Effects of Allicin and Bacillus natto Supplements on Production, Antioxidant Enzymes, Intestinal Morphology, and Cecal Microbiota of Fujian White Rabbits
-
摘要:
目的 研究大蒜素、纳豆菌及其复合物对福建白兔生产性能、抗氧化活性、肠道形态和菌群的影响，筛选合适的添加剂替代饲料抗生素。 方法 选取48只体重相近的40日龄福建白兔，随机分成4组，每组12只（公母各半），试验期50 d。对照组饲喂基础饲粮（A组，CK），试验在基础饲粮上分别添加200 mg·kg−1大蒜素、0.5%纳豆菌、200 mg·kg−1大蒜素+0.5%纳豆菌，设置大蒜素处理组（B组）、纳豆菌处理组（C组）和大蒜素+纳豆菌处理组（D组）。试验期间测定生产性能，试验结束测定屠宰性能、血清抗氧化酶、肠道形态和盲肠菌群结构。 结果 （1）试验组的腹泻率和死亡率都低于对照组；平均日增重大蒜素+纳豆菌处理（D组）极显著高于基础饲粮处理组（A组）和大蒜素处理组（B组）（P＜0.01），显著高于纳豆菌处理组（C组）（P＜0.05）；D组料重比最低，半净膛重极显著高于A组和B组（P＜0.01）；全净膛率和半净膛率各组之间差异不显著。（2）血清中GSH-Px含量，对照组均显著低于试验组，且A组和B组差异显著（P＜0.05）， A组和C、D组差异极显著（P＜0.01）。（3）回肠隐窝深度B组显著高于C组（P＜0.05）；空肠隐窝深度，对照组低于试验组，且与B组差异极显著（P＜0.01），与D组差异显著（P＜0.05）。（4）菌群结构分析，科水平和属水平盲肠unclassified_o__Clostridiales菌科、菌属在组间差异均显著 （P＜0.05），且A组显著高于D 组；属水平Ruminococcaceae_UCG-010在组间差异显著 （P＜0.05），A组显著高于C 组。 结论 大蒜素和纳豆菌联合使用可提高福建白兔平均日增重、半净膛重，降低料重比，增加空肠隐窝深度，减少有害菌，调整肠道菌群平衡，降低腹泻和死亡，促进生长发育。 Abstract:Objective Effects of addition of allicin and/or Bacillus natto in feed on the production performance, antioxidant enzymes, intestinal morphology, and cecal microbiota of Fujian white rabbits were studied for forage supplement as an antibiotic replacement. Method Forty-eight healthy 40-day-old Fujian white rabbits with similar body weight were randomly divided into 4 groups of 12 rabbits each, half male and half female, for a 50 d feeding trial. The rabbits in the control group were fed a basal diet (Group A), while those in the treatment groups the basal diet supplemented with 200 mg·kg−1 allicin (Group B), 0.5% B. natto (Group C), and 200 mg·kg−1 allicin+0.5% B. natto (Group D). Growth of the rabbits was monitored during the trial, and at the end, the animals were slaughtered to determine the meat production, serum antioxidant enzymes, intestinal morphology, and cecum microbiota. Results (1) The rates of diarrhea occurrence and mortality of the rabbits in Group B, C, and D were lower than those of Group A. The average daily weight gain of Group D was significantly higher than that of Group A and B at P＜0.01 and Group C at P＜0.05. Group D had the lowest F/G among all, and significantly higher half-eviscerated weight than that of Group A or Group B (P＜0.01). No significant differences were observed in the eviscerated and half-eviscerated rates among the groups. (2) On serum GSH-Px, Group A was significantly lower than Group B, C and D. The difference between group A and Group B was significant (P＜0.05), while those between Group A and Group C and between Group A and Group D extremely significant (P＜0.01). (3) The ileal crypt depth of Group B was significantly higher than Group C(P ＜0.05). Group A had a lower depth of jejunum crypt than the treatment groups and significantly different from Group B (P＜0.01) and Group D (P＜0.05). (4) The unclassified_o__Clostridiales significantly differed at both family and genus levels among the groups (P＜0.05) with Group A being significantly higher than Group D. Whereas, at genus level, Ruminococcaceae_UCG-010 significantly differed among the groups (P＜0.05), but Group A was significantly higher than Group C. Conclusion The combined use of allicin and B. natto in feed significantly increased the average daily weight gain and half-eviscerated weight, decreased the F/G, increased the depth of jejunum crypt, reduced the harmful bacteria population, balanced the cecum microbiota, mitigated diarrhea and deaths, promoted the growth and development of Fujian white rabbits. -
Key words:
- Fujian white rabbit /
- allicin /
- Bacillus natto /
- production performance /
- intestinal morphology /
- cecal microbiota
-
图 1 福建白兔肠道组织切片形态（100×）
Figure 1. Morphology of sectioned intestinal tissues of Fujian white rabbits (100×)
图 2 不同处理组门水平肠道微生物丰度
Figure 2. Intestinal microbial abundance at phylum level of treatment groups
图 3 不同处理组肠道微生物科水平丰度
Figure 3. Intestinal microbial abundance at family level of treatment groups
图 4 不同处理组肠道微生物科水平菌群差异性
Figure 4. Differential intestinal microflora at family level of treatment groups
图 5 不同处理组肠道微生物属水平丰度
Figure 5. Intestinal microbial abundance at genus level of treatment groups
图 6 不同处理组肠道微生物菌群属水平差异性
Figure 6. Differential intestinal microflora of treatment groups
表 1 基础饲粮组成及营养水平（干物质基础）
Table 1. Composition and nutrient levels of basic diets (DM basis)
项目
Items含量
Content原料 Ingredients 玉米 Corn/% 30.0 豆粕 Soybean meal/% 15.0 麸皮 Wheat bran/% 25.0 花生壳粉 Peanut shell powder/% 5.0 草粉 Grass meal/% 20.0 预混料 Premix1）/% 5.0 合计 Total/% 100.0 营养水平 Nutrient levels2） 粗蛋白质 Crude protein/% 17.0 消化能 Digestible energy/（MJ·kg−1） 10.6 粗纤维 Crude fiber/% 13.0 钙 Ca/% 1.0 磷 P/% 0.5 注：1）预混料为每千克饲粮提供：赖氨酸1 500 mg，蛋氨酸 1 500 mg，CaHPO4 15 000 mg，NaCl 5 000 mg，VA 10 000 IU，VD3 2 000 IU，VE 50 mg，VK3 2.5 mg，硫胺素5 mg，VB12 1 mg，核黄素10 mg，泛酸50 mg，烟酸20 mg，叶酸2.5 mg，氯化胆碱400 mg，Fe 100 mg，Zn 50 mg，Cu 40 mg，Mn 30 mg，I 0.5 mg，Se 0.05 mg，其余为载体补足。2）营养水平为计算值。
Note: 1) Premix provided the following per kg of diets: Lys 1 500 mg, Met 1 500 mg, CaHPO415 000 mg, NaCl 5 000 mg, VA 10 000 IU, VD3 2 000 IU, VE 50 mg, VK3 2.5 mg, thiamine 5 mg, VB12 1 mg, riboflavin 10 mg, pantothenic acid 50 mg, nicotinic acid 20 mg, folic acid 2.5 mg, choline chloride 400 mg, Fe 100 mg, Zn 50 mg, Cu 40 mg, Mn 30 mg, I 0.5 mg, Se 0.05 mg, the rest was meal carrier complement. 2) Nutrient levels were calculated.
下载: 导出CSV
表 2 不同添加剂对福建白兔腹泻率和死亡率的影响
Table 2. Effects of supplements on rates of diarrhea incident and mortality of Fujian white rabbits
组别
Groups腹泻率 Number of diarrhea/% 死亡率 Mortality/% 平均
Average40～60 d 60～90 d 平均
Average40～60 d 60～90 d 对照A组 CK 50.00 33.33 25.00 33.33 33.33 0.00 处理B组 Treatment B 25.00 25.00 0.00 33.33 33.33 0.00 处理C组 Treatment C 25.00 25.00 0.00 25.00 16.67 8.33 处理D组 Treatment D 8.33 8.33 0.00 16.67 8.33 8.33
下载: 导出CSV
表 3 不同添加剂对福建白兔生长性能的影响
Table 3. Effect of supplements on growth performance of Fujian white rabbits
组别
Groups初始体重
Original weight/g终末体重
Final weight/g平均日采食量
Average feed intake/（g·d−1）平均日增重
Average weight gain/（g·d−1）料重比
F/G处理A组 CK 667.25±78.68 1635.31±131.67 ABb 110.26±8.70 ABab 19.36±2.16 Bb 5.74±0.54 处理B组 Treatment B 659.13±86.17 1622.25±98.21 Bb 105.87±9.75 Bb 19.43±2.07 Bb 5.81±0.86 处理C组 Treatment C 690.33±83.40 1697.61±108.44 ABab 118.20±7.68 Aa 20.27±1.94 ABb 5.92±0.70 处理D组 Treatment D 618.9±112.43 1772.00±90.22 Aa 119.92±8.23 Aa 23.06±3.10 Aa 5.35±0.68 注：同列数据后字母相同或不标者表示差异不显著（P＞0. 05）；小写字母不同表示差异显著（P＜0.05）； 大写字母不同表示差异极显著（P＜0.01）。表4～8同。
Note: The datas with the same or no letters in a line mean no significance (P＞0. 05), the datas with different small letters indicate significance difference (P＜0.05), the datas with different capital letters indicate extremely significances difference (P＜0.01). Same for Table 4–8.
下载: 导出CSV
表 4 不同添加剂对福建白兔屠宰性能的影响
Table 4. Effect of supplements on slaughter performance of Fujian white rabbits
组别
Groups全净膛重
Carcass net weight/g半净膛重
Half eviscerated weight/g全净膛率
Whole net carcass rate/%半净膛率
Half-complete ratio/%对照A组 CK 799.06±65.05 ABb 880.31±68.27 Bb 0.49±0.02 0.54±0.02 处理B组Treatment B 790.63±44.17 Bb 870.56±49.53 Bb 0.49±0.02 0.54±0.02 处理C组Treatment C 835.39±47.79 ABab 928.78±52.59 ABa 0.49±0.03 0.55±0.03 处理D组Treatment D 861.65±56.93 Aa 957.8±56.53 Aa 0.49±0.02 0.54±0.02
下载: 导出CSV
表 5 不同添加剂对福建白兔血清抗氧化酶的影响
Table 5. Effect of supplements on serum antioxidant enzymes of Fujian white rabbits
组别
Groups总抗氧化能力
T-AOC/（mmol·L−1）谷胱甘肽过氧化物酶
GSH-Px/（U·mL−1）丙二醛
MDA/（nmol·mL−1）对照A组 CK 0.59±0.08 202.03±37.00 Bb 5.23±1.14 处理B组 Treatment B 0.61±0.08 275.63±53.97 ABa 5.38±1.51 处理C组 Treatment C 0.58±0.12 311.51±49.82 Aa 4.59±2.52 处理D组 Treatment D 0.56±0.06 318.22±69.78 Aa 4.43±1.29
下载: 导出CSV
表 6 不同添加剂对福建白兔肠道绒毛长度和隐窝深度的影响
Table 6. Effects of supplements on intestinal villus length and crypt depth of Fujian white rabbits
（单位：mm） 组别
Groups绒毛长度 Villus length 隐窝深度 Crypt depth 十二指肠
Duodenum回肠
Ileal空肠
Jejunum十二指肠
Duodenum回肠
Ileal空肠
Jejunum对照A组 CK 0.68±0.07 0.54±0.13 0.51±0.08 0.13±0.02 0.10±0.02 Aab 0.10±0.01 Bc 处理B组 Treatment B 0.62±0.13 0.49±0.09 0.49±0.05 0.13±0.05 0.12±0.04 Aa 0.13±0.03 Aa 处理C组 Treatment C 0.65±0.07 0.57±0.07 0.53±0.05 0.10±0.02 0.09±0.01 Ab 0.11±0.02 ABb 处理D组 Treatment D 0.62±0.13 0.52±0.06 0.52±0.07 0.12±0.03 0.10±0.02 Aab 0.12±0.03 ABab
下载: 导出CSV
表 7 不同添加剂对福建白兔肠道绒毛数量和隐窝数量的影响
Table 7. Effects of supplements on intestinal villi population and crypts of Fujian white rabbits
（单位：根·mm−2） 组别
Groups绒毛数量 Villus number 隐窝数量 Crypt number 十二指肠
Duodenum回肠
Ileal空肠
Jejunum十二指肠
Duodenum回肠
Ileal空肠
Jejunum对照A组 CK 4.15±0.88 7.62±1.74 7.44±2.68 13.08±4.03 18.01±7.88Aa 23.5±17.38 处理B组 Treatment B 4.75±1.17 7.70±0.96 6.73±1.02 18.01±6.76 17.34±4.75Aab 28.94±27.38 处理C组 Treatment C 4.58±1.05 7.61±1.05 6.28±0.60 14.68±6.50 12.19±3.48Ab 16.54±6.34 处理D组 Treatment D 4.75±0.95 7.41±1.87 6.16±0.76 14.29±4.78 13.75±2.62Ab 14.32±4.48
下载: 导出CSV
表 8 试验各组测序结果及Alpha多样性分析
Table 8. Sequence and alpha diversity of treatment groups
项目
Item对照A组
CK处理B组
Treatment B处理C组
Treatment C处理D组
Treatment D分类单元数量 OUT/个 648.00±49.88 571.25±90.6 578.56±144.44 575.20±147.72 覆盖率 Coverage/% 99.58±0.03 99.63±0.05 99.60±0.11 99.62±0.09 Shannon指数 Shannon index 4.82±0.18 Aa 4.59±0.36 Aab 4.53±0.33 Ab 4.54±0.52 Aab Simpson指数 Simpson index 0.02±0.01 0.03±0.02 0.04±0.02 0.03±0.02 ACE指数 ACE index 742.16±54.21 657.55±98.67 673.62±165.4 668.17±150.36 Chaol指数 Chaol index 751.06±49.72 668.86±98.81 689.77±171.52 673.87±169.42 注：同行数据后字母相同或不标者表示差异不显著（P＞0. 05）；小写字母不同表示差异显著（P＜0.05）；大写字母不同表示差异极显著（P＜0.01）。
Note: The datas with the same or no letters indicate no significance in a row(P＞0.05), the datas with different small letters indicate significance difference(P＜0.05), the datas with different capital letters indicate extremely significances difference(P＜0.01).
下载: 导出CSV
-
[1] 陈冬金, 陈岩锋, 孙世坤, 等. 福建白兔非特异性抗病特性研究 [J]. 中国草食动物科学, 2015, 35(6):34−37. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-3887.2015.06.011CHEN D J, CHEN Y F, SUN S K, et al. Study on general resistance characteristics on Fujian white rabbits [J]. China Herbivore Science, 2015, 35(6): 34−37.(in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-3887.2015.06.011 [2] 陈冬金, 桑雷, 孙世坤, 等. 福建白兔与新西兰白兔生长和生化指标比较 [J]. 福建农业学报, 2019, 34(4):433−437.CHEN D J, SANG L, SUN S K, et al. Growth and biochemistry of white rabbits from Fujian and new Zealand [J]. Fujian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2019, 34(4): 433−437.(in Chinese) [3] 陈岩锋, 陈冬金, 孙世坤, 等. 福建白兔肌肉营养成分分析与评价 [J]. 家畜生态学报, 2013, 34(5):75−79. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-1182.2013.05.016CHEN Y F, CHEN D J, SUN S K, et al. Analysis and evaluation of nutritional components of Fujian white rabbit muscle [J]. Acta Ecologiae Animalis Domastici, 2013, 34(5): 75−79.(in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-1182.2013.05.016 [4] 桑雷, 王锦祥, 孙世坤, 等. 闽西地方肉兔与新西兰兔屠宰和肉质性状研究 [J]. 福建农业学报, 2018, 33(9):888−892.SANG L, WANG J X, SUN S K, et al. Carcass characteristics and meat quality of local breeds and new Zealand white rabbits [J]. Fujian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2018, 33(9): 888−892.(in Chinese) [5] ICHIKAWA M, YOSHIDA J, IDE N, et al. Tetrahydro-beta-carboline derivatives in aged garlic extract show antioxidant properties [J]. The Journal of Nutrition, 2006, 136(3): 726S−731S. doi: 10.1093/jn/136.3.726S [6] 王飞, 章生根, 李勇. 大蒜素对肉鸡生产性能和免疫机能的影响 [J]. 安徽农业科学, 2013, 40(36):17608−17610.WANG F, ZHANG S G, LI Y. Effects of allicin on performance and immune function of broilers [J]. Journal of Anhui Agriculture Science, 2013, 40(36): 17608−17610.(in Chinese) [7] 黄瑞华, 王建辉, 陈雯, 等. 大蒜素对断奶仔猪生长发育及其周围环境的影响 [J]. 畜牧与兽医, 2002, 34(8):1−3. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0529-5130.2002.08.001HUANG R H, WANG J H, CHEN W, et al. Effects of garlicin on the growth performance of weaned piglets and on the surroundings [J]. Animal Husbandry & Veterinary Medicine, 2002, 34(8): 1−3.(in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0529-5130.2002.08.001 [8] MARCHESE A, BARBIERI R, SANCHES-SILVA A, et al. Antifungal and antibacterial activities of allicin: A review [J]. Trends in Food Science & Technology, 2016, 52: 49−56. [9] 吉美萍, 肖志婷, 那日, 等. 纳豆芽孢杆菌的相关研究进展 [J]. 河南师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2016, 44(5):83−93.JI M P, XIAO Z T, NA R, et al. Related progress of research of Bacillus natto [J]. Journal of Henan Normal University (Natural Science Edition), 2016, 44(5): 83−93.(in Chinese) [10] 董尚智, 陈远凤, 黄燕华, 等. 纳豆芽孢杆菌的饲料学特性研究 [J]. 动物营养学报, 2009, 21(3):371−378. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-267x.2009.03.015DONG S Z, CHEN Y F, HUANG Y H, et al. Research on feed characteristics of Bacillus natto [J]. Chinese Journal of Animal Nutrition, 2009, 21(3): 371−378.(in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-267x.2009.03.015 [11] 周国勤, 杜宣, 吴伟. 纳豆芽孢杆菌对鱼类非特异性免疫功能的影响 [J]. 水利渔业, 2006, 27(1):101−103. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-1278.2006.01.044ZHOU G Q, DU X, WU W. Effects of Bacillus natto on non-specific immune function in fish [J]. Reservoir Fisheries, 2006, 27(1): 101−103.(in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-1278.2006.01.044 [12] 陈兵, 何世山, 朱凤香, 等. 纳豆芽孢杆菌剂对AA鸡生产性能和十二指肠消化酶的影响 [J]. 浙江农业学报, 2003, 15(5):289−292.CHEN B, HE S S, ZHU F X, et al. Effects of Bacillus natto sawamura preparation on growth capability and duodenum digestive enzyme of AA broilers [J]. Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis, 2003, 15(5): 289−292.(in Chinese) [13] 盛清凯, 姜殿文, 刘艳艳, 等. 日粮中纳豆芽孢杆菌对体外猪粪发酵液中臭气及微生物的影响 [J]. 家畜生态学报, 2014, 35(10):36−40. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-1182.2014.10.007SHENG Q K, JIANG D W, LIU Y Y, et al. Effect of Bacillus natto in diet on odors and microbes in pig manure fermentation broths in vitro [J]. Acta Ecologiae Animalis Domastici, 2014, 35(10): 36−40.(in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-1182.2014.10.007 [14] 张俊瑜, 王连群, 王承敏, 等. 纳豆芽孢杆菌对绵羊生长性能、消化性能和血清生化指标的影响 [J]. 动物营养学报, 2019, 31(6):2666−2671.ZHANG J Y, WANG L Q, WANG C M, et al. Effects of Bacillus subtilis natto on growth performance, digestive performance and serum biochemical indexes of sheep [J]. Chinese Journal of Animal Nutrition, 2019, 31(6): 2666−2671.(in Chinese) [15] 赵会利, 曹玉凤, 高艳霞, 等. 纳豆芽孢杆菌对断奶犊牛生长性能和血液生化指标的影响 [J]. 中国畜牧杂志, 2013, 49(17):66−69. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-7033.2013.17.016ZHAO H L, CAO Y F, GAO Y X, et al. Effects of Bacillus natto on growth performance and blood biochemical indices of weaned calves [J]. Chinese Journal of Animal Science, 2013, 49(17): 66−69.(in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-7033.2013.17.016 [16] 杨佳栋, 魏凤菊. 大蒜素的功能与处理方法 [J]. 动物科学与动物医学, 2004, 21(5):50−51.YANG J D, WEI F J. Function and treatment of allicin [J]. Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, 2004, 21(5): 50−51.(in Chinese) [17] 何晓政, 王晓丽. 大蒜素与丁酸梭菌联用对青脚麻鸡生长性能的影响 [J]. 养禽与禽病防治, 2021(1):14−16.HE X Z, WANG X L. Effects of allicin combined with Clostridium butyricum on growth performance of Qingojiao chicken [J]. Poultry Husbandry and Disease Control, 2021(1): 14−16.(in Chinese) [18] NRC. Nutrient requirements of rabbits[M]. Washington, D. C. : National Academies Press, 1977. [19] DE BLAS C, WISEMAN J. Nutrition of the rabbit[M]. Wallingford: CABI, 2010. [20] ZHENG P, WU J, ZHANG H P, et al. The gut microbiome modulates gut–brain axis glycerophospholipid metabolism in a region-specific manner in a nonhuman primate model of depression [J]. Molecular Psychiatry, 2021, 26(6): 2380−2392. doi: 10.1038/s41380-020-0744-2 [21] DE BLAS J C. Nutritional impact on health and performance in intensively reared rabbits [J]. Animal, 2013, 7: 102−111. doi: 10.1017/S1751731112000213 [22] 吴玉臣, 郭爽, 阴正兴, 等. 复方中药对肉鸡免疫功能和抗氧化功能的影响研究 [J]. 中国畜牧兽医, 2011, 38(1):206−209.WU Y C, GUO S, YIN Z X, et al. Effect of one dose Chinese traditional medicine on immunity and antioxidant activity in broile [J]. China Animal Husbandry & Veterinary Medicine, 2011, 38(1): 206−209.(in Chinese) [23] 刘秋东, 张中文, 刘凤华, 等. 复方白头翁胶囊对腹泻犬小肠绒毛长度和隐窝深度的影响 [J]. 北京农学院学报, 2011, 26(3):38−40. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-3186.2011.03.011LIU Q D, ZHANG Z W, LIU F H, et al. Effects of herbal medicine on villus height and crypt depth in small intestine of canine [J]. Journal of Beijing University of Agriculture, 2011, 26(3): 38−40.(in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-3186.2011.03.011 [24] WANG Y, YI L, ZHAO M L, et al. Effects of zinc-methionine on growth performance, intestinal flora and immune function in pigeon squabs [J]. British Poultry Science, 2014, 55(3): 403−408. doi: 10.1080/00071668.2014.919375 [25] ZHANG Q, XIAO X H, LI M, et al. Vildagliptin increases butyrate-producing bacteria in the gut of diabetic rats [J]. PLoS One, 2017, 12(10): e0184735. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0184735 [26] HE W S, LI L L, RUI J X, et al. Tomato seed oil attenuates hyperlipidemia and modulates gut microbiota in C57BL/6J mice [J]. Food & Function, 2020, 11(5): 4275−4290. -
点击查看大图
图(6) / 表(8)
计量
- 文章访问数: 638
- HTML全文浏览量: 227
- PDF下载量: 37
- 被引次数: 0
