applications averaged 160 kg·hm⁻² on N, 62 kg·hm⁻² on P₂O₅, and 212 kg·hm⁻² on K₂O in the ratio of 1:0.4:1.3. However, the recommendation for different classes of field differed significantly. By replacing 25% NPK in the recommended fertilizations (RF) with manure, on average a 13.0% increase on tuber yield and 1 802 yuan·hm⁻² increase on net revenue over RF were realized. In the 79 field demonstrations with RF, the application of N was reduced by 16.7% and P₂O₅ by 47.41% while K₂O increased by 79.3% which resulted in 7.9% rise on yield and 3 394 yuan·hm⁻² more on net revenue over what practiced by the farmers (FP). On the other hand, in the 16 field tests where 25% NPK fertilizers was replaced with manure, the average yield rose by 11.0% with 4 192 yuan·hm⁻² higher in revenue. Conclusion Although either RF or 25% NPK replaced by organic manure could significantly improve the sweet potato productivity and profitability, the use of organic manure to partially substitute chemical fertilizer was deemed superior for the farming in the province.
- Sweet potato /
- field classification /
- fertilizer /
- organic manure /
- recommended fertilization /
- fertilization model

HTML全文

表 1 供试土壤主要理化性状

Table 1. Major physiochemical properties of soils at test fields

试验或示范类型 Experiment or demonstration	试验数 No. of trials	pH	有机质 Organic Matter/ （g∙kg⁻¹）	碱解氮 Alkaline hydrolytic nitrogen/ （mg∙kg⁻¹）	有效磷 Olsen-P/ （mg∙kg⁻¹）	速效钾 Available K/ （mg∙kg⁻¹）
试验或示范类型 Experiment or demonstration	试验数 No. of trials	pH	有机质 Organic Matter/ （g∙kg⁻¹）	碱解氮 Alkaline hydrolytic nitrogen/ （mg∙kg⁻¹）	有效磷 Olsen-P/ （mg∙kg⁻¹）	速效钾 Available K/ （mg∙kg⁻¹）	“3414”肥效试验 Fertilizer effect experiment using “3414”design	110	5.2±1.4	24.94±10.56	121.9±43.6	32.0±26.3	77.5±45.7
有机肥替代试验 Replacement fertilizer with organic manure	14	5.7±0.5	19.04±6.48	103.0±19.3	66.4±29.8	120.7±33.3
化肥推荐施肥田间示范 Recommended fertilization demonstration	76	5.6±0.7	19.66±8.18	88.3±38.7	53.1±31.7	81.6±43.7
有机肥替代化肥田间示范 Organic manure replacement fertilizer demonstration	16	5.6±0.4	17.46±7.67	102.4±18.1	67.4±29.1	121.4±33.5

下载: 导出CSV

表 2 甘薯有机肥替代化肥田间试验设计

Table 2. Field experiment design on sweet potato grown under NPK fertilization with organic manure

序号 No.	处理 Treatments	施肥量 Application rate/（kg∙hm⁻²）
序号 No.	处理 Treatments	N	P₂O₅	K₂O	有机肥 Organic manure
1	空白 CK	0	0	0	0
2	习惯施肥 FP	216	114	116	0
3	推荐施肥 RF	180	60	225	0
4	25%有机肥替代化肥 OR25%	135	45	170	3 000
5	50%有机肥替代化肥 OR50%	90	30	113	6 000
有机肥指商品有机肥，N+P₂O₅+K₂O≥5%，养分总量以5%计，含水量以25%计；处理3、处理4和处理5为等氮磷钾养分数量。FP、RF、OR25%、OR50%处理分别表示习惯施肥、化肥推荐施肥、有机肥替代25%化肥和有机肥替代50%化肥。下同。 Commercial organic manure contained N+P₂O₅+K₂O≥5%, total nutrients of 5%, and moisture content of 25%; same application rates of N, P₂O₅, and K₂O for Treatments 3, 4, and 5. FP: farmer practice; RF: recommend fertilization; OR25% and OR50%: 25% and 50% of chemical fertilizer replaced with organic manure, respectively. Same for below.

下载: 导出CSV

表 3 甘薯氮磷钾施肥类别及各类别的施肥效应

Table 3. Sweet potato field classes for NPK fertilization study and resulting tuber yields

施肥类别 Fertilization category	试验数 No. of trials	处理（6）施肥量 Application rate of treatment 6/（kg∙hm⁻²）			各处理甘薯产量 Peanut yield/（kg∙hm⁻²）
施肥类别 Fertilization category	试验数 No. of trials	N	P₂O₅	K₂O	CK	N₂P₂K₂	N₀P₂K₂	N₂P₀K₂	N₂P₂K₀
高产田 High yield field	5	180±16	60±17	288±24	35 445±7 102	73 650±7 881	45 510±8 091	66 000±8 091	63 915±8 164
中产田 Middle yield field	26	176±3	70±19	237±31	26 024±5 776	44 571±5 681	29 492±5 846	36 922±6 944	33 994±5 637
中低产田 Middle-low yield field	28	182±5	60±10	248±18	14 321±3 603	27 106±4 550	17 842±4 246	22 478±4 147	21 159±3 951
低产田 Low yield field	51	181±3	66±20	248±22	11 587±3 306	19 339±3 504	14 000±4 019	15 579±4 302	13 833±3 285

下载: 导出CSV

表 4 甘薯不同施肥类别的氮磷钾三元非结构肥效模型

Table 4. Ternary non-structural fertilization response models for sweet potato cultivated on fields of different classes

施肥类别 Fertilization category	模型参数 Model parameter							统计检验 Statistical test		模型典型性 Model typicality
施肥类别 Fertilization category	A×10³	N₀	P₀	K₀	c₁×10³	c₂×10³	c₃×10³	F	R²	模型典型性 Model typicality
高产田 High yield field	8.302 5	91.573	120.420	387.340	3.483 7	4.889 2	1.444 2	18.93**	0.942 0	典型式
中产田 Middle yield field	10.455 0	115.41	86.937	226.160	3.567 1	6.952 2	2.274 7	18.81**	0.941 6	典型式
中低产田 Middle-low yield field	5.301 3	119.21	89.095	237.590	3.158 7	6.419 4	2.093 0	62.49**	0.981 7	典型式
低产田 Low yield field	3.178 6	150.140	100.520	219.120	3.169 8	5.951 4	2.149 0	14.87**	0.927 2	典型式
“”表示P＜0.01。 “” represents P＜0.01.

下载: 导出CSV

表 5 基于农学效应的甘薯氮磷钾推荐施肥量

Table 5. Limit standards of NPK fertilization based on agronomic effects for sweet potato cultivation

施肥类别 Fertilization categories	空白区产量 Blank yield/ （kg∙hm⁻²）	目标产量 Target yield/ （kg∙hm⁻²）	最高施肥量及产量 Maxium fertilizer rate and yield/（kg∙hm⁻²）				经济施肥量及产量 Economic fertilizer rate and yield/（kg∙hm⁻²）
施肥类别 Fertilization categories	空白区产量 Blank yield/ （kg∙hm⁻²）	目标产量 Target yield/ （kg∙hm⁻²）	N	P₂O₅	K₂O	产量Yield	N	P₂O₅	K₂O	产量 Yield
高产田 High yield field	35 000±7 100	73 000±7 900	195	84	305	72 880	191	82	284	72 833
中产田 Middle yield field	26 000±5 800	45 000±5 700	165	57	213	42 636	158	55	199	42 595
中低产田 Middle-low yield field	14 000±3 600	27 000±4 600	197	67	240	26 400	183	64	213	26 322
低产田 Low yield field	11 000±3 300	19000±3500	165	68	246	18300	145	62	210	18192
表中各施肥类别的空白区产量和目标产量是在肥效模型计算值的基础上取整数。 Control and target yields of each sweet potato field class were rounded values from fertilization response models.

下载: 导出CSV

表 6 不同有机肥替代化肥比例对甘薯产量和施肥效益的影响

Table 6. Sweet potato yield and economic benefits under varied percentages of organic manure replacement on NPK application

施肥类别 Fertilization categories	项目 Items	施肥处理 Treatments					方差分析 Variance analysis
施肥类别 Fertilization categories	项目 Items	CK	FP	RF	OR25%	OR50%	方差分析 Variance analysis
高产田 High yield field（n=5）	产量 Yield/（kg∙hm⁻²）	35 586 d	40 055 c	41 710 b	43 397 a	41 357 b	F=57.2**
	增产 Yield increase/%	−14.5	−4.0	—	4.0	−0.8
	净增收 Net income/（元∙hm⁻²）	−668 1	−236 3	—	751	−408 0
中产田 Middle yield field（n=5）	产量 Yield/（kg∙hm⁻²）	23 072 c	33 477 b	34 816 b	36 969 a	34 510 b	F=146.4**
	增产 Yield increase/%	−33.7	−3.8	—	6.2	−0.9
	净增收 Net income/（元∙hm⁻²）	−15 111	−1 889	—	1 450	−4 009
中低产田 Middle-low yield field（n=3）	产量 Yield/（kg∙hm⁻²）	19 051 c	28 165 b	30 492 ab	33 656 a	29 212 b	F=28.2**
	增产 Yield increase/%	−37.5	−7.6	—	10.4	−4.2
	净增收 Net income/（元∙hm⁻²）	−14 656	−3 371	—	2 966	−5 470
低产田 Low yield field（ n =1）	产量 Yield/（kg∙hm⁻²）	13 150 c	18 167 b	19 433 b	24 167 a	22 083 a	F=6.4*
	增产 Yield increase/%	−32.3	−6.5	—	24.4	13.6
	净增收 Net income/（元∙hm⁻²）	−6920	−1780	—	5321	425
① “”表示P＜0.05， “”表示P＜0.01，同列数据后不同小写字母表示差异显著(P<0.05)。②CK、FP、RF、OR25%、OR50%处理的肥料成本分别为0、2386、2505、4285和6055元∙hm⁻²。 ① “”: P＜0.05, “**”: P＜0.01. Different lowcase letters of the same row in the table showed significant difference(P<0.05). ② Fertilizer costs of CK, FP, RF, OR25 % and OR50% were 0, 2 386, 2 505, 4 285, and 6 055 yuan·hm⁻², respectively.

下载: 导出CSV

表 7 化肥减施增效示范田的甘薯产量和施肥效益

Table 7. Sweet potato yield and economic benefit on demonstration field with fertilizer reduction and efficiency improvement

施肥类别 Fertilization categories	项目 Items	化肥推荐施肥 Recommended fertilization			有机肥替代化肥 organic manure replacement of chemical fertilizer
施肥类别 Fertilization categories	项目 Items	CK	FP	RF	CK	PF	OR25/%
高产田 High yield field	产量 Yield/（kg∙hm⁻²）	37 513±7 186	47 455±1 735	51 026±3 412	32 625±1 199	45 381±1 637	48 871±1 412
	增产 Yield increase/%	—	—	7.0	—	—	7.1
	净增收 Net income/（元∙hm⁻²）	—	—	5 008	—	—	3 333
中产田 Middle yield field	产量 Yield/（kg∙hm⁻²）	26 704±5 406	34 119±3 209	36 091±5 442	26 862±6 261	34 786±3 496	39 210±1 412
	增产 Yield increase/%	—	—	5.5	—	—	11.3
	净增收 Net income/（元∙hm⁻²）	—	—	2457	—	—	4737
中低产田 Middle-low yield field	产量 Yield/（kg∙hm⁻²）	17 819±5 432	26 175±3 249	29 190±3 227	22 061±2 610	28 410±3 057	32 217±2 839
	增产 Yield increase/%	—	—	10.3	—	—	11.8
	净增收 Net income/（元∙hm⁻²）	—	—	4 094	—	—	3 812
低产田 Low yield field	产量Yield/（kg∙hm⁻²）	13 537±2 256	17 611±1 663	21 291±1 400	13 158	18 141	24 192
	增产 Yield increase/%	—	—	17.3	—	—	25.0
	净增收 Net income/（元∙hm⁻²）	—	—	5 271	—	—	7 177
化肥推荐施肥的高产田、中产田、中低产田、低产田的示范田数量分别为7、40、24、5个，有机肥替代化肥的示范田数量则分别为4、5、6、1个。 There were 7 demonstration fields for high yield, 40 for medium yield, 24 for middle-low yield, and 5 for low-yield class in RF treatment; and 4 demonstration fields for high yield, 5 for medium yield, 6 for middle-low yield, and one for low-yield class in 25% organic manure replacement treatment.

下载: 导出CSV

参考文献(34)

[1]	林子龙, 杨立明, 郭其茂, 等. 福建省甘薯产业现状与发展对策 [J]. 福建农业科技, 2014(8):85−89. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0253-2301.2014.08.035 LIN Z L, YANG L M, GUO Q M, et al. Present situation and development countermeasure of sweet potato industry in Fujian Province [J]. Fujian Agricultural Science and Technology, 2014(8): 85−89.(in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0253-2301.2014.08.035
[2]	张辉, 贺娟, 梁健, 等. 长江中下游薯区甘薯农户施肥现状调查分析 [J]. 江苏师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2021, 39(2):31−34. ZHANG H, HE J, LIANG J, et al. Investigation and analysis of farmers fertilizer application for sweetpotato in the middle and lower reaches of Yangtze River [J]. Journal of Jiangsu Normal University (Natural Science Edition), 2021, 39(2): 31−34.(in Chinese)
[3]	王钊, 刘明慧, 高文川, 等. 陕西关中地区甘薯施肥存在的问题及建议 [J]. 农业科技通讯, 2013(8):209−210. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6400.2013.08.083 WANG Z, LIU M H, GAO W C, et al. Problems and suggestions of sweet potato fertilization in Guanzhong area in Shaanxi Province [J]. Bulletin of agricultural science and technology, 2013(8): 209−210.(in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6400.2013.08.083
[4]	张辉, 张永春. 肥料对甘薯营养品质影响的研究进展 [J]. 江苏农业科学, 2017, 45(17):1−5. ZHANG H, ZHANG Y C. Effects of fertilizer on nutrient quality of sweet potato [J]. Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences, 2017, 45(17): 1−5.(in Chinese)
[5]	赵鹏, 刘明, 靳容, 等. 长期施用有机肥对潮土区甘薯碳氮积累与分配的影响 [J]. 中国农业科学, 2021, 54(10):2142−2153. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2021.10.010 ZHAO P, LIU M, JIN R, et al. Effects of long-term application of organic fertilizer on carbon and nitrogen accumulation and distribution of sweetpotato in FluvoAquic soil area [J]. Scientia Agricultura Sinica, 2021, 54(10): 2142−2153.(in Chinese) doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2021.10.010
[6]	邬梦成, 李鹏, 张欣, 等. 不同有机物施用对油菜-红薯轮作模式下养分吸收利用的影响 [J]. 水土保持学报, 2018, 32(1):320−326. WU M C, LI P, ZHANG X, et al. Effects of different organic matters application on nutrient absorption and utilization in rape and sweet potato rotation mode [J]. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 2018, 32(1): 320−326.(in Chinese)
[7]	康国栋, 魏家星, 邬梦成, 等. 有机物料施用对旱地红壤作物产量和有机质活性组分的影响 [J]. 土壤, 2017, 49(6):1084−1091. KANG G D, WEI J X, WU M C, et al. Effects of organic material application on crop yield and active organic components in upland red soil [J]. Soils, 2017, 49(6): 1084−1091.(in Chinese)
[8]	魏猛, 张爱君, 诸葛玉平, 等. 长期施肥下甘薯产量稳定性及品质特性研究 [J]. 西北农业学报, 2017, 26(4):588−595. doi: 10.7606/j.issn.1004-1389.2017.04.014 WEI M, ZHANG A J, ZHUGE Y P, et al. Study of different fertilization practices on sweetpotato yield stability and quality characteristics [J]. Acta Agriculturae Boreali-Occidentalis Sinica, 2017, 26(4): 588−595.(in Chinese) doi: 10.7606/j.issn.1004-1389.2017.04.014
[9]	冉圆圆, 刘洪斌. 重庆市不同地貌甘薯土壤养分丰缺指标及施肥方案 [J]. 中国土壤与肥料, 2017(5):44−50,72. doi: 10.11838/sfsc.20170508 RAN Y Y, LIU H B. The soil fertility and fertilization strategies of sweet potato in different landforms areas of Chongqing [J]. Soil and Fertilizer Sciences in China, 2017(5): 44−50,72.(in Chinese) doi: 10.11838/sfsc.20170508
[10]	宁运旺, 张辉, 许仙菊, 等. 薯麦轮作体系钾肥全部施于薯季提高甘薯和周年产量 [J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2018, 24(4):935−946. doi: 10.11674/zwyf.17352 NING Y W, ZHANG H, XU X J, et al. Full application of potassium fertilizer in sweet potato to increase tuber and annual yields in sweet potato/wheat rotation [J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizers, 2018, 24(4): 935−946.(in Chinese) doi: 10.11674/zwyf.17352
[11]	刘明, 张爱君, 陈晓光, 等. 秸秆还田配施化肥对土壤肥力及鲜食甘薯产量和品质的影响 [J]. 应用生态学报, 2020, 31(10):3445−3452. LIU M, ZHANG A J, CHEN X G, et al. Effects of straw returning and fertilization on soil fertility and yield and quality of edible sweetpotato [J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 2020, 31(10): 3445−3452.(in Chinese)
[12]	段文学, 张海燕, 解备涛, 等. 化肥和生物有机肥配施对鲜食型甘薯块根产量、品质及土壤肥力的影响 [J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2021, 27(11):1971−1980. doi: 10.11674/zwyf.2021211 DUAN W X, ZHANG H Y, XIE B T, et al. Effects of chemical and bio-organic fertilizers on tuber yield, quality, and soil fertility of edible sweetpotato [J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizers, 2021, 27(11): 1971−1980.(in Chinese) doi: 10.11674/zwyf.2021211
[13]	姚宝全, 徐志平, 章明清, 等. 福建主要粮油作物测土配方施肥指标体系研究Ⅲ. 区域施肥模型及其推荐施肥 [J]. 福建农业学报, 2009, 24(2):137−142. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-0384.2009.02.009 YAO B Q, XU Z P, ZHANG M Q, et al. Soil testing and fertilization indices for major grain and oil crops in Fujian Ⅲ. models and recommendations for regional fertilization [J]. Fujian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2009, 24(2): 137−142.(in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-0384.2009.02.009
[14]	张建丽. 福建主要粮油作物测土配方施肥指标体系研究Ⅳ. 土壤速效氮磷钾测定值与最佳施肥量的关系 [J]. 福建农业学报, 2009, 24(3):246−250. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-0384.2009.03.011 ZHANG J L. Soil testing and fertilization indices for major grain and oil crops in Fujian Ⅳ. Correlation between soil test data and fertilization model [J]. Fujian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2009, 24(3): 246−250.(in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-0384.2009.03.011
[15]	章明清, 李娟, 孔庆波, 等. 福建甘薯氮磷钾施肥指标研究 [J]. 土壤通报, 2012, 43(4):861−866. ZHANG M Q, LI J, KONG Q B, et al. Study on fertilization index of nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium for sweet potato in Fujian [J]. Chinese Journal of Soil Science, 2012, 43(4): 861−866.(in Chinese)
[16]	曹榕彬. 宁德市耕地土壤养分空间分布特征分析和甘薯施肥建议 [J]. 中国土壤与肥料, 2018(2):153−160. doi: 10.11838/sfsc.20180223 CAO R B. Analysis of spatial distribution of soil nutrients and suggestions for fertilization of sweet potato in Ningde [J]. Soil and Fertilizer Sciences in China, 2018(2): 153−160.(in Chinese) doi: 10.11838/sfsc.20180223
[17]	王兴仁, 陈新平, 张福锁, 等. 施肥模型在我国推荐施肥中的应用 [J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 1998, 4(1):67−74. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1008-505X.1998.01.011 WANG X R, CHEN X P, ZHANG F S, et al. Application of fertilization model for fertilizer recommendation in China [J]. Plant Natrition and Fertilizen Science, 1998, 4(1): 67−74.(in Chinese) doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1008-505X.1998.01.011
[18]	李娟, 章明清, 章赞德, 等. 三元非结构肥效模型提高水稻施肥推荐的可靠性 [J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2019, 25(2):311−320. doi: 10.11674/zwyf.18104 LI J, ZHANG M Q, ZHANG Z D, et al. Increasing precision of fertilizer recommendation using ternary non-structural fertilizer response model [J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizers, 2019, 25(2): 311−320.(in Chinese) doi: 10.11674/zwyf.18104
[19]	鲁如坤. 土壤农业化学分析方法[M]. 北京: 中国农业科技出版社, 2000.
[20]	李娟, 章明清, 孔庆波, 等. 构建县域早稻氮磷钾施肥的系统聚类方法研究 [J]. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2017, 23(2):531−538. doi: 10.11674/zwyf.16123 LI J, ZHANG M Q, KONG Q B, et al. Building fertilization categories of N, P and K fertilization for early rice using systematic clustering method in County territory [J]. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer, 2017, 23(2): 531−538.(in Chinese) doi: 10.11674/zwyf.16123
[21]	袁志发, 宋世德. 多元统计分析[M]. 2版. 北京: 科学出版社, 2009.
[22]	Food and Agriculture Organization. FAOSTAT agriculture data[OL]. [2022-04-06] . http://www.fao.org/faostat/en.
[23]	王道中, 张永春. 安徽省甘薯生产及施肥现状调查分析 [J]. 安徽农业科学, 2010, 38(19):10024−10025. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0517-6611.2010.19.035 WANG D Z, ZHANG Y C. production and fertilization Investigation and analysis on sweet potato in Anhui Province [J]. Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences, 2010, 38(19): 10024−10025.(in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0517-6611.2010.19.035
[24]	李秀勉. 泉州市甘薯施肥现状及建议 [J]. 福建农业, 2009(3):15. LI X M. Fertilization status and suggestions for sweet potato in Quanzhou city [J]. Fujian Agriculture, 2009(3): 15.(in Chinese)
[25]	杨守春, 陈伦寿, 毛达如. 黄淮海平原主要作物优化施肥和土壤培肥技术[M]. 北京: 中国农业科技出版社, 1991.
[26]	王兴仁, 陈伦寿, 毛达如, 等. 分类回归综合法及其在区域施肥决策中的应用 [J]. 土壤通报, 1989, 20(1):17−21. WANG X R, CHEN L S, MAO D R, et al. Classification regression synthetic method and its application in regional fertilization decision [J]. Chinese Journal of Soil Science, 1989, 20(1): 17−21.(in Chinese)
[27]	毛达如, 张承东. 多点肥料效应函数的动态聚类方法 [J]. 北京农业大学学报, 1991, 17(2):49−54. MAO D R, ZHANG C D. Cluster Analysis of quadratic response fanction on the fertilizer dispersed experiments [J]. Journal of Beijing agricultural university, 1991, 17(2): 49−54.(in Chinese)
[28]	金耀青, 张中原. 配方施肥方法及其应用[M]. 沈阳: 辽宁科学技术出版社, 1993.
[29]	陈新平, 周金池, 王兴仁, 等. 小麦-玉米轮作制中氮肥效应模型的选择: 经济和环境效益分析 [J]. 土壤学报, 2000, 37(3):346−354. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0564-3929.2000.03.008 CHEN X P, ZHOU J C, WANG X R, et al. Economic and environmental evaluation on models for describing crop yield response to nitrogen fertilizers at winter-wheat and summer-corn rotation system [J]. Acta Pedologica Sinica, 2000, 37(3): 346−354.(in Chinese) doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0564-3929.2000.03.008
[30]	LARBI A, ETELA I, NWOKOCHA H N, et al. Fodder and tuber yields, and fodder quality of sweetpotato cultivars at different maturity stages in the West African humid forest and savanna zones [J]. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 2007, 135(1–2): 126–138.
[31]	王汝娟, 史春余, 董庆裕, 等. 甘薯施用有机—无机缓释肥的生物学效应 [J]. 杂粮作物, 2005, 25(4):248−250. WANG R J, SHI C Y, DONG Q Y, et al. Biological effects of organic-inorganic slow release fertilizer on sweetpotato [J]. Rain Fed Crops, 2005, 25(4): 248−250.(in Chinese)
[32]	魏猛, 张爱君, 李洪民, 等. 不同施肥方式对甘薯光合特性及产量的影响 [J]. 江西农业学报, 2017, 29(1):47−50. WEI M, ZHANG A J, LI H M, et al. Effects of different fertilization modes on photosynthetic characteristics and yield of sweet potato [J]. Acta Agriculturae Jiangxi, 2017, 29(1): 47−50.(in Chinese)
[33]	YANG J, GAO W, REN S. Long-term effects of combined application of chemical nitrogen with organic materials on crop yields, soil organic carbon and total nitrogen in fluvo-aquic soil [J]. Soil and Tillage Research, 2015, 151: 67−74. doi: 10.1016/j.still.2015.03.008
[34]	ZHANG X B, SUN N, WU L H, et al. Effects of enhancing soil organic carbon sequestration in the topsoil by fertilization on crop productivity and stability: Evidence from long-term experiments with wheat-maize cropping systems in China [J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2016, 562: 247−259. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.03.193