Growth Performance and Carcass Characteristics of Nanjiang Yellow Goats Raised by Fenced-in Feeding vs. Free-range Grazing
-
摘要: 为探讨放牧与圈养对南江黄羊生长发育及胴体品质的影响，选择4月龄南江黄羊48只，分别设放牧组、圈养1组、圈养2组，相应采用传统放牧加补饲混合精料、圈养饲喂粗料加补饲混合精料、圈养饲喂全价颗粒料等3种养殖模式，试验期180 d，10月龄屠宰。结果表明，圈养2组6~10月龄体重、胸围、4~10月龄总增重和平均月增重均极显著高于放牧组和圈养1组（P < 0.01），而放牧组与圈养1组两者间差异均不显著（P>0.05）。试验各组的胴体重、GR值、净肉重和屠宰率的差异均不显著（P>0.05），圈养2组净肉率、肉骨比值均显著高于圈养1组（P < 0.05）。圈养2组肌肉pH值小于放牧组，色差值a大于放牧组，两组间差异均显著（P < 0.05）。试验各组的肌肉含水率、粗蛋白、粗脂肪、粗灰分、色差值L与b，差异均不显著（P>0.05）。圈养2组肌肉总氨基酸含量，以及其中的天冬氨酸、苏氨酸、丝氨酸、谷氨酸、蛋氨酸、亮氨酸、酪氨酸、苯丙氨酸和赖氨酸含量均显著高于放牧组（P < 0.05）。圈养2组每只羊月均毛利比放牧组、圈养1组分别高9.6元、6.3元。Abstract: The growth performances and carcass characteristics of Nanjiang yellow goats raised by fenced-in feeding and free-range grazing were compared. Forty-eight 4-month-old goats were randomly divided into 3 groups. In a fenced-in setting, Group 1 was fed with silage and roughages, and Group 2 comprehensive nutrient pellets; whereas, Group 3 was allowed to graze freely on an open farm and supplemented with silage. The feeding lasted 180 days before the goats were slaughtered for carcass evaluation. The live body weight and chest girth of the goats aged 6-to10-month-old, as well as the total and average monthly weight gains of the goats aged 4-to 10-month-old, in Group 2 were found to be higher than those in either Group 1 or Group 3 (P < 0.01), with no significant difference between the latter two groups (P>0.05). No significant differences on the carcass weight, GR value, meat weights, and slaughter yield were observed among the 3 groups (P>0.05). However, the meat percentage of the goats in Group 2 was significantly higher than that of Group 1 at P>0.01; and, the meat/bone ratio, significantly higher at P < 0.05. The pH of the meat samples from Group 2 was significantly lower than that of Group 3 (P>0.01); and, the color value, a, significantly greater than that of Group 3 (P < 0.05). The contents of moisture, crude protein, crude fat, crude ash, and color values, L and b, of the meats among the 3 groups were not significantly different (P>0.05). The meat of the goats in Group 2 contained significantly more total amino acids (P>0.01), as well as, aspartic acid, threonine, serine, glutamic acid, methionine, leucine, tyrosine, phenylalanine and lysine than Group 3 (P < 0.05). Insofar as average monthly gross profit was concerned, Group 2 was 6.3 yuan more than Group 1, and 9.6 yuan higher than Group 3.
-
表 1 南江黄羊放牧与圈养条件下体重比较
Table 1. Live weight of Nanjiang yellow goats raised by free-range grazing or fenced-in feeding
表 2 南江黄羊放牧与圈养条件下体长、体高和胸围比较
Table 2. Body size of Nanjiang yellow goats raised by free-range grazing or fenced-in feeding
表 3 南江黄羊放牧与圈养条件下屠宰性能比较
Table 3. Carcass characteristics of Nanjiang yellow goats raised by free-range grazing or fenced-in feeding
表 4 南江黄羊放牧与圈养条件下胴体品质比较
Table 4. Meat quality of Nanjiang yellow goats raised by free-range grazing or fenced-in feeding
表 5 南江黄羊放牧与圈养条件下肌肉氨基酸含量比较
Table 5. Amino acid content of Nanjiang yellow goats raised by free-range grazing or fenced-in feeding
表 6 南江黄羊放牧与圈养条件下经济效益比较
Table 6. Economic comparison between Nanjiang yellow goats raised by free-range grazing and fenced-in feeding
-
[1] 王维春.南江南羊新品种的"八五"选育进展[J].四川草原, 1996, (2):57-60. [2] 王维春.南江黄羊的肉用性能及其世代选育进展[J].四川草原, 2001, (2):53-55. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SCCY200102014.htm [3] 谢喜平, 黄勤楼, 陈岩锋, 等.引进的南江黄羊系统选育研究[J].福建农业学报, 2007, 22(3):279-282. http://www.fjnyxb.cn/CN/Y2007/V/I3/279 [4] 苏铁, 王斌峰, 刘鹤翔, 等.舍饲圈养对浏阳黑山羊增重和肉质的影响[J].中国草食动物, 2010, 30(4):31-33. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CYCZ201004012.htm [5] 王志, 杨晓野, 杨莲茹, 等.舍饲与放牧条件下内蒙古白绒山羊血液学指标的测定与分析[J].内蒙古大学学报, 2010, 31(4):297-299. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-NMGM201004065.htm [6] 高爱霞, 赵慧丽.放牧与舍饲条件下对中卫山羊生产性能影响的探讨[J].甘肃畜牧兽医, 2010, 213(4):9-13. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GXMS201004005.htm [7] 汤继顺, 杨家军, 惠文巧, 等.养殖模式对母羊繁殖性能及初生羔羊成活率的影响[J].中国草食动物科学, 2014, 34(6):19-22. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-CYCZ201406006.htm [8] 胡友玲, 李建新, 姜德军.放牧与舍饲条件对宁夏滩羊繁殖规律及羔羊的影响[J].安徽农业科学, 2014, 42(5):1409-1410. http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-AHNY201405050.htm [9] 刘广华, 田蕊, 王新奎, 等.不同饲养方式对妊娠期济宁青山羊繁殖性能的影响[J].安徽农业科学, 2014, 42(10):2931-2933. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0517-6611.2014.10.036 [10] 徐睿.放牧与圈养方式下建昌黑山羊的血液生化指标比较[J].江苏农业科学, 2014, 42(10):192-193. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-1302.2014.10.064 -
点击查看大图
计量
- 文章访问数: 1538
- HTML全文浏览量: 220
- PDF下载量: 207
- 被引次数: 0
下载:
