度尾文旦柚辨形疏果最佳FSI阈值研究

王贤达; 范国成; 李健

doi:10.19303/j.issn.1008-0384.2020.03.006

度尾文旦柚辨形疏果最佳FSI阈值研究

doi: 10.19303/j.issn.1008-0384.2020.03.006

福建省农业科学院果树研究所，福建　福州　350013

基金项目: 国家重点研发计划项目（2017YFD0202000）；莆田市科技计划区域重点项目（2016N1001）；福建省科技计划公益类专项（2017R1013-6）；福建省农业科学院科技示范基地项目（sfjd1707）

详细信息

作者简介:
王贤达（1986−），男，助理研究员，主要从事果树病虫害与栽培研究（E-mail: 564944260@qq.com）

通讯作者:
李健（1956−），男，研究员，主要从事果树生理与栽培研究（E-mail: Fujianlijian@126.com）

中图分类号: S 666.3
计量
- 文章访问数: 1285
- HTML全文浏览量: 566
- PDF下载量: 14
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2019-12-01
- 修回日期: 2020-02-10
- 刊出日期: 2020-03-01

Threshold Fruit Shape Index for Optimal Pomelo Thinning on Duweiwendan Trees

Fruit Research Institute, Fujian Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Fuzhou, Fujian　350013, China

摘要

摘要: 目的根据裂果率（FCR）与果形指数（FSI）负相关原理，研究FSI辨形疏果的最佳FSI阈值。方法由2016－2018年于仙游县度尾文旦柚主产区采集n=8 660的果实裂宽（FCW）与FSI数据，对果实FSI及其裂顶与否的分布进行分析，研究FSI辨形疏果的报酬与降低裂果率代价。结果 FSI=0.90是疏果报酬盈亏拐点，疏果FSI阈值的上限为0.90。经迭代回归模拟Logistic累积曲线，FSI≤0.83区间疏除裂果效率相对较高；当FSI≤0.80时，疏果量约20%，疏果报酬＞2.0；若FSI＞0.80时，疏果量将陡增，疏果报酬＜2.0，反之FSI＜0.80裂果疏除效率降低。据试验总体与3年裂果率Logistic累积曲线变率的峰值评估，FSI≤0.80疏果阈值可靠安全，无过度误导疏果可能。结论为降低疏果对产量的影响，提高疏果FSI阈值的可靠性，本文推荐最佳疏果阈值为FSI≤0.80，丰产年份可考虑提升疏果阈值为FSI≤0.83。
- 度尾文旦柚 /
- 果实裂顶 /
- 果形指数 /
- 辨形 /
- 疏果阈值
Abstract: Objective Based on the inverse relation between the fruit cracking rate and fruit shape index (FSI), thresholds to achieve optimal pomelo thinning on Duweiwendan, Citrus grandis (L.) Osbeck. cv. Duweiwendan, was studied for orchard management. Method From 2016 to 2018, 8 660 pomelos on Duweiwendan trees were collected from the major producing areas in Xianyou County, Fujian to determine the fruit crack width (FCW) and FSI at the orchards. Distribution of the data compiled was used to access the cost/benefit to arrive at a recommended threshold for the fruit thinning. Result The upper limit of FSI at 0.90 was found to be the inflection point on the iterative regression simulation of logistic cumulative curve of the operation. According to the curve, at FSI≤0.83 a relatively high efficiency of cracked fruit elimination was obtained. At FSI≤0.80, 20% of the pomelos were discarded resulting in a definition greater than 2.0. At an FSI＞0.80, the amount of thinned fruits increased significantly, while the corresponding gain dropped to below 2.0. Conversely, if the FSI was reduced to less than 0.80, the operational efficiency declined. The peak of the logistic cumulative curve on the 3-year fruit crack rates, as well as the field statistics, indicated that a thinning threshold at FSI≤0.80 was appropriate with little concern of excessive loss on the fruit harvest. Conclusion An optimal threshold of FSI≤0.80 to improve the financial gain with a minimized harvest reduction was recommended for the Duweiwendan pomelo orchards. An FSI up to 0.83 could be considered in years when a bumper pomelo harvest is expected.
- Duweiwendan pomelo /
- fruit cracking /
- fruit shape index /
- fruit shape /
- fruit thinning threshold

HTML全文

图 1 果实FSI累积分布

Figure 1. Cumulative distribution of pomelo FSIs

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

表 1 度尾文旦柚果实裂果频率分析

Table 1. Fruit cracking frequency of Duweiwendan pomelo trees

FSI	果实 All Fruit/%		正常果 Normal Fruit/%		裂果 Crack Fruit/%		报酬 Reward
FSI	比率 Per	累率 CP	比率 Per	累率 CP	比率 Per	累率 CP	裂果/全果 CF/AF	裂果/正常果 CF/NF
0.70	0.31	0.31	0.05	0.05	0.27	0.27	0.86	5.50
～	～	～	～	～	～	～	～	～
0.78	2.62	12.92	0.83	3.96	1.79	8.96	0.69	2.27
0.79	2.79	15.71	1.00	4.96	1.79	10.75	0.68	2.17
0.80	3.37	19.07	1.34	6.30	2.03	12.78	0.67	2.03
0.81	3.81	22.89	1.57	7.87	2.24	15.02	0.66	1.91
0.82	3.73	26.61	1.64	9.51	2.09	17.11	0.64	1.80
0.83	4.11	30.73	2.11	11.62	2.00	19.11	0.62	1.64
0.84	4.17	34.90	2.34	13.96	1.83	20.94	0.60	1.50
0.85	4.56	39.46	2.76	16.72	1.80	22.74	0.58	1.36
0.86	4.39	43.85	2.62	19.34	1.77	24.51	0.56	1.27
0.87	3.99	47.85	2.41	21.75	1.58	26.09	0.55	1.20
0.88	5.31	53.15	3.57	25.32	1.74	27.83	0.52	1.10
0.89	4.69	57.85	3.06	28.39	1.63	29.46	0.51	1.04
0.90	4.21	62.06	3.04	31.43	1.17	30.63	0.49	0.97
0.91	3.81	65.87	2.72	34.15	1.09	31.72	0.48	0.93
0.92	4.33	70.20	3.29	37.45	1.04	32.75	0.47	0.87
～	～	～	～	～	～	～		～
1.08	0.14	100	0.13	62.49	0.01	37.51	0.38	0.60

下载: 导出CSV

表 2 度尾文旦柚FSI累积曲线回归模拟方程参数与变率拐点

Table 2. Parameters and inflection point on regression equation of accumulated FSI on Duweiwendan pomelos

累积率 CR	回归方程参数 Regression equation parameters						累积率拐点 CR Inflect point
累积率 CR	k	a	b	RSS	F	P	始盛期 Starting period	峰值期 Peak period	盛末期 Ending period
全果 AF	1.015 4	3.02E+07	19.653 1	6.10E-03	3.20E+04	＜0.000 1	0.81	0.88	0.94
正常果 NF	0.639 7	1.65E+08	20.958 5	1.10E-03	6.10E+04	＜0.000 1	0.84	0.90	0.97
裂果 CF	0.374 1	2.77E+08	23.382 4	1.20E-03	2.90E+04	＜0.000 1	0.78	0.83	0.89
裂果 CF2016	0.331 4	8.56E+08	25.453	1.40E-03	1.50E+04	＜0.000 1	0.76	0.81	0.86
裂果 CF2017	0.374 6	4.12E+08	23.839	1.00E-03	2.30E+04	＜0.000 1	0.78	0.83	0.89
裂果 CF2018	0.411 1	8.32E+08	24.217 9	1.10E-03	2.40E+04	＜0.000 1	0.79	0.85	0.90
注：CR=k/（1+a.exp（−b.FSI））；残差平方和 RSS≤6.1E-3，所有方程均收敛。 Note: CR=k/（1+a.exp（−b.FSI））; residual sum of squares RSS≤6.1E-3; all equations are convergent.

下载: 导出CSV

表 3 度尾文旦柚果形指数发育规律

Table 3. Development of FSI for Duweiwendan trees

果形 Fruit shape	果实编号 Fruit No.	初始果形指数 Initial FSI	果形指数变化/△FSI
果形 Fruit shape	果实编号 Fruit No.	初始果形指数 Initial FSI	△FSI1	△FSI2	△FSI3	△FSI4	△FSI5	Mean
高果形 H-FSI	1	1.100 5	−0.025 3	−0.002 5	−0.002 1	−0.016 8	−0.012 3	−0.011 8
	2	1.045 5	−0.002 1	0.043 6	−0.052 5	−0.044 7	−0.052 9	−0.021 7
	3	1.071 3	−0.025 7	−0.020 3	−0.054 8	−0.099 6	−0.115 4	−0.063 2
	4	1.002 5	0.010 4	0.036 7	−0.008 3	−0.029 0	−0.055 9	−0.009 2
	5	1.078 4	−0.053 0	0.027 3	−0.014 4	−0.063 1	−0.085 5	−0.037 7
	Mean	1.059 6	−0.019 2	0.017 0	−0.026 4	−0.050 6	−0.064 4	−0.028 7
扁果形 L-FSI	1	0.845 0	0.022 3	0.155 0	0.074 8	0.068 7	0.056 5	0.075 5
	2	0.770 3	−0.026 8	−0.016 7	−0.023 3	−0.012 6	−0.031 2	−0.022 1
	3	0.826 0	−0.030 3	0.047 7	−0.029 1	−0.026 2	−0.044 7	−0.016 5
	4	0.774 0	−0.019 3	0.035 5	0.032 9	0.020 2	0.056 9	0.025 2
	5	0.746 4	0.028 1	0.070 8	0.043 4	0.012 7	0.003 6	0.031 7
	Mean	0.792 3	−0.005 2	0.058 5	0.019 7	0.012 6	0.008 2	0.018 8
注：初次测定时间为5月30日，此后每间隔10 d测试1次；△FSIx表后面测定值－初始测定值。 Note: Initial measurement took place on May 30, followed by tests performed every 10 d thereafter; △FSIx = later measured value－initial measured value.

下载: 导出CSV

表 4 试验期间度尾文旦柚采前降雨情况

Table 4. Pre-harvest rainfall on Duweiwendan pomelo trees

年份 Year	2016			2017			2018
月份 Month	7	8	9	7	8	9	7	8	9
雨量 Rainfall/mm	392	348	661	184	58	43	117	602	87
评价 Evaluation	异常 Abnormal	偏多 Excessive	异常 Abnormal	正常 normal	显著 Significant	显著 Significant	显著 Significant	异常 Abnormal	显著 Significant
	偏多 Excessive		偏多 Excessive		偏少 Less	偏少 Less	偏少 Less	偏多 Excessive	偏少 Less
注：根据《2016－2018年仙游县气候影响评价》。 Note: Data source: “Climate Impact Assessment of Xianyou County from 2016 to 2018”.

下载: 导出CSV

参考文献(20)

[1]	彭建平, 郑玉亮, 李伟明, 等. 不同肥水处理对度尾文旦柚裂果及产量品质的影响 [J]. 福建农业学报, 2014, 29(11):1074−1078. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-0384.2014.11.006 PENG J P, ZHENG Y L, LI W M, et al. Effect of fertilization and water treatment on fruit cracking, yield and quality of duweiwendan pomelo [J]. Fujian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2014, 29(11): 1074−1078.(in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-0384.2014.11.006
[2]	陈玳清, 章春泉, 周今华. 玉环柚的裂果机制与防治 [J]. 果树科学, 1995, 12(2):139−140. CHEN D Q, ZHANG C Q, ZHOU J H. Mechanism and control of fruit cracking in Yuhuan pomelo [J]. ournal of Fruit Science, 1995, 12(2): 139−140.(in Chinese)
[3]	陈青英, 陈俊伟, 徐红霞, 等. 大棚栽培玉环柚果实发育与糖酸积累特性 [J]. 福建农业学报, 2015, 30(5):492−497. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-0384.2015.05.014 CHEN Q Y, CHEN J W, XU H X, et al. Fruit development and sugar/acids accumulation of Yuhuangyou pomelos cultivated in greenhouse [J]. Fujian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2015, 30(5): 492−497.(in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-0384.2015.05.014
[4]	陈苑虹, 李三玉, 董继新. 玉环柚果实特性与裂果的关系 [J]. 浙江大学学报(农业与生命科学版), 1999, 25(4):414−416. CHEN Y H, LI S Y, DONG J X. The relationship between the characteristics of Yuhuan pomelo fruit and fruit cracking [J]. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural University(Agric. & Life Sci.), 1999, 25(4): 414−416.(in Chinese)
[5]	谌金吾, 王正文, 黄胜先, 等. 思州柚裂果调查及综合防控对策 [J]. 耕作与栽培, 2016(1):50−52, 4, 17, 25, 27. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-2239.2016.01.023 CHEN J W, WANG Z W, HUANG S X, et al. Investigation and comprehensive control countermeasures of the Sizhou pomelo cracking [J]. Tillage and Cultivation, 2016(1): 50−52, 4, 17, 25, 27.(in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-2239.2016.01.023
[6]	沈志彬, 吴涛, 贾霭丽, 等. 柚类防裂剂在通贤柚上的应用试验 [J]. 中国南方果树, 2000, 29(2):17. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-1431.2000.02.011 SHEN Z B, WU T, JIA A L, et al. Application test of pomelo anti-cracking agent on Tongxian pomelo [J]. South China Fruits, 2000, 29(2): 17.(in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-1431.2000.02.011
[7]	谌金吾, 王正文, 黄胜先, 等. 4种施肥管理对思州柚果实品质的影响 [J]. 耕作与栽培, 2016(5):7−10. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-2239.2016.05.003 CHEN J W, WANG Z W, HUANG S X, et al. Effects of 4 fertilization managements on fruit quality of Sizhou Wendan-pomelo [J]. Tillage and Cultivation, 2016(5): 7−10.(in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-2239.2016.05.003
[8]	彭廷海, 罗明, 漆巨容. 四川部分良种名柚品种裂果原因及对策初探 [J]. 四川果树, 1994(3):12−13. PENG T H, LUO M, QI J R. Preliminary study on the causes and countermeasures of fruit cracking of some fine pomelo varieties in Sichuan [J]. Sichun Fruit, 1994(3): 12−13.(in Chinese)
[9]	郑元勋. 授粉和生长调节剂对南部脆香甜柚裂果及果实品质的影响研究 [D]. 北京: 中国农业科学院, 2013. ZHENG Y X. Effects of pollination and growth regulators on cracking and quality of Nanbu pomelo fruits [D]. Beijing: Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, 2013. (in Chinese)
[10]	吴智仁, 陈金椿, 陈文山. 度尾蜜柚裂果原因及克服措施 [J]. 中国柑桔, 1987, 16(2):33. WU Z R, CHEN J C, CHEN W S. Causes and overcoming measures of fruit crack of Duweiwendan pomelo (Citrus grandis cv. Duweiwendan) [J]. Chinese Citrus, 1987, 16(2): 33.(in Chinese)
[11]	陈清西, 李小初, 彭建平, 等. 度尾文旦柚裂果发生过程中裂原的发生与消长 [J]. 果树学报, 2008, 25(1):69−72. CHEN Q X, LI X C, PENG J P, et al. Occurrence, development and decline of original cracking cells in Duweiwendan pomelo cultivar [J]. Journal of Fruit Science, 2008, 25(1): 69−72.(in Chinese)
[12]	李淑一. 不同授粉的度尾文旦柚裂果相关差异蛋白的研究[D]. 福州: 福建农林大学, 2009. LI S Y. Study on the differential proteins of fruit dehiscent in different pollinated duweiwendan pomelo[D]. Fuzhou: Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, 2009. (in Chinese)
[13]	王贤达, 范国成, 李健. 度尾文旦柚鲜果分级与果顶开裂评价规范研究 [J]. 中国南方果树, 2018, 47(2):27−31, 35. WANG X D, FAN G C, LI J. Evaluation of the standards of fruit grading and fruit cracking of duweiwendan pomelo(Citrus grandis cv. duweiwendan) [J]. South China Fruits, 2018, 47(2): 27−31, 35.(in Chinese)
[14]	戴哲保, 陈潜, 王光裕, 等. “楚门文旦”裂果原因及其防治研究初报(续完) [J]. 浙江柑桔, 1987(3):15−18. DAI Z B, CHEN Q, WANG G Y, et al. Preliminary report on the causes and prevention of "Chumenwendan" [J]. Zhejiang Citrus, 1987(3): 15−18.(in Chinese)
[15]	崔党群. Logistic曲线方程的解析与拟合优度测验 [J]. 数理统计与管理, 2005, 24(1):112−115. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-1566.2005.01.021 CUI D Q. Analysis and making good fitting degree test for logistic curve regression equation [J]. Application of Statistics and Management, 2005, 24(1): 112−115.(in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-1566.2005.01.021
[16]	黄成就. 中国植物志第43卷第2分册 [M]. 北京: 科学出版社, 1997: 187-190.
[17]	彭建平, 李小初, 郑玉亮, 等. 授粉对度尾文旦柚裂果及果实品质的影响 [J]. 中国果树, 2007(3):27−28. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-8047.2007.03.014 PENG J P, LI X C, ZHENG Y L, et al. Effects of pollination on fruit cracking and fruit quality of Duweiwendan pomelo [J]. China Fruits, 2007(3): 27−28.(in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-8047.2007.03.014
[18]	陈秋夏, 郑坚, 张旭乐, 等. 永嘉早香柚果实裂瓣规律与授粉调控 [J]. 果树学报, 2007, 24(1):68−71. CHEN Q X, ZHENG J, ZHANG X L, et al. Study on the effect of hand pollination on juice sac cracking of Yongjia Zaoxiangyou pomelo cultivar [J]. Journal of Fruit Science, 2007, 24(1): 68−71.(in Chinese)
[19]	倪海枝, 陈方永, 林绍生, 等. 不同花粉授粉对玉环柚品质及裂果的影响 [J]. 中国南方果树, 2013, 42(6):34−35, 37. NI H Z, CHEN F Y, LIN S S, et al. Effects of different pollen pollination on the quality and fruit cracking of Yuhuan pomelo [J]. South China Fruits, 2013, 42(6): 34−35, 37.(in Chinese)
[20]	郑元勋, 彭良志, 胡强安, 等. 授粉对脆香甜柚裂果及果实品质的影响 [J]. 中国南方果树, 2014, 43(2):46−48. ZHENG Y X, PENG L Z, HU Q A, et al. Effect of pollination on fruit cracking and fruit quality of Cuixiangtianyou pomelo [J]. South China Fruits, 2014, 43(2): 46−48.(in Chinese)