Comparative Experiment of Mule Duck Rearing on Netting Bed and Ground
-
摘要: 为探讨半番鸭网床饲养效果, 将大型白羽半番鸭采用网床平养与地面平养2种饲养方式进行对比试验, 分析其生产性能、屠宰性能、肌肉品质、血清生化指标和经济效益。结果表明:网床平养组平均每只净增重比地面平养组多119.87g (3.90%) (P<0.05) , 2种养殖模式对半番鸭饲料报酬、成活率、屠宰性能和肌肉品质的影响没有显著差异 (P>0.05) ;血清生化指标中, 白蛋白、直接胆红素、肌酸激酶、二氧化碳和载脂蛋白B 2组间差异显著 (P<0.05) , 血糖、门冬氨酸氨基转移酶、CK同工酶、乳酸脱氢酶、羟丁酸脱氢酶和钠2组间差异极显著 (P<0.01) 。综上, 网床平养半番鸭的饲养效益优于地面平养。Abstract: Through the comparison test on large white-plumage mule duck rearing in netting bed and on ground, the production performance, slaughter performance, meat quality, serum biochemical indieces and economic benefit of ducks were measured.The results showed that the average net gain of each duck rearing in netting bed was higher than the duck rearing on ground by 119.87g (3.90%) (P<0.05) .Two breeding patterns had no significant difference in feed conversion, survival rate, slaughter performance and meat quality (P>0.05) .There were significant differences in albumin, direct bilirubin, creatine kinase, carbon dioxide and apolipoprotein B (P<0.05) and extremely significant difference in blood glucose, aspartate aminotransferase, isoenzymic CK-MB, lactate dehydrogenase, hydroxybutyrate dehydrogenase and sodium (P<0.01) .In summary, the feeding efficiency in netting of duck rearing in netting bed is higher than duck rearing on ground.
-
Key words:
- mule duck /
- rearing in netting bed /
- rearing on ground /
- production performance /
- biochemical index /
- economic benefit
-
[1] 杨宁.家禽生产学[M].北京:中国农业出版社, 2002. [2] 郑嫩珠, 陈晖, 朱志明, 等.大型白羽半番鸭母本的选育研究[J].福建农业学报, 2010, 25 (4) :396-398, 201. [3] 刘安芳, 赵智华, 肖文川.肉鸭网上与地面饲养效果比较试验[J].畜禽业, 1999, (6) :37-38. [4] 华云龙, 范如龙, 江贤海, 等.高架大棚网上平养肉鸭效果[J].中国家禽, 2002, 24 (24) :28-29. [5] 朱明霞.网上平养肉鸭效果的研究[J].中国畜牧兽医, 2009, 36 (9) :196-198. [6] 李昂.肉鸭全程网上养殖技术[J].水禽世界, 2010, (4) :7-9. [7] 宁中华, 王庆民, 袁建敏, 等.不同饲养方式对肉鸭饲养效果的影响[J].中国畜牧杂志, 1998, 34 (3) :22-23. [8] 陈岩锋, 梁阿政, 孙世坤, 等.肉鸭网床平养与地面平养对比试验研究[J].中国家禽, 2013, 35 (1) :33-36.
点击查看大图
计量
- 文章访问数: 156
- HTML全文浏览量: 29
- PDF下载量: 2
- 被引次数: 0