乔木对不同粒径颗粒物吸滞作用研究

林星宇; 李彦华; 李海梅; 李士美

doi:10.19303/j.issn.1008-0384.2019.08.007

乔木对不同粒径颗粒物吸滞作用研究

doi: 10.19303/j.issn.1008-0384.2019.08.007

青岛农业大学园林与林学院, 山东青岛 266109

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金资助项目 31971718

青岛农业大学青岛农业大学博士基金项目 6631116005

青岛农业大学2017年研究生创新立项项目 QYC201724

详细信息

作者简介:
林星宇(1991—), 男, 硕士研究生, 主要从事园林生态学的研究(E-mail:126698527@qq.com)

通讯作者:
李海梅(1975—), 女, 博士, 教授, 主要从事为园林生态学的研究(E-mail:@163.com)

中图分类号: S688
计量
- 文章访问数: 1202
- HTML全文浏览量: 402
- PDF下载量: 15
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2019-04-12
- 修回日期: 2019-07-14
- 刊出日期: 2019-08-01

Retention of Atmospheric Dust of Varied Particle Sizes by Landscape Tree Leaves

College of Landscape Architecture and Forestry, Qingdao, Shandong 266109, China

摘要

摘要: 目的研究青岛市城阳区道路绿地8种乔木对不同粒径颗粒物的滞尘能力，为城市园林绿化提供科学依据。方法用洗脱法并通过微孔滤膜过滤测定8种乔木对不同粒径颗粒物的滞尘能力。计算8种植株的单株叶面积和单株滞尘量，对比8种乔木单株滞尘量的大小，用JEOL7500F电子显微镜观测叶表面，分析叶表面结构与不同粒径颗粒物滞尘量之间的关系。结果不同树种滞尘能力存在差异，国槐和紫叶李对PM₁₀吸附能力较强，毛白杨和悬铃木较弱，总体表现为：国槐>紫叶李>女贞>洋白蜡>栾树>绦柳>毛白杨>悬铃木；紫叶李对PM₅滞尘能力最强，栾树最弱，紫叶李对PM₅单位叶面积滞尘量是栾树的约2.4倍；对PM_2.5吸附能力表现为国槐最强，栾树次之，绦柳最弱。对单株滞尘量的研究表明，悬铃木对不同粒径颗粒物单株滞尘量最大，栾树和紫叶李较低。进一步研究表明，具有叶表面粗糙、绒毛密集，气孔开口较大、沟壑明显等特征的植物滞尘能力较强。结论国槐和紫叶李对PM₁₀吸附能力较强，毛白杨和悬铃木较弱；紫叶李对PM₅滞尘能力最强，栾树最弱；对PM_2.5吸附能力表现为国槐最强，栾树次之，绦柳最弱。悬铃木对不同粒径颗粒物单株滞尘量最大，栾树和紫叶李较低；具有叶表面粗糙、绒毛密集，气孔开口较大、沟壑明显等特征的植物滞尘能力较强。
- 乔木 /
- 滞尘效益 /
- 不同粒径 /
- 单株滞尘量 /
- 叶表面结构
Abstract: Objective Effects of atmospheric dust particle size and landscape tree type on urban air quality improvement through dust retention of the plants were investigated. Methods Dust retention of 8 varieties of landscape trees in Chengyang District of Qingdao City was studied according to the particle sizes determined by eluting the retained dust on leaves with water followed by microporous filtration membrane filtration. The leaf surface morphology was examined under a JEOL7500F electron microscope. The average total leaf area and dust retention rates on varied particle sizes per plant of each variety were obtained for analysis. Results Among the tested species, Sophora japonica and Prunus cerasifera collected the highest, while Populus tomentosa and Platanus orientalis the lowest, amounts of PM₁₀ particles. The overall dust retention rates of the 8 varieties ranked as:S. japonica > P. cerasifera > Ligustrum lucidum > Fraxinus pennsylvanica > Koelreuteria paniculata > Salix matsudana > P. tomentosa > P. orientalis. PM₅ adhered more to the leaves of P. cerasifera but less to those of K. paniculata. The dust retention per unit leaf area of P. cerasifera was approximately 2.4 times higher than that of K. paniculata. The greatest retention on PM_2.5 was found with S. japonica followed by K. paniculata, and lowest with S. matsudana. On dust retention of all particle sizes, P. orientalis was the highest, whereas, K. paniculata and P. cerasifera the lowest. It appeared that the rougher the surface, the denser the villi, the larger the stomatal openings, and the more apparent the gully of the leaves were, the greater ability of the plants to retain dust fallen from the atmosphere. Conclusion S. japonica and P. cerasifera demonstrated a superior capacity to adsorb PM₁₀ on their leaves, but not P. tomentosa or P. orientalis; P. cerasifera to PM₅, but not K. paniculata; and, S. japonica to PM_2.5 followed by K. paniculata, but not S. matsudana. Including all varied particle sizes, the overall dust retention amount per plant of P. orientalis was the highest, while K. paniculata and P. cerasifera the lowest of the 8 tree varieties tested. And, trees of leaves with rough surface, dense villi, large stomatal openings, and obvious gully tended to collect more atmospheric dust that benefits air quality improvement for the vicinity. The information would aid the tree selection in urban landscape planning.
- landscape trees /
- dust retention effect /
- dust particle size /
- dust retention per plant /
- leaf surface structure

HTML全文

图 1 8种乔木单株叶面积

注：图中A~H分别为悬铃木、国槐、女贞、洋白蜡、毛白杨、紫叶李、栾树、绦柳。图中不同小写字母表示不同植物之间存在显著差异(P＜0.05)。图 2同。

Figure 1. Leaf area of 8 tree varieties

Note:A-H:Platanus orientalis, Sophora japonica, Ligustrum lucidum, Fraxinus pennsylvanica, Populus tomentosa, Prunus cerasifera, Koelreuteria paniculata, Salix matsudana. Data with different lowercase letters indicate significant difference at 0.05 level. The same as Fig. 2.

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 2 8种乔木对不同粒径颗粒物的单株滞尘量

Figure 2. Retention on dust of different particle sizes for 8 tree varieties

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 3 8种乔木叶片电镜扫描图像(×300)

注：1为国槐Sophora japonica，2为栾树Koelreuteria paniculata，3为紫叶李Prunus cerasifera，4为女贞Ligustrum lucidum，5为洋白蜡Fraxinus pennsylvanica，6为毛白杨Populus tomentosa，7为悬铃木Platanus orientalis，8为绦柳Salix matsudana；A为叶片上表面Is the upper suface of leaf，B为叶片下表面Is the lower suface of leaf。

Figure 3. Scanning electronic images of leaf surfaces of 8 tree varieties(×300)

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

表 1 8种乔木PM₁₀单位叶面积滞尘量

Table 1. Dust retention on PM₁₀ of 8 tree varieties

植物名称 Plants name	滞尘能力Dust-retention capacity/(g·m^-2)				平均 Average	排序 Sort
植物名称 Plants name	3 d	6 d	9 d	12 d	平均 Average	排序 Sort
国槐Sophora japonica	0.0989±0.0029a	0.1414±0.0099a	0.1715±0.0048a	0.223±0.0027a	0.1587	1
紫叶李Prunus cerasifera	0.0369±0.0014c	0.0809±0.0053b	0.1479±0.0060b	0.1852±0.0082b	0.1127	2
女贞Ligustrum lucidum	0.0288±0.0014d	0.0706±0.0028b	0.1083±0.0091c	0.183±0.0017b	0.0977	3
洋白蜡Fraxinus pennsylvanica	0.048±0.0022b	0.0797±0.0019b	0.1046±0.0074c	0.1577±0.0129c	0.0975	4
栾树Koelreuteria paniculata	0.0205±0.0020e	0.0478±0.0042c	0.0815±0.0014d	0.1489±0.0151c	0.0706	5
绦柳Salix matsudana	0.0147±0.0008e	0.0332±0.0013d	0.0466±0.0011e	0.1017±0.0033d	0.0491	6
毛白杨Populus tomentosa	0.0181±0.0021e	0.0288±0.0014d	0.0518±0.0036e	0.0864±0.0034d	0.0463	7
悬铃木Platanus orientalis	0.0342±0.0034ce	0.0417±0.0015cd	0.0473±0.0006e	0.0777±0.0029d	0.038	8
注：同列数值后不同字母代表 8种乔木同一天对PM₁₀滞尘量差异性显著(P < 0.05)。 Note：Different letters represent a significant difference in the amount of dust retention to PM₁₀ of 8 species of trees on the same day.

下载: 导出CSV

表 2 8种乔木PM₅单位叶面积滞尘量

Table 2. Dust retention on PM₅ of 8 tree varieties

植物名称 Plants name	滞尘能力Dust-retention capacity/(g·m^-2)				平均 Average	排序 Sort
植物名称 Plants name	3 d	6 d	9 d	12 d	平均 Average	排序 Sort
紫叶李Prunus cerasifera	0.0285±0.0026a	0.0531±0.0057a	0.081±0.0055a	0.1024±0.0037b	0.0663	1
栾树Koelreuteria paniculata	0.0075±0.0006c	0.0196±0.0020cd	0.0401±0.0040bc	0.1389±0.0176a	0.0515	2
国槐Sophora japonica	0.0216±0.0037b	0.0340±0.0019b	0.0485±0.0020b	0.0806±0.0036bc	0.0462	3
女贞Ligustrum lucidum	0.0165±0.0023b	0.0268±0.0019bc	0.0471±0.0035b	0.0826±0.0037bc	0.0433	4
洋白蜡Fraxinus pennsylvanica	0.0064±0.0005c	0.0232±0.0004cd	0.0369±0.0039bc	0.0845±0.0074bc	0.0378	5
毛白杨Populus tomentosa	0.0227±0.0005ab	0.0266±0.0011bc	0.0406±0.0034bc	0.0526±0.0006d	0.0356	6
绦柳Salix matsudana	0.0069±0.0017c	0.0176±0.0010d	0.0467±0.0026b	0.0679±0.0021cd	0.0348	7
悬铃木Platanus orientalis	0.0072±0.0012c	0.0216±0.0005cd	0.0299±0.0001c	0.0513±0.0063d	0.0275	8
注：同列数值后不同字母代表 8种乔木同一天对PM₅滞尘量差异性显著(P < 0.05)。 Note：Different letters represent a significant difference in the amount of dust retention to PM₅ of 8 species of trees on the same day.

下载: 导出CSV

表 3 8种乔木PM_2.5单位叶面积滞尘量

Table 3. Dust retention on PM_2.5 of 8 tree varieties

植物名称 Plants name	滞尘能力Dust-retention capacity/(g·m^-2)				平均 Average	排序 Sort
植物名称 Plants name	3 d	6 d	9 d	12 d	平均 Average	排序 Sort
国槐Sophora japonica	0.0121±0.0002b	0.0229±0.0012a	0.0268±0.0017bc	0.0635±0.0076a	0.0313	1
栾树Koelreuteria paniculata	0.0089±0.0005c	0.0159±0.0016bc	0.0351±0.00134a	0.0532±0.0056ab	0.0283	2
紫叶李Prunus cerasifera	0.0141±0.0008a	0.0168±0.0004b	0.0287±0.0033bc	0.0398±0.0036bc	0.0249	3
女贞Ligustrum lucidum	0.0064±0.0010d	0.0121±0.0003cd	0.0231±0.0022c	0.0433±0.0053bc	0.0212	4
洋白蜡Fraxinus pennsylvanica	0.0007±0.0001b	0.0074±0.0008d	0.0316±0.0014ab	0.0417±0.0025bc	0.0204	5
毛白杨Populus tomentosa	0.0063±0.0007d	0.0105±0.0034d	0.0234±0.0015c	0.0402±0.0051bc	0.0201	6
悬铃木Platanus orientalis	0.0016±0.0003f	0.0081±0.0006d	0.0134±0.0011d	0.0453±0.0042bc	0.0171	7
绦柳Salix matsudana	0.0041±0.0003e	0.01±0.0004d	0.0154±0.0003d	0.0362±0.0021c	0.0164	8
注：同列数值后不同字母代表 8种乔木同一天对PM_2.5滞尘量差异性显著(P < 0.05)。 Note：Different letters represent a significant difference in the amount of dust retention to PM_2.5 of 8 species of trees on the same day.

下载: 导出CSV

表 4 8种乔木叶表面结构特征

Table 4. Leaf surface morphology of 8 tree varieties

植物 Plants	叶表面特征Leaf surface characteristics		PM₁₀	PM₅	PM_2.5
植物 Plants	叶表皮上表面 Upper surface of leaf epidermis	叶表皮下表面 Subcutaneous surface of leaf surface	PM₁₀	PM₅	PM_2.5
紫叶李Prunus cerasifera	细胞轮廓不清晰，高低起伏明显，具明显褶皱	叶毛较多，具明显褶皱，高低起伏明显，气孔较密集，开口较小	较高	较高	较高
悬铃木 Platanus orientalis	具有密集的形成网状的丝状物，细胞轮廓不明显，具有密集浅线状突起	具有密集的形成网状的丝状物，细胞轮廓明显呈明显颗粒状突起，气孔较密集，开口较大	较低	较低	较低
女贞Ligustrum lucidum	蜡质层较厚，具不规则颗粒物和浅线状突起	气孔密集，开口较大，具明显褶皱和线状突起	中等	中等	中等
洋白蜡Fraxinus pennsylvanica	细胞轮廓明显，具少量腺体和沟槽	细胞轮廓不清晰，具少量腺体和浅沟槽，气孔较少，开口较小，细长	中等	较低	中等
毛白杨Populus tomentosa	较平整，具较厚蜡质层和密集的轻微瘤状突起	叶表面粗糙，具密集的丝状缠绕	较低	较低	中等
国槐Sophora japonica	叶表面较粗糙，具明显颗粒物突起和少量叶毛	具密集颗粒物突起，气孔较少，叶毛较密集	较高	较高	较高
栾树Koelreuteria paniculata	叶表面较平整，具轻微疣状突起，细胞轮廓不明显	具密集颗粒状突起，细胞轮廓明显，具有明显狭窄沟槽，气孔较少，开口较小，狭长	中等	较高	中等
绦柳Salix matsudana	气孔少，开口小，具较多不规则颗粒物和明显线状突起，细胞轮廓不清晰	具密集颗粒状突起和不规则颗粒物附着，细胞轮廓明显，沟壑较浅，气孔少，开口小	较低	较低	较低

下载: 导出CSV

参考文献(27)

[1]	刘一超, 王萌, 梁琼, 等.北京通州不同树种滞纳大气颗粒物的能力[J].北京农学院学报, 2018, 33(1):1-4. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/bjnxyxb201801017 LIU Y C, WANG M, LIANG Q, et al. Ability of different Tree species to lag Atmospheric particles in Tongzhou, Beijing[J].Journal of Beijing University of Agriculture, 2018, 33(1):1-4.(in Chinese) http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/bjnxyxb201801017
[2]	陈强, 梅琨, 朱慧敏, 等.郑州市PM_2.5浓度时空分布特征及预测模型研究[J].中国环境监测, 2015(3):105 -112. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/zghjjc201503018 CHEN Q, MEI K, ZHU H M, et al. Study on Spatial and temporal Distribution characteristics and Prediction Model of PM_2.5 concentration in Zhengzhou City[J].Environmental Monitoring in China, 2015(3):105 -112.(in Chinese) http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/zghjjc201503018
[3]	房静, 段素芳.园林植物对PM _2.5的影响[J].农业工程, 2016, 6(4):43-44. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=nygch201604014 FANG J, DUAN S F. Effect of Garden plants on PM 2.5[J].Agricultural Engineering, 2016, 6(4):43-44.(in Chinese) http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=nygch201604014
[4]	刘璐, 管东生, 陈永勤.广州市常见行道树种叶片表面形态与滞尘能力[J].生态学报, 2013, 33(8):2604-2614. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/stxb201308032 LIU L, GUAN D S, CHEN Y Q. Leaf Surface Morphology and Dust retention ability of Common Road Tree species in Guangzhou[J]. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2013, 33(8):2604-2614.(in Chinese) http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/stxb201308032
[5]	周旭丹, 安佰仪, 王薇, 等.北方城市不同植物滞尘效应季节变化[J].江苏农业科学, 2016, 44(8):489-493. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/jsnykx201608141 ZHOU X D, AN B Y, WANG W, et al. Seasonal variation of Dust retention effect of different plants in Northern cities[J].Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences, 2016, 44(8):489-493.(in Chinese) http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/jsnykx201608141
[6]	王亚军, 郁珊珊.厦门市常见园林树种滞尘效应及生态特性研究[J].西南农业学报, 2016, 29(8):1987-1992. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/xnnyxb201608043 WANG Y J, YU S S. Study on Dust retention effect and Ecological characteristics of Common Garden Tree species in Xiamen City[J].Southwest China Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2016, 29(8):1987-1992.(in Chinese) http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/xnnyxb201608043
[7]	陈上杰.基于模拟实验分析植物对大气颗粒物的影响[D].北京: 北京林业大学, 2015. CHEN S J. Analysis of the effect of plants on Atmospheric particles based on Simulation experiment[D].Beijing: Beijing Forestry University, 2015.(in Chinese)
[8]	罗佳, 田育新, 周小玲, 等.几种生态树种滞留PM_2.5等颗粒污染物能力研究[J].西北林学院学报, 2016, 31(6):41-44, 49. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7461.2016.06.08 LUO J, TIAN Y X, ZHOU X L, et al. Study on the ability of several ecological tree species to retain PM2.5 and other particulate pollutants[J].Journal of Northwest Forestry University, 2016, 31(6):41-44, 49.(in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7461.2016.06.08
[9]	是怡芸.南京常见绿化树种滞留PM_2.5等大气颗粒物的效应研究[D].南京: 南京林业大学, 2017. SHI Y Y. Study on the effect of retention of PM_2.5 and other Atmospheric particles by Common Greening Tree species in Nanjing[D].Nanjing: Nanjing Forestry University, 2017.(in Chinese)
[10]	赵云阁, 鲁笑颖, 鲁绍伟, 等.北京市常见绿化树种叶片秋季滞纳不同粒径颗粒物能力[J].生态学杂志, 2017, 36(1):35-42. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/stxzz201701005 ZHAO Y G, LU X Y, LU S W, et al. Capability of capturing different sized particles by common greening tree species in Beijing in autumn[J].Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2017, 36(1):35-42.(in Chinese) http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/stxzz201701005
[11]	周蕴薇, 田忠平, 苏欣.哈尔滨市常见绿化树种叶表面形态与滞尘能力的关系[J].西北林学院学报, 2017, 32(1):287-292. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7461.2017.01.46 ZHOU Y W, TIAN Z P, SU X.Relationship between leaf surface morphology and dust retention ability of common greening tree species in Harbin[J].Journal of Northwest Forestry University, 2017, 32(1):287-292.(in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7461.2017.01.46
[12]	张维康, 王兵, 牛香.不同树种叶片微观结构对其滞纳空气颗粒物功能的影响[J].生态学杂志, 2017, 36(9):2507-2513. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/stxzz201709016 ZHANG W K, WANG B, NIU X. Effect of leaf microstructure of different tree species on the function of delayed air particles[J].Chinese Journal of Ecology, 2017, 36(9):2507-2513.(in Chinese) http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/stxzz201709016
[13]	刘璐, 管东生, 陈永勤.广州市常见行道树种叶片表面形态与滞尘能力[J].生态学报, 2013, 33(8):2604-2614. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/stxb201308032 LIU L, GUAN D S, CHEN Y Q. Leaf surface morphology and dust retention ability of common street trees in Guangzhou[J].Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2013, 33(8):2604-2614.(in Chinese) http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/stxb201308032
[14]	夏冰, 马晓.郑州市绿化植物滞尘效应及其生理特征响应[J].江苏农业科学, 2017, 45(6):127-131. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/jsnykx201706032 XIA B, MA X. Dust retention effect of Greening plants in Zhengzhou City and its physiological response[J].Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences, 2017, 45(6):127-131.(in Chinese) http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/jsnykx201706032
[15]	么旭阳, 胡耀升, 刘艳红.北京市常见绿化树种滞尘效应[J].西北林学院学报, 2014, 29(3):92-95. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7461.2014.03.19 ME X Y, HU Y S, LIU Y H. Dust retention effect of common greening tree species in Beijing[J]. Journal of Northwest Forestry University, 2014, 29(3):92-95.(in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7461.2014.03.19
[16]	高丹丹, 赵丽娅, 李成, 等.常见园林植物滞尘能力及评价方法[J].湖北大学学报(自然科学版), 2017, 39(1):56-59+71. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2375.2017.01.011 GAO D D, ZHAO L Y, LI C, et al. Dust retention ability and evaluation method of common garden plants[J]. Journal of Hubei University(Natural Science), 2017, 39(1):56-59, 71.(in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2375.2017.01.011
[17]	黄靖懿, 黄泽, 刘慧婧, 等.哈尔滨市12种常见树木的滞尘能力比较[J].江苏农业科学, 2017, 45(8):117-121. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/jsnykx201708033 HUANG J Y, HUANG Z, LIU H J, et al.Comparison of dust retention ability of 12 common trees in Harbin[J].Jiangsu Agricultural Sciences, 2017, 45(8):117-121.(in Chinese) http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/jsnykx201708033
[18]	赵松婷, 李新宇, 李延明.北京市29种园林植物滞留大气细颗粒物能力研究[J].生态环境学报, 2015, 24(6):1004-1012. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/tryhj201506015 ZHAO S T, LI X Y, LI Y M. Study on the Capacity of Retention of Fine Particulate Matters in 29 Kinds of Garden Plants in Beijing[J]. Ecology and Environmental Sciences, 2015, 24(6):1004-1012.(in Chinese) http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/tryhj201506015
[19]	陆锡东, 李萍娇, 贺庆梅, 等.宜州城区5种行道树叶表面特征及滞尘效果比较[J].河池学院学报, 2014, 34(5):37-43. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-9021.2014.05.006 LU X D, LI P J, HE Q M, et al. Comparison of leaf surface characteristics and dust retention effects of five kinds of streets in Yizhou city[J]. Journal of Hechi University, 2014, 34(5):37-43.(in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-9021.2014.05.006
[20]	杨静慧, 翟彤彤, 王茂思, 等.天津市10种常绿植物冬季滞尘量分析[J].天津农学院学报, 2016, 23(3):31-34. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-5394.2016.03.008 YANG J H, ZHAI T T, WANG M S, et al. Analysis of dust retention in winter of 10 evergreen plants in Tianjin[J].Journal of Tianjin Agricultural University, 2016, 23(3):31-34.(in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-5394.2016.03.008
[21]	孙晓丹, 李海梅, 郭霄, 等. 10种灌木树种滞留大气颗粒物的能力[J].环境工程学报, 2017, 11(2):1047-1054. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/hjwrzljsysb201702060 SUN X D, LI H M, GUO X, et al. Ability of 10 shrubs to retain atmospheric particles[J].Chinese Journal of Environmental Engineering, 2017, 11(2):1047-1054.(in Chinese) http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/hjwrzljsysb201702060
[22]	石辉, 王会霞, 李秧秧, 等.女贞和珊瑚树叶片表面特征的AFM观察[J].生态学报, 2011, 31(5):1471-1477. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/stxb201105032 SHI H, WANG H X, LI Y Y, et al. AFM observation of Leaf Surface characteristics of Ligustrum lucidum and Coral trees[J].Acta Ecologica Sinica, 2011, 31(5):1471-1477.(in Chinese) http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/stxb201105032
[23]	刘鹏.青岛常见园林树种叶表面结构观察[D].青岛: 青岛农业大学, 2016. LIU P. Observation on leaf surface structure of common garden tree species in Qingdao[D].Qingdao: Qingdao Agricultural University, 2016.(in Chinese)
[24]	王萌, 刘一超, 梁琼, 等.北京城市森林公园不同树种吸附大气颗粒物能力[J].北京农学院学报, 2018(1):1-4. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/bjnxyxb201801016 WANG M, LIU Y C, LIANG Q, et al. Adsorption of Atmospheric Particulate Matters by Different Tree Species in Beijing Urban Forest Park[J].Journal of Tianjin Agricultural University, 2018(1):1-4.(in Chinese) http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/bjnxyxb201801016
[25]	杨佳.北京公园绿化树种滞留PM_2.5等颗粒物能力及其应用模式[D].西安建筑科技大学, 2015. YANG J. The ability of greening tree species to retain PM_2.5 and its application model in Beijing Park[D].Xi'an University of Architecture and Technology, 2015.(in Chinese)
[26]	张桐, 洪秀玲, 孙立炜, 等.6种植物叶片的滞尘能力与其叶面结构的关系[J].北京林业大学学报, 2017, 39(6):70-77. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/bjlydxxb201706008 ZHANG T, HONG X L, SUN L W, et al. The relationship between dust retention ability and leaf surface structure of six species of plants[J].Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 2017, 39(6):70-77.(in Chinese) http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/bjlydxxb201706008
[27]	阿衣古丽·艾力亚斯, 玉米提·哈力克, 依力哈木·艾力亚斯, 等.新疆阿克苏市13种绿化树种滞尘量特征[J].中国沙漠, 2014, 34(6):1475-1479. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/zgsm201406005 ARYIGULI·AILYYASI, CORN TI·HALIK, YILIHAMU·AILIYASI, et al. Characteristics of dust retention of 13 greening tree species in Aksu City, Xinjiang[J].Journal of Desert Research, 2014, 34(6):1475-1479. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/zgsm201406005