Expression of Cu/Zn-SOD Gene and Activity of Cu/Zn-SOD Enzyme in Mule Duck Tissues
-
摘要:
目的 首次对半番鸭不同组织Cu/Zn-SOD基因表达、酶活性进行研究,以期了解半番鸭不同组织抗氧化特性,为深入研究半番鸭对环境因子的响应能力及相关分子机制提供参考。 方法 通过实时荧光定量法、黄嘌呤氧化酶法和硫代巴比妥酸法分别测定了半番鸭心脏、肝脏、脾脏、肺脏、肾脏、肌胃和胸肌中的Cu/Zn-SOD mRNA相对表达量、酶活力和MDA含量。 结果 Cu/Zn-SOD mRNA在胸肌中相对表达量最高,总体趋势为胸肌>肝脏>肺>心脏>脾脏>肾脏/肌胃。酶活力测定结果显示,肝脏和肾脏Cu/Zn-SOD酶活力显著高于胸肌和肌胃。半番鸭胸肌MDA含量显著高于肝脏、肌胃和肾脏,提示胸肌可能更易受到氧化应激损伤。相关分析结果显示Cu/Zn-SOD活力与MDA含量呈显著负相关,而抗氧化酶活力与mRNA表达水平相关性不显著。 结论 半番鸭Cu/Zn-SOD基因表达和酶活力具有组织特异性。不同组织Cu/Zn-SOD活力差异可能与Cu/Zn-SOD自身的生理功能以及组织代谢水平有关。 Abstract:Objective Expressions of Cu/Zn-SOD gene and activities of the antioxidant enzyme in various organs of mule ducks were determined. Method The gene expression in the heart, liver, spleen, lung, kidney, gizzard and chest muscles, antioxidant enzyme activities, and MDA contents of mule duck were determined by the qRT-PCR, xanthine-xanthine oxidase, and thiobarbituric acid methods. Result The greatest mRNA expression of Cu/Zn-SOD gene was found in the chest muscle followed by the tissues in the order of liver > lung > heart > spleen > gizzard/kidney of the ducks. The activities of Cu/Zn-SOD enzyme in the liver and kidney were significantly higher than those in the breasts and gizzard. The higher MDA content in the breasts than in the liver, gizzard or kidney indicated a greater susceptibility of the chest muscle to damage by oxidative stress. There was no significant correlation observed between the antioxidant enzyme activity and the mRNA expression level in different organs. However, the Cu/Zn-SOD enzyme activity was inversely correlated to MDA content in the tissues. Conclusion The Cu/Zn-SOD mRNA expression and enzyme activity were organ-specific. The differences in the enzymatic activities might stem from the diverse physiological functions of the enzymes and/or the tissue metabolism per se. -
Key words:
- Cu/Zn-SOD /
- mRNA expression /
- enzyme activity /
- mule duck
-
图 2 半番鸭不同组织Cu/Zn-SOD mRNA的相对表达
注:1:心脏;2:肝脏;3:脾脏;4:肺脏;5:胸肌;6:肌胃;7:肾脏。不同小写字母表示在P<0.05水平差异有统计学意义,不同大写字母表示在P<0.01水平差异有高度统计学意义。
Figure 2. Relative expressions of Cu/Zn-SOD mRNA in mule duck tissues
Note: 1: heart; 2: liver; 3: spleen; 4: lung; 5: chest; 6: gizzard; and, 7: kidney. Data with different lowercase letters indicate significant differences at P < 0.05; and, data with different capital letters indicate significant differences at P < 0.01.
表 1 不同时期饲料的营养水平
Table 1. Nutrients in diets for mule ducks at various stages
营养水平
Nutrient levels/%0~21 日龄
0~21 days of age22~42 日龄
22~42 days of age43~70 日龄
43~70 days of age粗蛋白 CP ≥18.0 ≥16.0 ≥15.0 粗纤维 CF ≤5.0 ≤6.0 ≤7.0 粗灰分 CA ≤8.0 ≤12.0 ≤12.0 钙 Ca 0.70~1.40 0.70~1.40 0.70~1.40 总磷 AP ≥0.40~0.80 ≥0.35~0.75 ≥0.35~0.75 食盐 NaCl 0.30~0.80 0.30~0.80 0.30~0.80 水分 Water ≤13.0 ≤13.0 ≤13.0 表 2 荧光定量PCR引物信息
Table 2. Information on qRT-PCR primers
基因
Genes登录号
GenBank No.引物序列(5′→3′)
Primer Sequences (5′to 3′)扩增长度
Size/bpTm
/℃SOD1 KU048808.1 F: CAGCAGGGTAACGGACCAGTAAA;R: CCCAAATTCGTGGACATGGAAG 87 60 ACTB EF667345 F: GATGTGGATCAGCAAGCAGGAGT;R: GGGTGTGGGTGTTGGTAACAGT 95 60 注:SOD1:铜锌超氧化物歧化酶;ACTB:β-肌动蛋白。
Note: SOD1: Cu/Zn SOD; ACTB: β-actin.表 3 半番鸭不同组织Cu/Zn-SOD活力和MDA含量
Table 3. Cu/Zn-SOD enzyme activity and MDA content in mule duck tissues
指标
Index肝脏
Liver胸肌
Chest muscle肌胃
Gizzard肾脏
KidneyCu/Zn-SOD活力Cu/Zn-SOD activity/(U·mg-1) 176.07±4.57Aa 39.37 ±1.41Cc 48.49±2.08Cc 117.64±4.85 Bb MDA含量MDA content/(n mol·mg-1) 1.07±0.02Ba 2.84±0.18 Aa 1.10±0.03 Bb 0.89±0.02 Cc 注:同行数据后不同小写字母表示差异显著(P<0.05),不同大写字母表示差异极显著(P<0.01)。
Note: In the same row, different lowercase letters represent statistically significant differences at the 0.05 probability level; different capital letters represent highly statistically significant differences at the 0.01 probability level. -
[1] HÜPPI P S. The role of oxygen in health and disease-a series of reviews[J]. Pediatric Research, 2009, 65(3):261-268. doi: 10.1203/PDR.0b013e31818fc83f [2] FELLENBERG M, SPEISKY H. Antioxidants:their effects on broiler oxidative stress and its meat oxidative stability[J]. World's Poultry Science Journal, 2006, 62(1):53-70. doi: 10.1079/WPS200584 [3] SURAI P F. Antioxidant systems in poultry biology:superoxide dismutase[J]. Journal of Animal Research and Nutrition, 2016, 1(1):8. http://cn.bing.com/academic/profile?id=c44897f900bcb020fd63c382a41c15fc&encoded=0&v=paper_preview&mkt=zh-cn [4] SURAI P. The relevance of the antioxidant system to the health and growth of the developing chick[J]. Australian Poultry Science Symposium, 2001:126-134. http://cn.bing.com/academic/profile?id=838063912ff4ca85bcf0f884467d9102&encoded=0&v=paper_preview&mkt=zh-cn [5] 郑明学, 韩克光, 高建广.自由基在鸡肾病发生中的作用研究[J].农业生物技术学报, 2000, 8(2):176. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-7968.2000.02.026ZHENG M X, HAN K G, GAO J G. Effects of Free Radical in Pathogenesis of NePhrosis in Chicken[J]. Journal of Agricultural Biotechnology, 2000, 8(2):176.(in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-7968.2000.02.026 [6] XIONG W, CHEN Y, WANG Y, et al. Roles of the antioxidant properties of icariin and its phosphorylated derivative in the protection against duck virus hepatitis[J]. BMC Veterinary Research, 2014, 10(1):226. doi: 10.1186/s12917-014-0226-3 [7] HALLIWELL B. Free radicals and antioxidants:updating a personal view[J]. Nutrition Reviews, 2012, 70(5):257-265. doi: 10.1111/j.1753-4887.2012.00476.x [8] FANTEL A G. Reactive oxygen species in developmental toxicity:review and hypothesis[J]. Teratology, 1996, 53(3):196-217. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9926(199603)53:3<196::AID-TERA7>3.0.CO;2-2 [9] JAESCHKE H. Mechanisms of oxidant stress-induced acute tissue injury[J]. Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Biology and Medicine, 1995, 209(2):104-111. doi: 10.3181/00379727-209-43885b [10] GÜLŞ, BELGE-KURUTAŞ E, YILDIZ E, et al. Pollution correlated modifications of liver antioxidant systems and histopathology of fish (Cyprinidae) living in Seyhan Dam Lake, Turkey[J]. Environment International, 2004, 30(5):605-609. doi: 10.1016/S0160-4120(03)00059-X [11] TAPPEL M E, CHAUDIERE J, TAPPEL A L. Glutathione peroxidase activities of animal tissues[J]. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology B, Comparative Biochemistry, 1982, 73(4):945-949. doi: 10.1016/0305-0491(82)90341-8 [12] DAUN C, ÅKESSON B. Glutathione peroxidase activity, and content of total and soluble selenium in five bovine and porcine organs used in meat production[J]. Meat Science, 2004, 66(4):801-807. doi: 10.1016/S0309-1740(03)00178-5 [13] SURAI P F, SPEAKE B K, NOBLE R C, et al. Tissue-specific antioxidant profiles and susceptibility to lipid peroxidation of the newly hatched chick[J]. Biological Trace Element Research, 1999, 68(1):63-78. doi: 10.1007/BF02784397 [14] 孙淑霞, 倪玉平, 张连江, 等.半番鸭的养殖现状及发展前景[J].畜牧与饲料科学, 2015(10):113-115. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-5190.2015.10.043SUN S X, NI Y P, ZHANG L J, et al. Current situation and developing prospect of of mule duck[J]. Animal Husbandry and Feed Science, 2015(10):113-115.(in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-5190.2015.10.043 [15] 郑嫩珠, 李丽, 辛清武, 等.酵母硒, 黄芪多糖及其复合剂对半番鸭生长性能、肉品质和抗氧化能力的影响[J].动物营养学报, 2016, 28(12):3856-3866. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/dwyyxb201612018ZHENG N Z, LI L, XIN Q W, et al. Effects of selenium yeast, Astragalus polysaccharide and their compound on growth performance, meat quality and antioxidant ability of mule ducks[J]. Chinese Journal of Animal Nutrition, 2016, 28(12):3856-3866.(in Chinese) http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/dwyyxb201612018 [16] 李丽, 缪中纬, 辛清武, 等.酵母硒和黄芪多糖对半番鸭屠宰性能, 血清生化及抗氧化指标的影响[J].浙江大学学报(农业与生命科学版), 2016, 43(4):502-510. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/zjdxxb-nyysm201704014LI L, MIAO Z W, XIN Q W, et al. Effects of selenium-enriched yeast and astragalus polysaccharide on slaughter performance, serum biochemical and antioxidant indexes of mule duck[J]. Journal of Zhejiang University (Agriculture and Life Sciences), 2016, 43(4):502-510.(in Chinese) http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/zjdxxb-nyysm201704014 [17] BAEK I J, SEO D S, YON J M, et al. Tissue expression and cellular localization of phospholipid hydroperoxide glutathione peroxidase (PHG-Px) mRNA in male mice[J]. Journal of Molecular Histology, 2007, 38(3):237-244. doi: 10.1007/s10735-007-9092-7 [18] RHEE S G. Redox signaling:hydrogen peroxide as intracellular messenger[J]. Experimental & molecular medicine, 1999, 31(2):53. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/OAPaper/oai_pubmedcentral.nih.gov_2935341 [19] XU C, WANG Y, GUO J, et al. Comparison of age-related differences in expression of antioxidant enzyme mRNA and activity in various tissues of pigs[J]. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part B:Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, 2007, 147(3):445-451. doi: 10.1016/j.cbpb.2007.02.007 [20] YUAN H T, BINGLE C D, KELLY F J. Differential patterns of antioxidant enzyme mRNA expression in guinea pig lung and liver during development[J]. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA)-Gene Structure and Expression, 1996, 1305(3):163-171. doi: 10.1016/0167-4781(95)00214-6 [21] CULOTTA V C, YANG M, O'HALLORAN T V. Activation of superoxide dismutases:putting the metal to the pedal[J]. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA)-Molecular Cell Research, 2006, 1763(7):747-758. doi: 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2006.05.003 [22] 朱子玉, 曹广力, 朱越雄, 等.丝毛乌骨鸡和北京油鸡超氧化物岐化酶活性比较研究[J].中国畜牧杂志, 2000, 36(6):3-4. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-7033.2000.06.001ZHU Z Y, CAO G L, ZHU Y X, et al. Coimparison of superoxide dismutase activity in silkies and beijing fatty chickens[J]. Chinese Journal of Animal Science, 2000, 36(6):3-4.(in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0258-7033.2000.06.001 [23] MARKLUND S L. Extracellular superoxide dismutase and other superoxide dismutase isoenzymes in tissues from nine mammalian species[J]. Biochemical Journal, 1984, 222(3):649-655. doi: 10.1042/bj2220649 [24] LEI X G, ROSS D A, RONEKER K R. Comparison of age-related differences in expression of phospholipid hydroperoxide glutathione peroxidase mRNA and activity in various tissues of pigs[J]. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part B:Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, 1997, 117(1):109-114. doi: 10.1016/S0305-0491(96)00316-1 [25] ZHANG W, JIANG Y, ZHU Q, et al. Sodium butyrate maintains growth performance by regulating the immune response in broiler chickens[J]. British Poultry Science, 2011, 52(3):292-301. doi: 10.1080/00071668.2011.578121