花生秸秆在福清山羊中的瘤胃降解特性

陈鑫珠; 林雅婷; 黄秀声; 刘景; 庄益芬; 翁伯琦; 黄勤楼; 唐兆秀; 陈炳钿

doi:10.19303/j.issn.1008-0384.2019.11.005

花生秸秆在福清山羊中的瘤胃降解特性

doi: 10.19303/j.issn.1008-0384.2019.11.005

陈鑫珠^{1, 2,},
林雅婷³,
黄秀声⁴,
刘景^1, ,,
庄益芬^3, ,,
翁伯琦⁴,
黄勤楼⁴,
唐兆秀⁵,
陈炳钿^{1, 2}

1.
福建省农业科学院畜牧兽医研究所，福建　福州　350013
2.
福建省新闽科生物科技开发有限公司，福建　福州　350008
3.
福建农林大学动物科学学院，福建　福州　350001
4.
福建省农业科学院农业生态研究所，福建　福州　350013
5.
福建省农业科学院作物研究所，福建　福州　350013

基金项目: 福建省农业科学院青年英才计划项目（YC2016-9）；国家公益性行业（农业）科研专项（201303094-04）；福建省农业科学院项目（AA2018-5）

详细信息

作者简介:
陈鑫珠（1985−），女，博士，副研究员，研究方向：饲料加工与贮藏（E-mail：010622051@163.com）

通讯作者:
刘景（1967−），男，副研究员，研究方向：动物营养与饲料科学（E-mail：184660569@qq.com）

庄益芬（1957−），女，硕士，教授，主要从事饲草加工与贮藏（E-mail：yfzfz@163.com）

中图分类号: S 826
计量
- 文章访问数: 852
- HTML全文浏览量: 380
- PDF下载量: 13
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2019-08-30
- 修回日期: 2019-10-24
- 刊出日期: 2019-11-01

Degradation of Peanut Straws in Rumen of Fuqing Goats

1.
Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Medicine Institute, Fujian Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Fuzhou, Fujian　350013, China
2.
Fujian Xinminke Biology Science and TechnologyDevelopment Co., Ltd., Fuzhou, Fujian　350008, China
3.
College of Animal Science, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, Fujian　350002, China
4.
Agricultural Ecology Institute, Fujian Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Fuzhou, Fujian　350013, China
5.
Crop Research Institute, FujianAcademy of Agricultural Sciences, Fuzhou, Fujian　350013, China

摘要

摘要: 目的探究花生秸秆干物质（DM）、中性洗涤纤维（NDF）和酸性洗涤纤维（ADF）在福清山羊瘤胃内消化降解规律。方法本试验选用3头安装有永久性瘤胃瘘管的福清山羊为试验动物，采用尼龙袋法，对4份不同地区不同季节采集的花生秸秆（花生秸秆1为2016年10月28日收获于清流、花生秸秆2为2017年6月19日收获于清流、花生秸秆3为2017年6月3日收获于福清、花生秸秆4为2017年11月10日收获于清流）样本的干物质（DM）、酸性洗涤纤维（ADF）和中性洗涤纤维（NDF）在各个时间点（4、8、16、24、36、48、72 h）的瘤胃降解率和降解参数进行测定。结果花生秸秆2和花生秸秆4的粗蛋白质含量较高，中性洗涤纤维较低。在福清山羊瘤胃内，4种花生秸秆样本的DM、NDF和ADF在瘤胃内降解趋势类似，均随着降解时间延长呈现上升的趋势，48–72 h花生秸秆DM的降解率达到50%–57%。结论综合评价，在清流10月底和11月初收获的两份花生秸秆的降解率较高，说明福清山羊对秋收花生秸秆消化率较高。
- 花生秸秆 /
- 瘤胃 /
- 降解率 /
- 尼龙袋法
Abstract: Objective Digestion of peanut straws (PSs) collected at different seasons and areas in rumen of Fuqing goats was studied. Method Three Fuqing goats permanently in-planted with ruminal cannula were fed PS collected at different seasons and areas. PS1 was harvest at Qingliu on October 28, 2016, PS2 at Qingliu on June 19, 2017, PS3 at Fuqing on June 3, 2017, and PS4 at Qingliu on November 10, 2017. The in-rumen degradation rates of PS with respect of dried matters (DM), acidic detergent fibers (ADF), and neutral detergent fibers (NDF) in 4, 8, 16, 24, 36, 48 and 72 h were determined by placing the PS samples in Nylon bags. Result PS2 and 4 had higher crude protein but lower NDF than the other specimens. The DM, ADF, and NDF degradation rates of all PSs were similar and increased with time in rumen. In 48–72 h, 50%–57% of DM in PS was degraded. Conclusion PS 1 and 4 were shown to have higher degradation rate in the goat rumen indicating a preference in choosing PS harvested in autumn over the other time in a year.
- peanut straw /
- rumen /
- degradation rate /
- nylon bag method

HTML全文

表 1 花生秸秆的化学成分

Table 1. Chemical composition of peanut straws

项目 Items	干物质 Dry matter （DM）/%	可溶性碳水化合物 Water soluble-carbohydrate (WSC)/%DM	粗蛋白 Crude protein (CP)/%DM	中性洗涤纤维 Neutral detergent fiber (NDF)/%DM	酸性洗涤纤维 Acid detergent fiber (ADF)/%DM	半纤维素 Hemi-cellulase (HC)/%DM	粗脂肪 Ether extract (EE)/%DM	灰分 Ash/% DM
花生秸秆1 PS1	31.41±0.10 ab	4.21±0.12 b	10.5±1.67 c	60.6±2.76 a	34.9±1.78 c	25.7±1.07 a	1.85±1.07 c	22.34±1.98 a
花生秸秆2 PS2	30.04±0.22 ab	5.55±0.16 a	14.7±1.90 a	46.3±1.59 c	41.7±1.22 b	4.6±1.88 c	2.63±0.96 a	13.42±1.88 c
花生秸秆3 PS3	32.18±0.15 a	3.72±0.09 c	12.5±2.14 b	57.1±2.09 ab	47.9±1.99 a	9.2±1.23 b	2.07±1.01 b	13.47±1.65 c
花生秸秆4 PS4	29.25±0.09 b	4.13±0.11 b	14.8±1.23 a	52.0±2.11 b	40.7±1.86 b	11.3±1.41 b	1.55±1.89 c	18.19±1.06 b
注：同列数据后不同小写字母表示差异显著。 Note: Means with different lowercase letters on a same column are significantly different (P＜0.05).

下载: 导出CSV

表 2 瘤胃内干物质的降解率

Table 2. Degradation rate of dry matters in goat rumen （单位：%）

降解时间 Time of degradation	花生秸秆1 PS1	花生秸秆2 PS2	花生秸秆3 PS3	花生秸秆4 PS4
4 h	5.89±2.46 dB	13.76±0.42 dA	4.88±2.71 eB	2.51±1.11 eC
8 h	25.03±3.91 cA	19.87±0.75 dB	25.33±6.06 dA	15.11±5.51 dB
16 h	42.91±2.33 bcA	43.53±1.76 cA	33.19±2.29 cB	35.63±6.74 cB
24 h	45.59±0.99 b	47.98±4.32 b	47.81±1.17 b	45.43±1.78 b
36 h	42.94±1.16 bc	49.99±2.75 a	46.67±2.85 b	47.15±4.29 b
48 h	51.70±0.66 a	49.87±3.98 a	54.79±1.41 a	53.08±1.22 a
72 h	49.27±1.05 a	50.40±4.31 a	51.08±0.85 a	50.82±2.86 a
注：同列数据后不同小写字母表示不同时间点的降解率差异显著（P＜0.05）；同行数据后不同大写字母表示不同原料的降解率差异显著（P＜0.05）。表3、4同。 Note: Means with different lowercase letters on a same column are significantly different on degradation rate at different sampling times (P<0.05); and those with different uppercase letters on a same row, between different PSs (P<0.05). The same for Tables 3, 4.

下载: 导出CSV

表 3 瘤胃内中性洗涤纤维的降解率

Table 3. Degradation rate of NDF in rumen （单位：%）

降解时间 Time of degradation	花生秸秆1 PS1	花生秸秆2 PS2	花生秸秆3 PS3	花生秸秆4 PS4
4 h	6.04±1.58 dB	10.72±1.19 dA	5.04±1.31 eB	9.58±1.96 dA
8 h	20.82±3.96 cA	13.86±1.03 dB	15.13±3.49 dB	20.00±5.27 cA
16 h	32.42±2.64 bA	31.81±1.35 cA	26.91±3.09 cB	34.86±6.12 bA
24 h	32.37±0.59 bB	35.23±3.78 bB	32.26±1.11 bB	42.79±1.79 bA
36 h	33.57±0.62 bB	37.13±2.72 bB	35.42±3.20 bB	46.65±4.94 abA
48 h	40.56±1.33 aB	38.83±3.83 bB	39.69±1.71 aB	47.17±1.86 aA
72 h	41.43±1.26 aB	42.64±4.75 aB	41.76±1.29 aB	50.94±1.19 aA

下载: 导出CSV

表 4 瘤胃内酸性洗涤纤维的降解率

Table 4. Degradation rate of ADF in rumen （单位：%）

降解时间 Time of degradation	花生秸秆1 PS1	花生秸秆2 PS2	花生秸秆3 PS3	花生秸秆4 PS4
4 h	7.64±1.71 cA	7.91±1.77 eA	3.34±2.40 eB	2.28±4.26 dB
8 h	25.46±5.79 bcA	11.42±2.55 dB	13.75±2.14 dB	15.95±6.93 cB
16 h	28.29±2.76 bAB	25.46±1.17 cAB	22.50±2.78 cB	32.24±9.73 bA
24 h	29.07±2.23 b	27.41±4.53 bc	31.06±2.34 b	33.46±1.59 b
36 h	29.54±0.84 b	30.72±2.77 b	33.18±3.05 b	34.94±2.99 b
48 h	36.46±1.82 a	33.22±4.56 ab	37.15±2.00 a	37.71±1.23 a
72 h	37.02±0.75 a	36.18±8.85 a	38.59±1.66 a	39.70±1.42 a

下载: 导出CSV

参考文献(19)

[1]	布瑞克农业. 中国花生行业供需报告(一)[CP/DK]. [2017-10-31]. https://www.sohu.com/a/201407891_426900.
[2]	聂胜委, 郭占玲, 张巧萍, 等. 河南省作物秸秆资源利用现状分析及对策 [J]. 山西农业科学, 2015, 43(5):599−602. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-2481.2015.05.27 NIE S W, GUO Z L, ZHANG Q P, et al. Analysis of the utilization status of crop straw resources and resolve methods in Henan Province [J]. Journal of Shanxi Agricultural Sciences, 2015, 43(5): 599−602.(in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-2481.2015.05.27
[3]	毕于运. 秸秆资源评价与利用研究[D]. 北京: 中国农业科学院, 2010. BI Y Y. Study on straw resources evaluation and utilization in China[D]. Beijing: Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, 2010. (in Chinese)
[4]	李海文, 马文静, 牛超, 等. 芦苇瘤胃降解率的研究 [J]. 中国饲料, 2017(17):42−44. LI H W, MA W J, NIU C, et al. Study on rumen degradability of reed [J]. China Feed, 2017(17): 42−44.(in Chinese)
[5]	ZHAO X Y, CHEN J, DU F L. Potential use of peanut by-products in food processing: a review [J]. Journal of Food Science and Technology, 2012, 49(5): 521−529. doi: 10.1007/s13197-011-0449-2
[6]	罗志忠, 刘利晓, 李洪波, 等. 不同收获时间、高度对花生秧营养价值的影响 [J]. 黑龙江畜牧兽医, 2015(22):140−141. LUO Z Z, LIU L X, LI H B, et al. Effects of different harvest times and heights on the nutritional value of peanut vine [J]. Heilongjiang Animal Science and Veterinary Medicine, 2015(22): 140−141.(in Chinese)
[7]	王颖, 侯慧, 王敏玲, 等. 收获期对花生植株产量及蛋白质含量的影响 [J]. 东北师大学报(自然科学版), 2011, 43(2):108−111. WANG Y, HOU H, WANG M L, et al. Effect of harvest date on plant yield and crude protein content of peanut [J]. Journal of Northeast Normal University(Natural Science Edition), 2011, 43(2): 108−111.(in Chinese)
[8]	薛红枫, 孟庆翔. 不同方法测定反刍动物饲料NDF、ADF和木质素含量的比较 [J]. 中国畜牧杂志, 2006, 42(19):41−45. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-7033.2006.19.015 XUE H F, MENG Q X. A comparison of various techniques for the determination of NDF, ADF and lignin in ruminant feedstuffs [J]. Chinese Journal of Animal Science, 2006, 42(19): 41−45.(in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-7033.2006.19.015
[9]	YUAN J S, TILLER K H, AL-AHMAD H, et al. Plants to power: bioenergy to fuel the future [J]. Trends in Plant Science, 2008, 13(8): 421−429. doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2008.06.001
[10]	ABDOU N, NSAHLAI I V, CHIMONYO M. Effects of groundnut haulms supplementation on millet stover intake, digestibility and growth performance of lambs [J]. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 2011, 169(3/4): 176−184.
[11]	刘庆华, 聂芙蓉, 毛秋月, 等. 花生秧养分及其在绵羊瘤胃内降解规律的研究 [J]. 中国草食动物, 2008, 28(4):37−39. LIU Q H, NIE F R, MAO Q Y, et al. Study on nutrients of Peanut seedlings and their degradation in the tumor and stomach of sheep [J]. China Herbivores, 2008, 28(4): 37−39.(in Chinese)
[12]	包淋斌, 黎力之, 潘柯, 等. 花生藤在锦江黄牛瘤胃降解率测定 [J]. 饲料研究, 2015(11):34−38. BAO L B, LI L Z, PAN K, et al. Determination of rumen degradability of peanut vine in Jinjiang yellow cattle [J]. Feed Research, 2015(11): 34−38.(in Chinese)
[13]	刘纪成, 张敏, 刘佳, 等. 花生秸秆在畜禽生产中的利用现状及其生物发酵技术 [J]. 中国饲料, 2017(20):36−38. LIU J C, ZHANG M, LIU J, et al. Application of peanut stalk in animal production and its biological fermentation [J]. China Feed, 2017(20): 36−38.(in Chinese)
[14]	杨胜. 饲料分析及饲料质量检测技术[M]. 北京: 中国农业大学出版社, 1993: 19-33.
[15]	VAN SOEST P J. Development of a comprehensive system of feed analyses and its application to forages [J]. Journal of Animal Science, 1967, 26(1): 119−128. doi: 10.2527/jas1967.261119x
[16]	郑向丽, 王俊宏, 徐国忠, 等. 4种花生秸秆在奶牛瘤胃中的降解特性 [J]. 草业学报, 2016, 25(5):149−155. doi: 10.11686/cyxb2015354 ZHENG X L, WANG J H, XU G Z, et al. Degradation characteristics of four types of peanut straw in the rumen of dairy cows [J]. Acta Prataculturae Sinica, 2016, 25(5): 149−155.(in Chinese) doi: 10.11686/cyxb2015354
[17]	魏晨, 游伟, 万发春, 等. 不同地区小麦秸秆的营养价值及瘤胃降解规律 [J]. 饲料工业, 2018, 39(23):13−17. WEI C, YOU W, WAN F C, et al. Nutritive value and rumen degradation rule of wheat straws from different regions [J]. Feed Industry, 2018, 39(23): 13−17.(in Chinese)
[18]	李茂, 字学娟, 白昌军, 等. 不同生长高度王草瘤胃降解特性研究 [J]. 畜牧兽医学报, 2015, 46(10):1806−1815. doi: 10.11843/j.issn.0366-6964.2015.10.013 LI M, ZI X J, BAI C J, et al. Rumen degradation characteristics of kinggrass at different plant heights [J]. Chinese Journal of Animal and Veterinary Sciences, 2015, 46(10): 1806−1815.(in Chinese) doi: 10.11843/j.issn.0366-6964.2015.10.013
[19]	杨凤. 动物营养学[M]. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 1993.