Correlations among Petal Color, pH, and Epidermal Cell Morphology of Ornamental Crabapple
-
摘要:
目的 以14个观赏海棠品种为研究对象,初步探讨观赏海棠花色与花瓣pH、表皮细胞形态特征之间的关系。 方法 分别采用比色卡及色差计对不同色系(白色、粉红色、紫红色、暗红色等)观赏海棠品种盛花期及不同开花进程(大蕾期、盛花期、末花期)的海棠花瓣,进行色彩评价,同时测定其细胞pH值,通过电镜扫描观察花瓣表皮细胞形态特征, 探讨海棠花色与花瓣pH值、表皮细胞形态特征的关系。 结果 白色系、粉色系品种pH值5.24~6.37,而暗紫红、紫红色系pH值4.98~5.53;从白色系到紫红色系,花瓣pH值整体呈现下降趋势。随着花瓣颜色的加深,花瓣pH值总体呈现出逐渐降低的变化趋势,与不断增大的红绿色度a*值和饱和度C*值存在一定的负相关关系,在开花进程中也存在类似的变化规律;除暗紫色系外,其他3个色系内部均存在不同的表皮细胞类型,开花过程中,随着花色的淡化,海棠花瓣表皮细胞的扁平化趋势表现较为明显。 结论 观赏海棠花瓣pH值与花色的形成及淡化均存在一定的相关性,花瓣表皮细胞形状未与花色表型差异构成明显的联系,但与开花进程中的海棠花瓣褪色现象有一定的关联性。 Abstract:Objective Correlations among the color, pH, and epidermal cell morphology of petals of ornamental crabapple flowers were preliminarily analyzed. Method Colors of the petals of 14 varieties of white, reddish purple, pink, and dark-purple crabapples at blooming, big-bud, full-bloom, and end florescence stages were measured by RHSCC and a chromatic meter. Morphology of petal epidermal cells was examined under a scanning electron microscope. Correlations among these properties were statistically analyzed. Result The white and pink lines of crabapples had a petal pH ranging from 5.24 to 6.37, while the dark-purple and reddish purple lines, from 4.98 to 5.53. In general, the pH declined as the color turned from light or white to dark or reddish purple and the colorimeter red-green a* and saturation C* measurements increased. A similar trend was also observed during the flowering process. Aside from the dark-purple variety, the other 3 crabapple series had petal epidermal cells of varied types and, in florescence, the cells became more noticeably flattened as the petal color faded. Conclusion There appeared to be correlations among the pH of petals and the formation and fading of flower color on the 14 ornamental crabapple varieties. The petal epidermal cell morphology did not significantly correlate to the flower color phenotype but possibly to the color fading in florescence of the plants. -
Key words:
- Ornamental crabapple /
- flower color /
- epidermal cell /
- pH
-
图 2 11个品种海棠盛花期花瓣pH值
注:A1~A3依次为白色系品种艾琳、金色仙踪、甜蜜时光;B1~B3依次为粉红色系品种高原玫瑰、克莱姆、硕蕾;C1~C3依次为紫红色系品种黛玉、鲁道夫、盛花;D1~D2分别为暗紫红色系品种紫宝石和皇家。
Figure 2. pH of petals of 11 crabapple cultivars at blooming stage
Note: A1-A3: white varieties, M. ‘Eleyi’, M. ‘Fairytail Gold’, and M. ‘Sugar Tyme,’ respectively; B1-B3: pink varieties, M. ‘Prairie Rose’, M. ‘Klehm’s Improved Bechtel’, and M. ‘Big alabstrum,’ respectively; C1-C3: reddish purple varieties, M. ‘Black Jade’, M. ‘Rudolph’, and M. ‘Abundunce,’ respectively; D1-D2: dark-purple varieties, M. ‘purple Gem’ and M.‘Royalty,’ respectively.
图 4 11个海棠品种盛花期花瓣表皮细胞形状
注:(1)放大倍数为800倍,标尺为50 μm。(2)A1~A3依次为白色系品种艾琳、金色仙踪、甜蜜时光;B1~B3依次为粉红色系品种高原玫瑰、克莱姆、硕蕾;C1~C3依次为紫红色系品种黛玉、鲁道夫、盛花;D1~D2分别为暗紫红色系品种紫宝石和皇家。
Figure 4. Shapes of petal epidermal cells of 11 crabapple cultivars at blooming stage
Note: (1)The magnification is 800 times and the scale is 50 μ m.(2)A1-A3: white varieties, M. ‘Eleyi’, M. ‘Fairytail Gold’, and M. ‘Sugar Tyme, respectively’; B1-B3: pink varieties, M. ‘Prairie Rose’, M. ‘Klehm’s Improved Bechtel’, and M. ‘Big alabstrum,’ respectively; C1-C3: reddish purple varieties, M. ‘Black Jade’, M. ‘Rudolph’, and M. ‘Abundunce,’ respectively; D1-D2: dark-purple varieties, M. ‘purple Gem’ and M. ‘Royalty.’ respectively.
图 5 3个海棠品种不同时期花瓣表皮细胞形状
注:E、F、G分别代表芭蕾红、红衣主教、马凯米克3个品种,S1、S2、S3分别表示大蕾期、盛花期、末花期。
Figure 5. Shapes of petal epidermal cells of 3 crabapple cultivars at different florescence stages
Note: E, F, and G stand for M. ‘Ballet Red’, M. ‘Cardinal,’ and M. ‘Makamik,’ respectively; S1, S2, and S3 stand for Big Bud, full-bloom, and end florescence stages, respectively.
表 1 不同色系海棠品种花瓣色彩评价及相应参数
Table 1. Measurements and descriptions of flower color of different crabapple varieties
色系
Color series品种/种名
Cultivar or species nameRHSCC 色彩参数
Color parameters色彩还原
Color reproductionL* a* C* 白色 white 艾琳 M. Eleyi NN155D 90.78±0.28 A −1.90±0.08 A 3.28±0.52 A 白色 white 金色仙踪 M. Fairytail Gold NN155D 92.34±0.20 A −2.04±0.07 A 2.99±0.26 A 白色 white 甜蜜时光 M. Sugar Tyme NN155C 91.55±0.30 A −2.05±0.14 A 2.96±0.13 A 粉红 pink 硕蕾 M. Big alabstrum N66C 72.22±3.99 B 18.41±2.83 B 23.74±2.29 B 粉红 pink 克莱姆 M. Klehm 68C 70.69±3.19 B 17.62±1.35 B 22.34±3.19 B 粉红 pink 高原玫瑰 M. Prairie Rose 68D 72.06±2.62 B 19.01±2.31 B 21.38±2.59 B 紫红 pink 盛花 M. Abundunce 46C 47.95±1.27 C 43.63±0.99 C 43.15±1.22 C 紫红 pink 黛玉 M. Black Jade N57B 48.12±1.28 C 43.31±0.89 C 43.99±1.69 C 紫红 purplish red 鲁道夫 M. Rudolph 58B 47.17±1.66 C 43.21±0.99 C 44.64±2.02 C 暗紫红 dark purple 紫宝石 M. purple Gem 46A 31.39±0.91 D 30.31±1.77 D 30.82±1.84 D 暗紫红 dark purple 皇家 M. Royalty 59B 31.82±1.97 D 29.43±1.51 D 30.83±2.02 D 注:表中同列数值后不同大写字母表示差异达到极显著水平(P<0.01)。表2同。
Note: Data with different capital letters on same column indicate extremely significant difference at P<0.01. Same for Table 2.表 2 3个品种不同花期花瓣色彩评价及相应参数
Table 2. Measurements and descriptions of flower color of 3 crabapple cultivars at different florescence stages
品种或种名
Cultivar or species name时期
Period of floweringRHSCC 色彩参数
Color parameters色彩还原
Color reproductionL* a* C* 芭蕾红M. Ballet Red 大蕾期 the period of blooming 46C 45.02±3.34 A 38.57±2.53 A 38.69±2.57 A 盛花期 blossom period N57A 53.26±4.72 B 34.82±3.38 B 35.06±3.24 B 末花期 last flowering stage N57C 64.14±6.15 C 22.21±4.58 C 22.86±4.60 C 红衣主教 M. Cardinal 大蕾期 the period of blooming 47B 48.29±2.39 A 39.34±2.94 A 39.45±2.88 A 盛花期 blossom period 54B 53.11±4.89 B 27.45±3.96 B 28.21±3.73 B 末花期 last flowering stage N57D 64.46±4.82 C 24.67±3.54 C 25.58±3.42 C 马凯米克 M. Makamik 大蕾期 the period of blooming 53C 39.22±2.33 A 46.08±2.19 A 46.57±2.34 A 盛花期 blossom period 58B 56.06±4.11 B 33.60±2.47 B 33.88±2.39 B 末花期 last flowering stage 61D 68.55±3.66 C 20.40±3.01 C 25.58±3.42 C 表 3 海棠花瓣色度a*、C*、pH值间的相关系数
Table 3. Correlation coefficient between color parameters a*, C* and pH value of crabapple petals
指标
indexpH a* C* pH 1 a* −0.651* 1 C* −0.647* 0.998** 1 注:*和**分别表示在0.05和0.01水平上相关性显著。
Note: * and * * indicate significant correlation at 0.05 and 0.01 levels, respectively. -
[1] YAMAGISHI M, IHARA H, ARAKAWA K, et al. The origin of the LhMYB12, gene, which regulates anthocyanin pigmentation of tepals, in Oriental and Asiatic hybrid lilies (Lilium, spp.) [J]. Scientia Horticulturae, 2014, 174(1): 119−125. [2] GROTEWOLD E, SAINZ M B, TAGLIANI L, et al. Identification of the residues in the Myb domain of maize C1 that specify the interaction with the bHLH cofactor R [J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2000, 97(25): 13579−13584. doi: 10.1073/pnas.250379897 [3] 张超, 陈光, 李彦慧. 二乔玉兰开花过程中花色变化的生理生化机制 [J]. 西北植物学报, 2012, 32(4):716−721. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-4025.2012.04.013ZHANG C, CHEN G, LI Y H. Physiological and biochemical mechanism of flower color variation during flowering season in Yulania × soulangeana [J]. Acta Botanica Boreali-Occidentalia Sinica, 2012, 32(4): 716−721.(in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-4025.2012.04.013 [4] 胡可, 孙翊, 韩科厅, 等. 花瓣细胞pH值对不同色系菊花品种花色表现的影响[A]//2007中国(中山小榄)国际菊花研讨会论文集. 中国风景园林学会菊花研究专业委员会: 中国风景园林学会, 2007: 4. [5] 翟宇慧, 吕嘉琪, 李想, 等. 欧洲报春细胞液pH对花色形成的作用机理初探 [J]. 园艺学报, 2020, 47(3):477−491.ZHAI Y H, LÜ J Q, LI X, et al. Effects of cell Sap pH on the flower color formation in Primula vulgaris [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2020, 47(3): 477−491.(in Chinese) [6] 卓毓光, 刘儒华, 古福生, 等. 花青素稳定性影响因素与应用研究进展 [J]. 广东化工, 2018, 45(24):70−72. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-1865.2018.24.037ZHUO Y G, LIU R H, GU F S, et al. The factors influencing anthocyanins stability and progress on application research [J]. Guangdong Chemical Industry, 2018, 45(24): 70−72.(in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-1865.2018.24.037 [7] 唐东芹, 徐怡倩, 袁媛, 等. 理化因素对风信子花色苷稳定性的影响 [J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2016, 40(4):69−73.TANG D Q, XU Y Q, YUAN Y, et al. Effects of physical and chemical factors on anthocyanin stability in Hyacinthus [J]. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (Natural Sciences Edition), 2016, 40(4): 69−73.(in Chinese) [8] YOSHIDA K, KONDO T, OkAZAKI Y, et al. Cause of blue petal colour [J]. Nature, 1995, 373: 291. doi: 10.1038/373291a0 [9] 吴晓星, 刘凤栾, 房义福, 等. 36个欧美观赏海棠品种(种)应用价值的综合评价 [J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2015, 39(1):93−98.WU X X, LIU F L, FANG Y F, et al. A comprehensive evaluation on application value of 36 Euro-American ornamental crabapples [J]. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University (Natural Sciences Edition), 2015, 39(1): 93−98.(in Chinese) [10] 张往祥, 裘靓, 江志华, 等. 观赏海棠品种群开花进程中色素组分动态特征研究 [J]. 园艺学报, 2014, 41(6):1145−1156.ZHANG W X, QIU J, JIANG Z H, et al. Studies on dynamic characteristics of the pigment components of ornamental crabapple cultivars groups in flowering process [J]. Acta Horticulturae Sinica, 2014, 41(6): 1145−1156.(in Chinese) [11] TAI D, TIAN J, ZHANG J, et al. A Malus crabapple chalcone synthase gene, McCHS, regulates red petal color and flavonoid biosynthesis [J]. Plos One, 2014, 9(10): e110570. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0110570 [12] VOSS D H. Relating colorimeter measurement of plant color to the Royal Horticultural Society colour chart [J]. HortScience, 1992, 27(12): 1256−1260. [13] ZHAO D Q, WEI M R, DING L, et al. Anatomical and biochemical analysis reveal the role of anthocyanins in flower coloration of herbaceous peony [J]. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, 2016, 102: 97−106. doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2016.02.023 [14] GRLESBACH R J. The Inheritance of Flower Color in Petunia hybrida Vilm [J]. Naenina, 1996, 87(3): 241−245. [15] 中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局, 中国国家标准化管理委员会. 化学试剂 pH值测定通则: GB/T 9724—2007[S]. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2008. [16] LI Y L. Scanning Electron Microscope Observation on Floral Organs and Leaf Epidermis of F. suspensa [J]. Medicinal Plant, 2012, 3(8): 1−3, 8. [17] COLLISON C H, MARTIN E C. A Scanning Electron Microscope Study Of Cucumber Nectaries, Cucumis Sativus [J]. Journal of Apicultural Research, 2015, 14(2): 79−84. [18] 白新祥. 菊花花色形成的表型分析[D]. 北京: 北京林业大学, 2007.BAI X X. Phenotype analysis of flower coloration of Chrysanthemum × morifolium ramat.[D]. Beijing: Beijing Forestry University, 2007. (in Chinese). [19] 薛英利, 赵庆师, 黄由安, 等. 滇山茶的花色类型与细胞内环境关系初探 [J]. 云南农业大学学报(自然科学), 2015, 30(3):455−463.XUE Y L, ZHAO Q S, HUANG Y N, et al. Research on relationship between floral colors and intracellular environment of Camellia reticulata lindl [J]. Journal of Yunnan Agricultural University (Natural Science), 2015, 30(3): 455−463.(in Chinese) [20] 裘靓. 观赏海棠品种群色彩评价技术研究[D]. 南京: 南京林业大学, 2011.QIU L. Study on the color evaluation technology of ornamental crabapple cultivar group[D]. Nanjing: Nanjing Forestry University, 2011. (in Chinese). [21] BACH T J. Methods in Plant Biochemistry(Volume 3)[M]//LEA P J. Enzymes of Primary Metabolism. London: Academic Press Ltd., 1990: 414. [22] 李绍文. 生态生物化学[M]. 北京:北京大学出版社, 2003. [23] 赵昶灵, 陈俊愉, 刘雪兰, 等. 理化因素对梅花‘南京红须’花色色素颜色呈现的效应 [J]. 南京林业大学学报(自然科学版), 2004, 28(2):27−32.ZHAO C L, CHEN J Y, LIU X L, et al. Effects of physical and chemical factors on the color expression of the flower color pigment of Prunus mume sieb. et zucc. 'Nanjing hongxu' (Nanjing red-bearded) [J]. Journal of Nanjing Forestry University, 2004, 28(2): 27−32.(in Chinese) [24] 岳娟. 单子叶植物蓝色花花瓣表型观察与解剖结构研究[D]. 杨凌: 西北农林科技大学, 2013.YUE J. Phenotype observation and anatomic structure resrarch of petals from the monocotyledons blue flower[D]. Yangling, China: Northwest A & F University, 2013. (in Chinese). [25] 肖文芳, 李佐, 陈和明, 等. 不同颜色蝴蝶兰花瓣表皮细胞形态差异比较 [J]. 中国农学通报, 2017, 33(7):104−111. doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb16050024XIAO W F, LI Z, CHEN H M, et al. Comparing the petal microstructure of different color Phalaenopsis [J]. Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2017, 33(7): 104−111.(in Chinese) doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb16050024 [26] 林国辉, 王育林, 彭永宏. 月季花瓣的扫描电镜观察 [J]. 华南师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2001, 33(3):106−110.LIN G H, WANG Y L, PENG Y H. Observation on the ultrastructure of petal of cut rose flowers by sem [J]. Journal of South China Normal University (Natural Science), 2001, 33(3): 106−110.(in Chinese) [27] 张丽霞, 施兆鹏, 刘德华, 等. 茉莉花瓣解剖结构的研究 [J]. 湖南农业大学学报, 1998, 24(5):33−37.ZHANG L X, SHI Z P, LIU D H, et al. A study ON the dissection structure OF the petal OF jasminum sambac [J]. Journal of Hunan Agricultural University, 1998, 24(5): 33−37.(in Chinese) [28] 于晓南, 张启翔. 观赏植物的花色素苷与花色 [J]. 林业科学, 2002, 38(3):147−153. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-7488.2002.03.026YU X N, ZHANG Q X. Anthocyanin in ornamental plant and color express [J]. Scientia Silvae Sinicae, 2002, 38(3): 147−153.(in Chinese) doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-7488.2002.03.026