• 中文核心期刊
  • CSCD来源期刊
  • 中国科技核心期刊
  • CA、CABI、ZR收录期刊

留言板

尊敬的读者、作者、审稿人, 关于本刊的投稿、审稿、编辑和出版的任何问题, 您可以本页添加留言。我们将尽快给您答复。谢谢您的支持!

姓名
邮箱
手机号码
标题
留言内容
验证码

籼稻明恢86多基因遗传转化体系的研究

魏林艳 连玲 魏毅东 罗曦 何炜 谢鸿光 谢华安 张建福

魏林艳, 连玲, 魏毅东, 罗曦, 何炜, 谢鸿光, 谢华安, 张建福. 籼稻明恢86多基因遗传转化体系的研究[J]. 福建农业学报, 2019, 34(6): 621-629. doi: 10.19303/j.issn.1008-0384.2019.06.001
引用本文: 魏林艳, 连玲, 魏毅东, 罗曦, 何炜, 谢鸿光, 谢华安, 张建福. 籼稻明恢86多基因遗传转化体系的研究[J]. 福建农业学报, 2019, 34(6): 621-629. doi: 10.19303/j.issn.1008-0384.2019.06.001
WEI Lin-yan, LIAN Ling, WEI Yi-dong, LUO Xi, HE Wei, XIE Hong-guang, XIE Hua-an, ZHANG Jian-fu. Multi-gene Transformation of Indica Rice, Minghui 86[J]. Fujian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2019, 34(6): 621-629. doi: 10.19303/j.issn.1008-0384.2019.06.001
Citation: WEI Lin-yan, LIAN Ling, WEI Yi-dong, LUO Xi, HE Wei, XIE Hong-guang, XIE Hua-an, ZHANG Jian-fu. Multi-gene Transformation of Indica Rice, Minghui 86[J]. Fujian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 2019, 34(6): 621-629. doi: 10.19303/j.issn.1008-0384.2019.06.001

籼稻明恢86多基因遗传转化体系的研究

doi: 10.19303/j.issn.1008-0384.2019.06.001
基金项目: 

福建省科技计划项目——省属公益类科研院所基本科研专项 2016R1020-12

国家重点研发计划项目 2017YFD0100100

详细信息
    作者简介:

    魏林艳(1988-), 女, 硕士, 研究实习员, 主要从事水稻遗传转化研究(E-mail:290689712@qq.com)

    通讯作者:

    谢华安(1941-), 男, 研究员, 主要从事杂交水稻育种研究(E-mail:huaanxie@163.com)

    张建福(1971-), 男, 博士, 研究员, 主要从事水稻分子设计育种研究(E-mail:jianfzhang@163.com)

  • 中图分类号: S511

Multi-gene Transformation of Indica Rice, Minghui 86

  • 摘要:   目的  探索适合籼稻明恢86多基因遗传转化的条件,为创制含高产、抗逆、抗虫、抗病等基因的水稻新材料奠定基础。  方法  以籼稻明恢86为受体材料,将构建好的含作物高产基因RRM2、耐旱基因HS1、抗除草剂基因EPSPS、抗虫基因Bt、细胞凋亡抑制基因iap和促细胞再生基因p35等多基因载体(载体分别命名为P5和P8)进行遗传转化。在此基础上,分别对多基因遗传转化体系的受体材料、农杆菌浓度、侵染时间、共培养方式、G418筛选浓度和草甘膦筛选浓度等主要影响因素进行试验,探讨其适宜的转化条件。  结果  受体材料的筛选结果表明,幼胚的出愈率显著高于成熟胚,且其愈伤组织状态相对较好;各转化条件的筛选结果,农杆菌侵染浓度OD600为0.4~0.6、侵染时间15~20 min、共培养2~3 d、培养基上添加无菌滤纸、G418筛选浓度150 mg·L-1和草甘膦筛选浓度800 mg·L-1是提高转化效率的优化条件;PCR分析结果,多基因载体P5中的GUS基因成功转入籼稻明恢86。  结论  通过对培养条件的优化,可使籼稻明恢86愈伤组织的诱导愈伤率和抗性愈伤率得到显著提高。
  • 图  1  多基因表达载体结构

    注:A代表P5载体结构图;B代表P8载体结构图。

    Figure  1.  Construct of multi-gene expression vector

    Note:A=The construct of multi-gene P5;B=The construct of multi-gene P8.

    图  2  明恢86幼胚和成熟胚愈伤组织诱导情况

    注:A为明恢86幼胚,B为明恢86成熟胚。

    Figure  2.  Callus induction of immature and mature embryos of Minghui 8

    Note:A.Minghui 86immature embryos, B.Minghui 86mature embryo.

    图  3  草甘膦对明恢86愈伤组织筛选浓度的确定

    注:A~D分别为草甘膦400、600、800、1 000 mg·L-1

    Figure  3.  Determination of screening concentration of glyphosate on callus of Minghui 86

    Note:A-D=400, 600, 800, 1 000 mg·L-1.

    图  4  G418对明恢86愈伤组织筛选浓度的确定

    注:A~D分别为G418=0、100、150、200 mg·L-1G418。

    Figure  4.  Determination of screening concentration of G418 on callus of Minghui 86

    Note:A-D:418=0, 100, 150, 200 mg·L-1.

    图  5  明恢86的多基因遗传转化

    注:A为继代;B为筛选;C为预分化;D为分化;E为生根;F为炼苗。

    Figure  5.  Multi-gene transformation of Minghui 86

    Note:A=Subculture; B=Screening; C=Predifferentiation; D=Differentiation; E=Rooting; F=Refining.

    图  6  转基因植株的PCR检测

    注:M为2 000 bp;1为水;2为非转基因植株;3~9为转基因植株;10为质粒。

    Figure  6.  PCR analysis on transgenic plan

    Note:M=2 000 bp; 1=H2O; 2=Non-transgenic plants; 3-9=Transgenic plants; 10=Plasmid.

    表  1  农杆菌浓度对转化效率的影响

    Table  1.   Transformation rate affected by agrobacterium screening concentration

    农杆菌浓度(OD600值)
    Agrobacterium concentration
    抗性愈伤组织数
    No. of resistance callus (Mean±SD)
    抗性愈伤组织率
    Resistance callus induction rate/% (Mean±SD)
    愈伤组织生长状态
    Callus grow status
    0.20 9.33±1.15dD 23.33±2.89dD 无农杆菌No visible bacteria colony
    0.40 24.00±2.00bB 60.00±5.00bB 无农杆菌No visible bacteria colony
    0.60 30.00±2.00aA 75.00±5.00aA 少量农杆菌Few visible bacteria colonies
    0.80 17.33±1.15cC 43.33±2.89cC 大量农杆菌Many visible bacteria colonies
    注:表中同列数值后无相同小、大写字母者分别表示处理间差异达显著(P < 0.05)或极显著(P < 0.01)水平。表 2~4同。
    Note:Different lowercase letters after the value indicate significant difference (P < 0.01).The same as Table 2-4.
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  2  不同侵染时间对抗性愈伤率的影响

    Table  2.   Effect of infecting time on antagonistic callus rate

    侵染时间
    Infectiontime /min
    抗性愈伤数
    No. of resistance callus (Mean±SD)
    抗性愈伤率
    Resistance callus induction rate/% (Mean±SD)
    愈伤生长状态
    Callus grow status
    5 3.33±0.58dD 16.67±2.89dD 无褐化No browning
    10 6.67±1.53cdCD 33.33±7.64cdCD 少量褐化Slighty browning
    15 11.67±1.53aA 58.33±7.64aA 边缘,顶部褐化Browning at the margin and top
    20 12.33±1.53aA 61.67±7.64aA 边缘,顶部褐化Browning at the margin and top
    25 10.33±1.15abAB 51.67±5.77abAB 褐化严重Severely Browning
    30 7.33±0.58bcBC 36.67±2.89bcBC 褐化严重Severely Browning
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  3  共培养方式的转化效果

    Table  3.   Transformation effect of co-culture

    共培养方式
    Co-cultivation method
    愈伤数
    No. of callus
    抗性愈伤数
    No. of resistance callus (Mean±SD)
    抗性愈伤率
    Resistance callus induction rate/% (Mean±SD)
    愈伤生长状态
    Callus grow status
    不加滤纸
    Without filter paper
    40 17.66±2.52bB 44.33±6.03bB 生长慢,易褐化
    Growing slowly and prone to browning
    加滤纸
    With filter paper
    40 30.33±2.52aA 76.00±6.56aA 生长快,褐化慢
    Growing fast and resistant to Browning
    下载: 导出CSV

    表  4  共培养时间对抗性愈伤率的影响

    Table  4.   Effect of co-culture time on callus resistance

    共培养时间
    Co-culture time/d
    侵染愈伤数
    Number of contaminated calli (Mean)
    抗性愈伤数
    Number of resistant calli (Mean)
    抗性愈伤率
    Frequency of resistant calli/% (Mean±SD)
    愈伤生长状态
    Callus grow status
    1 56.67 20.33 35.96±1.10dD 无农杆菌
    No visible bacteria colony
    2 70.33 54.33 77.26±1.07bB 底部偶见少量农杆菌
    Occasionally bacteria colony at the bottom
    3 72.67 60.00 82.67±1.15aA 底部有明显农杆菌
    Visible bacteria colony at the bottom
    4 58.33 39.33 67.33±1..53cC 大量农杆菌包裹
    Covered with bacteria
    下载: 导出CSV
  • [1] 王维旭, 张骥诚, 刘学群, 等.籼稻品种Kasalath遗传转化条件的研究[J].安徽农业科学, 2010, 38(4):1735-1737, 1856. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0517-6611.2010.04.031

    WANG W X, ZHANG J C, LIU X Q, et al.Study on the Factors of Genetic Transformation for Indica Rice Kasalath[J]. Journal of Anhui Agri.Sci.2010, 38(4):1735-1737, 1856. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0517-6611.2010.04.031
    [2] 柳红.籼稻高效遗传转化体系的建立[D].福州: 福建农林大学, 2009: 1-75. http://cdmd.cnki.com.cn/Article/CDMD-10389-2009170697.htm

    LIU H.Establishment of Indica efficient genetic transformationsystem[D].Fuzhou: Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, 2009: 1-75. (in Chinese) http://cdmd.cnki.com.cn/Article/CDMD-10389-2009170697.htm
    [3] 向阳, 赵德刚, 朱冬雪, 等.籼稻成熟胚愈伤组织诱导及不定芽分化[J].山地农业生物学报, 2004, 23(3):193-197. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-0457.2004.03.002

    XIANG Y, ZHAO D G, ZHU D X, et al.Indica rice matureembryo callus induction and adventitious bud differentiation[J].J Mountain Agric Biol, 2004, 23(3):193-197. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-0457.2004.03.002
    [4] BABA A, HASEZAWA S, SYONO K, et al. Cultivation of riceprotoplasts and their transformation mediated by Agrobacterium spheroplasts[J]. Plant Cell Physiol, 1986, 27:463-468.
    [5] HIEI Y, OHTA S, KOMARI T, et al. Efficient transformation of rice (Oryza sativa L.). mediated by Agrobacterium and sequence analysis of the boundaries of the T-DNA[J]. Plant J, 1994(6):271-282.
    [6] CHENG X, SARDANA R, KAPLAN H, et al.Agrobacterium-transformed rice plants expressing syntheticcryIA(a) and cry IA(c) genes are highly toxic to striped stem borer and yellow stem borer[J]. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 1998, 95:2767-2772. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.6.2767
    [7] 项友斌, 梁竹青, 高明尉, 等.农杆菌介导的苏云金杆菌抗虫因cryIA(b)和cryIA(c)在水稻中的遗传转化及蛋白表达[J].生物工程学报, 1999, 15(4):494-500. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-3061.1999.04.015

    XIANG Y B, LIANG Z Q, GAO M W, et al.Agrobacterium mediated Transformation of Insecticidal BacillusthuringiensiscryIA(b) and cryIA(c) Genes and Their Expression in Rice Chinese Journal of Biotechnology[J]. Journal of Bioengineering, 1999, 15(4):494-500. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-3061.1999.04.015
    [8] CHEN L, MARMEY P, TAYLOR N J, et al. Expression and inheritance of multiple transgenes in rice plants[J]. Nature Biotechnology, 1998, 16:1060-1064. doi: 10.1038/3511
    [9] 冯道荣, 许新萍, 邱国华, 等.多个抗病抗虫基因在水稻中的遗传和表达[J].科学通报, 2000, 45(15):1593-1599. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0023-074X.2000.15.004

    FENG D R, XU X P, QIU G H, et al.Inheritance and expression of multiple disease resistance and insect resistance genes in rice[J].Chinese Science Bulletin, 2000, 45(15):1593-1599. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0023-074X.2000.15.004
    [10] YE X, AL-BABILI S, KLOTI A, et al. Engineering the provitamin A (β-Carotene)biosynthetic pathway into (Carotenoid-free) rice endosperm[J].Science, 2000, 287:303-305. doi: 10.1126/science.287.5451.303
    [11] 李宝健, 朱华晨.论应用多基因转化策略综合改良生物体遗传性研究方向的前景[J].中山大学学报, 2005, 44(4):79-83. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0529-6579.2005.04.021

    LI B J, ZHU H C.Prospects for the application of multi-gene transformation strategies to comprehensively improve the genetic research direction of organisms[J].Journal of Sun Yat-sen University, 2005, 44(4):79-83. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0529-6579.2005.04.021
    [12] 王慧中, 黄大年, 鲁瑞芳.转mt1D/gutD双价基因水稻的耐盐性[J].科学通报, 2000, 45(7):724-728. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0023-074X.2000.07.012

    WANG H Z, HUANG D N, LU R F.Salt tolerance of transgenic rice with mt1D/gutD[J].Chinese Science Bulletin, 2000, 45(7):724-728. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0023-074X.2000.07.012
    [13] 朱永兴, 曹鹏, 许兴, 等.多基因表达载体KCTB转化宁夏枸杞的研究[J].中国科学通报, 2010, 26(9):74-77. http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=zgnxtb201009014

    ZHU Y X, CAO P, XU X, et al.The Transformation of Multigene Expressed Vector for Lyciumbarbarum L.[J].Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin, 2010, 26(9):74-77. (in Chinese) http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=zgnxtb201009014
    [14] 朱丽, 傅亚萍, 刘文真, 等.利用共转化和花药培养技术快速获得无选择标记的三价转基因水稻[J].中国水稻科学, 2007, 21(5):475-481. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-7216.2007.05.006

    ZHU L, FU Y P, LIU W Z, et al.Rapidly obtaining trivalent transgenic rice without selection marker by co-transformation and anther culture techniques[J].Chinese Rice Science, 2007, 21(5):475-481. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-7216.2007.05.006
    [15] CAO M X, HUANG J Q, WEI Z M, et al. Agrobacterium-mediated multiple-gene transformation in rice using a single vector[J]. J IntegrPlantBiol, 2005, 47(2):233-242.
    [16] NAQVI S, FARRE G, SANAHUJA G, et al.When more is better:multigene engineering in plants[J].Trends Plant Sci, 2010, 15(1):48-56. doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2009.09.010
    [17] 凌键, 陈永文, 龚一富, 等.甘薯离体遗传转化体系的优化[J].西南师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2004, 29(3):466-470. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-5471.2004.03.032

    LING J, CHEN Y W, GONG Y F, et al.Optimization of system for in vitro genetic transformation in sweetpotato[J].Journal of Southwest China Normal University (Natural Science Edition), 2004, 29(3):466-470. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-5471.2004.03.032
    [18] 陈明利, 刘香利, 唐广立, 等.农杆菌侵染小麦的优化方案[J].分子植物育种, 2007, 5(4):577-582. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-416X.2007.04.022

    CHEN M L, LIU X L, TANG G L, et al.Optimization of Agrobacterium infecting Wheat[J].Molecular plant breeding, 2007, 5(4):577-582. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-416X.2007.04.022
    [19] 奚亚军, 张启发, 林拥军, 等.利用农杆菌浸种法将叶片衰老抑制基因PSAG12-IPT导入普通小麦的研究[J].中国农业科学, 2004, 37(8):1235-1238. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0578-1752.2004.08.027

    XI Y J, ZHANG Q F, LIN Y J, et al.Introduction of Leaf Aging Inhibitory Gene PSAG12-IPT into Common Wheat by Agrobacterium Soaking[J].Chinese Agricultural Science, 2004, 37(8):1235-1238. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0578-1752.2004.08.027
    [20] 雷江丽, 王丹, 吴燕民, 等.农杆菌浸种法介导中华结缕草遗传转化体系的建立[J].农业生物技术学报, 2009, 17(5):865-871. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-7968.2009.05.021

    LEI J L, WANG D, WU Y M, et al.Agrobacterium tumefaciens seed soaking method mediates the establishment of genetic transformation system of Zoysia japonica[J].Journal of Agricultural Biotechnology, 2009, 17(5):865-871. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-7968.2009.05.021
    [21] 田文忠.提高籼稻愈伤组织再生频率的研究[J].遗传学报, 1994, 3(5):27-31. http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/zgnxtb201133001

    TIAN W Z.Study on the Improve of Regeneration Frequency of Mature Embryo-derived indica Rice Callus[J].J Genet Genom, 1994, 3(5):27-31. (in Chinese) http://d.old.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/zgnxtb201133001
    [22] CHENG M, HU T, JEAMME L, et al.Desiccation of plant tissue post-Agrobacterium infection enhances T-DNA delivery and in creases stable transformation efficiency in wheat[J].In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Plant, 2003, 39:595-604. doi: 10.1079/IVP2003471
    [23] 马艳丽, 叶兴国, 刘艳鹏, 等.农杆菌敏感小麦基因型的筛选研究[J].麦类作物学报, 2005, 25(6):6-10. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-1041.2005.06.002

    MA Y L, YE X G, LIU Y P, et al. Screening of wheat genotype sensitive to Agrobacterium tumefaciens infection[J].Journal of Triticeae Crops, 2005, 25(6):6-10. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-1041.2005.06.002
    [24] 王文治, 蔡文伟, 冯翠莲, 等.高效快速甘蔗转基因方法探索[J].热带作物学报, 2012, 33(9):1619-1624. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2561.2012.09.017

    WANG W Z, CAI W W, FENG C L, et al.Exploring the method of high efficient and rapid sugarcane transgenic[J].Journal of Tropical Crops, 2012, 33(9):1619-1624. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-2561.2012.09.017
    [25] 项友斌, 梁竹青, 高明尉, 等.农杆菌介导的苏云金杆菌抗虫因cryIA(b)和cryIA(c)在水稻中的遗传转化及蛋白表达[J].生物工程学报, 1999, 15(4):494-500. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-3061.1999.04.015

    XIANG Y B, LIANG Z Q, GAO M W, et al.Agrobacterium mediated Transformation of Insecticidal BacillusthuringiensiscryIA (b) and cryIA(c) Genes and Their Expression in Rice[J].Chinese Journal of Biotechnology, 1999, 15(4):494-500. (in Chinese) doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-3061.1999.04.015
  • 加载中
图(6) / 表(4)
计量
  • 文章访问数:  1434
  • HTML全文浏览量:  278
  • PDF下载量:  41
  • 被引次数: 0
出版历程
  • 收稿日期:  2019-02-19
  • 修回日期:  2019-05-05
  • 刊出日期:  2019-06-28

目录

    /

    返回文章
    返回